Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Public House › notes from expert panel on the virus & other expert views
- This topic has 30 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 9 months ago by wv.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 13, 2020 at 1:30 am #112217znModerator
Notes from UCSF Expert panel – March 10
University of California, San Francisco BioHub Panel on COVID-19
March 10, 2020
Panelists
Joe DeRisi: UCSF’s top infectious disease researcher. Co-president of ChanZuckerberg BioHub (a JV involving UCSF / Berkeley / Stanford). Co-inventor of the chip used in SARS epidemic.
Emily Crawford: COVID task force director. Focused on diagnostics
Cristina Tato: Rapid Response Director. Immunologist.
Patrick Ayescue: Leading outbreak response and surveillance. Epidemiologist.
Chaz Langelier: UCSF Infectious Disease docWhat’s below are essentially direct quotes from the panelists. I bracketed the few things that are not quotes.
Top takeaways
At this point, we are past containment. Containment is basically futile. Our containment efforts won’t reduce the number who get infected in the US.
Now we’re just trying to slow the spread, to help healthcare providers deal with the demand peak. In other words, the goal of containment is to “flatten the curve”, to lower the peak of the surge of demand that will hit healthcare providers. And to buy time, in hopes a drug can be developed.
How many in the community already have the virus? No one knows.
We are moving from containment to care.
We in the US are currently where at where Italy was a week ago. We see nothing to say we will be substantially different.
40-70% of the US population will be infected over the next 12-18 months. After that level you can start to get herd immunity. Unlike flu this is entirely novel to humans, so there is no latent immunity in the global population.
[We used their numbers to work out a guesstimate of deaths— indicating about 1.5 million Americans may die. The panelists did not disagree with our estimate. This compares to seasonal flu’s average of 50K Americans per year. Assume 50% of US population, that’s 160M people infected. With 1% mortality rate that’s 1.6M Americans die over the next 12-18 months.]
The fatality rate is in the range of 10X flu.
This assumes no drug is found effective and made available.
The death rate varies hugely by age. Over age 80 the mortality rate could be 10-15%. [See chart by age Signe found online, attached at bottom.]
Don’t know whether COVID-19 is seasonal but if is and subsides over the summer, it is likely to roar back in fall as the 1918 flu did
I can only tell you two things definitively. Definitively it’s going to get worse before it gets better. And we’ll be dealing with this for the next year at least. Our lives are going to look different for the next year.
What should we do now? What are you doing for your family?
Appears one can be infectious before being symptomatic. We don’t know how infectious before symptomatic, but know that highest level of virus prevalence coincides with symptoms. We currently think folks are infectious 2 days before through 14 days after onset of symptoms (T-2 to T+14 onset).
How long does the virus last?
On surfaces, best guess is 4-20 hours depending on surface type (maybe a few days) but still no consensus on this
The virus is very susceptible to common anti-bacterial cleaning agents: bleach, hydrogen peroxide, alcohol-based.
Avoid concerts, movies, crowded places.
We have cancelled business travel.
Do the basic hygiene, eg hand washing and avoiding touching face.
Stockpile your critical prescription medications. Many pharma supply chains run through China. Pharma companies usually hold 2-3 months of raw materials, so may run out given the disruption in China’s manufacturing.
Pneumonia shot might be helpful. Not preventative of COVID-19, but reduces your chance of being weakened, which makes COVID-19 more dangerous.
Get a flu shot next fall. Not preventative of COVID-19, but reduces your chance of being weakened, which makes COVID-19 more dangerous.
We would say “Anyone over 60 stay at home unless it’s critical”. CDC toyed with idea of saying anyone over 60 not travel on commercial airlines.
We at UCSF are moving our “at-risk” parents back from nursing homes, etc. to their own homes. Then are not letting them out of the house. The other members of the family are washing hands the moment they come in.
Three routes of infection
Hand to mouth / face
Aerosol transmission
Fecal oral route
What if someone is sick?
If someone gets sick, have them stay home and socially isolate. There is very little you can do at a hospital that you couldn’t do at home. Most cases are mild. But if they are old or have lung or cardio-vascular problems, read on.
If someone gets quite sick who is old (70+) or with lung or cardio-vascular problems, take them to the ER.
There is no accepted treatment for COVID-19. The hospital will give supportive care (eg IV fluids, oxygen) to help you stay alive while your body fights the disease. ie to prevent sepsis.
If someone gets sick who is high risk (eg is both old and has lung/cardio-vascular problems), you can try to get them enrolled for “compassionate use” of Remdesivir, a drug that is in clinical trial at San Francisco General and UCSF, and in China. Need to find a doc there in order to ask to enroll. Remdesivir is an anti-viral from Gilead that showed effectiveness against MERS in primates and is being tried against COVID-19. If the trials succeed it might be available for next winter as production scales up far faster for drugs than for vaccines. [More I found online.]
Why is the fatality rate much higher for older adults?
Your immune system declines past age 50
Fatality rate tracks closely with “co-morbidity”, ie the presence of other conditions that compromise the patient’s hearth, especially respiratory or cardio-vascular illness. These conditions are higher in older adults.
Risk of pneumonia is higher in older adults.
What about testing to know if someone has COVID-19?
Bottom line, there is not enough testing capacity to be broadly useful. Here’s why.
Currently, there is no way to determine what a person has other than a PCR test. No other test can yet distinguish “COVID-19 from flu or from the other dozen respiratory bugs that are circulating”.
A Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test can detect COVID-19’s RNA. However they still don’t have confidence in the test’s specificity, ie they don’t know the rate of false negatives.
The PCR test requires kits with reagents and requires clinical labs to process the kits.
While the kits are becoming available, the lab capacity is not growing.
