NFL will 'sweeten the pot' to keep the Rams in St. Louis

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle NFL will 'sweeten the pot' to keep the Rams in St. Louis

Viewing 21 posts - 31 through 51 (of 51 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #18941
    Dak
    Participant

    From what Joe posted, and what I heard elsewhere, there seems to be environmental issues and legal hoops to go through to make the Carson site viable.

    Seems to me that San Diego and Oakland are using this strategy to force talks from their local leaders about a new stadium lease. So, just seems to me that the Chargers’ and Raiders’ owners are looking for a way to stay and make more money, while SK is looking for a way to leave and make more money.

    I go back to my original feeling that the Rams are headed out of STL to L.A.

    #18948
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i don’t know. i think st louis’ chances have improved. definitely improved. not sure by how much.

    i do think spanos is kind of dumb the way he’s playing this though. it could bite him in the ass.

    should be an interesting next couple of years.

    #19027
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I dont understand the bolded sentence, but there it is.
    I mean, how can five voters ‘sidestep’ all that environmental stuff?

    w
    v

    ================
    http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/nfl/story/_/id/12378821/inglewood-city-council-oks-fast-tracking-st-louis-rams-backed-nfl-stadium

    INGLEWOOD, Calif. — The Inglewood City Council late Tuesday night approved plans to build a football stadium that includes St. Louis Rams owner Stan Kroenke as a partner, clearing a path for a return to the Los Angeles area of the NFL for the first time in two decades.

    The council approved the $2 billion plan with a 5-0 vote after a meeting with several hours of public comment and many vocal Rams fans wearing jerseys in attendance.

    The vote adopts a new redevelopment plan without calling a public vote, effectively kickstarting construction and sidestepping lengthy environmental review of issues such as noise, traffic and air pollution.

    It adds the 80,000 seat, 60-acre stadium to an existing 2009 plan to redevelop the former Hollywood Park racetrack site with homes, offices, stores, parks and open space and a hotel.

    Kroenke is part of the Hollywood Park Land Co. development group that is promoting the project.

    New urgency came to the issue last week with the announcement that the Oakland Raiders and the San Diego Chargers are planning a shared stadium in suburban Carson if they don’t get their current hometowns to cough up enough money to replace their aging stadiums. Another stadium plan remains alive for downtown Los Angeles, but has no team attached.

    Stadium proponents said it is important to approve the concept as soon as possible to avoid delays in the redevelopment that already is underway. They would like construction to start by year’s end to have a venue ready for the 2018 football season.

    A Feb. 20 consultants’ report to the city manager backing the stadium notes that the developer, not the public, would pay the cost of building the stadium and says the plan would allow the city — once home to the Los Angeles Lakers and Los Angeles Kings before they moved to Los Angeles — “to continue its legacy of providing the region with world-class sports and entertainment.”

    The consultants also conclude that no new environmental impact reports — which are costly and often take months or even years — would be necessary.

    The review also said the stadium would bring the city more than 10,000 jobs and tens of millions of dollars a year in new tax revenue.

    #19029
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    #19054
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i was thinking the same thing. how can you just bypass all those regulations?

    how long does it take to build a stadium anyway? i bet kroenke makes one in record time.

    #19055
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    i was thinking the same thing. how can you just bypass all those regulations?

    how long does it take to build a stadium anyway? i bet kroenke makes one in record time.

    Plus it will run on a perpetual motion engine.

    That’s a sly movie reference……..

    #19057
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    http://deadspin.com/inglewood-decides-not-to-let-public-vote-on-rams-stadiu-1687940403

    oh so you just donate money to the campaign funds of the mayor and councilmembers…

    perpetual motion machine. why does that sound familiar?

    #19058
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    perpetual motion machine. why does that sound familiar?

    m

    #19059
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Any opponents of the Inglewood plan, dubbed the City of Champions Revitalization Project, now have 30 days to file a referendum to force a public vote.

    Per LA Times

    #19061
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Any opponents of the Inglewood plan, dubbed the City of Champions Revitalization Project, now have 30 days to file a referendum to force a public vote.

    Per LA Times

    Ok, that sounds more democratic.

    I assume Spanos will pay someone
    20 dollars to “file a referendum.”

    I was just griping to someone today
    about California. It seems like yall
    get to vote on things out there.
    Referendums on this and that.
    We dont get to have ref-erendums in WV.

