the lesson of Jacksonville (rookie OLs)

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle the lesson of Jacksonville (rookie OLs)

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #27728
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Last year the Jagz OL started 2 rookies and 1 one-year player (Joeckel).

    The rookies were center Luke Bowanko (6th round) and OG Brandon Linder (3rd round).

    Joeckel was a high first round pick in 2013 who struggled both as a rookie and last year (though he only played a few games in 2013 before getting injured…ironically, against the Rams).

    The initial news out of Jacksonville when it comes to starting a lot of inexperienced linemen is not good. But then, they also started a rookie qb for 13 games. They were 32nd in points for, and 31st in offensive yards. They gave up an amazing 71 sacks. Their sack percentage was an eye-bugging 11.3%.

    They threw a lot…in fact they threw the ball 63.5% of the time, which is one of the highest pass-heavy percentages in the league. So they were both forced to throw a lot AND had a high sack percentage. This is not a winning combination. They were also 30th in offensive plays run.

    HOWEVER, it’s not all hell and high water.

    They DID manage to get 4.5 per carry running. They just didn’t run much. So while they were 6th in yards per carry, they were 28th in rushing attempts and 21st in rushing yards. A lot of that was Bortles, who ran 56 times in 13 games, getting 7.1 a carry. That upped their avg.

    The Jagz situation does not look like an endorsement of starting young linemen. So what’s the potential difference between the Rams offense and the Jagz offense?

    This is all “on paper” but…

    1. the Rams too will (possibly) start 2 rookies and an inexperienced LOT, plus an inexperienced center. HOWEVER, they have a veteran qb to go along with their staple of effective backs.

    2. the Jagz defense was 26th in yards and 26th in points, which put even more pressure on the offense. Rams offense and special teams ought to take some pressure off of the offense.

    Points 1 and 2 combine to suggest that the Rams ought to have a more productive running game, and a situation in which they can run the ball more than the Jagz did.

    So that’s something.

    Interestingly enough, though, PFF did not rank the Jagz OL from last year that low.

    Here’s their take:

    https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2015/01/08/2014-pff-offensive-line-rankings/2/

    18. Jacksonville Jaguars

    Stud: There’s no doubt the Jaguars are happy with just how quickly Brandon Linder (+16.6) has acclimatized to life in the NFL. He’s contributed to a top-notch group of rookie guards.

    Dud: With eight sacks allowed and a team-worst pass blocking grade, the Jags must have hoped for more from Luke Joeckel by now.

    Breakdown: They got better when they replaced Jacques McClendon with Luke Bowanko [at center] and have taken a huge step forward this year. A new offensive coordinator will still need to get more out of a unit that didn’t help their rushers enough in the run game.

    #27733
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    RG Kyle Long 13/1
    RT Jordan Mills 13/5
    Started for Chicago in 2013. The Bears went 8-8.
    LT Louise Sharpe 82/1
    RT Tootie Robbins 82/4
    Started for the Stl Cardinals. They went 5-4 in the shortened season.
    FWIW

    Agamemnon

    #27739
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    RG Kyle Long
    RT Jordan Mills
    Started for Chicago in 2013. The Bears went 8-8.

    LT Louise Sharpe
    RT Tootie Robbins
    Started for the Stl Cardinals. They went 5-4 in the shortened season.
    FWIW

    Just to continue these thoughts….

    Chicago was 30th on defense in 2013. They threw the ball 60% of the time. It was once again a case of being able to run, just not doing it (4.5 a carry). Unlike the Jagz last year they had veteran qbs (McCown and Cutler). They also genuinely had a real passing game, with Jeffries and Marshall. The sack percentage was an excellent 4.9%.

    It will be hard to generalize about the strike year. But in 82 the St. Louis Cards were actually pretty good on defense (14th). They could and did run the ball (7th in attempts, 7th in yards). In fact they ran more than they passed. They had both Neil Lomax and Ottis Anderson. Though the sack percentage was a mind-numbing 13.1%. (Ag you probably remember that year…you were a football Cards fan, right?)

    .

    #27742
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    For a spread QB, Lomax did ok. 😉

    Agamemnon

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.