Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Public House › Is anybody watching this republican debate?
- This topic has 13 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 9 months ago by Zooey.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 13, 2016 at 10:12 pm #38966ZooeyModerator
OMG.
This is the WWE.
The crowd is heckling everybody.
This is just so great.
February 14, 2016 at 2:58 am #38972ZooeyModeratorThat’s the first debate I’ve watched from start to finish. Brilliant theatre. I am surprised nobody threw an octopus onto the stage. I’m hearing that Jerry Springer is going to moderate the next debate.
This is bad for the Republicans. Boy, oh boy, I hope we get a floor fight at the convention.
February 14, 2016 at 9:24 am #38975znModeratorThis is bad for the Republicans. Boy, oh boy, I hope we get a floor fight at the convention.
Well, are you sure republican voters think that?
They could be fine with it.
Examples from off the net:
Rob Proud American • 8 hours ago
I liked Donald Trump from the beginning. After tonight, I ADMIRE DONALD TRUMP MORE THAN I THOUGHT I COULD. He said something that I have thought for a long, long time: GEORGE W. BUSH LIED ABOUT WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION TO DRAG THE U.S. INTO AN ILLEGAL AND NEEDLESS WAR!!!!! Finally!!!! A Republican calling that elitist, sinister, evil family of war-profiteers what they are: “LIARS!” Had W. not thinned our nation out financially, militarily, and morally, a sleazy demon like Obama would NEVER have had a shot at the White House!!!! Thank you, Future President Trump!February 14, 2016 at 12:46 pm #38984ZooeyModeratorThis is bad for the Republicans. Boy, oh boy, I hope we get a floor fight at the convention.
Well, are you sure republican voters think that?
They could be fine with it.
I’m not sure I know what ANYBODY thinks. That’s why this election has more drama for me as a spectator compared to most of them, and why I’m on a message board trying to get into conversations about what other people are seeing.
The quote you put up is by a Trump supporter. A diehard supporter who saw Trump clean up in the debate. I have not hit the news yet this morning – coming here first as is my habit – but last night all the TH (Talking Heads) were saying Trump lost and that Bush was the victor. Which I thought was interesting in itself because I saw no difference between Trump last night and the Trump was declared a victor in previous debates. He wasn’t “exposed,” or embarrassed the way Rubio was last time. And the dude plastered Bush with several body blows on Iraq. And he got away with denouncing Cruz as a Fat Liar. Rubio was much better this time, Bush was okay, Carson is dead and basically forgotten, and it looked to me like….
Well, here’s where I speculate. Rob Proud American would be happy to have the convention look like that debate, I suppose. But the “establishment” Republicans certainly don’t. They want to win the White House, and I think the party is going to suffer badly if Trump wins the nomination, or if there is an ugly floor fight that ends with an establishment nominee at Trump’s expense. I think there is a possibility that there will be voter defections: either vote for someone else, or stay home. And so I speculate that the establishment is now starting to impose their establishment views without restraint. They are now starting to say that Trump lost. The establishment can’t let this continue. They can’t have a different candidate every time take first or second place while Trump stays up there in first or second place. They anti-Trump wing of the party has to coalesce quickly around somebody, or else. IMO, Trump doesn’t ever get more popular. Every possible Trump supporter is already on board. Nobody – imo – has Trump as their 2nd choice if their first choice drops out. That’s the thing. He has 1/3 of the Republican party, and that’s it. The people who want a bull in the china shop are already lined up behind him.
And independents…they aren’t going to support a bloody and bruised candidate that emerges from a messy convention.
I think the Republicans are in a very bad position right now, and here they are lining up to filibuster whomever Obama nominates to replace Scalia. They aren’t going to look good doing that if Obama nominates someone without some glaring vulnerability. It’s going to look like partisan politics – which it is – and I don’t think the Republicans have a shot at the White House anyway at this point. Fighting the appointment…I mean, seriously, I think this could have impact going well down the party. I think there is the possibility of wide defections, and significant defeat for the Republicans.
The Republicans are divided right now. You can say that the Democrats are divided, too, and you would be right. But they aren’t headed towards a gang fight like the Republicans are.
February 14, 2016 at 2:51 pm #38988znModeratorWe need more of this. These kinds of discussions.
Not that I can contribute much.
But they are in a way our glory.
February 14, 2016 at 3:29 pm #38989ZooeyModeratorI am as “into” it as I have been since W finally left office. I have been taking a vacation from politics to a large extent post-Bush since I was worn out, and also because I pretty much expected mainstream Cruise Control under Obama which is what we got. But at least he wasn’t out doing abnormally sociopathic things like W.
But I am intrigued by this election. The establishment people are facing rejection by a large number of voters. This is the storyline. Both Rs and Ds are pissed at the establishment – as they have been for a long time – but this time is different. There are large numbers in each party that are demanding changes to the status quo. The shit-stirrers are the candidates with passionate followings. They may still lose out, but the threat is real, and I think is going to have consequences.
