Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › NFL on having a season w/ pandemic (thread 1, to 7/17))
- This topic has 21 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 4 years, 9 months ago by
zn.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 30, 2020 at 10:57 am #117346
zn
ModeratorNFLPA directs agents to ensure players know COVID-19 risks before camp starts in late Julyhttps://t.co/wDMFvcEmKq
— Around The NFL (@AroundTheNFL) June 29, 2020
—
From yesterday’s NFLPA memo: The CDC defines obesity as body-mass index of 30+, so just about every offensive and defensive lineman would qualify. Players also have expressed concern over family members with conditions such as diabetes. A lot of conversations to be had. https://t.co/6Fplksdr0i
— Tom Pelissero (@TomPelissero) June 30, 2020
==
The coronavirus is unique, but the narratives we face as athletes are often recycled and undermine our leverage and power as players. We want to return to work, but we want to be safe, too: https://t.co/SOhGzKTzkX
— JC Tretter (@JCTretter) June 30, 2020
==
From the NFLPA President: “Underlying conditions like high BMI, asthma and sleep apnea are all associated with a higher risk of developing severe symptoms and complications when infected with COVID-19. Those conditions are widespread across the league.” https://t.co/SJQbgyHJdh
— Tom Pelissero (@TomPelissero) June 30, 2020
June 30, 2020 at 3:31 pm #117354zn
ModeratorWill there be a player revolt if NFL coronavirus protections aren't enough? https://t.co/W30nWNB0Cu
— Rams Wire (@TheRamsWire) June 30, 2020
July 1, 2020 at 9:48 am #117393zn
ModeratorAs the NFL and the union work toward workplace rules for training camps, NFLPA president says every answer “brings up three more questions” https://t.co/RqYZk0ycko
— ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) July 1, 2020
July 2, 2020 at 5:02 am #117444zn
ModeratorMike Garafolo@MikeGarafolo
NFL teams would like to play two preseason games to get a read on their rosters and get ready for Week 1, though the NFLPA hasn’t signed off on that and is wondering if it’s wise to start mixing teams for games that don’t count in the standings.The NFLPA has been vocal about the health and safety of their players, and not just publicly. The union will continue to discuss whether it’s safe to play any preseason games.
Albert Breer@AlbertBreer
One thing lingering over the preseason sked is the need for an acclimation period. The NFL/NFLPA joint committee on health and safety recommended a 3-week ramp-up before helmets go on.Teams report July 28. Three weeks from that is Aug. 18. Preseason Week 2 starts Aug. 20. (1/2)
Data shared to team docs in the aftermath of the 2011 lockout showed a significant league-wide uptick in Achilles and hamstring injuries. That’s what the committee is trying to avoid.
So it might not wind up being 3 weeks, but there will be an acclimation period. (2/2)
July 3, 2020 at 2:48 pm #117548zn
ModeratorVincent Bonsignore@VinnyBonsignore
I’ve been saying this for a while now. The sense I get is, while the @NFL hopes all fans are on board and in support of the socially conscientious decisions the league is making, I also don’t get the sense they are sweating the loss of some “fans” that might result.Dan Graziano@DanGrazianoESPN
NFLPA held a 2-hour call today for player reps. Lots of info re: season plans. Players could face fines for conduct detrimental if they’re found to have spread COVID by engaging in “reckless” behavior away from the facility, such as eating out at restaurants or riding in Ubers.Other items from NFLPA call:
-Meetings, media access likely to be virtual, not in-person.
-Current proposal is to test every other day in camp, players pushing for daily testing. Public access to testing is a factor.
-Players will stay in their homes, not team hotels, for camp.Sources said there is definitely some sentiment among players of, “Why are we playing at all if it’s this unsafe?” A ton of questions still have to be answered before they feel good about playing. There’s another NFLPA call scheduled for Friday for all players, not just reps.
Tom Pelissero@TomPelissero
With the NFLPA still opposed to preseason games, one possible camp schedule the union has discussed:3 days: medical/equipment
21 days: strength & conditioning
10 days: unpadded practice
14 days: practice (10 max/8 padded)Then it’d be straight into Week 1.
Worth noting is this scenario as discussed by the NFLPA: Players would be divided into smaller groups initially, e.g. under 15 players for S&C and up to 40 in unpadded practices. That’d buy an extra month or so before all players are together in a higher-exposure setting.