The leading clinical lab firms, Quest and Labcore have capacity to process 1000 kits per day. For the nation.
Expanding processing capacity takes “time, space, and equipment.” And certification. ie it won’t happen soon.
UCSF and UCBerkeley have donated their research labs to process kits. But each has capacity to process only 20-40 kits per day. And are not clinically certified.
Novel test methods are on the horizon, but not here now and won’t be at any scale to be useful for the present danger.
How well is society preparing for the impact?
Local hospitals are adding capacity as we speak. UCSF’s Parnassus campus has erected “triage tents” in a parking lot. They have converted a ward to “negative pressure” which is needed to contain the virus. They are considering re-opening the shuttered Mt Zion facility.
If COVID-19 affected children then we would be seeing mass departures of families from cities. But thankfully now we know that kids are not affected.
School closures are one the biggest societal impacts. We need to be thoughtful before we close schools, especially elementary schools because of the knock-on effects. If elementary kids are not in school then some hospital staff can’t come to work, which decreases hospital capacity at a time of surging demand for hospital services.
Public Health systems are prepared to deal with short-term outbreaks that last for weeks, like an outbreak of meningitis. They do not have the capacity to sustain for outbreaks that last for months. Other solutions will have to be found.
What will we do to handle behavior changes that can last for months?
Many employees will need to make accommodations for elderly parents and those with underlying conditions and immune-suppressed.
Kids home due to school closures
[Dr. DeRisi had to leave the meeting for a call with the governor’s office. When he returned we asked what the call covered.] The epidemiological models the state is using to track and trigger action. The state is planning at what point they will take certain actions. ie what will trigger an order to cease any gatherings of over 1000 people.
Where do you find reliable news?
The John Hopkins Center for Health Security site. Which posts daily updates. The site says you can sign up to receive a daily newsletter on COVID-19 by email.
The New York Times is good on scientific accuracy.Observations on China
Unlike during SARS, China’s scientists are publishing openly and accurately on COVID-19.
While China’s early reports on incidence were clearly low, that seems to trace to their data management systems being overwhelmed, not to any bad intent.
Wuhan has 4.3 beds per thousand while US has 2.8 beds per thousand. Wuhan built 2 additional hospitals in 2 weeks. Even so, most patients were sent to gymnasiums to sleep on cots.
Early on no one had info on COVID-19. So China reacted in a way unique modern history, except in wartime.
Every few years there seems another: SARS, Ebola, MERS, H1N1, COVID-19. Growing strains of antibiotic resistant bacteria. Are we in the twilight of a century of medicine’s great triumph over infectious disease?
“We’ve been in a back and forth battle against viruses for a million years.”
But it would sure help if every country would shut down their wet markets.
As with many things, the worst impact of COVID-19 will likely be in the countries with the least resources, eg Africa. See article on Wired magazine on sequencing of virus from Cambodia.March 13, 2020 at 11:34 am #112220MackeyserModeratorhttps://www.livescience.com/how-long-coronavirus-last-surfaces.html
A new analysis found that the virus can remain viable in the air for up to 3 hours, on copper for up to 4 hours, on cardboard up to 24 hours and on plastic and stainless steel up to 2 to 3 days.
ON the mortality rate:
I think that mortality rate is really low. The mortality rate of flu is .1% which would put 10x mortality rate at 1%.
As of Feb 27th. US had barely started reporting cases. Latest US 2.7% with massive underreporting of COVID19 cases
China 3.5%
Italy 2.6%
Iran (due to sanctions) 10.6%
Hong Kong 2.1%And considering that where this got out of hand early, in Italy, China and Iran, the mortality rate was respectively 2.6%, 3.5% and 10.6%.
Napkin math. If 70% contract this with a 10.6% mortality rate, the US could see:
329M x .70 x .106 = 24.4M dead…in the US alone.
Thus, the idea that people are scared of 1M deaths grossly underestimates what can happen as we see hospitals doing wartime triage and deciding who lives and dies as they present at overwhelmed ERs and other healthcare/quarantine facilities.
On Wednesday, Mar 11th, in the entire US according to the CDC, 8 COVID-19 tests were done. EIGHT!!!
Overall, we’ve done 7k. TOTAL. South Korea is doing 10k PER DAY.
Thus based on the lack of testing, the lack of coordination with state Depts of Health and Hospital systems I honestly think we’re looking at numbers AT LEAST as bad as China, but more likely Iran… 10.6%
Also, this virus wouldn’t have been handled much better under Obama. During Swine Flu, as I became unfortunately PERSONALLY aware, there was inadequate testing and community spread was rampant. I tested positive for Swine Flu at the VA when the state of Florida had just announced SIX confirmed cases. Moreover, I never heard of my family counted and no cases were reported for my county for weeks.
So while Trump is a disaster on this, Obama/Biden wasn’t much better on a less serious flu variant.
Thus, with less beds per capita, areas of the country with ZERO beds per capita and the complete lack of testing (there are thousands on Twitter alone that have been told they meet ALL of the criteria for COVID testing and they’ve been sent home to self isolate. Thus, the lack of positive tests is more a function of lack of tests than lack of infection.
Folks, I dunno how to overstate this beyond just running down the street screaming, “we’re all gonna die”.
The science is clear and our fractured healthcare system is guaranteed to make this problem so much worse than it is.
Also, to add to this morbid topic… we don’t have the facility to deal with the bodies, even if it is only 1M within a few months.
Oh, sorry… good morning, everyone!
Sports is the crucible of human virtue. The distillate remains are human vice.
March 13, 2020 at 4:53 pm #112227ZooeyModeratorI read that even as more test kits come in, our facilities can run only about 1,000 tests/day anyway.
