Nick Foles 2013-14 Highlightts

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle Nick Foles 2013-14 Highlightts

Viewing 18 posts - 1 through 18 (of 18 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #20153
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    #20181
    rfl
    Participant

    Interesting.

    OK. It’s a highlight reel. Still, it ain’t a bad one. My quick observations:

    * He’s pretty mobile.
    * He throws really well on the run.
    * He seems to be sharp in the red zone.
    * I don’t see–in these highlights at least–problems with executing under pressure.

    He moves well in the pocket. Keeps plays alive. And makes throws on the run in a way somewhat reminiscent of R W. There are some shots of him standing in and making tough throws while getting hit.

    Well, it is a highlight reel. And there are probably lots of low-lights where he doesn’t do as well under pressure.

    Still, he’s better than the 3 schlubs we’ve run out there the 2.6 years. By a good distance.

    And in the end, it comes down to a single question. We all know Sam is a really good QB. But can his knees be trusted?

    If you don’t trust them–and I don’t–then this is a pretty damn good move to get decent QB play AND a bunch of cap room to build the roster.

    This isn’t our year yet. But this seems to me a fine step in building toward Year 1 in Pasadena.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    #20191
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Well, it is a highlight reel. And there are probably lots of low-lights where he doesn’t do as well under pressure.

    Still, he’s better than the 3 schlubs we’ve run out there the 2.6 years. By a good distance.

    I agree with point #2. That’s pretty clear.

    But I also see issues, even though these are highlights. That is, you combine a slow-ish release with a tendency to hold the ball.

    According to Cosell that’s a flaw–he holds the ball and when he does, he loses his mechanics.

    There’s a lot to still understand about his 2014 season. Here are some of the differences.

    TD% inside the 10
    2013: 47.6%
    2014: 18%

    Accuracy on long passes, 31+ yards:
    2013: 47.8%
    2014: 19%

    TD%
    2013: 8.5%
    2014: 4.1%

    INT%
    2013: 0.6%
    2014: 3.2%

    QB rating:
    2013: 119.2
    2014: 81.4

    #20192
    Winnbrad
    Participant

    Agree with RFL. Foles can move. I’m not sure where people are getting the “no mobility” stuff from.

    His pocket presence seems fine to me. Better than Bradford. I especially like the way Foles steps up in the pocket with very little hesitation. Keeps his eyes down-field while he does it, too. I know it’s a highlight reel, but still, I see some traits that look good.

    I can see him doing well in the Fisher offense. And he costs less than $2 million.

    #20194
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    By the looks of things Foles must be used to poor pass protection. He rarely had a clean pocket to throw from in that video. He seems pretty good at extending plays and has good pocket awareness. I did see his mechanics breakdown when defenders were around him but in those instances he didn’t have room to step into his throws. He made a coupla’ bad decisions while throwing off his back foot that worked out which is why they are on a highlight reel but I would prefer he not try that with the Rams. He’s also a lot more mobile than I thought.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by Avatar photonittany ram.
    #20199
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    By the looks of things Foles must be used to poor pass protection. He rarely had a clean pocket to throw from in that video.

    I say, look again. s

    The Eagles have one of the 2-3 best OLs in the league, and their sack percentage is low.

    If you watch the plays again, it’s not that protection breaks down, it’s that Foles holds the ball. He takes too long to get plays off and has a slowish release on top of it.

    Cosell made that point about him:

    http://theramshuddle.com/topic/segment-6-howard-balzer-3-11-15/#post-20187

    The key with Nick Foles is you have to define things for him. The longer he stays in the pocket, the worse he is and his arm strength declines…because he tends to throw off balance. So things need to be defined for him so the ball comes out.

    #20201
    Winnbrad
    Participant

    I say, look again.

    The Eagles have one of the 2-3 best OLs in the league, and their sack percentage is low.

    If you watch the plays again, it’s not that protection breaks down, it’s that Foles holds the ball. He takes too long to get plays off and has a slowish release on top of it.

    Cosell made that point about him:

    The key with Nick Foles is you have to define things for him. The longer he stays in the pocket, the worse he is and his arm strength declines…because he tends to throw off balance. So things need to be defined for him so the ball comes out.

    Hopefully, the Rams coaches see the same thing.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by Winnbrad.
    • This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by Winnbrad.
    #20202
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    This will sound odd but you know who he reminds me of?
    His stature, clunkiness, slowness, strength, mannerisms, etc === Roman Gabriel.

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    #20207
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I say, look again. s

    The Eagles have one of the 2-3 best OLs in the league, and their sack percentage is low.

    If you watch the plays again, it’s not that protection breaks down, it’s that Foles holds the ball. He takes too long to get plays off and has a slowish release on top of it.

    Well, I’m not saying you’re wrong. I did see him hold the ball on some plays but it’s hard to know why he was holding the ball. Maybe no one was open so he was trying to extend the play. Watch the highlites against the Vikings again though. He did not get good protection in that game but he was able to feel the pressure and buy time with his legs. I did see him throw off his back foot which I didn’t like.

    #20210
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Well, I’m not saying you’re wrong. I did see him hold the ball on some plays but it’s hard to know why he was holding the ball. Maybe no one was open so he was trying to extend the play. Watch the highlites against the Vikings again though. He did not get good protection in that game but he was able to feel the pressure and buy time with his legs. I did see him throw off his back foot which I didn’t like.

    If you look at numbers…he is one of the worst in the league at getting rid of the ball. He has a high percentage both years of taking over 2.6 seconds to throw. Meaning, he ranks poorly v. everyone else both years.

    That isn’t because receivers aren’t open, I submit, it’s because he’s not confident making tight laser throws to tight windows. He waits for something more.

