Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › This is a poorly coached team.
- This topic has 19 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 11 months ago by zn.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 22, 2014 at 2:17 am #14453rflParticipant
ZN. Please do not move this thread into the game reaction thread. It’s about far more than that.
The defensive breakdown we saw today is part of the same pattern we saw last week and in the 1st half of the year. The same patterns of blown plays, chippy but ineffectual faux-toughness, and a superbly talented D front that cannot figure out how to get the slightest pressure on a smart, veteran QB.
Yes, the defense put a good string together for a few games. Apparently, they have talent. But they also laid down and died today as they laid down and died repeatedly early in the year. You can’t have it both ways. Either this defense has the talent that would warrant the praise they were getting a few weeks ago or they have a bunch of jerks. What you saw last week and this week was a poorly deployed defense getting whipped because their DC doesn’t know how to play solid football. As he has shown repeatedly all year. All bleeding year, with a couple of anomalous exceptions.
Then you have the OL. Which is manned by 2 OTs, 2 OGs, and a C chosen by this coaching staff, with a gimpy has-been LOT long since departed for the year. Not a single bet made by the coaching staff on the OL has come up this year. Not one.
And you have a team with virtually no discipline, mouthing off and taunting teams while it is being whipped. And a HC who, as was pointed out in the other thread, takes zero responsibility for any of it.
See, something happened last week and this week. We faced well coached teams. And we got whipped. The only reason AZ didn’t score 25+ was because its QBs are injured. But its lines whipped ours on both sides of the ball. Why? Because Arians can actually coach and he prepared his bunch to whip our pathetic OL and a DL crippled by a DC who won’t trust them and actually defend the pass. Arians said it perfectly. He prepared his team to block our guys and they did it. Coughlin, who is also actually competent, had a healthy offense and he prepared it to make us pay.
Did you notice how little Tavon accomplished? The jet sweep went nowhere today because the Giants were ready for it. They were prepared to deal with one of our few threats. We were prepared for nothing the Giants did.
Think of 3 games. The 1st of the year. The game after the bye week. This game, after 10 days to prepare. In NONE of these cases did we enter the game ready to play. This coaching staff is incapable of using time to its advantage to prepare.
Think more broadly over the whole season. We all expected something this year. Preseason games showed us reason to question our assumptions, as the defense in particular looked porous. People said, “oh, don’t worry. It’s pre-season. We have guys injured. Wait till the real season.”
The vets came back in Week 1 and we were utterly unprepared for the year. We snuck by a bad team in W2, then cratered, with the defense tanking. Game after game until we were in a deep hole.
Then came the mini-streak. Which only netted a couple of wins and marked several more bad losses due to ill discipline.
Followed by the last 2 weeks. In which the defense reverted to its worst traits from early in the season.
So what can anyone say now? Do they still need time to learn Williams’ schemes? Is anyone going to defend the OL choices made by this staff?
Are we ready to recognize that this coaching staff is incapable of preparing the team more than a couple of times a year? Is anyone going to blame the toughness of the opposition? Really?
‘Cause, see, call me crazy, but a team that aspires to be COMPETITIVE in the NFL does not see AZ on its 3rd string QB and a 5-win Giants team as the sort of stiff competition that makes it OK to stink 2 weeks in a row.
Early in the year I said that Jeff Fisher was floundering, failing. I was very careful to say that I was describing what was happening then, not predicting the future. I actually figured he’d do better than what we have seen.
Well, does anyone want to try to deny that he has failed badly this year? That Gregg Williams has squandered a year with superb defensive talent and a DL he clearly does not know how to use? Anybody want to try to deny that?
We end the year where the pre-season projected us to end. Mired in utter futility. Unable to get defensive stops. Yielding point in droves. Stuck with one of the most inept OLs in the league. Once again a laughingstock, dismissed for impotent cheap shots masquerading as toughness.
We’re 3 years into Fisher’s reign. Snead has clearly improved the talent level. But Fisher? He has a 3 year pattern of lousy preparation, hopeless discipline, and a couple of stolen wins to simulate progress. Three years of it.
He is not in control of this team. He is getting badly out-coached and demonstrating little ability to command success. He’s a clown taking refuge behind his shades in affected cool. And he has been that all year long. The trends have been there all year long. It’s not a reaction to one game. Or two. It’s his StL Ram legacy.
