Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Public House › Nearly 900 Hate Incidents
- This topic has 12 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 11 months ago by zn.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 2, 2017 at 3:50 am #62162znModerator
There’s Been An ‘Outbreak’ Of Nearly 900 Hate Incidents Since Trump’s Win
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-hate-incidents_us_583dd8bfe4b0860d6116bf95
Black children being told by classmates to sit in the back of school buses. Muslims called “terrorist” and told to go back to “your country with ISIS.” Swastikas drawn on a synagogue, schools, cars and driveways. A gay man being beaten by an assailant who said the “president says we can kill all you faggots now.” Plus “Trump Nation” and “Whites Only” spray-painted on a church attended largely by immigrants.
Those are some of the nearly 900 hate incidents across the U.S. in the 10 days immediately following President-elect Donald Trump’s surprise victory earlier this month, according to a new report from the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Blacks, immigrants, Jews, Muslims, LGBTQ people, women and other groups were all targeted, according to the report, which attributes this “outbreak” of hate to Trump’s win.
ASHLEY DEAN VIA ASSOCIATED PRESS
“Both the harassment since the election and the energy on the radical right are the predictable results of the campaign that Trump waged for the presidency — a campaign marked by incendiary racial statements, the stoking of white racial resentment, and attacks on so-called ‘political correctness,’” states the report, titled “Ten Days After.”The SPLC, which tracks hate groups and hate crimes, documented 867 hate incidents using media reports and submissions to the #ReportHate page on its website.
The report does not include incidents of online harassment, and excluded incidents determined to be hoaxes by authorities. While the SPLC cautions it couldn’t “confirm the veracity of all reports,” it also states that hate incidents it documented “almost certainly represent a small fraction of the actual number of election-related hate incidents that have occurred since November 8.”
The report cites the Bureau of Justice Statistics estimate that two-thirds of hate crimes go unreported to law enforcement.
Trump’s win is fueling hate and “celebratory violence.”
Nearly 40 percent of the hate incidents tracked in the 10 days after the election involved people explicitly invoking the president-elect’s name or his campaign slogans, which the SPLC says is a clear indicator that “the outbreak of hate stemmed in large part from his electoral success.”
In one incident in Arizona, a woman putting groceries in her car said two men in a pickup truck drove past her and yelled “Trump forever, you half-nigger slut bitch!”
“Can’t wait until your ‘marriage’ is overturned by a real president. Gay families = burn in hell. #Trump2016,” read a note received by a gay couple in North Carolina.
The SPLC did not track incidents of hate and harassment in the same way before the election, so the number can’t be directly compared to an earlier period or solely attributed to Trump’s win. Trump himself put some of the blame on the media for amplifying the stories of attacks after the election.
The number of reported incidents dropped significantly after a huge number in the first three days after the election.
Mark Potok, SPLC senior fellow, said the rash of hate incidents are directly related to the election, and echo a similar, though smaller number of anti-black incidents the SPLC noticed following President Barack Obama’s win in 2008. The difference now, Potok said, is that the latest incidents are “celebratory violence by Trump supporters.”
The SPLC report also underscores that many of the people who were targeted for their gender, orientation or ethnicity said the recent incidents were either their first experience with harassment or took it to a new extreme.
An Asian-American woman who was told to “go home” when she left a train station in Oakland, California, wrote that she had experienced discrimination before, “but never in such a public and unashamed manner.”
Trump regularly incited political violence during his campaign.
Hate incidents are occurring almost everywhere in the country.
Hate incidents were reported in all but four states: Hawaii, Wyoming, North Dakota and South Dakota. Larger states tended to have a higher number of incidents, and three states ― California, New York and Texas ― accounted for more than a quarter of all the reports.
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER
Immigrants have been the most frequent targets for post-election hate.
About one-third of the incidents, 280 total, were motivated by anti-immigration sentiments, according to the SPLC report.
Trump stoked immigration fears starting with his first campaign speech, when he referred to Mexican immigrants as rapists and criminals. He energized his supporters with his promise to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border, and has pledged to deport millions of undocumented immigrants once he is in office.