I had hoped with Obama – best case scenario – that he could be transformative in the way that Reagan was. That he could start the pendulum swinging back away from conservative excesses. He wasn’t. But he may have at least put brakes on the rightward swing.
The establishment Rs are getting zero love. One of them may still win, but it will clearly be because he is not Donald Trump more than because he is inspiring.
Hillary has some love, but there’s no passion. The only sign of passion coming out of her campaign is coming from her supporters attacking Sanders’ followers with all the petulance of someone who feels like some kids cut in line in front of her.
The passion squares up behind Sanders and Trump only. They are the ones promising changes in the system, and come across as honest rather than calculated. Hillary just isn’t able to fire anyone up with her rallying cry of “Hey, I can make incremental progress!” and the Rs are all just making each other look completely unfit for the Oval Office.
Something is happening here. And it may get swallowed up under the SuperPACs in the long run, but the establishment needs to take control of this by the first week of March, or there are going to be fireworks this summer and into the Fall.
February 14, 2016 at 8:29 pm #38991MackeyserModeratorSports is the crucible of human virtue. The distillate remains are human vice.
February 14, 2016 at 8:47 pm #38992MackeyserModeratorI try to watch the Republican debates, but with only one TV and limited ability to relieve stress (one can only deep breathe so much before it’s actually hyperventilating), I just can’t do it anymore.
We know too much about how the words translate into action.
Unfortunately, that leaves me with the regurgitated aftermath… and it doesn’t take much imagination to realize that if the original wasn’t very appealing, that the regurgitated mess isn’t any more appealing.
That anyone can do it is fantastic. Thanks for the reportage. I take them like Camp Reports… valuable since I can’t be there…
Sports is the crucible of human virtue. The distillate remains are human vice.
February 14, 2016 at 9:36 pm #38994ZooeyModeratorI try to watch the Republican debates, but with only one TV and limited ability to relieve stress (one can only deep breathe so much before it’s actually hyperventilating), I just can’t do it anymore.
We know too much about how the words translate into action.
Unfortunately, that leaves me with the regurgitated aftermath… and it doesn’t take much imagination to realize that if the original wasn’t very appealing, that the regurgitated mess isn’t any more appealing.
That anyone can do it is fantastic. Thanks for the reportage. I take them like Camp Reports… valuable since I can’t be there…
I totally understand.
No one has to tell me about the ennui of following modern American politics.
But this is a train wreck. We don’t have a bunch of stiffs out-platituding each other.
We have a genuine dust up. A bunch of silver spoons trying to maintain their dignity in the middle of a food fight, and not able to do it.
You guys are missing out.
February 15, 2016 at 6:06 am #38995TSRFParticipantFrom the BBC site… a bit old, but aren’t we all…
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-35521558
Viewpoint: Are Donald Trump and his rivals a big joke?
9 February 2016
From the section MagazineWith the US presidential election just nine months away, and would-be candidates battling it out in Tuesday’s New Hampshire primary, American political satirist, PJ O’Rourke casts a scathing eye over the candidates hoping to make it to the White House.
There’s an American saying: “Anyone can become president.” And in the 2016 election we’ve been trying to prove it.
The list of people running for president seemed to include everybody except Beyonce. And there actually was a rumour last October that Beyonce’s husband, rapper Jay Z, might run.
The US presidential field has begun to narrow at last. Although, to judge by who’s left, this is not because of quality control.
To the rest of the world Donald Trump seems like a joke. And, please, let’s hope he is. Trump is a prank the American electorate is pulling on the American political establishment.Like many jokes, Trump is a manifestation of discomfort and anxiety.
America is a pretty good place. By world-historical standards it’s an excellent place. And yet, according to opinion polls, almost two-thirds of Americans think the country is “on the wrong track”.
What has got Americans so worried? The technological revolution is unsettling. So are rapid social shifts involving everything from immigrants to gender roles and sexuality. The global economy is shaky. And America’s political establishment is so bitterly divided that we can’t get bipartisan agreement on whether the sun will come up. (Republicans call predictions of dawn “unproven climate change science”.)
So, for a laugh, a lot of Republicans are claiming to support a cartoon character – an over-confident blustery bigot, a self-inflated one-man business boom who claims he can make a deal with the devil that will have the angels of heaven lining up to buy condos in Trump Tower Hell.
Like many jokes, it’s not very funny.
Trump’s Democratic Party opposite number is Bernie Sanders. Bernie repeats the pieties of the 1960s New Left with a straight face, as deadpan as Trump is clownish.Bernie seems a bit foggy on things that have happened since Woodstock, especially in the realm of foreign affairs. Bernie doesn’t know the Berlin Wall fell and doesn’t know he’s still standing on the wrong side of it.
