Matt Stafford, not in the best 100 players in the NFL. Okey dokey. w v
The oversight is truly weird. Stafford is a guy with career #s that place him among the all-time greats, he plays in the 2nd-largest media market, and won a Super Bowl a year ago, and nobody seems to think he’s any good. I can’t account for it in any way other than recency bias.
Yeah. But then…he was in Detroit for so long, and many people would overlook the context and just say so why doesn’t he win? And last year, like many similar years before, I would encounter people who just couldn’t factor OL injuries into qb play. (Plus MS was banged up from the get-go last year.)
Plus, have we ever seen the NFL so full of so many promising young qbs? Mahomes, Burrow, Lawrence, Hurts, Herbert, Allen, Watson. So Matt becomes “oh yeah and Stafford, but he only won in the playoffs one season.” Overlooked city. I hope he’s a proud, shoulder-chippy kind of guy.
He’s 35 now, can he play 3 more seasons?
Kurt played till he was 38. Favre played one more year too many but he was still effective at 40. Rivers’ last season he was still effective at 39. Rodgers is 39. Brady is the gold standard (played till 45) but that’s too surreal a comparison. It’s obviously a combo of things–advances in sports medicine, in training, in diet and nutrition (eg. getting individualized bloodwork for nutrition).