WaPo editorial

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Public House WaPo editorial

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #100635
    Zooey
    Moderator

    Opinions
    The 2020 election isn’t going to be close

    By Hugh Hewitt
    April 27 at 4:55 PM
    The 2020 election isn’t going to be close.

    The first-quarter gross domestic product growth rate of 3.2 percent sets up the first reality that will be noted in November 2020 because it telegraphs where the economy will be then: not in recession. Recessions are charted when GDP growth is negative for two consecutive quarters or more. That can and has occurred in sudden fashion — financial panics don’t send “save the date” cards. But the economy over which President Trump is presiding is strong and getting stronger. Innovation is accelerating, not declining. A recession before Election Day looks less and less likely by the day.

    Small wonder then that Trump dominates the GOP with an approval rating above 80 percent. His administration’s deregulatory push is accelerating. More and more rule-of-law judges, disinclined to accept bureaucrats’ excuses for overregulation, are being confirmed to the bench. Readiness levels in the U.S. military have been renewed. Our relationship with our strongest ally, Israel, is at its closest in decades.

    Meanwhile, the Dems are facing a Hobbesian choice of Sens. Bernie Sanders or Kamala D. Harris, or former vice president Joe Biden. Sanders and Harris are too far to the left, Sanders by a lot. Biden is far past his best years. The nice folk lower down are looking for other rewards. The nomination going to someone such as South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg is possible, I suppose, but what happens when the dog chasing the car catches it? What was an entertaining and amusing aside suddenly becomes a commitment and, with that, well, comes a barrage of attacks. Where Trump deflects incoming with ease, the Democrats scatter, some limping away, some blown out of the picture.

    This will come as news to #Resistance liberals, who are certain Trump will lose, because they dislike him so much. They still haven’t figured out that 40 percent of the country love him and at least another 10 percent are very much committed to considering the alternative in comparison to Trump, not reflexively voting against him. That decile is doing very well in this economy. Unemployment remains incredibly low. The markets are soaring. That’s not a given for the fall of 2020, but better to be soaring than falling 18 months out.

    On immigration, border security has always been a legitimate concern (and Immigration and Customs Enforcement a legitimate agency). People don’t talk much about it as they decline to state anything that will earn them the label racist, but the reality of open borders is understood to be an unqualified disaster by most of the country, and most of the country understands the Democrats to be arguing for a de facto open-border system, if not a de jure one.

    The Green New Deal sounds like a bad science-fair project where the smart kids got the colors to combine via an elaborate device and make all the “lava” flow black down the volcanoes’ sides and the village is destroyed. Medicare-for-all is a Professor Harold Hill production, headed for Iowa as was the Music Man. There’s not a lot of serious thinking or talking among the Ds about the People’s Republic of China and the “nine-dash line” in the South China Sea (which many may think is some sort of shorthand for their marks on the debate stage), or Huawei, which is just too complicated to try to debate in five-minute exchanges. Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s turn as Madame Defarge may even wake up some of the wealthy-woke to their peril. It’s a circus coming to a cable-news network near you soon.

    Last week’s message from a booming economy should have rocked the Democratic field. Alas, the party seems collectively intent on poring over the Mueller report yet again in the hope that, somehow, someway, there’s something there. But the probe is over. No collusion. No obstruction. Democrats have to campaign on something else besides a great economy, rising values of savings, low unemployment across every demographic, clarity about allies and enemies abroad, and a rebuilding military. It’s a tough needle to thread, condemning everything about Trump except all that he has accomplished that President Barack Obama couldn’t or wouldn’t. Not just tough — it’s practically impossible.

    Read more:

    Gary Abernathy: Admit it: Fox News has been right all along

    Andy Puzder: The naysayers were wrong about the Trump economy

    Larry J. Sabato and Kyle Kondik: It’s easy to see how Trump can win reelection

    Hugh Hewitt: Trump may be outside our norms. But he is succeeding for all of us.

    #100653
    waterfield
    Participant

    I’m afraid most of that is true. The fact that he is a narcissistic baby means nothing to half the people in this country if they “perceive” that their own personal circumstances (read selfish) is better than they would be under a democrat. It is and always will be how a voter looks at his own relationship with the economy. The democrats can go on about the climate, health care for all, and free college tuition but to half of this wonderful country that translates to government taking something “away” from them. Bannon knew this from the very beginning and so do the Republicans of today.

    #100654
    Zooey
    Moderator

    I’m afraid most of that is true. The fact that he is a narcissistic baby means nothing to half the people in this country if they “perceive” that their own personal circumstances (read selfish) is better than they would be under a democrat. It is and always will be how a voter looks at his own relationship with the economy. The democrats can go on about the climate, health care for all, and free college tuition but to half of this wonderful country that translates to government taking something “away” from them. Bannon knew this from the very beginning and so do the Republicans of today.