Most of Bernie’s support comes from people who weren’t born when his ideas were in vogue. They’re too young to know that what Bernie says may sound like it makes sense during the dorm room bull session, but sooner or later you have to put the bong down and exhale.
For the rest of America what’s not amusing is Bernie labelling himself a socialist. The word has a particular and peculiar meaning in the US. If you say “I’m a socialist,” what Americans hear is, “I’m going to take your flat-screen TV and give it to a family of pill addicts in the backwoods of Vermont.”
Bernie is not the right man to break America’s political deadlock. It would be worse than electing Angela Merkel prime minister of Greece.
Then there are the serious candidates. Chief among them is Hillary Clinton. She has been seriously trying to become president, one way or another, since 1992.Hillary is a seasoned, pragmatic, centre-left candidate. Her nomination by the Democratic Party was supposed to be inevitable. But it turns out that “evitable” is a real word in the English language. I checked the dictionary. We should start using it.
In a year when Americans have been willing to go in any direction for the sake of change, Hillary is setting her course by the beacon of continuity, the Lighthouse of Sameness. She’s pulling her oar in an opposite direction, the one rower facing the wrong way in the Viking longship.
Now that Ben Carson has faded, the seriously conservative candidate is Republican Ted Cruz.
Dr Carson is a nice man. But he seemed to have no idea why he was running for president. GOP voters wanted him to go back to work as a neurosurgeon, perhaps removing Donald Trump’s ruptured silicone brain implant that is endangering Republicans everywhere.
Ted Cruz wants a 10% flat-rate income tax. The US gross domestic product is $18tn. The US federal budget is $3.8tn. Suppose Cruz somehow lops $1tn off the budget. Suppose the 10% tax is somehow applied to the entire GDP. That still leaves a $1tn-plus hole in the national pants pocket.In American politics, you mustn’t say that hardline conservatives don’t count. But you may say that they can’t count.
Cruz is also a hardline cultural conservative, vehemently opposed to gay rights, drug law reform and so forth. He’s still fighting the Culture Wars. He’s up on the front line bravely firing away without noticing that the other side has gone home to celebrate victory with legalised marijuana at same-sex wedding receptions.
The remaining candidates – all Republicans – are “The Muddle in the Middle.”
Marco Rubio, John Kasich, Jeb Bush and Chris Christie are seasoned, pragmatic centre-right candidates. And Carly Fiorina is the same, plus being a woman, minus the seasoning.
They all face the same problem as Hillary Clinton would, if Hillary were competing with five of herself.
Jeb Bush is the “Great American Failure Story”. Here’s Jeb with all the Bush influence, all the Bush political connections, all the Bush campaign funding, and he can’t get out of single-digit polling numbers. This would be almost impossible for the son of an oligarchic family anywhere else in the world. Isn’t America a wonderful country?John Kasich is the very popular conservative governor of Ohio, a not-very-conservative state.
Ohio is a microcosm of American conflicts – labour v management, nativists v immigrants, blacks v whites, Occupy Cincinnati v the 1%. They all hate each other, but they don’t hate John.
Kasich beat an incumbent Democratic governor and was re-elected by a landslide. Before that he served nine terms shovelling important manure in the Augean stables of the House of Representatives – 18 years on the House Armed Services Committee and six years as chairman of the House Budget Committee.
No wonder he’s so far behind. Republicans are in no damn mood for competent, experienced politicians with broad popular appeal.
Chris Christie is a former US district attorney, a prosecutor famously tough on crime. He was elected the Republican governor in Democratic New Jersey because voters hoped he’d clean up corruption. Not for nothing was the TV show The Sopranos set in that state.
Then one of Christie’s top aides ordered lane-closing on the George Washington Bridge to Manhattan, causing huge traffic jams in Ft Lee, New Jersey, in order to punish the mayor of Ft Lee for not supporting Christie’s gubernatorial re-election campaign.
“Bridgegate” was just the kind of thing that the Sopranos would do – if they used highway cones instead of guns.Carly Fiorina was the CEO of Hewlett-Packard, and the company’s stock price fell more than 60% while she was in charge. I may forgive Carly, but my retirement plan never will.
Marco Rubio may emerge as the moderate Republican choice. He has a couple of things going for him.Rubio is a Washington “outsider”. Well, actually, he’s a US senator. But he’s missed a lot of senate votes, and I assume that was because, during the voting, Rubio was outside Washington. This counts.
And Rubio gets the Latino vote. In Cuba. If Cuba had political polls, Marco Rubio would be polling far ahead of Raul Castro in the Cuban presidential election, if Cuba had presidential elections.
What does the 2016 presidential campaign tell us about my country? What I hope is that it tells us America has a great sense of humour.