But since there is nothing much that can be done for patients apart from IVs and comfort care, I’m not sure testing really makes that much difference. I don’t know what can be done except for everyone to stay away from crowds, wash hands all the time, and stop breathing.
I hope RBG is in a bubble tent.
March 13, 2020 at 8:19 pm #112237nittany ramModeratorI read that even as more test kits come in, our facilities can run only about 1,000 tests/day anyway.
But since there is nothing much that can be done for patients apart from IVs and comfort care, I’m not sure testing really makes that much difference. I don’t know what can be done except for everyone to stay away from crowds, wash hands all the time, and stop breathing.
I hope RBG is in a bubble tent.
Not testing from the beginning is where we really dropped the ball. Testing early and often is how you stop an outbreak in its tracks. It allows you to find and contain infected people before the disease gets into the community. Once its in the community, the opportunity to contain it is lost, as zn’s article says.
Gearing up for this outbreak has been a nightmare for my small community hospital. We are not staffed well enough to deal with the logistics of coordinating the billion moving parts involved in this. We send the covid-19 specimens we collect to the VT Dept of Health Lab. I’ve been there for meetings and seminars many times. It is a brand new and modern lab but they are also not staffed to deal with this. Tensions are high. I got in a shouting match with the state’s Public Health Compliance chief over the phone when they decided we could no longer send specimens in the manner they initially requested. There I was with 20 specimens from suspected covid-19 patients that the state lab was telling me they wouldn’t accept. As it turns out, one of those specimens was positive for the covid virus (SARS-COV-2). It was the first positive specimen in VT.
Of course, testing isn’t perfect and a negative result does not ensure the patient isn’t infected. In the beginning when they were trying to determine the best way to test for the virus, the CDC recommended that we collect lower respiratory cultures (sputum or bronchial lavage), upper respiratory specimens (nasopharyngeal swab, oropharyngeal swab, and nasal wash), and a stool and urine specimen in case additional testing was necessary. That’s a lot of specimens to be collecting and testing. As it turns out, the best results come from sputum and the lavage. The problem is, a productive cough isn’t a typical symptom so sputum is often hard to come by, and you can’t collect a lavage (flood the lungs with saline and suck up the contents) easily especially when you are talking about dozens of people a day. So they settled on the nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) swabs and winnowed that down further to just the NP swab. Remember that patient who tested positive? He was tested early on when we were still collecting multiple specimens from all those different sources. We were able to get a sputum from him, so we sent it along with an NP swab, OP swab, and nasal wash to the state lab for testing. The sputum and nasal wash came back positive. The NP and OP swabs were negative. The NP swab is now the specimen of choice, but if that was all that we had sent, we might not know we had a patient with covid-19. Don’t get me wrong, testing is still effective and necessary in dealing with this outbreak, but as I said before, it’s not perfect.
March 13, 2020 at 8:35 pm #112240MackeyserModeratorTesting is crucial. It’s why South Korea is testing so much.
It tells medical professionals how many are actually infected. That lets planners know how based on symptom progression what the future demand will be on the system and gives real data about the infection progression.
It also can give data which could indicate viral mutation or hopefully, the end of the virus’ infection period.
As for the testing capacity, 1k per day is through the CDC which doesn’t allow automated testing.
if they allow automated testing and outsourcing to approved labs, that could easily increase 10 fold or more.
Sports is the crucible of human virtue. The distillate remains are human vice.
March 13, 2020 at 8:50 pm #112243wvParticipantcapitalism and the virus:https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/03/12/i-did-math-katie-porter-gets-trump-cdc-head-commit-making-coronavirus-testing-free?cd-origin=rss&utm_term=AO&utm_campaign=Daily%20Newsletter&utm_content=email&utm_source=Daily%20Newsletter&utm_medium=Email
———
Common Dreams site‘I Did the Math’: Katie Porter Gets Trump CDC Head to Commit to Making Coronavirus Testing Free
“We live in a world where 33% of Americans put off medical treatment last year, and we have $1,133 expense just for testing for the coronavirus.”
by
Eoin Higgins, staff writerDemocratic firebrand Rep. Katie Porter on Thursday extracted a commitment from Centers for Disease Control director Dr. Robert Redfield to use his authority under federal regulations to waive the cost of coronavirus testing for all Americans.
“I did the math,” said Porter, holding up a whiteboard on which she wrote the associated costs to the total $1,331 bill.
“We live in a world where 40% of Americans can’t even afford a $400 unexpected expense,” said Porter. “We live in a world where 33% of Americans put off medical treatment last year, and we have $1,133 expense just for testing for the coronavirus.”
Noting that the prohibitive expense of the test could discourage poorer Americans from getting tested, Porter demanded Redfield use his legal authority under the Code of Federal Regulations to waive the cost.
After a back and forth in which Porter called Redfield’s attempts to avoid committing to covering the cost “not good enough,” the California Democrat finally got Redfield to commit to using his authority under 82 CFR 6975 to waive the costs of testing.
Watch the full exchange:…
Progressives praised the California Democrat’s latest standoff with a Trump administration official and noted that Porter and Redfield’s exchange had real-world, positive consequences for the country.
“Representative Katie Porter just got CDC director Robert Redfield to commit to making coronavirus testing free for anyone regardless of insurance,” tweeted the Atlantic’s James Hamblin. “That’s big.”
Crooked Media’s Priyanka Aribindi simply stated her admiration.
“Katie Porter is fucking phenomenal,” said Aribindi.
March 13, 2020 at 9:03 pm #112246nittany ramModeratorTesting is crucial. It’s why South Korea is testing so much.
It tells medical professionals how many are actually infected. That lets planners know how based on symptom progression what the future demand will be on the system and gives real data about the infection progression.
It also can give data which could indicate viral mutation or hopefully, the end of the virus’ infection period.