If this franchise were a stable part of the StL scene, I would think fans would demand a new HC. As it is, I doubt anyone in StL really gives a fart, as they are sensing that the team will soon be pulling up stakes. Once again, Ram incompetence covers an abandonment of a fan base. So, as GRITS has said, I imagine Fisher will be there again next year to play out the team’s lame duck season. He’ll still be here next year.
And I will expect another unprepared, sorry-ass, ill-disciplined failure to match this year’s debacle. It doesn’t matter how much talent we acquire. He and Williams will screw it up. We’ve seen what they’ve done to our defense this year.
Wake me up when they have a coach who can actually prepare them to succeed.
By virtue of the absurd ...
December 22, 2014 at 3:02 am #14461Eternal RamnationParticipantWell put RFL I agree. I hate to say it but the strangest thing happened watching the SEA AZ game. I think I’m now a Seahawks fan, I actually enjoyed watching them play in a way I haven’t enjoyed the Rams since 2003 and Fisher in his 3 years has sucked out every last bit of joy from watching the Rams play.
December 22, 2014 at 3:16 am #14463znhaterBlockedWell put RFL I agree. I hate to say it but the strangest thing happened watching the SEA AZ game. I think I’m now a Seahawks fan, I actually enjoyed watching them play in a way I haven’t enjoyed the Rams since 2003 and Fisher in his 3 years has sucked out every last bit of joy from watching the Rams play.
What? U can’t even read that lol.
December 22, 2014 at 7:03 am #14464PA RamParticipantI am as perplexed and frustrated by Fisher and his sidekick Williams as anyone.
I believe Rams fans today have every right to be outraged by that performance and to want to hold the coaching staff accountable. The lack of discipline alone was embarrassing. They looked like a team more interested in picking fights than playing football. It looked like schoolyard stuff.
Manning easily saw every blitz and made sure his line knew who to take.
The Rams line was clueless and ineffective.
At some point the coaching staff has to take some responsibility for this mess.
To revert back to looking like they did in the first few games is an absolute joke.
Giants: 514 yards of offense.
Horrible.
I really am getting tired of excuses like injuries—if Wells can’t play where is his back-up? Who is the next man up?
He’s had 3 years to prepare. Where is that guy?
The O-line is a collection of hobbled, ineffective players who need to be constantly shuffled around.
Next year is year 4.
If this sort of thing continues it may be time for Fisher to go.
I’m trying very hard not to overreact. I’m emotional about it. I get that.
Just a couple of weeks ago I was thinking–okay–the team gets Williams now–just a tweak here or there and this team is right there.
Then I look at yesterday’s mess and I don’t know what to think.
Is it all a tease?
Is it just going to be–wow–this team has talent, wow–they show flashes of greatness to wow–what a group of knuckleheads…wow–they look lost?
At some point they need to resemble a solid NFL team for more than a couple of weeks.
At some point they need to play with consistency.
Rams fans are right to be angry about all of this. Few NFL franchises have suffered as long as this one. The fans deserve more.
We didn’t expect a Superbowl this year…and we’re even okay with missing the playoffs. But to play the Giants and come out like idiots who half sleepwalk through the actual game only to wake up for out of bounds hits, endzone celebrations and fights?
If the coaching staff can’t control that they cant coach this team.
At least the Giants were WINNING! Making plays.
I am truly embarrassed as a fan today.
Hey–the Rams aren’t ALL of my life–just a part, I’ll live.
But that game really pissed me off and not just because they lost–but HOW they lost–HOW they played–HOW ill-prepared they looked—HOW dumb they were.
It was terrible and I don’t know what I want Fisher to say and frankly it doesn’t matter if the team continues to do this crap.
Prove it on the field as a solid, well-coached and disciplined football team.
- This reply was modified 9 years, 11 months ago by PA Ram.
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick
December 22, 2014 at 9:30 am #14466wvParticipantWell, i share the threads
emotions of disgust and loathing 🙂I got nuthin analytical to say yet.
I cant even ‘go there’. That
was…awful.The interior of an OLine is
the most critical link
for an offense. Ya just cant
play offense with a soft middle.And the defense,
couldnt handle a good vet QB
and a great WR.Wouldnt surprise me if the Rams
lost by 24 to Seattle, and
it wouldnt surprise me if
they won by 10.There is something very wrong
with this team, but i am hoping
that there is an upward trajectory
going on here and its just hard to
see.Three years of mediocrity.
Year Four — I just hope
they totally tank or they
win 12 games. I do NOT wanna
see another mediocre 7 win type season.