    He is much, much better as a qb when he just throws it quick (under 2.5 seconds). In fact when he does that, he is one of the top qbs in terms of completion percentage.

    When I watched those highlights, I saw a guy who was slow to throw it. It worked in what we watched because those are highlights. BUT if you look at his completion percentage when he holds the ball, it’s actually bad.

    Passes over 2.6 seconds, percentage of attempts
    2013: 61.5% (5th most in the league)
    2014: 51% (5th most in the league)

    Passing after 2.6 seconds or more, completion percentage
    2013: 55.9% (15th in the league)
    2014: 46.4% (38th in the league)

    Passing under 2.5 seconds, completion percentage
    2013: 74.6% (3rd in the league)
    2014: 73.4% (6th in the league)

    #20211
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    When I watched those highlights, I saw a guy who was slow to throw it. It worked in what we watched because those are highlights. BUT if you look at his completion percentage when he holds the ball, it’s actually bad.

    So is that a coachable thing?

    w
    v

    #20212
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    So is that a coachable thing?

    w
    v

    I listened to Cosell on it. From what I gathered? You have to coach him to get rid of the ball. You can’t improve his “release quickness” and you can’t improve his arm. You coach him to unload the ball and not take time on plays.

    That was Cosell’s view.

    He’s good when he unloads the ball.

    Cosell didn’t say THIS but he’s good at play action.

    So IMO that makes him a fit.

    #20228
    Avatar photojoemad
    Participant

    I agree with point #2. That’s pretty clear.

    But I also see issues, even though these are highlights. That is, you combine a slow-ish release with a tendency to hold the ball.

    According to Cosell that’s a flaw–he holds the ball and when he does, he loses his mechanics.

    There’s a lot to still understand about his 2014 season. Here are some of the differences.

    TD% inside the 10
    2013: 47.6%
    2014: 18%

    Accuracy on long passes, 31+ yards:
    2013: 47.8%
    2014: 19%

    TD%
    2013: 8.5%
    2014: 4.1%

    INT%
    2013: 0.6%
    2014: 3.2%

    QB rating:
    2013: 119.2
    2014: 81.4

    only 1 year, but damn, not a good trend…… I saw him twice last (vs Rams and vs SF) I remember the Ram game being impressed with Foles in the 1st half, but not the 2nd half…..

    I also respect Cosell’s reports on QBs, and his summary seemed to reflect the data on Foles….

    good thing his name is Foles and not Fodes… fodes means fucked in Portuguese……

    #20251
    rfl
    Participant

    We’re all looking for tell-tails to try to get a sense of things.

    I think we could all agree that the indicators are mixed. There are signs both ways.

    And we have to remember that individual indicators can have both positive and negative sides as well. ZN quotes Cosell on NF holding onto the ball. That can be a positive as well as a negative. Someone makes a comparison to Roman Gabriel (!). Damn, I loved it when he would stand in like an oak tree. I know ZN is talking about stats when throwing slowly. But I just think this isolated issue can be over-blown. SO can all the others–positive and negative.

    I think we all recognize that this is not Tom Brady II. But, he has genuine virtues as a starter. Including mobility and, apparently, a knack for late, clutch drives. (Sam was good then, too.)

    I see him as a positive set of possibilities likely to raise our QB ceiling from where it has been the last 2 years. And as a transition to the future.

    And who knows? Maybe he’ll be more than that. Not all champion QBs can pass the scouting critique for perfect form. Ugly can often get it done.

    Get the OL fixed and we should be OK. That’s where my worries are.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    #20269
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    But, he has genuine virtues as a starter. Including mobility and, apparently, a knack for late, clutch drives. (Sam was good then, too.)

    It is true that for me anyway clutch drives count a lot. I would rather have an awkward up and down qb who comes through in the clutch than a smoothee who comes up short in the clutch.

    Though one of the key points Cosell made is that he IS excellent as a ball control passing game when he does throw on rhythm and get the ball out, and that coaching should stress that.

    Anyway, clutchness. It;s actually what finally sold me on Bradford. In terms of that, here’s an imperfect but interesting stat—-percentage of comeback wins/game winning drives. That is, percentage of total starts that are won in a 4th quarter comeback.

    It’s imperfect because the REAL stat is percentage of wins in comeback situations. That is, how many does he lose, how many does he win. But no one keeps that stat. So this is as close as we get.

    Foles, counting just 2013/14. 20 starts, 4 comebacks/gwd. 20%. Which isn’t too bad. Notably, 3 of them were in 2013, when their games were closer…partly due to qb play. 2 were close games against Washington and the Colts. What that suggests to me is that he has a short memory and can get up off the mat and deliver when the game counts. If THAT is true, and we see that in Rams games, then, I will be sold.

    Some CW/GWD comparisons. Last 2 years only. A few qbs chosen at random.

    Brady: 9 of 32 starts, 28%.
    Rodgers: 3 of 25 starts, 12%
    Luck: 5 of 32 starts, 15.6%
    Wilson: 10 of 32 starts, 31.2%
    Romo: 6 of 30 starts, 20%

    #20311
    Herzog
    Participant

    I like the pocket presence and the play action. He’s the guy to steer the ship….. A ship with a good defense and a good running game.

    If either of those things don’t happen for the Rams, then Foles likely won’t elevate them. If all these things do happen, than I don’t see why he can’t take us to the promised land.

    I’m getting real worried about the o line though. I’m tired of “building” an online. We have to have something respectable.

    #20417
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    So Foles is wearing Dieter Brock’s old number I see.

    Hopefully he can play the stink off it.

    #20735
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    How is Ramben, doing?

    You think the Rams have
    finally turned the corner?
    Is Year Four, the playoff year?

    w
    v

Viewing 18 posts - 1 through 18 (of 18 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.