some discussion points on the infamous PFF roster ranking

Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › some discussion points on the infamous PFF roster ranking

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • July 10, 2014 at 10:13 am #1369
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    ramssuperbowl99

    I love metrics, analytics, and how they interact in the sports world, but I’m completely at a loss as to PFF’s treatment of the Rams this offseason.

    It might come off as a typical ‘jilted fan’ post, but whatever. The Rams were the youngest team in football, lost no free agents of note, played in the toughest division in football, played the 3rd most difficult schedule in football, and did all of that without their starting QB for half a season. They still finished at basically .500 with a point differential that backs that up. In other words, by all measures, they were a .500 talent team at minimum, who certainly didn’t get worse and (when you consider their draft ammunition) almost certainly got better.

    And somehow in PFF’s eyes they are almost as bad as the historically bad Jags.

    NVRamsFan

    PFF goes and rates our front 7 as the best in the league but when you look at the roster analysis they rate most of them as below average. It just doesn’t jive.

    July 10, 2014 at 12:09 pm #1376
    Winnbrad
    Participant

    Only one playmaker, Quinn. None on the O. Everybody loves playmakers…

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.