Of course there’s always the possibility that Americans are serious about who they’re supporting for president. In that case America has no sense at all.February 15, 2016 at 9:50 am #39000wvParticipantFrom the BBC site… a bit old, but aren’t we all…
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-35521558
Viewpoint: Are Donald Trump and his rivals a big joke?
9 February 2016
From the section MagazineWith the US presidential election just nine months away, and would-be candidates battling it out in Tuesday’s New Hampshire primary, American political satirist, PJ O’Rourke casts a scathing eye over the candidates hoping to make it to the White House.
There’s an American saying..————————
Well, O’Rourke always just sounds like a rightwing libertarian
to me. Which is what he is.w
v
wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P._J._O’Rourke
“…member of the Cato institute…He did his undergraduate work at Miami University, in Ohio, and earned an M.A. in English at Johns Hopkins University while a brother of the Alpha Delta Phi Literary Society. He recounts that during his student days he was a left-leaning hippie, but that in the 1970s his political views underwent a volte-face. He emerged as a political observer and humorist with libertarian viewpoints.February 15, 2016 at 12:09 pm #39010ZooeyModeratorI’ve never liked O’Rourke. Yeah, he’s a rightie libertarian, a group that as a leftie libertarian myself, I would think I would have more affinity for, but of all possibilities in the political spectrum, I find rightie libertarians to be the most annoying by far. I wonder where they are going this election with Paul long gone. Kasich, I guess.
To the rest of the world Donald Trump seems like a joke. And, please, let’s hope he is. Trump is a prank the American electorate is pulling on the American political establishment.
Like many jokes, Trump is a manifestation of discomfort and anxiety.
This is Karl Rove’s and Roger Ailes’ cynicism having now grown large enough to bite the Republicans in the ass. They have deliberately seeded anger, resentment, and fear through Limbaugh, Hannity, Savage, Beck, O’Reilly, and the FOX news network in order to line up this voting bloc, and guess what? They now have a fully grown angry, resentful, and xenophobic group of voters on their hands who are dissatisfied with all the empty promises. The hardline cultural conservatives are feeling the same way. For more than 30 years, the corporate politicians have been giving lip service to abortion and gays and illegal immigration and Big Government et cetera, and then not doing much of anything about it. Those people are pissed now. Trump isn’t a joke. He is the embodiment of the disenfranchisement of the uneducated white males who have been deliberately targeted with this propaganda and USED by the Republican party to support their money grab for the 1%. They seeded this monster, fertilized it, and used it for decades to consolidate their rigging of the economic system, and now that bloc is getting out of control and demanding delivery of these crackpot solutions they’ve been sold as reasonable solutions.
Interestingly, FOX News itself has a fault line trembling through the middle of it right now. Murdoch is trying to line up succession both to himself and to Ailes, and it isn’t going well. Ailes ended up getting a contract extension, but he is reportedly much more scattered these days, and FOX isn’t receiving a clear cut set of marching orders like it used to. That’s part of the reason why FOX hasn’t delivered a clear Trump message. FOX is for Rubio, evidently, but without a Trump plan, it is floundering. There is also a schism between the News side and the Programming/business side with the leaders of those two divisions openly hating each other and rarely speaking, and publicly exemplified by the little cat fight between George Will and Bill O’Reilly. FOX is more likely to repair their rift than the Republican party is, but the conservative branches in this country are starting to turn on each other, and that can only be good for the country.
February 15, 2016 at 2:20 pm #39020TSRFParticipantO’Rourke has always struck me as a raging alcoholic. Also, a “glass half full” type to be sure; a little prick who is never happy with anyone or anything. I just thought it interesting that he does Op Ed’s on BBC. I think it is important at times to get an outside view of what goes on here, not that he is an outsider, but he didn’t write this for us, he wrote it for the rest of the world.
I used to read “The Economist” whenever I could, and bought an issue before my trip to CA a few weeks ago.
If you think most Americans think the current race is loopy, you can only imagine what the Europeans think…
Zooey is right, this is a train wreck in slow motion…
February 15, 2016 at 6:16 pm #39042ZooeyModeratorO’Rourke has always struck me as a raging alcoholic. Also, a “glass half full” type to be sure; a little prick who is never happy with anyone or anything. I just thought it interesting that he does Op Ed’s on BBC. I think it is important at times to get an outside view of what goes on here, not that he is an outsider, but he didn’t write this for us, he wrote it for the rest of the world.
I used to read “The Economist” whenever I could, and bought an issue before my trip to CA a few weeks ago.
If you think most Americans think the current race is loopy, you can only imagine what the Europeans think…
Zooey is right, this is a train wreck in slow motion…
Yeah, I think O’Rourke has always fancied himself to be the guy at the Exclusive Gentleman’s Club who is seen as the offbeat iconoclast with the witty bon mot. An Insider positioning himself as a Freethinking Outsider.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.