As for the testing capacity, 1k per day is through the CDC which doesn’t allow automated testing.
if they allow automated testing and outsourcing to approved labs, that could easily increase 10 fold or more.
The way we are testing doesn’t make sense. Testing every specimen via PCR is overly time-consuming, expensive, and inefficient. Now they are running out of the reagent needed for RNA extraction. Our state lab warned us that testing might slow down as the test materials they need become backordered.
We need a quick and inexpensive EIA screening test that can be performed at every hospital lab. Only specimens that test positive with the screening test would need to be sent to the state lab for confirmatory testing with PCR. This two-tiered approach is similar to the way we test for Lyme disease. Physicians would get their results quicker as the majority of tests would be negative and they would have the results the same day. If the test is positive, the specimen can ship to the state lab the very same day so the PCR turnaround time is no longer than it is now. Actually, it would be much shorter because the state lab would be running fewer specimens.
- This reply was modified 4 years, 9 months ago by nittany ram.
March 13, 2020 at 9:40 pm #112250InvaderRamModeratorhow much do we actually know about this virus? the experts i mean.
mortality rates were originally being reported as high as 3% and now it is being reported to be about 1%.
korea which is doing aggressive testing seems to be reporting around 1% or slightly below (right now it’s at 0.77%). this would seem to be more accurate as they are likely getting the most accurate numbers of how many people are actually being infected. what if the final numbers show that the mortality rate is actually well below 1%?
the reason i ask this is not because we shouldn’t be concerned. we should definitely be concerned and should be finding out as much as we can about this particular strain of coronavirus. however, i feel like the media is being a little irresponsible about how they are reporting on this. it seems to me they are trying to politicize this pandemic, and i’m afraid that it could quite possible backfire on them.
but i could very well be wrong. i’m not an expert on this so if someone could enlighten me.
- This reply was modified 4 years, 9 months ago by InvaderRam.
March 13, 2020 at 9:53 pm #112257wvParticipantThis site is purty good on the basics, Invader. At least thats what I’ve been told. See the actual link. I just cut and pasted a bit of it.
Its ‘mutating’ btw. Two distinct strains as of now, from what i read from a Doc on a message board.link:https://emcrit.org/ibcc/covid19/
basics
COVID-19 is a non-segmented, positive sense RNA virus.
COVID-19 is part of the family of coronaviruses. This contains:
(i) Four coronaviruses which are widely distributed and usually cause the common cold (but can cause viral pneumonia in patients with comorbidities).
(ii) SARS and MERS – these caused epidemics with high mortality which are somewhat similar to COVID-19. COVID-19 is most closely related to SARS.
It binds via the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor located on type II alveolar cells and intestinal epithelia (Hamming 2004).
This is the same receptor as used by SARS (hence the technical name for the COVID-19, “SARS-CoV-2”).
When considering possible therapies, SARS (a.k.a. “SARS-CoV-1”) is the most closely related virus to COVID-19.
COVID-19 is mutating, which may complicate matters even further (figure below). Virulence and transmission will shift over times, in ways which we cannot predict. New evidence suggests that there are roughly two different groups of COVID-19. This explains why initial reports from Wuhan described a higher mortality than some more recent case series (Tang et al. 2020; Xu et al 2020).
(Ongoing phylogenetic mapping of new strains can be found here.)
———–stages of illness ??
There seem to be different stages of illness that patients may move through.
(#1) Replicative stage – Viral replication occurs over a period of several days. An innate immune response occurs, but this response fails to contain the virus. Relatively mild symptoms may occur due to direct viral cytopathic effect and innate immune responses.
(#2) Adaptive immunity stage – An adaptive immune response eventually kicks into gear. This leads to falling titers of virus. However, it may also increase levels of inflammatory cytokines and lead to tissue damage – causing clinical deterioration. There is a suggestion that this could lead to virus-induced hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)(Mehta et al.). More discussion about this entity and possible therapy here.
This progression may explain the clinical phenomenon wherein patients are relatively OK for several days, but then suddenly deteriorate when they enter the adaptive immunity stage (e.g. Young et al. 3/3/2020).
This has potentially important clinical implications:
Initial clinical symptoms aren’t necessarily predictive of future deterioration. Sophisticated strategies may be required to guide risk-stratification and disposition (see below section on prognosis).
Anti-viral therapies might need to be deployed early to work optimally (during the replicative stage).
Immunosuppressive therapy (e.g. low-dose steroid) might be best initiated during the adaptive immune stage (with a goal of blunting this immunopathologic response slightly, in the sickest patients). But this is purely speculative.transmission
(back to contents)
large droplet transmissionCOVID-19 transmission can occur via large droplet transmission (with a risk limited to ~6 feet from the patient)(Carlos del Rio 2/28).
This is typical for respiratory viruses such as influenza.
Transmission via large droplet transmission can be prevented by using a standard surgical-style mask.airborne transmission ??
It’s controversial whether COVID19 can be transmitted via an airborne route (small particles which remain aloft in the air for longer periods of time). Airborne transmission would imply the need for N95 masks (“FFP2” in Europe), rather than surgical masks. This controversy is explored further in Shiu et al 2019.
Airborne precautions started being used with MERS and SARS out of an abundance of caution (rather than any clear evidence that coronaviruses are transmitted via an airborne route). This practice has often been carried down to COVID19.
Guidelines disagree about whether to use airborne precautions:
The Canadian Guidelines and World Health Organization guidelines both recommend using only droplet precautions for routine care of COVID19 patients. However, both of these guidelines recommend airborne precautions for procedures which generate aerosols (e.g. intubation, noninvasive ventilation, CPR, bag-mask ventilation, and bronchoscopy).
