WAPO: It's hard to take the Rams seriously when their offense stinks…

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle WAPO: It's hard to take the Rams seriously when their offense stinks…

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #54393
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator
    #54394
    bnw
    Blocked

    The Dilfer lead offense for the Bucs didn’t stop them from winning the Super Bowl.

    The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.

    Sprinkles are for winners.

    #54416
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    was the bucs offense this bad though?

    in terms of total yardage we’re getting out gained every week. that’s not going to cut it i don’t think. maybe i’m wrong.

    #54419
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    was the bucs offense this bad though?

    in terms of total yardage we’re getting out gained every week. that’s not going to cut it i don’t think. maybe i’m wrong.

    ————–

    Well depends what you mean by ‘cut it’. Right now, they look exactly like a wild-card-level
    team to me. The lowest-level-wildcard teams are usually around 9-7 or 10-6.
    Those kinds of teams always have significant flaws.

    The thing about the Rams though, is, they seem to be improving each week. Getting more in sync.

    I dunno what their ceiling is this year, and I dunno how good the offense can be this year, but i do know they can play with any of the other 10-6 type teams
    in the NFL right now.

    w
    v

    #54420
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    by “cut it” i mean maintain a winning record.

    but yeah. there’s probably always outliers when you’re talking about 9-7 teams.

    plus this offense is consistently improving from week to week.

    curious to see how they fare against buffalo.

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 2 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    • This reply was modified 8 years, 2 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.