    I’d like to start a referendum about
    giving us the right to have referendums.

    w
    v

    #19069
    Avatar photojoemad
    Participant

    yep, Charger, Raider or STL fan will pony up $20 to file the referendum…….

    but I think the Inglewood Council Members will be getting free Ram tickets someday.

    BTW, I too got the Survey from the STL Rams for the open air stadium in STL…. I used a Jefferson City Zip Code when I gave them my feedback, which basically said that STL is a baseball town….Stan Kroenke was named after Enos Slaughter, NOT Conrad Dobler….

    #19072
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    ========================================
    Laram

    This was sent to me by someone in my office. Sorry Admins no link.

    ——————

    http://www.pe.com/articles/repeating-754888-san-diego.html

    RAMS: History is repeating itself

    Rams equipment manager Todd Hewitt (right) and assistant Jim Lake pack up the team’s equipment in early 1995 for the move from Anaheim to St. Louis.

    Published: Nov. 23, 2014 Updated: Nov. 25, 2014 12:16 a.m.
    SAN DIEGO — Small crowds. Struggles on the field. And rumors, almost daily, about the home team’s future destination.
    Hey, St. Louis? We’ve been there.

    What that Missouri city is experiencing now, as rumors of the Rams’ relocation (re-relocation?) to Los Angeles, continue, is exactly what the team’s Southern California fan base experienced in 1993 and ’94, during the last stages of the team’s 49-year tenure in Los Angeles/Anaheim.

    Really, the seeds of SoCal’s loss of the Rams began more than a decade before the deed was actually done. When Carroll Rosenbloom decided to move the team from the Coliseum to Anaheim Stadium, effective with the 1980 season, the deal included the rights to develop part of the Big A’s parking lot—a deal that drew protests from the Autrys, owners of the Angels. (Arte Moreno may appreciate the irony.)

    That development never took place, and ultimately—when the city of Anaheim built what is now Honda Center and lured an NHL expansion team (now the Ducks)—the Rams leveraged it into an escape clause that would allow them to break their lease with 15 months notice and a $30 million reimbursement to the city of Anaheim, the unpaid debt involved with the expansion of the stadium for football.

    By this time, Georgia Frontiere was in charge. She’d inherited the team from her late husband, Rosenbloom (and subsequently remarried). And I will forever remain convinced that Georgia and her henchman, John Shaw, intentionally degraded the product on the field to facilitate a move.

    By the time This Space took over the P-E Rams beat from the esteemed Matt Jocks in 1993, the team was coming off two losing seasons, after a decade in which the Rams won or contended for division titles and drew strong crowds to the Big A (even with the Raiders carving up the market after their move to the Coliseum in 1982).

    Chuck Knox was the coach, in his dotage as an NFL coach. The quarterback, Jim Everett, was on the descent. The cornerback, Darryl Henley, was about to be indicted for his part (along with a Rams cheerleader) in a cocaine distribution ring. Jerome Bettis was a rookie, future Hall of Famer Jackie Slater was injured, and most of the rest of the roster was a sea of mediocrity.

    It was in this environment that, in the middle of the 1993 season, the rumors began. Before a November 1 game in San Francisco, CBS’ NFL pregame show reported that the Rams had been in contact with Baltimore, which was hedging its bets if it had lost out in expansion (which it ultimately did, with Jacksonville being picked to enter the league with Charlotte).

    That brought the bizarre scene of Shaw, the team’s executive vice president, addressing beat writers on a concourse outside the locker room tunnel in Candlestick Park, denying the rumors.

    “That is totally true, 100 percent untrue,” Shaw said. “There’s been so many rumors about the sale of this team, the movement of this team in the last 15 years, that really nothing surprises me … (A Baltimore writer) asked me if we had a lease we could get out of. I think we answered that, ‘Yes, for a lot of money.’ ”

    Not that much, as it turned out. And a little over a month later, Shaw confirmed that, indeed, the Rams had been contacted by representatives from not only Baltimore but St. Louis and Memphis.

    “We have not asked (Anaheim) for anything,” Shaw said then. ” . . . I don’t want to give the impression that we’re negotiating lease concessions or anything like that with the city, because we’re not.

    “We’re just going to have to make a decision at some time as to whether this situation here, even if it was modified or changed, would be such that we could ever be competitive.”

    Ominous words, reinforced later that month when Frontiere told the Los Angeles Times that a move was “something that you have to consider. It’s just a fact of life. People do look at other possibilities in life.”

    (Then again, the Rams management in those days was positively chatty compared with the current version. Owner Stan Kroenke, whose purchase of 60 acres near Hollywood Park and reported negotiations for 300 additional acres have spurred the latest Rams-to-L.A. rumors, has been equally ominous in his silence.)