The United States CDC recommends using airborne precautions all the time when managing COVID19 patients.
Using airborne precautions for all patients who are definitely or potentially infected with COVID19 will likely result in rapid depletion of N95 masks. This will leave healthcare providers unprotected when they actually need these masks for aerosol-generating procedures.
In the context of a pandemic, the Canadian and WHO guidelines may be more sensible in countries with finite resources (i.e. most locales). However, infection control is ultimately local, so be sure to follow your hospital’s guidance regarding this.contact transmission (“fomite-to-face”)
This mode of transmission has a tendency to get overlooked, but it may be incredibly important. This is how it works:
(i) Someone with coronavirus coughs, emitting large droplets containing the virus. Droplets settle on surfaces in the room, creating a thin film of coronavirus. The virus may be shed in nasal secretions as well, which could be transmitted to the environment.
(ii) The virus persists on fomites in the environment. Human coronaviruses can survive on surfaces for up to about a week (Kampf et al 2020). It’s unknown how long COVID-19 can survive in the environment, but it might be even longer (some animal coronaviruses can survive for weeks!).
(iii) Someone else touches the contaminated the surface hours or days later, transferring the virus to their hands.
(iv) If the hands touch a mucous membrane (eyes, nose, or mouth), this may transmit the infection.
Any effort to limit spread of the virus must block contact transmission. The above chain of events can be disrupted in a variety of ways:
(a) Regular cleaning of environmental surfaces (e.g. using 70% ethanol or 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solutions; for details see Kampf et al 2020 and CDC guidelines).
(b) Hand hygiene (high concentration ethanol neutralizes the virus and is easy to perform, so this might be preferable if hands aren’t visibly soiled)(Kampf 2017).
(c) Avoidance of touching your face. This is nearly impossible, as we unconsciously touch our faces constantly. The main benefit of wearing a surgical mask could be that the mask acts as a physical barrier to prevent touching the mouth or nose.
Any medical equipment could become contaminated with COVID-19 and potentially transfer virus to providers (e.g. stethoscope earpieces and shoes). A recent study found widespread deposition of COVID-19 in one patient’s room, but fortunately this seems to be removable by cleaning with sodium dichloroisocyanurate (Ong et al 2020).when can transmission occur?
(#1) Asymptomatic transmission (in people with no or minimal symptoms) appears to be possible (Carlos del Rio 2/28).
(#2) Transmission appears to occur over roughly ~8 days following the initiation of illness.
Patients may continue to have positive pharyngeal PCR for weeks after convalescence (Lan 2/27). However, virus culture methods are unable to recover viable virus after ~8 days of clinical illness (Wolfel 2020). This implies that prolonged PCR positivity probably doesn’t correlate with clinical virus transmission. However, all subjects in Wolfel et al. had mild illness, so it remains possible that prolonged transmission could occur in more severe cases.
CDC guidance is vague on how long patients with known COVID-19 should be isolated. It may be advisable to obtain two paired RT-PCR tests (one of the nasopharynx and one of the pharynx), with each pair collected >24 hours apart, prior to discontinuing precautions.R⌀
R⌀ is the average number of people that an infected person transmits the virus to.
If R⌀ is <1, the epidemic will burn out.
If R⌀ = 1, then epidemic will continue at a steady pace.
If R⌀ >1, the epidemic will increase exponentially.
Current estimates put R⌀ at ~2.5-2.9 (Peng PWH et al, 2/28). This is a bit higher than seasonal influenza.
R⌀ is a reflection of both the virus and also human behavior. Interventions such as social distancing and improved hygiene will decrease R⌀.
Control of spread of COVID-19 in China proves that R⌀ is a modifiable number that can be reduced by effective public health interventions.
The R⌀ on board the Diamond Princess cruise ship was 15 – illustrating that cramped quarters with inadequate hygiene will increase R⌀ (Rocklov 2/28).March 13, 2020 at 10:09 pm #112258wvParticipantPS, on that link, if u scroll down to the bottom there is a good podcast on the virus, by doctory types:
link:https://emcrit.org/ibcc/covid19/======================
March 13, 2020 at 10:31 pm #112260Billy_TParticipantInvader,
I’ve heard experts say it’s anywhere between 10 times and 40 times worse than regular influenza. The latter kills tens of thousands of Americans per year, and we have vaccines and decades of immunity build-up for that. We have nothing whatsoever on either front for Covid-19.
Seems to me officials and the media would be criminally negligent if they didn’t make a huge deal about this.
Experts have also said we might reach 50% infected rate, or worse. Which means, even at under 1% mortality, more than a million Americans would die.
This is serious, especially for us old fogies with underlying health issues.
March 13, 2020 at 11:01 pm #112264InvaderRamModeratoryeah. definitely the morbidity and mortality rates are significantly higher than the flu.
that can’t be denied. i just wonder if the amount of focus being paid to it is disproportionate to the actual threat it poses.
i know at least one doctor who was relatively unconcerned about it’s threat. maybe he’s changed his tune now. i haven’t talked to him in a couple months.
i just worry that this could do more damage than it necessarily should.
i mean let’s say the mortality rates end up being 0.7%. far less than the 3% that was initially reported. now maybe i’m being paranoid. maybe it doesn’t even matter considering hundreds of thousands of lives possibly millions are at stake.
but what if trump weaponizes this? what if he uses this to mobilize other agendas. agendas that could threaten the existence of this planet? i could see him saying look at the liberal media trying to destroy his maga mission. does he attempt to frame it in a way that diminishes the threat of global warming dismissing it as just another lie from the liberal media trying to destroy him? trust me when i say there are plenty of people watching this questioning the numbers being thrown out there. what are the optics when you get everybody in a frenzy saying mortality rates are north of 3% and they end up being less than 1%? the swine flu in 2009 was similarly touted as a threat to humanity when follow up studies showed it wasn’t any more dangerous than the regular flu. again this is not to say that this coronavirus is the same as the flu.
my point isn’t to diminish the seriousness of this issue. but i feel like it needs to be framed differently. i see the media using it as a way of exposing trump’s flaws. i think it’s a mistake.
am i paranoid? are my thoughts just too far out there? probably.
