Noteboom

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #95965
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #96058
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    The buzz around from “coach’s 22” watchers is that if you look at what NB did against SF, he holds up and projects as an NFL starting LOT. The one knock is that he’s not that aggressive. The lack of nastiness or aggression doesn’t bother me though—you can do worse than have a technician at LOT.

    Landing a good starting LOT in round 3 puts the Rams way ahead. The numbers on that working are very slim. But it seems to have worked.

    Kromer has a nice history with LOTs. He inherited Bushrod (a 4th rounder) in N.O. who took over at LOT in 2009 and played well every year AK was there. He inherited Glenn in Buffalo who also did well for him, including what might be his best year at LOT (2015).

    Like everyone else, OL coaches have their strengths and weaknesses. Hanifan could coach em but couldn’t pick em (except for Pace who was a no-brainer). Boudreau did better with veterans and re-treads and cast-offs, guys who had been around. He couldn’t pick em either.

    I think Kromer can pick em AND coach em, and unlike Boudreau, AK has shown over the years that he can coach up both vets and rookies.

    As long as I am on Kromer…..

    And he has always had good guards. Incognito had by far his best years in Buffalo under Kromer. He also had a rookie on his line in Buffalo who did pretty well. Jahri Evans was always pretty good but under Kromer he was just exceptional. Carl Nicks was great under Kromer with the Saints, then left for Tampa and disappeared. Matt Slauson had his best year by far under Kromer in 2013 (before getting hurt the next year). Many say this is Saffold’s best year. Blythe came out of nowhere.

    #96081
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    who was noteboom going up against primarily?

    i think one game is too early to tell.

    we won’t really know until he’s consistently starting games.

    but i like his measurables. he’s athletic. he’s long.

    i’d rather have athletic and long than physical and nasty at left tackle.

    #96083
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    He is a wait and see guy. What these Offense needs is bigger guards. No way can keep Austin Blythe. He is way too small to be on the OLine. This OLine needs to get bigger inside. Blythe to me just plain sux. Sure, look good against the Cardinals and 9ers, but they are really bad football teams, but against better teams, he got manhandled, ala Chicago and Philly, playing RG.

    #96117
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    He is a wait and see guy. What these Offense needs is bigger guards. No way can keep Austin Blythe. He is way too small to be on the OLine. This OLine needs to get bigger inside. Blythe to me just plain sux. Sure, look good against the Cardinals and 9ers, but they are really bad football teams, but against better teams, he got manhandled, ala Chicago and Philly, playing RG.

    I dunno Jack, I think that this is a zone concept offense and that a smaller more athletic guard fits it. Like the old Alex Gibbs OLs in Denver back when they were the kings of zone running.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.