I’ve seen a lot of speculation all over the net that the Rams could cut or trade Quinn for the cap space.
But, turns out, the Chiefs wanted him as part of the Peters trade, and the Rams turned them down on that. So logically, if the Rams are keeping him instead of trading him, that means something. Actually it means 2 things. It means, first, that the Rams see value in him and want him around contributing. AND it means the CHIEFS also see value in him and tried to get him.
So at least 2 teams see present value in him…one wanted to get him and the other wants to keep him.
Obviously you cut a guy you value that much just for cap space. Heck if they wanted to get rid of him, they would not only have gotten the cap space by trading him, they would have saved a pick in trading for Peters too.
So he’s just not on the cutting block.
…