March 13, 2020 at 11:12 pm #112265InvaderRamModeratorand call me crazy if you want.
cuz i probably am.
but i predicted a long time ago when kroenke bought that piece of land out in inglewood that the rams were moving back to la….
so. there.
March 14, 2020 at 9:08 am #112267znModeratorMarch 15, 2020 at 1:14 am #112317AgamemnonParticipantHow Serious is the Coronavirus? Infectious Disease Expert Michael Osterholm Explains | Joe Rogan
Michael Osterholm is an internationally recognized expert in infectious disease epidemiology. He is Regents Professor, McKnight Presidential Endowed Chair in Public Health, the director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP), Distinguished Teaching Professor in the Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, a professor in the Technological Leadership Institute, College of Science and Engineering, and an adjunct professor in the Medical School, all at the University of Minnesota. Look for his book “Deadliest Enemy: Our War Against Deadly Germs” for more info. https://amzn.to/2IAzeLe
The first video is a beginning of the whole interview. This seemed as good as anything, so watch it and decide it you agree,
March 15, 2020 at 1:31 am #112321znModeratorfrom This coronavirus is unlike anything in our lifetime, and we have to stop comparing it to the flu
Business Insider
https://www.yahoo.com/news/coronavirus-unlike-anything-lifetime-stop-201955346.html
…
Our health care system doesn’t have the capacity to deal with this.
Epidemiological experts keep talking about the need to “flatten the curve.” What they mean by that is that we need to slow the speed at which new cases are reported. We may not be able to stop the spread of the coronavirus, but we have to try to manage it. If 1,000 new cases happen over a month instead of a week, the health care system is more able to handle them.
Here’s why this is a worry: Overall, our hospitals have fewer beds than other developed countries, according to recent data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The United States had 2.8 beds per 1,000 residents. By comparison, Germany had 8 beds and China 4.3 per 1,000.
The United States looks better when it comes to intensive care beds, but there’s tremendous variation between regions and states. If we experience what parts of China and Italy saw, we won’t have anywhere for sick patients to go. We will quickly run out of capacity.
Even if we have the capacity, we may not have enough supplies.
In a crisis moment, supplies like ventilators and N95 face masks will be key. But as National Geographic and other media have reported, the United States has only a fraction of the medical supplies it needs.
“Three hundred million respirators and face masks. That’s what the United States needs as soon as possible to protect health workers against the coronavirus threat. But the nation’s emergency stockpile has less than 15 percent of these supplies,” the magazine reported.
Others have reported shortfalls as well, and ProPublica has been hearing from health care professionals across the country who say their own institutions are running short of supplies. (Share your story here.)
U.S. Surgeon General Jerome Adams tweeted at the end of February, “Seriously people- STOP BUYING MASKS! They are NOT effective in preventing general public from catching #Coronavirus, but if healthcare providers can’t get them to care for sick patients, it puts them and our communities at risk!”
Another challenge: Hospital staff have been exposed too.
And if that weren’t enough, there’s another problem. Health care workers who have been exposed to the virus are now quarantining themselves, further reducing available staff at hospitals. Kaiser Health News reported on the effects of this:
“In Vacaville, California, alone, one case — the first documented instance of community transmission in the U.S. — left more than 200 hospital workers under quarantine and unable to work for weeks.
“Across California, dozens more health care workers have been ordered home because of possible contagion in response to more than 80 confirmed cases as of Sunday afternoon. In Kirkland, Washington, more than a quarter of the city’s fire department was quarantined after exposure to a handful of infected patients at the Life Care Center nursing home.”
This week, Banner Health in Colorado informed employees that a co-worker is among those with the coronavirus, The Colorado Sun reported. “People who came into prolonged, close contact with the woman in a Banner Health emergency room are being notified and asked to home-quarantine for 14 days, according to a source close to the investigation who spoke to The Sun on the condition of anonymity.”
And my ProPublica colleagues reported Friday how some EMS workers are also being quarantined because of exposure. (It didn’t help, of course, that the EMS system was slow to get up to speed on the threat.)
More than that, many health care workers have children and as schools begin to close, they have to figure out how to care for their own families.
People in rural areas will have little care nearby should they be affected by COVID-19.
Rural areas in the U.S. are losing their hospitals entirely, and residents are having to travel hours for care. According to the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 126 rural hospitals have closed since 2010, including six so far this year. That’s about 6%.An analysis by the Chartis Center for Rural Health and iVantage Health Analytics this year found that about a quarter of the nation’s 1,844 open rural hospitalsare vulnerable.
As The Washington Post described it last year, “Hospitals like Fairfax Community [in Oklahoma] treat patients that are on average six years older and 40 percent poorer than those in urban hospitals, which means rural hospitals have suffered disproportionately from government cuts to Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement rates. They also treat a higher percentage of uninsured patients, resulting in unpaid bills and rising debts.
“A record 46 percent of rural hospitals lost money last year. More than 400 are classified by health officials as being at ‘high risk of imminent failure.’ Hundreds more have cut services or turned over control to outside ownership groups in an attempt to stave off closure.”
…
March 15, 2020 at 1:51 am #112322MackeyserModeratorInvader, it is important when comparing numbers to study not just the pathology, but the external factors.