Albert Breer@AlbertBreer
Btw, worth mentioning the NFLPA’s recommendation of cancelling preseason game will come with significant lost revenue. Teams will lose the gate, lose out on a lot of local TV money, plus the league’s network routinely posts its highest ratings in August, bc of the games.Some more notes from the NFLPA call …
• Standard for contact tracing = being around someone for 10+ minutes at closer than 6 feet.
• After players report, COVID cases will be “football injuries”, requiring guys be paid.
• Handling of loss of revenue is being discussed.
From NFL Now on @nflnetwork on the standoff between the NFL and NFLPA on the number of preseason games and why each side feels it has a say on the matter. Plus a cameo of sorts by @TomPelissero. pic.twitter.com/c3c3vTsaNV
— Mike Garafolo (@MikeGarafolo) July 3, 2020
July 3, 2020 at 5:52 pm #117555zn
ModeratorWhile the NFL looks to trim the preseason schedule, the NFLPA's board voted to recommend not playing any preseason games ahead of the 2020 season https://t.co/tQNsIMYdGG
— Sports Illustrated (@SInow) July 3, 2020
July 4, 2020 at 12:04 pm #117571zn
ModeratorPlayers aren't ready to accept mandatory face shields https://t.co/5surBECepF
— John McClain (@McClain_on_NFL) July 4, 2020
July 4, 2020 at 12:52 pm #117577zn
ModeratorSo here’s where we stand between the NFL and NFLPA:
– Education, treatment, hygiene, travel protocols mostly set
– Testing, game-day protocols still being finalized
– NFL intends to play 2 preseason games; NFLPA wants 0, longer rampupMost players scheduled to report in 24 days
— Tom Pelissero (@TomPelissero) July 4, 2020
July 8, 2020 at 9:46 am #117702zn
ModeratorMike Garafolo@MikeGarafolo
Last night @TomPelissero said the NFLPA told the NFL to “kick rocks” on the proposal to hold some 2020 salary in escrow. A well-placed player source tells me this morning the chances are “less than zero percent” the players will accept that. The union is firmly dug in.The players’ side believes the league has no legal position to hold this year’s money in escrow. The NFLPA is adamant about borrowing for future years to offset a potential salary cap drop in 2021. To them, flat caps for a few years > giving back money in 2020.
July 9, 2020 at 7:30 am #117743zn
ModeratorMaybe the owners should have saved better and not spent all their money on iPhones and avocado toast. https://t.co/wwFyJRb4n7
— Brett Kollmann (@BrettKollmann) July 9, 2020
July 9, 2020 at 7:31 am #117745zn
ModeratorAfter the Bills’ naming rights sponsor lays off 117 workers there, Buffalo politician says he’s going back to calling it Ralph Wilson Stadium https://t.co/nJFqFam3AA
— ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) July 9, 2020
July 9, 2020 at 5:44 pm #117798zn
ModeratorAs badly as we all want the NFL back ASAP is it really feasible in this COVID world? https://t.co/JGrPlKT3My
— Hub Arkush (@Hub_Arkush) July 9, 2020
July 10, 2020 at 10:11 am #117821zn
ModeratorNFL, NFLPA discussing plan for potential player opt-outs in 2020
https://www.nfl.com/news/nfl-nflpa-discussing-plan-for-potential-player-opt-outs-in-2020
With veterans expected to report to training camps in 20 days, the NFL and NFL Players Association have a host of issues to continue to sort out before players return.
Among the questions lingering in the air amid the COVID-19 pandemic is the potential for players opting out of participating in 2020.
NFL Network’s Tom Pelissero reported Wednesday on NFL NOW that the league and union anticipate player opt-outs would be available, but would need to be communicated by a certain date.
“My understanding is both the union and the league intend to have an opt-out for players who have either a pre-existing condition, family (members) with pre-existing conditions, just general concerns over COVID-19, would not want to play this season,” Pelissero said. “General managers were told on a call earlier this week there would be a specific date by which players would need to opt-out. That date is still to be determined.”
We’ve seen players in the MLB and NBA opt to sit out as their respective sports return to play. It’s unclear how many NFL players would consider sitting an entire season. Several veterans, including the McCourty twins in New England and Stefon Diggs in Buffalo, recently have voiced concerns about playing amid the pandemic.
With any potential opt-outs comes the question of how that would affect a player’s contract.
Pelissero reported that possible tolling of contracts of players who opt out is still to be determined and is something that would need to be agreed to prior to the start of training camp
July 10, 2020 at 11:34 am #117833zn
ModeratorIan Rapoport@RapSheet
Update on where things stand 18 days out:
— Almost everything is done and agreed to except for number of preseason games and testing protocols.