Fisher had a bunch of 8 win seasons in Tennessee
and then they broke thru. So perhaps
there is hope in the dark.w
vDecember 22, 2014 at 9:41 am #14467wvParticipantWell put RFL I agree. I hate to say it but the strangest thing happened watching the SEA AZ game. I think I’m now a Seahawks fan, I actually enjoyed watching them play in a way I haven’t enjoyed the Rams since 2003 and Fisher in his 3 years has sucked out every last bit of joy from watching the Rams play.
Step away from the Aqua Light.
w
vDecember 22, 2014 at 10:23 am #14468znModeratorI really am getting tired of excuses like injuries—if Wells can’t play where is his back-up? Who is the next man up?
Well first there was Turner but he left. He played better with the Rams than with the Titans and got benched. Then there was Jones but he had to bulk up. He did, then injured his back, had surgery, and as a result could not lift, and therefore regressed physically. Barnes? Well I suppose if they were happy with Barnes as starter material, they would not have gotten Jones.
But even with 3 interior linemen playing hurt, and a rookie at LOT, and the line clearly struggling, they put up 27 points and Hill hit 75% of his throws.
So I think what happens is, with a loss, people highlight every problem.
Even with the OL struggling they still could have won. They put up 27. But they lost and now in a lot of peoples’s minds, everything is wrong. Including, why can’t this team be the only one in the NFL to overcome having 2 centers affected by injuries. Seriously. How many teams are 3 deep at center with a quality 3rd ready to play?
In my entire history following this team, fans are angriest when the team raises expectations and then collapses in a bad loss or losses. So for example, in 2010, expectations were high, and then they lost on the road in Seattle. The feeling was so bad after that that many, if not most, did not pause to notice that in 2011, the Rams were losing because of a massive injury epidemic the likes of which we have never seen (according to Football Outsiders, that was the most injured offense in the league since 2002, and that’s not even counting the defense). At the end of 2006 they came on strong, then in 2007 the OL lost 10 starters to injuries, including 4 for the season, and most did not count the injuries…they just began beating on Linehan and Bulger.
Of these 3 cases, I thought Linehan deserved it, in spite of the injuries. I thought Spags was a victim of circumstances but was fine with Kroenke getting his own guy. I think Fisher will push through this and have winning seasons.
December 22, 2014 at 10:47 am #14469canadaramParticipantIn a ten point game, the Giants scored 10 points off of turnovers, and it could’ve been more if they didn’t take a knee after the last shotgun snap from Wells. Perhaps someone can point to evidence that suggests otherwise, but Benny is usually quite reliable with his ball control and has been quite solid as a KR this season. To me in Benny’s case it’s just one of those rare things that happens. Austin just screwed up letting the ball bounce off of his hands and into the hands of Wynn. Both of those plays were big in the outcome of the game. Me? I don’t see that as a coaching thing. Others porbably do, I guess.
The penalties and chippy stuff are mostly young players acting up. The coaches have got to do a better job reigning them in. Personally, I think that stuff dissipates as guys like McDonald and Ogletree get older.
Anyway, a disappointing loss for sure. The coverage breakdowns are mind numbing. There’s no way McDonald should’ve been left alone on Beckham on his first TD. I don’t know who screwed up on the second Beckham TD, Joyner or Johnson, but it looked like Joyner to me. A young secondary always has me holding my breath. Mistakes there are so costly, and young guys are good for a couple a game.
December 22, 2014 at 11:05 am #14470znModeratordon’t know who screwed up on the second Beckham TD, Joyner or Johnson, but it looked like Joyner to me.
That was Joyner, according to Joyner.
December 22, 2014 at 11:16 am #14471canadaramParticipantcanadaram wrote:
don’t know who screwed up on the second Beckham TD, Joyner or Johnson, but it looked like Joyner to me.That was Joyner, according to Joyner.
Oh well. His first real playing time in over a month, coming right after the injury to Gaines. Rookie CBs and rookie QBs make the most costly types of errors.
December 22, 2014 at 11:28 am #14472znModeratorzn wrote:
canadaram wrote:
don’t know who screwed up on the second Beckham TD, Joyner or Johnson, but it looked like Joyner to me.That was Joyner, according to Joyner.
Oh well. His first real playing time in over a month, coming right after the injury to Gaines. Rookie CBs and rookie QBs make the most costly types of errors.
Plus a couple of the guys in the secondary are playing over their heads in the first place. Like, arguably, McCleod.