China was initially in denial and engaged in half measures. By the time they really understood, they had to brutally lockdown 60M people and were literally spraying the streets down every night with tanker trucks and literally rounding up symptomatic people (ignoring for now the speculation about what happened to those people, the rumors are pretty out there and may be true, we just don’t know).
But think about this… China, for the first time, shared actual data in real time. The infectious disease community was first surprised and then very, very concerned.
South Korea was VERY proactive, started MASSIVE testing and that has lead to significantly better results.
Italy was at first very lax and ran into the same issues as China, had to quarantine a whole section of the country and they have ERs where they are literally performing battle field triage. In this case, old people who present are simply not treated and allowed to die. These reports have been confirmed by multiple accounts. When ERs get overrun, it’s all they can do.
Iran has such a high rate because they cannot even get masks due to the economic sanctions.
So, where are we? We’ve performed by far the least testing per capita among major countries and among industrialized nations in the entire world. We have 50+ depts of health for states and territories, all governed in part by political appointees, so the reactions have ranged as you would expect. However, there are NO places where one can just go to get tested even if you have confirmed symptoms and can trace the infection to a direct cause (travel abroad) or contact with that person. If anything, testing has almost ground to a halt based on the CDC’s numbers.
Moreover, unlike everywhere else in the world except maybe the UK, a large number of young people are gathering I guess to spite the situation. The problem is that the numbers from South Korea show that 30% of those mass tested were in that 18-29 age bracket. The reason Italy’s numbers skew so much older is that they ONLY test those who are already symptomatic suggesting that young people may be able to spread this prior to them becoming noticeably symptomatic.
This is yet another vector for community spread which could make this so much worse.
Listen, I’m in that highest bracket as I’ve got a compromised immune system (Crohn’s in remission), I have asthma AND I’ve had multiple bouts of pneumonia including two that were nearly fatal, one of which it was divine providence that it didn’t as I should have been dead by rights.
I would really love if this was all hype and media bullshit, but the science doesn’t bear that out.
even best case scenario of 40% spread and 0.7% morbidity rate, that’s 329M x .4 x 0.007 = 921k
Think about that. The BEST case scenario which ignores how badly we’re fucking this up mean nearly a MILLION dead.
That’s nearly as many soldiers that have died in every US war…EVER. All within a period of a few months. And if it mutates like the Spanish Flu did (there is already an S and L variant…the S being the ancestor and the L being a newer, more damaging strain), then we’re looking at multiple rounds of this.
I still think that most people just can’t wrap their heads around this, but once they do… it seems we need to see hospitals overwhelmed to believe how bad it is gonna be.
I mean think about it. China basically shut down their manufacturing exports for MONTHS for this. Think how serious it would need to be for them to do that…
Sports is the crucible of human virtue. The distillate remains are human vice.
March 15, 2020 at 10:31 am #112329znModeratorWow
This man is the global authority on the spread of disease. If you are a leader (in any capacity) watch this. If you are not, watch it too. pic.twitter.com/bFogaekehM
— Jim Richards Sh🎙wgram (@JIMrichards1010) March 15, 2020
March 15, 2020 at 12:57 pm #112359InvaderRamModeratorI would really love if this was all hype and media bullshit, but the science doesn’t bear that out.
i’m just willing to wait it out until we know more.
that’s not to say the approach has been all wrong.
i agree with the cancellation of mass gatherings.
and we do need to do more testing.
and i’m keeping an eye on how the new vaccination trial is going.
but the science is changing every week.
i do still worry about the negative impacts this pandemic could cause beyond just the disease itself.
March 15, 2020 at 1:30 pm #112363InvaderRamModeratoranother question i have is will this change our approach to how we treat our food?
this is just going to be a bigger and bigger problem as we go forward.
cuz even if we can get this one under control. the next one is right around the corner.
March 15, 2020 at 1:52 pm #112365znModeratorMarch 15, 2020 at 2:00 pm #112366znModeratori’m just willing to wait it out until we know more.
We know a lot.
You just have to find it and read it.
Look at my sticky above, if you read anything about the virus. That links to 2 articles in a thread here. One is about what happened in Italy because they did not stay ahead of this. The other is how much it took for Hong Kong, Singapore, and Taiwan to contain it.
It;s instructive reading those 2 things.
It got out of control in Italy. It’s instructive to learn why they let it get out of control, and it’s instructive to see what the results of that were.
They contained it in the 3 Asian places mentioned. It’s instructive to learn how much it took to do that.
I would honestly say that if anyone has not read those 2 pieces yet all the way through, then, they don’t really know this situation.
….,
March 15, 2020 at 2:24 pm #112367InvaderRamModeratorWe know a lot.
i’ve read it. we know a lot about other cases.
and we can project. we don’t know about this particular strain. again we can project. and make very educated guesses. there’s a range that we can work within. that’s it.
and thanks ag for that video. that was informative.
we’ll just have to see.
March 15, 2020 at 2:50 pm #112368InvaderRamModeratorok. i re-read your post. i’m not trying to say we don’t know anything about it. and yes. we can learn what to do and what not to do from how other countries have responded to it. yeah. for sure. we still have yet to see what kind of impact it will have on this country.
and i’m not saying we shouldn’t be overprepared. like i said in my previous post. testing is important. instructing people to stay at home is important. limited contact in public places. yes. that’s important.
but again. we have people saying wash your hands. and then the video ag posted. the expert says handwashing is important for disease prevention but will do little to prevent the spread of THIS particular disease.
then you have people buying up surgical masks. n95 masks. taking this supply from people who actually need it. every single health expert agrees that masks are not helpful in preventing the spread of this disease UNLESS you are infected yourself in which case you should wear the mask to prevent transmitting it to other people. the buying up of these masks is actually doing more harm than good.
telling people that this is harmless and not to worry is irresponsible. at the same time sending people into a panic is not responsible either.
