Inhaling Oxytocin

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Public House Inhaling Oxytocin

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #40880
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    http://www.world-science.net/exclusives/131010_oxytocin.htm

    Love your enemy? Hormone spray may help with that, too

    Oct. 31, 2013
    Special to World Science

    Could in­hal­ing some­thing really help fos­ter world peace, as some hip­pies claim?

    Don’t count on it. Yet a study has found that sniff­ing one spe­cial sub­stance may make peo­ple feel more sor­ry for the suf­fer­ing of out­siders, stig­ma­tized peo­ple and out­right en­e­mies. That chem­i­cal is ox­y­to­cin, a hor­mone al­ready nat­u­rally pre­s­ent in the brain and some­times called the trust hor­mone.

    The study found that even peo­ple in­volved in one of the world’s most emo­tion­ally fraught con­flicts, the Is­rae­li-Pal­es­tin­ian strug­gle, seem to find a new heart for the oth­er side af­ter they in­hale ox­y­to­cin.

    But the find­ings al­so run count­er to those of past stud­ies in some ways, sug­gest­ing that bi­ol­o­gists are only be­gin­ning to clar­i­fy the func­tion of the fas­ci­nat­ing hor­mone known to play a role in so­cial be­hav­ior and bond­ing in both hu­mans and an­i­mals.

    “Oxy­tocin re­markably in­creased em­pa­thy to the pain of Pales­tini­ans” among Jew­ish Is­raelis in an ex­pe­ri­ment, wrote re­search­ers, re­port­ing their find­ings Sept. 22 on­line in the jour­nal Psy­cho­neu­ro­en­docrin­ol­ogy. The in­creased em­pa­thy re­duced the par­ti­ci­pants’ “in-group bi­as,” they added—the pre­dom­i­nant ten­den­cy of peo­ple to show more em­pa­thy for “those who they per­ceive as si­m­i­lar to them­selves.”

    In their re­port, the re­search­ers said they re­cruited 55 Jew­ish Is­raelis. These par­ti­ci­pants were shown some pho­tos of peo­ple in pain­ful situa­t­ions, such as hav­ing a car hood closed on a hand, and oth­er pho­tos of peo­ple in non-pain­ful situa­t­ions. La­bels with the pho­tos in­di­cat­ed that the pic­tured per­son was from one of three groups. Ei­ther he or she was anoth­er Is­rae­li Jew; or an Arab—often viewed as the “en­e­my” group for Is­raelis; or a Eu­ro­pe­an, cho­sen as a middle-ground group.

    The par­ti­ci­pants viewed the pho­tos af­ter hav­ing tak­en ei­ther ox­y­to­cin or an in­ac­tive sub­stance, and were lat­er as­sessed for how much em­pa­thy they showed to the peo­ple pic­tured.

    Ox­y­to­cin sig­nif­i­cantly in­creased par­ti­ci­pants’ em­pa­thy for the Arabs in pain, while leav­ing un­changed their em­pa­thy for the oth­er two groups in pain, the re­search­ers found. That sug­gests, they added, that ox­y­to­cin does­n’t nec­es­sarily make peo­ple em­pa­thize more with those they al­ready em­pa­thize with.

    The ex­pe­ri­menters meas­ured view­ers’ em­pa­thy by ask­ing them to rate how much pain they thought the pic­tured per­son was ex­periencing.

    Past stud­ies in­di­cate that tak­ing ox­y­to­cin helps peo­ple over­come shy­ness, in­creases their trust in oth­ers, and helps them read oth­ers’ emo­tion­al states bet­ter. But find­ings with ox­y­to­cin and em­pa­thy have been mixed. Some stud­ies have found that ox­y­to­cin in­creases peo­ple’s em­pa­thy for oth­ers in their own group—at the ex­pense of those out­side the group. That’s al­most the op­po­site of the new find­ings.

    So why the in­con­sist­en­cy?

    It might have to do with the pre­cise func­tion of ox­y­to­cin, said the au­thors of the new stu­dy, Si­mone G. Shamay-Tsoory of the Uni­vers­ity of Hai­fa in Is­ra­el, Ah­mad Abu-Akel of the Uni­vers­ity of Bir­ming­ham in the U.K., and col­leagues. Re­search sug­gests ox­y­to­cin seems to make “so­cially rel­e­vant in­forma­t­ion” more viv­id in the view­er’s mind, they wrote, and the em­pa­thy ef­fects fol­low.

    So if study par­ti­ci­pants have no par­tic­u­lar in­forma­t­ion about the oth­ers that they are deal­ing with, ox­y­to­cin might not in­crease em­pa­thy, they ar­gued. This may have been the case with some past stud­ies, where par­ti­ci­pants were di­vid­ed in­to “teams” but not pro­vid­ed any in­forma­t­ion about each oth­er.