That also means that amidst the youth, there is no clear top-gun leader. Seattle has a young secondary too, but here’s the difference. First, Earl Thomas is a rare grade-A level team leader type, along with being immensely talented. He is their Ray Lewis or London Fletcher (Fletcher isn’t at Lewis’s level as a player but he was, says Martz, the heart of the Rams defense). Second, the Seahawks play it the opposite of the Rams–whereas the Rams have a lot of “system” to learn, Seattle keeps their defense basic.
I think the Rams could have a good secondary if they mature and maybe if they added another player or 2, but they did not end up with a Thomas, plus a Sherman and a Chancellor. It can be good but it won’t be that caliber.
And in the meanwhile, we can all name the games where huge coverage errors in the secondary arguably cost them games. Sometimes Jenkins is the culprit, sometimes McCleod, sometimes Joyner. Even Gaines let a TD get past him early this season where he just got beat badly. We can even evoke the memories by naming all the receivers who did it–Bryant, Lloyd, Floyd, Beckham.
December 22, 2014 at 12:32 pm #14473JackPMillerParticipantI have been thinking the same thing, have we improved. Seattle needs to win on Sunday for a bye. With Fisher, our record has gotten worse, 7-8-1, 7-9, to 6-10(maybe)? That is 20 wins in 3 years. No Head Coach would last that long. I know Fisher and company will be back, but if he does not turn this around quickly, Fisher and his staff will be gone. Nextyear he knows this team has to win at least 10 games, no excuses.
December 22, 2014 at 12:59 pm #14475wvParticipantI have been thinking the same thing, have we improved. Seattle needs to win on Sunday for a bye. With Fisher, our record has gotten worse, 7-8-1, 7-9, to 6-10(maybe)? That is 20 wins in 3 years. No Head Coach would last that long. I know Fisher and company will be back, but if he does not turn this around quickly, Fisher and his staff will be gone. Nextyear he knows this team has to win at least 10 games, no excuses.
How much of a break do we give Snisher
since they lost their starting QB,
two years in a row?Ah well. Snisher will get another
year. Let us hope they do not
give us a fourth year of
inconsistent-mediocrity.
I do not want to be sitting here
next year typing
“wait till year FIVE…”w
vDecember 22, 2014 at 2:45 pm #14481OahuRamParticipantJackPMiller wrote:
I have been thinking the same thing, have we improved. Seattle needs to win on Sunday for a bye. With Fisher, our record has gotten worse, 7-8-1, 7-9, to 6-10(maybe)? That is 20 wins in 3 years. No Head Coach would last that long. I know Fisher and company will be back, but if he does not turn this around quickly, Fisher and his staff will be gone. Nextyear he knows this team has to win at least 10 games, no excuses.How much of a break do we give Snisher
since they lost their starting QB,
two years in a row?Ah well. Snisher will get another
year. Let us hope they do not
give us a fourth year of
inconsistent-mediocrity.
I do not want to be sitting here
next year typing
“wait till year FIVE…”w
vI think they had to come a long way in overhauling the roster, and have done a good job in doing that. Other teams that turned things around in the past 5-8 years (Detroit, Arizona, Houston) all had pieces in place. The Rams had very little (Long, JL, an aging Jackson). But having said that, other teams found their QBs (Seattle) and rebuilt their OLs (Dallas) so Fisher has to be held accountable for not having done that to this point. He also has to be held accountable for the faux-toughness. The trash talking and cheap shots have to go. McDonald almost decapitated Gaines yesterday because he was trying to layout Beckham when the pass had already been made incomplete.
December 22, 2014 at 2:53 pm #14483znModeratorother teams found their QBs (Seattle) and rebuilt their OLs (Dallas) so Fisher has to be held accountable for not having done that to this point. He also has to be held accountable for the faux-toughness. The trash talking and cheap shots have to go. McDonald almost decapitated Gaines yesterday because he was trying to layout Beckham when the pass had already been made incomplete.
I agree about the trash-talking. I feel exactly the same way.
On the OL? They signed Long, they signed Wells, they found Barksdale, they drafted Jones, they drafted Robinson. Both Long and Wells played fine when first signed. What they encountered was a series of injuries. Demoff has even said that OL injuries are the Rams achilles heel. Because of injuries, Long is done, Robinson is at LOT instead LOG as a rookie, and Saffold Wells AND Joseph are playing banged up. And Jones is no use to them because he had back surgery and lost muscle because he could not lift after the surgery.
And they didn’t have to find a qb, they had one. He then became the 1st qb we have ever heard of in all NFL history who injured the same ACL in under 12 months.
