JT – tweets – 9/9 – Salary Cap = 6.7 million

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle JT – tweets – 9/9 – Salary Cap = 6.7 million

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #30161
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I am sure this does not include the practice squad and it is just for the 51 man roster. So subtract ~2 million.

    The salary cap sites won’t quite match this cause,,,,,,,they aren’t 100 per cent accurate. 😉 4.7 million sounds good to me for the start of the season. We will have to see what the actual figure is when the season starts.

    The 51 rule doesn’t expire until tomorrow, when they have to add the last 2 players to the cap figure. I am not sure when the practice squad get officially counted either. Anyway, I am going with 4.7 for now.

    • This topic was modified 9 years, 3 months ago by Avatar photoAgamemnon.

    Agamemnon

    #30182
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/st.-louis-rams/cap/

    This is a close as I have seen Spotrac. If you delete Watts, who is on the SUS, You get ~4.7 million. I guess it works that when Watts comes off the SUS, the Rams will gain ~400k. Like if you took a player off IR. imo

    Agamemnon

    #30188
    rfl
    Participant

    So, like, maybe there might have been some cap room for vet OL?

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    #30189
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    So, like, maybe there might have been some cap room for vet OL?

    Probably, cause the excess cap space is mostly for IR now. I think 3 million is the space that teams reserve for that.?

    I think it is more likely that they use any excess to try to sign their future FAs. imo

    If they need more cap space, the next thing they would probably do is restructure Quinn for another 4 million in cap space. imo

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 3 months ago by Avatar photoAgamemnon.

    Agamemnon

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.