It’s not clear if Trump can and will deliver on his promises, but they’re being used to harass immigrants, particularly Latinos, and often at schools, the report notes:
Students and young people have absorbed divisive campaign rhetoric and are using it to taunt and harass their classmates, with chants of “Build the wall!” making their way into school cafeterias, hallways, and buses. In Colorado Springs, Colorado, 8th grade students told Latino students on the school bus, “Not only should Trump build a wall, but it should be electrocuted (sic) and Mexicans should have to wear shock collars.” In Redding, California, students brought “deportation letters” to school for their Latino classmates.
People of other ethnicities have also been targeted, according to the SPLC. In one incident, a Florida teacher reportedly threatened her black students with forced removal from the country, saying, “Don’t make me call Donald Trump to get you sent back to Africa.”Other minorities, including groups Trump targeted during his campaign, have also suffered from hate incidents.
Trump is a racist who refused to condemn white supremacists campaigning for him. He once bragged about sexually assaulting women. He tweeted an anti-semitic image. He’s repeatedly disparaged Muslims. And though he’s said he supports LGBT rights, his vice president and other members of his administration have repeatedly pushed anti-gay laws.
Similarly, the incidents tracked by the SPLC show hate directed at nearly every minority group.
Close to one-quarter of the hate incidents tracked by the SPLC in the report were categorized as anti-black, and there were also a large number of anti-LGBT and anti-Semitic incidents.
There were 49 anti-Muslim incidents and 40 anti-women incidents, including several that echoed Trump’s own misogynistic comments.
Children and young people were responsible for many of the hateful messages.
About 320 of the incidents occurred at universities and K-12 schools, which the report authors say is unsurprising, “given how prevalent bullying is in our nation’s schools and the characteristics of young people.”
Teachers have shared concerns that Trump’s win will open the door to more bullying in their classrooms. For a separate report on how the election has affected schools, SPLC conducted an online survey of 10,000 educators. More than 2,500 said they knew of incidents of bigotry, harassment and physical fights directly related to election rhetoric.
Public spaces were also common locations for hate incidents, the SPLC found, particularly in stores and on the street. The report shares several anecdotes from retail and service workers who were harassed by customers:
When an 18-year old service employee in Kalamazoo, Michigan, asked a man if he needed help, he replied, “I don’t need to ask you for shit. Donald Trump is president.” He then called her a “black bitch” and spat on her shoes. A cashier in Minnesota and a hostess in Illinois were both called “nigger” by their customers.
A number of the incidents supported white nationalist views, adding to fears that Trump’s election has emboldened white supremacists.Trump’s presidential campaign was widely supported by the white nationalist or white supremacist movement in the U.S. According to the SPLC, “the language, literature, and symbols of white nationalism have cropped up throughout the country” in the days since Trump’s electoral win.
White nationalist fliers were found at “businesses, public parks, on people’s cars, in driveways, and, especially, on college campuses around the country,” the report states.
“Are you sick of anti-white propaganda in college? YOU ARE NOT ALONE,” read one flier on a college campus. “RACE IS REAL. Your professors are lying to you to keep their jobs.”
“Why White Women Shouldn’t Date Black Men,” read another flier found at multiple college campuses. “Love who you are,” read another flier, distributed at an Ohio university, “white people have the right to exist as white people. BE WHITE.”
There were also reports of KKK recruiting literature being distributed across the country.
Trump selected Steve Bannon as his chief strategist in the White House. Bannon is the former executive chairman of Breitbart News ― a site that regularly airs white nationalist viewpoints.
A small number of incidents were apparently motivated by hate for Trump himself.
Twenty-three of the 867 hate incidents, or less than three percent, were directed at actual or perceived Trump supporters.
In Chicago, a reported traffic altercation led to a white man being assaulted by black teenagers who shouted, “It’s one of them white boy Trump guys!” In Denver, the word “No” was written on the Trump campaign’s headquarters. And in New York, a man wearing a Trump hat on the subway was reportedly grabbed around the neck.
The SPLC report comes amid other reports of rising hate in America.
According to the latest FBI statistics, there was a nearly 7 percent rise in hate crimes in 2015, an uptick driven largely by a surge in anti-Muslim hate crimes.
