Rams will play top 3 QBs in next 4 games

Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › Rams will play top 3 QBs in next 4 games

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 24, 2019 at 9:34 am #108552
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    In 3 of the next four games, the Rams will play the top Three ranked QBs — R.Wilson, Dak, L.Jackson.
    In the last stretch, They will also face Kyler Murray who is in the top 10, and Garappolo who is 13th.
    ————————
    Rankings of Last 3 QBs the Rams have played:
    Trubisky — 28th
    Rudolph – 31st
    Dalton — 29th
    ================
    Raven’s Lamar Jackson is ranked 3rd.
    (Dak Prescott is 2nd, Kyler Murray is 10th)

    ===========

    Others Rams D has faced: Matt Ryan is 9th, Russell Wilson is 1st, Garoppolo is 13th, J.Winston is 20th, B.Mayfield is 22nd, T.Bridgewater 21st
    ———-
    Tom Brady is 15th. Philip Rivers is 23rd.
    ————
    Goff is 27th.

    QB:http://www.espn.com/nfl/qbr

    w
    v

    November 24, 2019 at 12:19 pm #108560
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I don’t see this as a playoff year. That does not have me “bummed” or any of that…it’s just not in the cards. They could get there, I s’pose, but if they do, to me it’s gravy. I see it as more of a “change the offensive scheme and OL” year, though that wasn’t the original plan. A stumbled-up OL changed the initial plan.

    And also, a get the defense in a higher gear year. So it will be interesting to see how they fare against the league’s top 3 qbs.

    November 24, 2019 at 12:36 pm #108563
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator
    zn wrote:

    I don’t see this as a playoff year.

    Yeah, the Steelers game to me was the final nail in the coffin.

    A playoff team cannot lose to Frisco at home with 4 days more preparation than they had, and cannot lose to the Steelers coming out of a bye.

    It’s not just the math.

    It’s the performance. This is a team with loose sprockets.

    I think they should draft some new sprockets, and get a damn wrench in the off season.

    November 24, 2019 at 2:04 pm #108568
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Yeah I agree with Z and Z.

    It shall be interesting to see whether the D has actually improved or not. They’ve played bad-QBs for a month now. Lets see what they do against real QBs.

    My expectations are that they’ll do ‘ok’ but not shine.

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 4 years, 11 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    November 24, 2019 at 2:48 pm #108570
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator
    wv wrote:

    Yeah I agree with Z and Z.

    It shall be interesting to see whether the D has actually improved or not. They’ve played bad-QBs for a month now. Lets see what they do against real QBs.

    My expectations are that they’ll do ‘ok’ but not shine.

    w
    v

    I am still unable to process giving up 55 to the Bucs.

    I don’t understand it. That game was gibberish to me, kinda like listening to Nittany Ram.

    November 24, 2019 at 2:53 pm #108571
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator
    Zooey wrote:

    I am still unable to process giving up 55 to the Bucs.

    Defense just did not come to play that game. Weddle was yelling at them on the sideline at one point.

    November 24, 2019 at 6:23 pm #108581
    Avatar photowv
    Participant
    Zooey wrote:

    I am still unable to process giving up 55 to the Bucs.

    I don’t understand it. That game was gibberish to me, kinda like listening to Nittany Ram.

    =====================
    Well, setting aside the important topic of Nittany’s folderal and claptrap,
    the Bucs are a weird team. They put up 34 on Seattle and 30 on the Cards, 31 on the Giants.
    Granted, 55 is ridiculous. It was the defensive equivalent of Gibberish.

    w
    v
    ========

    The etymology of gibberish is uncertain. The term was first seen in English in the early 16th century. It is generally thought to be an onomatopoeia imitative of speech, similar to the words jabber (to talk rapidly) and gibber (to speak inarticulately).

    Gibberish, alternatively jibber, jabber, jibber-jabber, or gobbledygook, is speech that is (or appears to be) nonsense. It may include speech sounds that are not actual words,[1] or language games and specialized jargon that seems nonsensical to outsiders.[2]

    “Gibberish” is also used as an imprecation to denigrate or tar ideas or opinions the user disagrees with or finds irksome, a rough equivalent of “nonsense”, “folderol”, or “claptrap”. The implication is that the criticized expression or proposition lacks substance or congruence, as opposed to simply being a differing view.

    The related word jibber-jabber refers to rapid talk that is difficult to understand.[3]
    https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia › wiki › Gibberish

    Gibberish – Wikipedia

    November 24, 2019 at 6:49 pm #108582
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i agree with y’all. i wanna see improvements.

    oline and defense specifically.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.