I thought they would have won yesterday even with the banged up OL because Hill, though he started shakey, settled in. So I don’t think qb was the issue yesterday. They lost because of a rare special teams turnover and then a regression into the “blown coverages” scenarios from earlier in the season.
December 22, 2014 at 3:23 pm #14486OahuRamParticipantOahuRam wrote:
other teams found their QBs (Seattle) and rebuilt their OLs (Dallas) so Fisher has to be held accountable for not having done that to this point. He also has to be held accountable for the faux-toughness. The trash talking and cheap shots have to go. McDonald almost decapitated Gaines yesterday because he was trying to layout Beckham when the pass had already been made incomplete.I agree about the trash-talking. I feel exactly the same way.
On the OL? They signed Long, they signed Wells, they found Barksdale, they drafted Jones, they drafted Robinson. Both Long and Wells played fine when first signed. What they encountered was a series of injuries. Demoff has even said that OL injuries are the Rams achilles heel. Because of injuries, Long is done, Robinson is at LOT instead LOG as a rookie, and Saffold Wells AND Joseph are playing banged up. And Jones is no use to them because he had back surgery and lost muscle because he could not lift after the surgery.
And they didn’t have to find a qb, they had one. He then became the 1st qb we have ever heard of in all NFL history who injured the same ACL in under 12 months.
I thought they would have won yesterday even with the banged up OL because Hill, though he started shakey, settled in. So I don’t think qb was the issue yesterday. They lost because of a rare special teams turnover and then a regression into the “blown coverages” scenarios from earlier in the season.
I hear you ZN but there were concerns about those signings when they happened, so it was Fisher and Snead’s choices to go with who they got. It was often said that the Rams got ‘inexpensively,’ and the Dolphis let go of, Long because of injury concerns. My buddy that is a Packers fan chuckled when I told him we signed Wells. Barksdale has not had a good year this season. Why draft Jones if he has to “bulk” up, and then the bulking up led to him getting hurt and needing back surgery? The Raiders apparently knew what they were doing in not signing Saffold because of his shoulder. So I understand that the Rams have been unfortunate with all the injuries, but they chose all of these guys despite them all having question marks. So the Rams have to shoulder some of the blame.
Regarding yesterday’s game. In the moment I was very unhappy but know that the turnovers prevented the Rams from having a chance to win. Now I could argue that the turnovers, although unusual, were commited by questionable personnel that the Rams chose to have on their team. T. Austin has been a major disappointment to me and his missed catch was just another example to me that he cannot play in this league. Cunningham has been a good KR so I cannot really fault him too much for his fumble. He has been pretty good with ball security since that phantom fumble he had last year.
For QBs, yes they had their QB but it could be argued that despite Bradfor having good numbers last season he still was not winning enough games. He was not a difference maker. He still needs to prove that he can be a reason they consistently win. I like Bradford and want him to be a 16-game starter for the Rams next season. But up to this point he has not proven himself. I think they should have had a better back up plan for the future. For comparison it will be interesting to see what the Cardinals do with QB this offseason because Palmer now has had 2 ACLs.
December 22, 2014 at 3:38 pm #14487znModeratorI hear you ZN but there were concerns about those signings when they happened, so it was Fisher and Snead’s choices to go with who they got. It was often said that the Rams got ‘inexpensively,’ and the Dolphis let go of, Long because of injury concerns. My buddy that is a Packers fan chuckled when I told him we signed Wells. Barksdale has not had a good year this season. Why draft Jones if he has to “bulk” up, and then the bulking up led to him getting hurt and needing back surgery? The Raiders apparently knew what they were doing in not signing Saffold because of his shoulder. So I understand that the Rams have been unfortunate with all the injuries, but they chose all of these guys despite them all having question marks. So the Rams have to shoulder some of the blame.
Regarding yesterday’s game. In the moment I was very unhappy but know that the turnovers prevented the Rams from having a chance to win. Now I could argue that the turnovers, although unusual, were commited by questionable personnel that the Rams chose to have on their team. T. Austin has been a major disappointment to me and his missed catch was just another example to me that he cannot play in this league. Cunningham has been a good KR so I cannot really fault him too much for his fumble. He has been pretty good with ball security since that phantom fumble he had last year.
For QBs, yes they had their QB but it could be argued that despite Bradfor having good numbers last season he still was not winning enough games. He was not a difference maker. He still needs to prove that he can be a reason they consistently win. I like Bradford and want him to be a 16-game starter for the Rams next season. But up to this point he has not proven himself. I think they should have had a better back up plan for the future. For comparison it will be interesting to see what the Cardinals do with QB this offseason because Palmer now has had 2 ACLs.
