Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › Wagoner: time for Isaiah Pead to produce
- This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 4 months ago by zn.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 15, 2014 at 10:01 am #1761znModerator
Time to produce: RB Isaiah Pead
By Nick Wagoner
http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/9662/time-to-produce-rb-isaiah-pead
EARTH CITY, Mo. — As the St. Louis Rams prepare to enter their third training camp under coach Jeff Fisher and staff, much will hinge on the ability of the team’s many young players to turn potential into production. In this final week before camp officially begins, we take a look at some players who must take the next step either to preserve their jobs, help the team reach its first winning record since 2003 or, to the team’s preference, both.
What he’s done: After the Rams used the third of three 2012 second-round picks on him, much was expected of Pead. In his first year, he was supposed to handle the primary backup duties to Steven Jackson and then entered 2013 with a shot at the starting job after Jackson moved on to Atlanta. Pead was unable to secure either of those jobs and by the end of last season had settled into a role that was almost exclusive to special teams. In two years, Pead has 17 carries for 75 yards and 14 catches for 94 yards. He’s also done some kick return work but has mostly worked on coverage units. Fumbling issues combined with a four-game suspension to open the 2013 season haven’t helped his cause.
Why he must do more: Much like receiver Brian Quick, the Rams have high hopes for this second-round skill position player. But myriad things have kept Pead from ascending to a more prominent role. In just two seasons, Pead has been surpassed by running backs with lesser draft status including Daryl Richardson and Zac Stacy. Even undrafted rookie Benny Cunningham handled a bigger role in 2013 and the Rams drafted Tre Mason in the third round this year. Pead’s long term future in St. Louis will likely hinge on his ability to finally produce in 2014.
Where he fits: In the spring, offensive coordinator Brian Schottenheimer indicated that he’d like to see competition develop at running back, but it remains to be seen whether that competition is legitimate or based on coach speak. Pead even took some repetitions with the first-team offense during organized team activities. It’s a big leap from there to more work in the offense, however, and it’s probably not realistic to expect Pead to make enough of a leap to steal carries from Stacy, Cunningham and Mason. A more plausible scenario would see Pead continue to contribute on special teams and develop into a potential third-down back who can become something of a specialist catching balls out of the backfield and helping with blitz pickup.
July 15, 2014 at 10:11 am #1763AgamemnonParticipantJuly 15, 2014 at 10:17 am #1765znModeratorFumbling issues combined with a four-game suspension to open the 2013 season haven’t helped his cause.
I have issues with this. First, I don’t think he is a fumbler. Second, he was suspended for one game.
Isaiah Pead suspended for substance abuse violation
By Dan Hanzus
May 31, 2013Isaiah Pead’s rookie season with the St. Louis Rams never got off the ground. His second season won’t start on a promising note.
NFL.com’s Ian Rapoport reported Friday that Pead will be suspended without pay for the first game of the 2013 season for violating the NFL Policy and Program for Substances of Abuse.
The suspension takes Pead out of the equation for the Rams’ season opener against the Arizona Cardinals on Sept. 8. He will be eligible to return to the active roster a day later. Pead is eligible to participate in all offseason and preseason practices and games.
Pead, the 50th overall pick in the 2012 NFL Draft, is coming off a disappointing rookie season in which he struggled to pick up the playbook and eventually slipped behind seventh-round pick Daryl Richardson on the depth chart. He finished the season with just 10 carries. He spoke candidly about the lost season in a recent interview with his alma mater, the University of Cincinnati.
“Honestly, I would call it miserable,” Pead said. “Miserable life. Miserable four-five months.”
With Steven Jackson out of the picture, the Rams have an open competition for carries. In addition to Richardson, Pead is competing with rookie Zac Stacy and second-year pro Terrance Ganaway. Getting hit with a suspension does Pead no favors.
July 15, 2014 at 1:37 pm #1774HerzogParticipantWonder why Pead only got one game, and Bailey gets four games.
July 15, 2014 at 2:18 pm #1776znModeratorWonder why Pead only got one game, and Bailey gets four games.
I haven’t looked into this very far, but, if a guy is suspended just one game like that, according to JT, it probably means he didn’t fail a drug test…that it’s something else.
Pead blames himself for trouble
• By Jim ThomasAnother thing that’s unusual about Pead’s suspension is that it’s for only one game.
That’s an indication that Pead wasn’t suspended for failing a league-mandated drug test, because those suspensions are always for four games by NFL policy.
One game obviously is better than four, and it may not seem like much.
July 15, 2014 at 4:01 pm #1778znModeratorHerzog wrote:
Wonder why Pead only got one game, and Bailey gets four games.I haven’t looked into this very far, but, if a guy is suspended just one game like that, according to JT, it probably means he didn’t fail a drug test…that it’s something else.
Pead blames himself for trouble
• By Jim ThomasAnother thing that’s unusual about Pead’s suspension is that it’s for only one game.
That’s an indication that Pead wasn’t suspended for failing a league-mandated drug test, because those suspensions are always for four games by NFL policy.
One game obviously is better than four, and it may not seem like much.
.
I got more on that from Balzer.
—
me:
do you recall why Pead was suspended for just 1 game, not 4, in 2013?HB Today at 3:31 PM:
It was never officially revealed as I recall, but my belief is that it likely resulted from an arrest, and there were probably some questions about the circumstances. He likely made a deal.—
Me again: so if you put JT and Howard together, whatever it was may have included an arrest (say, just guessing, for minor possession) and not a failed drug test, so the scale of suspensions worked differently than it did for Bailey this year or Dunbar last year.
Not sure exactly why it would work that way…but that’s what the 2 (combined) seem to be saying.
,
.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.