— No fans will be at training camp, but teams can have up to two fan events at stadiums this preseason with strict protocols if allowed
Other notes:
— Where fans are allowed at games, they will wear face coverings.
— Actual training camp schedule of practices can be tied to the preseason game questions, so not there yet.
— The economics are not yet finalized, either.==
NFL, NFLPA still have major issues to negotiate
The NFL and NFL Players Association have approached the negotiations on the 2020 season like negotiations on a broader labor deal: Start with the easy issues, and then move to the difficult ones.
As to football in a pandemic, the easy ones are done. The difficult ones remain.
Ian Rapoport of the NFL reports that “[a]lmost everything is done and agreed to except for number of preseason games and testing protocols.” Those are two very significant issues, however.
The NFL wants two preseason games, the NFLPA wants none, and the two sides are stuck at an impasse on the issue. The testing protocols remain a point of contention, given that the players want testing more frequently. Throw in the fact that it may not be easy to get results quickly (and that doing so could slow down the process of finalizing tests for the general public), it will not be a simple process to reach a consensus on how often testing will be conducted and how quickly teams and players reasonably will obtain results.
Rapoport’s final point is this: “The economics are not yet finalized, either.”
That’s perhaps the most significant remaining area of tension. It was Rapoport and his colleagues who first floated, under the umbrella of the league’s in-house media conglomerate, the notion of salary givebacks. Then, NFL Media reported on the fact that the league suggested placing 35 percent of 2020 player salaries into escrow, which will make it easier to claw back money later.
The NFLPA recognizes that lost revenues now will impact salary-cap calculations later, but the suggestion that any player should take less in a season during which players will be assuming a greater risk is nonsensical. Plenty of the men who play in 2020 won’t even be in the league in 2021, whether due to injury, retirement, or erosion of skills relative to younger, cheaper options. Why take less now (while absorbing all the risks of football in a pandemic) so that there will be more later, if the players who take less now won’t be around to get more later?
Taken together, these aren’t small issues. They are major points of contention that must be resolved before anything can happen. Meanwhile, rookies are due to report for COVID-19 testing in only nine days.
That leads us back to the point that J.J. Watt made earlier this week on #PFTPM: What’s the rush? It makes much more sense to get it right and delay things a bit than it does to rush into a headwind that could blow down what ultimately could be a house of cards.
July 10, 2020 at 4:39 pm #117838zn
ModeratorJohn McClain , Houston Chronicle
from https://www.houstonchronicle.com/texas-sports-nation/john-mcclain/article/Mailbag-Texans-2020-NFL-season-COVID-19-15398638.php?utm_campaign=CMS%20Sharing%20Tools%20(Premium)&utm_source=t.co&utm_medium=referralQ: I am starting to have serious questions about restarting professional sports. Players are testing positive for COVID-19 in baseball. I don’t hear much about football, but I have real concerns. After all, football is more contact-related with hard breathing and fluids. If even one player in any sport were to become seriously ill or die from COVID-19, that would be a tragedy. — Ronald J.
A: Yes, it would, Ronald. Because NFL players haven’t reported, we have no idea how many have tested positive, but you can be sure when they report to camp, there’ll be many positive tests. The NFL wants the show to go on, so I expect the season to start on time without fans. As long as teams have enough healthy players, I think they’ll play. There’s a lot of money to be made. I do think there’ll be interruptions. We’d be foolish to think the season will go smoothly.
Q: I don’t see the NFL, MBL, NBA or NHL playing this year. One does not have to be a medical researcher to see that the virus is not leveling off but is instead accelerating. I seriously doubt Division I college football will play as well. The owners can ride this out for a year and still pay their staffs. Likewise, all but the bottom-tier players can handle one year without a paycheck. Many minimum wage workers are having to do it. Those players who cannot should turn to their union for assistance. The union can tap the strike fund for those few who need it. Never thought I’d say this but missing sports these past four months has not brought the world to an end. Call 2020 a mulligan and shoot for 2021. — Eric R.
A: Ultimately, you might be right, Eric, but players want to get paid. Because they’re young and healthy, most believe it’s worth the risk and want to earn their money. The owners are going to lose a lot of money without fans, so they’re determined to play unless there are so many positive tests they’re forced to shut down. I don’t see that happening. I think the players who test positive will be treated like injured players in that they’ll have to deal with it the best way teams know how.
Q: It seems MLB has their protocol for testing in place like the PGA Tour. Do you know what the NFL is going to do? What happens if a star player like Deshaun Watson tests positive? I assume he’ll have to quarantine for two weeks. What happens if half the team tests positive? Do you think the NFL will play this year? I think we’ll know a lot more after training camp. — Glen K.