The Huffington Post has documented over 300 instances of anti-Muslim violence, vandalism, discrimination and political speech in 2016. There have been 13 stories of apparent Trump supporters attacking, harassing or plotting to kill Muslims.
In a “60 Minutes” interview earlier this month, Trump claimed he wasn’t aware of all the hate incidents following his victory.
“I’m so saddened to hear that,” he told CBS’ Lesley Stahl. “And I say, ‘Stop it.’ If it ― if it helps, I will say this, and I will say right to the cameras: ‘Stop it.’”
“Mr. Trump claims he’s surprised his election has unleashed a barrage of hate across the country,” SPLC President Richard Cohen said in a statement Tuesday. “But he shouldn’t be. It’s the predictable result of the campaign he waged. Rather than feign surprise, Mr. Trump should take responsibility for what’s occurring, forcefully reject hate and bigotry, reach out to the communities he’s injured, and follow his words with actions to heal the wounds his words have opened.”
The Trump administration did not respond to a request for comment on the SPLC report Tuesday.
January 2, 2017 at 6:15 am #62163bnwBlockedSPLC is a hate group that focuses on other groups hatred but not their own. The veracity of their reports defines Fake News since so many high profile instances are later proven to be BS. The report is a sad pitch for money but the previously gullible have awakened to the reality that the MSM and the SPLC have been lying to them for many years and the donations are drying up from mom and pop. But relax, Soros will still pick up the slack.
The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
January 2, 2017 at 6:46 pm #62252TSRFParticipantYeah, this article reeks of hyperbole. Beneath our veneer of progressivism, we as a country are steeped in intollarance. All this would have happened with or without the Donald victory.
I was talking with my brother (yes, ZN; the “wing nut” one who thinks this nation started going to hell when we went off the gold standard). He is a life-long Democrat and held office for several years as the minority leader of his county legislature, somewhere up in NY State. Anyway, I asked him if he was scared of a Trump presidency. He said he was concerned, but not afraid. He called Trump an “agent of change” and thought that it was long overdue (he had nothing good to say about HRC or BO, and said “good riddance”). He just hopes that this is the wake up call the Democrats and Republicans have needed, and that nothing truly bad goes down during the wake up call.
I tend to agree with him. I just hope there are enough checks and balances in our government to weather the Trump presidency.
January 2, 2017 at 9:48 pm #62262znModeratorYeah, this article reeks of hyperbole
No it doesn’t. It stands up to scrutiny and the work is done by the Southern Poverty Law Center, which has a sterling reputation. Actually the kinds of things they describe have happened here locally. Hiding from this kind of thing does not fix it.
In terms of being afraid of Trump…or other kinds of beside the point, misleading rhetoric—that article has nothing to do with that. These are people acting out on their dumb beliefs, it;s not Trump himself.
In terms of a Trump presidency, look at his policies. They will be an unmitigated disaster. And I am not talking about the kind of silly stuff the news focuses on. I am talking about straightforward policies. It will be hard to keep count of the number of things they are going to screw up.
So don’t be distracted by this monster Trump the boggie man caricature which then people rightly say is just not a big deal.
The real disaster is the actual policies. There will be no checks and balances (republican court, republican Congress) but then again this has nothing to do with the silly boggie man caricature, it has to do with actual real policies.
Nothing good will come of this. AND it’s nothing new, either. It’s the sameole sameole economic neo-liberal, trickle down, dismantle social security and planned parenthood etc., anti-science etc. right-wing stuff we’ve seen before. Only, this time, in spades.
.
January 3, 2017 at 7:56 am #62276DakParticipantSPLC is a hate group that focuses on other groups hatred but not their own. The veracity of their reports defines Fake News since so many high profile instances are later proven to be BS. The report is a sad pitch for money but the previously gullible have awakened to the reality that the MSM and the SPLC have been lying to them for many years and the donations are drying up from mom and pop. But relax, Soros will still pick up the slack.
Provide some proof of your claims that the SPLC is a hate group. That sounds like something a good old-fashioned Aryan racist would say because the SPLC is the only organization willing to take on bigots these days. The federal government stopped after 911.