    Going into the 1994 season, it was pretty much assumed that the moving vans were assembling. The team finished 4-12, and average attendance was 42,312, “the remnants of a fan base alienated beyond repair,” I wrote in a 2004 reminiscence of the final year.

    A curious confluence: During that 1994 season, the Los Angeles Rams played (and won) a game in Kansas City Sept. 25, and members of the St. Louis media crossed the state to eyeball the city’s potential next NFL team.

    Flash forward to 2014. The Rams and Chargers play in San Diego this afternoon, and a check of the Qualcomm Stadium parking lot before the game showed a lot – a LOT – of fans wearing Rams gear. And maybe 35 to 40 percent of it was in the team’s current navy blue and old gold colors. The vast majority? The royal blue and yellow colors the team wore in Los Angeles and Anaheim.

    One fan behind the Rams bench during warmups held a sign: “Come Home Rams (to) L.A.” Another draped a “Los Angeles Rams” banner over the railing momentarily.

    At least one Rams booster club is here in force, holding a tailgate in Lot P3 (the word having been spread by the “Bring Back The Los Angeles Rams” page on facebook.

    Yes, St. Louis, we feel your pain. Sort of. Just not enough to lift a finger to stop the repossession.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    #19080
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    m

    ah yes. that was a cool movie.

    #19081
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    forgive my ignorance but how does one file a referendum?

    do you need a specified number of people to file or can just one person file?

    #19084
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I was just griping to someone today
    about California. It seems like yall
    get to vote on things out there.
    Referendums on this and that.
    We dont get to have ref-erendums in WV.

    I’d like to start a referendum about
    giving us the right to have referendums.

    w
    v

    Really?

    Be careful what you wish for.

    We started ballot propositions in California in the late 70s, so that we could pass bills that them damn politicians won’t or can’t. Great idea.

    Now we get Safe Drinking Water initiatives that are backed by astroturf “citizens groups” that get their money from Monsanto, and propositions to reform education financing, only there will suddenly be 3 propositions on the same ballot that all claim to do great things for education reform, all with poison pills that will have to be litigated, and backed by carefully concealed interests, and to be honest, I don’t think most California voters actually read the complete text of each proposition before making their voting decisions.

    And if the stadium goes to a vote in Inglewood, it will all be about traffic congestion, and crime, and drunkenness, and business revenue, and taxes in versus taxes out, with all kinds of tv commercials claiming completely different things with no way of knowing if anybody is even trying to tell the truth, and even if they are, if what they are saying is actually accurate because who the hell can figure any of this out?

    So the real vote will be on “Do you want the NFL, specifically the Rams, right here in Inglewood, or not?” because that’s all most of the voters will care about, and all the other issues are just going to be market tested to find out where it is worthwhile to invest advertising dollars to bang a drum long enough to chip off a percentage of undecided voters.

    If you want that kind of democracy in West Virginia, you are welcome to take California’s version of it, as far as I’m concerned.

    What we’ve ended up with here is a lot of voters thinking they know more than the legislators, and that they can budget better than the state government can (cuz gov’t misappropriates all the $), and a lot of good causes got voted intractable amounts of the general budget to the point that our state government can’t actually govern anything anymore, and the voters have gone and misspent the money worse than the government ever did, and there’s nothing that can be done about it.

    #19085
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    forgive my ignorance but how does one file a referendum?

    do you need a specified number of people to file or can just one person file?

    I have no idea, but I like the idea of everyone
    going over to Zooey’s lawn and hashing things out:

    Referendum — Wiki
    ….
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Referendum
    …Although some advocates of direct democracy would have the referendum become the dominant institution of government, in practice and in principle, in almost all cases, the referendum exists solely as a complement to the system of representative democracy, in which most major decisions are made by an elected legislature. An often cited exception is the Swiss canton of Glarus, in which meetings are held on the village lawn to decide on matters of public concern. In most jurisdictions that practice them, referendums are relatively rare occurrences and are restricted to important issues. Most popularly disputed form of direct popular participation is the referendum on constitutional matters.[2]…

    w
    v

    #19086
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I was just griping to someone today
    about California. It seems like yall
    get to vote on things out there.
    Referendums on this and that.
    We dont get to have ref-erendums in WV.

    I’d like to start a referendum about
    giving us the right to have referendums.

    w
    v

    Really?

    Be careful what you wish for.

