Akers and Jefferson offer another interesting aspect/advantage/difference, etc. . . . at least to me:
All things being equal, it’s better to draft younger players (IMO) — and 21 is pretty much as young as they get. Akers will be 21 (like Gurley) as a rook. Jefferson will be 24 (like Kupp).
All kinds of other factors kick in, obviously. Injuries, playing time, maturity, ability to pick up plays, schemes, etc. etc. But, on balance, if I’m a coach/scout/trainer, I’d rather have a younger player to work with, coach up, build up, etc. Akers is young enough that he hasn’t even fully grown into his body. He’s a likely candidate for “natural” weight gain. Jefferson? Not so much. He’s likely where he’s supposed to be, sans additional weight training. Akers also likely has more years of peak physical performance ahead of him than Jefferson. But the latter’s age may well be seen (by the Rams) as a major advantage. I think they drafted Kupp in large part because they saw him as already mature, NFL-ready, and their passing game needs that. They may not think the same thing is as necessary for their running game.
Thoughts?