A: I agree about training camp, Glen. Any player who tests positive has to be quarantined and can’t return until he has two negative tests. They’re hoping most players won’t be very ill or some will be asymptomatic and can return to play as soon as possible. I think Roger Goodell is determined to start the season on time. I’d delay it at least a month, including cancelling games if I had to. I think it’s ridiculous to start the second week of September. After the first weekend of games, if there are a lot of positive tests, Goodell will have to decide to play or delay.
July 11, 2020 at 10:40 am #117854zn
ModeratorWill the NFL season start on time? Here's what we know — and what's up in the air, via @SeifertESPN:https://t.co/SXzhGbOwS6
— Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) July 11, 2020
July 11, 2020 at 4:03 pm #117870zn
ModeratorTom Pelissero@TomPelissero
The NFLPA sent the NFL an economic counterproposal, per sources:– No escrow of 2020 salaries
– Flat salary cap of $198.2M for 2021
– Spread revenue loss this year over 2022-2030 caps
– All fully guaranteed money paid even if games are canceledAlbert Breer@AlbertBreer
the economics are still the big boulder to move. In a nutshell …• Looming ’21 cap drop is the issue.
• NFLPA wants losses spread over future years.
• NFL wants players to take a hit now.No one wants a cap drop in ’21. Good for no one — Players lose jobs, rosters get slashed. Either paycut or smoothing of the cap help solve that.
Well, NFL once smoothed the cap before (’11-13). Guess what? Some owners hated it, felt it was an interest-free loan to players.
Evan Koch@evankoch
I often see those defending the owners say “they should make more, they are taking all the risk.” Welp…. This is that fabled risk being played out isn’t it? If they transfer their losses immediately to the players, they should also transfer gains immediately during boom yearsMike Tanier@MikeTanier
NFL owners are actually encountering “risk ” for the 1st time in their lives in many cases right now. So naturally they will act like operating in the red for a year or 2 is like losing the farm.July 12, 2020 at 5:29 pm #117912zn
ModeratorNFL expects plenty of players to test positive when they report for training camp https://t.co/anYdGqsmfx
— ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) July 12, 2020
July 16, 2020 at 11:58 am #118053zn
ModeratorExpect about double that number by the time initial testing is done. Players maybe be healthy and young but not immune to what is out there in the community. Key to season is what happens after initial tests and quarantine. https://t.co/NsB8f54vCS
— David J. Chao – ProFootballDoc (@ProFootballDoc) July 16, 2020
July 17, 2020 at 2:53 pm #118084zn
ModeratorDan Graziano@DanGrazianoESPN
NFLPA prez JC Tretter: “We’ve had coaches say the protocols are too much to ask, coaches come forward and saying, ‘Everyone’s going to get sick, so we might as well all get sick together.’ Those attitudes can’t happen. There are consequences to getting sick.”July 17, 2020 at 3:59 pm #118086zn
ModeratorWhat we learned from the NFLPA's Friday conference call https://t.co/SnlU5x0qTR
— Rams Wire (@TheRamsWire) July 17, 2020
July 17, 2020 at 7:58 pm #118095zn
ModeratorDan Graziano@DanGrazianoESPN
THREAD: What I’ve learned today from sources on NFL/NFLPA reopening negotiations:-They’re ongoing, expected to continue thru the weekend.
-Both sides believe, if the health/safety piece of the talks gets resolved, they can start camps and continue to discuss financial piece.
Players still want daily testing, league doesn’t believe it’s necessary. (Actually worries it can create false sense of security.) Possible compromise involves daily testing at start of camp, phase into less frequent as people get more comfortable with the facility protocols.
Players still want all preseason games eliminated, league continues to resist. Possible compromise involves going down to just one preseason game per team, but NFLPA doesn’t want any. Thinks it raises infection risk unnecessarily (i.e, the games don’t count)
Both sides are dug in. especially on preseason games. Imo, nothing gets resolved and the nflpa files an expedited grievance against the league. I’m sorry, but that’s the way I see it play out unfortunately.
==
In the interest of having everyone on the same page in terms of what we know and don’t know at this time, here are a few things I’ve learned being on four NFLPA calls in the last two weeks with hundreds of other players.
Keep in mind our rookies are scheduled to report in 48 hrs pic.twitter.com/wAH1XyQenf
— JJ Watt (@JJWatt) July 16, 2020
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.