    While I think what YOU say is true, I don’t think most people care much about what the oft-presented economic numbers say if they are not personally experiencing improvement in their economic circumstances. So the key question is: For WHOM is the economy doing well?”

    For example, fewer than half of Americans own any stock. WTF do they care how the stock market is doing?

    Millions of Americans are working at jobs that don’t pay enough to make ends meet. Are they happy unemployment rates are low?

    I just think this guy’s perspective comes from a leather armchair with a Wall Street Journal folded over his knee.

    And his view of Sanders, Harris, and Biden comes from the same place. He blithely dismisses them as virtually irrelevant when polls show otherwise, and Trump’s disapproval rating is high, and Trump won only because of razor thin margins in a handful of crucial Rust Belt states where Hillary inexplicably did not campaign following the convention. Hillary had the second-highest negative ratings in presidential campaign history, and won 3 million more popular votes than Trump.

    Now…I’m not predicting a defeat of Trump. Far from it.

    But this guy’s assessment of the situation shows no comprehension of the sources of frustration in this country.

    #100675
    wv
    Participant

    I think Bernie is the next Prez.

    I dont say that because I’m some sorta bernie fan, coz I’m not a Bernie fan. I just think he will eek out a win among the Dems and then eek out a win in the general election. I think the undecideds will choose him over Trump. Its all about that ten percent that can go either way.

    w
    v

    #100681
    Zooey
    Moderator

    Bernie is the one guy who is going to take the full brunt of all the billions of dollars rich people are going to throw at this election. He is absolutely the last guy Republicans and the Democrat Party want to see win.

    What he has is passionate support that is actually organizing.

    And he is the Anti-Trump. He is honest, and refuses to take the low road. He emphasizes other people, rather than himself. Beyond that, he addresses the same economic grievances held by Trump supporters. With the difference in the last election being 70,000 votes in 4 states, I would guess Bernie could take the general. Yeah. I think Bernie beats Trump.

    If he gets by the DNC first.

    #100686
    wv
    Participant

    If he gets by the DNC first.

    ===============

    Yeah, the general election would be easier than winning the Dem Primary. The Dems (Wash Post, NyTimes, NPR, CNN, MSNBC, will smear Bernie ENDLESSLY and TIRELESSLY during the primaries.

    But I think the voters are getting tired of the media, and I dont think it will be as effective as in the past.

    But what the hell do i know. I picked Hostetler in the primary against Warner. And I thought Secretariat would finish third.

    w
    v

    #100874
    waterfield
    Participant

    I think your dead wrong on Sanders. Most of those who take showers after they work as opposed to those who shower before they go to work will think he is going to take some of their hard earned money and spread it around to those in more need. That is precisely what the Bannon people want them to think and will structure the campaign in that manner if Sanders is nominated. Easey peasey for them. All they then need is to add the racists and bigots and we got Trump for another term. As far as the individual and the economy goes it has nothing to do with whether or not the individual is actually benefiting from the upstart -its how he “perceives” he is doing-and the Republicans are awfully good and convincing people they are sharing in this improved economy. More importantly they are also very good at scaring the same people that the buggy man in the bushes (i.e. democrats) are going to take away whatever gains they “perceive” they are making. If Sanders is the nominee this is exactly how the Presidential campaign will play out. Put simply, they are going to go after the precise same people the Democrats will go after. They already have the racists, bigots, bullies and the 1% in their pockets. In order to get rid of this baby the Democrats need to convince the voters that they are NOT going to do anything to take away what they “believe” they have gained these last 4 years. Sanders is the last person in the world that can do that. Sanders strength is convincing the youth that he will make life much easier for them as they age. And that is fine for them as they don’t have anything that the buggy man can take away. Trump’s campaign can care less about them-their address is on that guy in the showers at 6.PM-so should the democrats.

    #100875
    Zooey
    Moderator

    I think your dead wrong on Sanders.

    Maybe. I agree that the line of attack you describe is exactly what they are going to use, but I’m not sure they are going to be convincing with that. That sounds like the same old criticism, actually, and it may be wearing thin, especially since some people feel like the money got funneled to the wealthy, and Trump hasn’t delivered on his Jobs promises, and instead of Draining the Swamp, he’s running a shit show.

    Sanders has to drive home that Trump hasn’t kept his promises, and is now coming for SS and Medicare.

    In the mean time, 70% of Americans are in favor of Medicare-for-All, including a lot of Republicans. And the other issues he is running on are favored by a majority of Americans. So…we shall see. As always, it will be determined by voter turnout. Who will show up at the polls in greater numbers? People with something to lose under Sanders, or people with something to gain.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.