    We started ballot propositions in California in the late 70s, so that we could pass bills that them damn politicians won’t or can’t. Great idea.

    Now we get Safe Drinking Water initiatives that are backed by astroturf “citizens groups” that get their money from Monsanto, and propositions to reform education financing, only there will suddenly be 3 propositions on the same ballot that all claim to do great things for education reform, all with poison pills that will have to be litigated, and backed by carefully concealed interests, and to be honest, I don’t think most California voters actually read the complete text of each proposition before making their voting decisions.

    And if the stadium goes to a vote in Inglewood, it will all be about traffic congestion, and crime, and drunkenness, and business revenue, and taxes in versus taxes out, with all kinds of tv commercials claiming completely different things with no way of knowing if anybody is even trying to tell the truth, and even if they are, if what they are saying is actually accurate because who the hell can figure any of this out?

    So the real vote will be on “Do you want the NFL, specifically the Rams, right here in Inglewood, or not?” because that’s all most of the voters will care about, and all the other issues are just going to be market tested to find out where it is worthwhile to invest advertising dollars to bang a drum long enough to chip off a percentage of undecided voters.

    If you want that kind of democracy in West Virginia, you are welcome to take California’s version of it, as far as I’m concerned.

    What we’ve ended up with here is a lot of voters thinking they know more than the legislators, and that they can budget better than the state government can (cuz gov’t misappropriates all the $), and a lot of good causes got voted intractable amounts of the general budget to the point that our state government can’t actually govern anything anymore, and the voters have gone and misspent the money worse than the government ever did, and there’s nothing that can be done about it.

    It’s true that the referendum process in California has been a nightmare.

    #19087
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Really?

    Be careful what you wish for.

    We started ballot propositions in California in the late 70s, so that we could pass bills that them damn politicians won’t or can’t. Great idea.

    Now we get Safe Drinking Water initiatives that are backed by astroturf “citizens groups” that get their money from Monsanto, and propositions to reform education financing, only there will suddenly be 3 propositions on the same ballot that all claim to do great things for education reform, all with poison pills that will have to be litigated, and backed by carefully concealed interests, and to be honest, I don’t think most California voters actually read the complete text of each proposition before making their voting decisions.

    And if the stadium goes to a vote in Inglewood, it will all be about traffic congestion, and crime, and drunkenness, and business revenue, and taxes in versus taxes out, with all kinds of tv commercials claiming completely different things with no way of knowing if anybody is even trying to tell the truth, and even if they are, if what they are saying is actually accurate because who the hell can figure any of this out?

    So the real vote will be on “Do you want the NFL, specifically the Rams, right here in Inglewood, or not?” because that’s all most of the voters will care about, and all the other issues are just going to be market tested to find out where it is worthwhile to invest advertising dollars to bang a drum long enough to chip off a percentage of undecided voters.

    If you want that kind of democracy in West Virginia, you are welcome to take California’s version of it, as far as I’m concerned.

    What we’ve ended up with here is a lot of voters thinking they know more than the legislators, and that they can budget better than the state government can (cuz gov’t misappropriates all the $), and a lot of good causes got voted intractable amounts of the general budget to the point that our state government can’t actually govern anything anymore, and the voters have gone and misspent the money worse than the government ever did, and there’s nothing that can be done about it.

    —————
    Ok, well then
    i changed my mind.

    I just want to decide
    everything myself.

    wv ram makes all the
    decisions. a wv-ram-ocracy.

    My decision is:
    Rams go back to LA
    and wear blue and white.

    San Diego stays in San Diego
    and they wear the old Lance Allworth Uniforms.

    Raiders stay in Oakland.

    Dallas moves to St.Louis
    and become the St.Louis Stallions.

    Washington changes its name to
    the Washington Cowboys.

    Dallas fans can root for Houston.

    Problems solved. Give me a beer.

    w
    v

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    #19100
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator
    #19213
    Avatar photowv
    Participant
    #19398
    waterfield
    Participant

    Here is a quote from an article in the Orange County Register:

    Butts and HPLC officials said folding plans for the 60-acre stadium into plans for initial Hollywood Park redevelopment through voter approval could allow the stadium project to avoid years of costly environmental and fiscal reviews.

    But state environmental law experts told the Register the stadium project would still have to undergo an environmental impact review (EIR) study that could take years and millions of dollars to complete before the matter could even be placed on a ballot. Butts later acknowledged he was uncertain whether passage of a ballot measure would allow the project to avoid undergoing an EIR.

Viewing 21 posts - 31 through 51 (of 51 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.