January 3, 2017 at 9:51 am #62283znModeratorSPLC is a hate group that focuses on other groups hatred but not their own. The veracity of their reports defines Fake News since so many high profile instances are later proven to be BS. The report is a sad pitch for money but the previously gullible have awakened to the reality that the MSM and the SPLC have been lying to them for many years and the donations are drying up from mom and pop. But relax, Soros will still pick up the slack.
Provide some proof of your claims that the SPLC is a hate group. That sounds like something a good old-fashioned Aryan racist would say because the SPLC is the only organization willing to take on bigots these days. The federal government stopped after 911.
Yeah there’s not going to be any valid dismissals of the SPLC…there will be some partisan shot taking mostly based on repeating right-wing bot sites, but nothing real or valid. (Right wing bot sites are very quick to try and manage this kind of thing for their partisan readers.)
And btw 900 incidents is just scratching the surface.
Rather than condemn that kind of racist and disturbed action, which they OUGHT to do, partisan types will try to smear the messenger.
As I said there were incidents right in my town.
January 3, 2017 at 11:58 am #62299bnwBlockedSPLC is a hate group that focuses on other groups hatred but not their own. The veracity of their reports defines Fake News since so many high profile instances are later proven to be BS. The report is a sad pitch for money but the previously gullible have awakened to the reality that the MSM and the SPLC have been lying to them for many years and the donations are drying up from mom and pop. But relax, Soros will still pick up the slack.
Provide some proof of your claims that the SPLC is a hate group. That sounds like something a good old-fashioned Aryan racist would say because the SPLC is the only organization willing to take on bigots these days. The federal government stopped after 911.
The SPLC hates christians and conservatives. Its purpose is political and its method is via political correctness which if you haven’t noticed is going the way of the Dodo Bird.
The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
January 3, 2017 at 8:11 pm #62346TSRFParticipantHere’s what I meant by hyperbole (from the article):
The SPLC did not track incidents of hate and harassment in the same way before the election, so the number can’t be directly compared to an earlier period or solely attributed to Trump’s win. Trump himself put some of the blame on the media for amplifying the stories of attacks after the election.
Do I think the Trump victory emboldened a bunch of racists? Yes.
Do I think Trump will go down as one of the worst presidents ever? Yes.
Do I believe all of the hate and racism is a direct result of Trump’s victory? No. It was always here, we’re just viewing it through Trump colored lenses.
January 4, 2017 at 7:57 am #62364DakParticipantSPLC is a hate group that focuses on other groups hatred but not their own. The veracity of their reports defines Fake News since so many high profile instances are later proven to be BS. The report is a sad pitch for money but the previously gullible have awakened to the reality that the MSM and the SPLC have been lying to them for many years and the donations are drying up from mom and pop. But relax, Soros will still pick up the slack.
Provide some proof of your claims that the SPLC is a hate group. That sounds like something a good old-fashioned Aryan racist would say because the SPLC is the only organization willing to take on bigots these days. The federal government stopped after 911.
Yeah there’s not going to be any valid dismissals of the SPLC…there will be some partisan shot taking mostly based on repeating right-wing bot sites, but nothing real or valid. (Right wing bot sites are very quick to try and manage this kind of thing for their partisan readers.)
And btw 900 incidents is just scratching the surface.
Rather than condemn that kind of racist and disturbed action, which they OUGHT to do, partisan types will try to smear the messenger.
As I said there were incidents right in my town.
Yeah, true.
As for the comment above about hating Christians and conservatives, Aryan groups wouldn’t be what I’d consider truly Christian or even conservative.
January 4, 2017 at 12:19 pm #62367wvParticipant. It stands up to scrutiny and the work is done by the Southern Poverty Law Center, which has a sterling reputation.
.
—————-
I agree. I’m a big fan of the Southern Poverty Law Center.Course, no-one is going to change anyone’s mind about this stuff.
99 percent of the Voters went for Hildabeast or TrumpaBeast.
One percent went for the only candidate who supported actual, real, Social Justice.
(now of course some of that voting pattern had to do with lesser-evil strategy etc — but even if we account for that we probly end up with 90 percent of the voting public preferring Hildabeast or Trumpabeast.)So, when a society is ‘that’ propagandized — 90 percent.