March 15, 2020 at 6:12 pm #112378nittany ramModeratorCoronaviruses have a variety of animal reseviours. The first SARS was hosted in civits and racoon dogs. For MERS it was camels. The novel coronavirus is found in bats and pangolins. Practically all birds and mammals will host some variety of coronavirus.
Coronaviruses are RNA viruses. Unlike DNA viruses (ex. Herpes) RNA viruses are prone to mutations because they lack the biochemical machinery necessary to fix replication errors. Most of the errors are lethal or have a negative or neutral impact on the virus. However, every so often, a mutation confers some advantage on the virus, such as the ability to infect a new host. As the COVID-19 virus spreads around the globe, it’s very possible a mutation will allow it to acquire new animal hosts.
Viruses that have only a single host can be eradicated because they have no place to hide. Small pox is an example. Develop a vaccine and you’re good to go. However, it’s nearly impossible to eradicate a virus that can jump back and forth between humans and other animals because it can re-emerge later on as a new and improved version of itself. Herd immunity and vaccines might still effectively control the virus but they will never eliminate it completely, and the potential for new outbreaks will always exist. It will be interesting to see if the novel coronavirus can acquire some new animal hosts as it moves around the world. There might be some species of bats in the US that it could infect right now without mutating at all.
March 15, 2020 at 7:13 pm #112379wvParticipantDo we have any logic-based-guesses on when the Virus is really gonna get going in the USA ? How soon before it gets rolling? Do we know?
w
vMarch 15, 2020 at 8:08 pm #112382InvaderRamModeratorthis is a cnn interview with the same guy rogan interviewed above.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/10/opinions/osterholm-coronavirus-interview-bergen/index.html
March 15, 2020 at 8:12 pm #112384nittany ramModeratorDo we have any logic-based-guesses on when the Virus is really gonna get going in the USA ? How soon before it gets rolling? Do we know?
w
vIt’s hard to get good estimates because we aren’t doing enough testing. It could be rolling right now. We could be a couple weeks away from the peak. It’s hard to say. This disease has an estimated R0 of about 2.5 to 3.2, meaning one person with the disease infects between 2.5 and 3.2 others. Compare that with the seasonal flu which has an R0 of between 1 and 2. That means when COVID-19 begins rolling, it could really roll.
Btw, we now have 3 positive patients in our small community hospital. That’s 3 positives in about 80 tests which doesn’t sound terrible, but 2 of those positives were in the last 10 tests. Shit might be about to get real.
- This reply was modified 4 years, 9 months ago by nittany ram.
March 15, 2020 at 8:12 pm #112385InvaderRamModeratorDo we have any logic-based-guesses on when the Virus is really gonna get going in the USA ? How soon before it gets rolling? Do we know?
my understanding is that it’s about… now.
March 17, 2020 at 4:46 am #112441znModeratorDr. Rob Davidson@DrRobDavidson
As an ER doc trying to treat patients who may have COVID-19, I can’t underscore enough how much harder the lack of testing is making our job. Yes we’re used to making life-or-death decisions with limited information, daily. But this scenario is very different. Here’s why: (1/12)For us data is everything. Board Certified Emergency Physicians (ER docs) are trained in pattern recognition & rely on research to know when the preponderance of evidence directs us toward one or another path of treatment that could significantly help or harm our patients. (2/12)
With COVID-19, we doctors have very little evidence-based data on the basic science of transmissibility, incubation period or even what measures would be taken to protect patients (& providers). Our best evidence? What has occurred in China, South Korea & Italy thus far… (3/12)
But the difference with these other countries with COVID-19 is that at the earliest point possible, a huge testing regime was used to determine the extent of the virus in the hospitalized “very sick” population & the “walking well” less-sick population. We don’t have that. (4/12)
Because this novel #coronavirus causes such minimal symptoms in so many young people (including children) — as well as in older people at the onset of disease — we’re not able to determine cases based on symptoms. This is how we managed the SARS outbreak of 2002-2003. (5/12)
SARS had a case-fatality rate of 10%, but the ability to ID cases early & isolate them significantly, limited its spread and kept fatalities relatively low. By contrast, COVID-19 cases are difficult to ID early above the background level of other respiratory viruses. (6/12)
During the H1N1 influenza pandemic of 2009, the case-fatality rate was 0.1%, slightly higher than seasonal flu. That’s also ~50% less contagious than COVID-19. The point? With a highly contagious virus that’s difficult to diagnose clinically, early testing is critical. (7/12)
Here’s the kicker: WHO had a test that worked, but it was rejected by the U.S. in January. Then, initial attempts to make our own test failed. As a result, as an ER doc I can’t get most patients tested. And it’s now known that the virus has been here for several weeks. (8/12)
To get a patient tested, they have to have traveled to certain countries, had direct contact with a COVID19+ patient, or be ill enough to be hospitalized & have no other diagnosis. There’s no way around it: Tests are being rationed due to the Administration’s mismanagement.(9/12)
Right now we’re not truly defining the extent of the virus in communities. Short of a complete lockdown,we’re dependent on everyone exercising caution when they have even minor symptoms, to avoid infecting those most at risk of dying (elderly & those with chronic disease).(10/12)
The only path forward is a massive testing regime ID’ing relatively healthy individuals who are infected.Only then can containment stop the spread in communities. And perhaps the more “walking well” positives we get, the more we can convince people that the threat is real.(11/12)
To be blunt: Our ability to fight this virus has been seriously hurt by right-wing pundits & the President, who convinced people it’s “just a cold” and will go away “like that.” For us ER docs to do our job, those comments need to stop. And massive testing needs to start. /END.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.