I disagree. Long was not gotten cheaply, for one. He got the ordinary avg. hit you get for a guy in his position. Wells was fine to start off and is playing hurt. Long was never a nifty left side pass protector but he was a great run blocking LOT, and arm injuries are not predictors of leg injuries.
I have no problem with Austin. But now we’re getting into loss trauma syndrome. Him missing that one catch in a loss everyone is upset about exaggerates his issues.
Yeah the rare special teams turnover didn’t help but they lost because a young secondary (with Joyner forced into the action when Gaines got hurt) blew a coverage, and there were other blown coverages as well.
To me Bradford has amply proven himself already. In the last 2 years, when this team has had both a relatively healthy OL (ie not up to 3 injury replacements a la the first half of 2012) AND a running threat (ie. not Richardson) Bradford has played well. Played well enough to reach “proven himself” status. That is, in 2012/13, in the games meeting that description (relatively healthy OL + running threat), Bradford has averaged a qb rating of 92.2, along with 1.8 TDs per game & 0.67 INTs per game, and a near 50% TDs on attempts inside the 10. And that was without the improved 2014 receivers and Mason. The issue with Bradford is health.
December 22, 2014 at 3:50 pm #14488OahuRamParticipantTo me Bradford has amply proven himself already. In the last 2 years, when this team has had both a relatively healthy OL (ie not up to 3 injury replacements a la the first half of 2012) AND a running threat (ie. not Richardson) Bradford has played well. Played well enough to reach “proven himself” status. That is, in 2012/13, in the games meeting that description (relatively healthy OL + running threat), Bradford has averaged a qb rating of 92.2, along with 1.8 TDs per game & 0.67 INTs per game, and a near 50% TDs on attempts inside the 10. And that was without the improved 2014 receivers and Mason. The issue with Bradford is health.
What are Dalton’s numbers like in Cincinnati? I think he has good stats too but I do not think that anyone would say that he has proven himself yet. I hope that Sam comes back next year and lights it up. I think he has the ability to do it. It was so much fun watching the Rams with Warner and then Bulger at the helm. I just miss it man. I miss it. We gotta get it back. If only Cleveland had made that FG attempt the season before the Luck draft.
December 22, 2014 at 4:01 pm #14491AgamemnonParticipantDecember 22, 2014 at 4:20 pm #14494znModeratorzn wrote:
To me Bradford has amply proven himself already. In the last 2 years, when this team has had both a relatively healthy OL (ie not up to 3 injury replacements a la the first half of 2012) AND a running threat (ie. not Richardson) Bradford has played well. Played well enough to reach “proven himself” status. That is, in 2012/13, in the games meeting that description (relatively healthy OL + running threat), Bradford has averaged a qb rating of 92.2, along with 1.8 TDs per game & 0.67 INTs per game, and a near 50% TDs on attempts inside the 10. And that was without the improved 2014 receivers and Mason. The issue with Bradford is health.What are Dalton’s numbers like in Cincinnati? I think he has good stats too but I do not think that anyone would say that he has proven himself yet. I hope that Sam comes back next year and lights it up. I think he has the ability to do it. It was so much fun watching the Rams with Warner and then Bulger at the helm. I just miss it man. I miss it. We gotta get it back. If only Cleveland had made that FG attempt the season before the Luck draft.
I didn’t BASE THAT on numbers, but numbers validate it. Bradford’s way better than Dalton according to any test you want to offer, but what he doesn’t have is AJ Green. He had Amendola and Gibson. I would say Bradford has proven himself to the point where just watching the games and looking at the numbers back it. That’s what I saw. Provided, as I said, he has both a relatively healthy qb and a running threat. That’s mostly because every qb does better with a relatively healthy OL and most do better with a running threat.
Bulger and Warner had years of Bruce and Holt and a stable OL, until the stable OLs ran out in 2007. Bradford never had the weapons they had. Warner is the best of the 3 but Bradford would have done as well as Bulger if not better IMO if he had even just the Rams 2014 WRs.
Heck in the span of games I am talking about…where he had the things I say he needed (OL, running threat) he has 4 comeback games and was the qb of an offense that beat (from memory, I think the number is) 8 top 12 defenses.
Luck is a rare type, like once a decade, but Bradford could be at least as good as Eli and Flacco at their best — if not better — if he is healthy.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.