When only 10 percent or so, supports actual, real, social justice — I cannot say there is much, if any, hope.Maybe a little. A tiny tiny bit of hope.
w
vJanuary 4, 2017 at 12:37 pm #62368AgamemnonParticipantJanuary 4, 2017 at 2:17 pm #62369Billy_TParticipant. It stands up to scrutiny and the work is done by the Southern Poverty Law Center, which has a sterling reputation.
.
—————-
I agree. I’m a big fan of the Southern Poverty Law Center.Course, no-one is going to change anyone’s mind about this stuff.
99 percent of the Voters went for Hildabeast or TrumpaBeast.
One percent went for the only candidate who supported actual, real, Social Justice.
(now of course some of that voting pattern had to do with lesser-evil strategy etc — but even if we account for that we probly end up with 90 percent of the voting public preferring Hildabeast or Trumpabeast.)So, when a society is ‘that’ propagandized — 90 percent.
When only 10 percent or so, supports actual, real, social justice — I cannot say there is much, if any, hope.Maybe a little. A tiny tiny bit of hope.
w
vWell, I guess I need to work a bit harder on my New Year’s resolution.
;>)
Anyway, for what it’s worth, WV, that tiny bit of hope gets a boost from this fact: Nearly half the electorate didn’t vote at all, so, in a sense, we still don’t know what a “majority” of Americans really think or desire regarding “social justice,” at least as far as voting goes.
And it reminds me of something else, which I bump into when I talk with Clinton supporters. This idea of counterfactuals, which are incredibly limited and cherry-picked by all “sides” in our political debates.
As in, they’ll say, “If only the Bernie voters and the Stein voters had cast their vote for HRC instead, we wouldn’t have Trump in power.”
Well, that may be true. But it’s also true that if we don’t cherry-pick and limit our counterfactuals, and expand the “what ifs” a bit further, we could just as easily say:
“If all the Democrats who voted for Hillary had voted Green Party or Socialist instead, Trump wouldn’t be the president.”
And we would have social justice, environmental protection and peace as the main elements of American public policy in 2017 — for the first time in our history.
January 9, 2017 at 11:26 pm #63004znModeratorJewish Centers in Several States Targeted With Bomb Threats
JENNIFER KAY
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/miami-area-jewish-centers-targeted-threats-44655934
Bomb threats targeted Jewish community centers in at least six states Monday, and some were made with prerecorded telephone calls, according to an official with the Jewish Federations of North America.
It’s not clear why up to 20 Jewish community centers across the South and Northeast were targeted, said Richard Sandler, chair of the JFNA board of trustees.
“Some of the threats were robo-calls,” said Sandler, adding that the number of threats was unusually high.
No additional details about the calls were immediately available. Some community centers were evacuated but no explosives were found, Sandler said.
Bomb threats also targeted Jewish community centers and schools in central Florida and Tampa last week, but Sandler said there was no apparent link between those threats and the calls received Monday.
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives spokeswoman Amanda Hils said in an email that the agency was aware of the threats and its field divisions were ready to assist state and local law enforcement.
Most of the centers have resumed normal operations, said David Posner, director of strategic performance at JCC Association of North America.
The Maitland Jewish Community Campus was evacuated Monday for the second time in a week because of a bomb threat. The complex includes a school, community center, a Holocaust museum and the offices of the Jewish Federation of Greater Orlando.
Bomb threats also were received at the Miami Beach Jewish Community Center and the Jewish Community Alliance of Jacksonville. A Miami-Dade Police bomb squad was dispatched to the Alper Jewish Community Center, where staff evacuated hundreds of children “as an abundance of caution,” said Miami-Dade Police Detective Alvaro Zabaleta.
In Nashville, Tennessee, 225 people were evacuated from the Gordon Jewish Community Center and an adjacent school after a security guard received a bomb threat over the phone. Buildings were evacuated and authorities investigated similar threats in Atlanta; Tenafly, New Jersey; Columbia, South Carolina; and Wilmington, Delaware.
In Maryland, threats also were called into Jewish community centers in Baltimore and Rockville.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.