    “Our re­sults may have im­por­tant im­plica­t­ions for rec­on­cilia­t­ion and con­flict res­o­lu­tion,” the re­search­ers wrote. “While spec­u­la­tive, train­ing Is­rae­li and Pal­es­tin­ian mem­bers of the ne­go­ti­at­ing par­ties to con­sciously con­tem­plate the per­spec­tive of the oth­er,” they went on, could help cre­ate “an en­vi­ron­ment where peace is giv­en a chance.”

    #40881
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    How dogs stole our hearts

    By David Grimm

    If you think of your dog as your “fur baby,” science has your back. New research shows that when our canine pals stare into our eyes, they activate the same hormonal response that bonds us to human infants. The study—the first to show this hormonal bonding effect between humans and another species—may help explain how dogs became our companions thousands of years ago.

    “It’s an incredible finding that suggests that dogs have hijacked the human bonding system,” says Brian Hare, an expert on canine cognition at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, who was not involved in the work. Hare says the discovery might lead to a better understanding of why service dogs are so helpful for people with autism and post-traumatic stress disorder. “A finding of this magnitude will need to be replicated because it potentially has such far-reaching implications.”

    Dogs are already renowned for their ability to interact with humans. It’s not just the walks and the Frisbee catching; canines seem to understand us in a way that no other animal does. Point at an object, for example, and a dog will look at where you’re pointing—an intuitive reading of our intentions (“I’m trying to show you something”) that confounds our closest relatives: chimpanzees. People and dogs also look into each other’s eyes while interacting—a sign of understanding and affection that dogs’ closest relatives, wolves, interpret as hostility.

    It was this mutual gazing that piqued the interest of Takefumi Kikusui, an animal behaviorist at Azabu University in Sagamihara, Japan. Kikusui’s lab studies oxytocin, a hormone that plays a role in maternal bonding, trust, and altruism. Other groups have shown that when a mother stares into her baby’s eyes, the baby’s oxytocin levels rise, which causes the infant to stare back into its mother’s eyes, which causes the mother to release more oxytocin, and so on. This positive feedback loop seems to create a strong emotional bond between mother and child during a time when the baby can’t express itself in other ways.

    Kikusui—a dog owner for more than 15 years—wondered if the same held true for canines. “I love my dogs, and I always feel that they’re more of a partner than a pet,” he says. “So I started wondering, ‘Why are they so close to humans? Why are they connected so tightly to us?’ ”

    Kikusui and his colleagues convinced 30 of their friends and neighbors to bring their pets into his lab. They also found and reached out to a few people who were raising wolves as pets. When each owner brought his or her animal into the lab, the researchers collected urine from both and then asked the owners to interact with their animal in a room together for 30 minutes. During this time, the owners typically petted their animals and talked to them. Dogs and their owners also gazed into each other’s eyes, some for a total of a couple of minutes, some for just a few seconds. (The wolves, not surprisingly, didn’t make much eye contact with their owners.) After the time was up, the team took urine samples again.

    Mutual gazing had a profound effect on both the dogs and their owners. Of the duos that had spent the greatest amount of time looking into each other’s eyes, both male and female dogs experienced a 130% rise in oxytocin levels, and both male and female owners a 300% increase. (Kikusui was one of them, participating in the experiment himself with his two standard poodles, Anita and Jasmine.) The scientists saw no oxytocin increase in the dogs and owners who had spent little time gazing at each other, or in any of the wolf-owner duos.

    In a second experiment, the team repeated the same essential procedure, except this time they gave the dogs a nasal spray of oxytocin before they interacted with their owners. There were also no wolves this time around. “It would be very, very dangerous to give a nasal spray to a wolf,” Kikusui laughs. Female dogs given the nasal spray spent 150% more time gazing into the eyes of their owners, who in turn saw a 300% spike in their oxytocin levels. No effect was seen in male dogs or in dogs given a nasal spray that contained only saline.

    The results suggest that human-dog interactions elicit the same type of oxytocin positive feedback loop as seen between mothers and their infants, the team reports online today in Science. And that, in turn, may explain why we feel so close to our dogs, and vice versa. Kikusui says the nasal spray may have affected only female dogs because oxytocin plays a greater role in female reproduction, being important during labor and lactation.

    This positive feedback loop, he says, may have played a critical role in dog domestication. As wolves were morphing into dogs, only those that could bond with humans would have received care and protection. And humans themselves may have evolved the ability to reciprocate, adapting the maternal bonding feedback loop to a new species. “That’s our biggest speculation,” says Kikusui, who suggests that because oxytocin decreases anxiety, the adaptation may have been important for human survival as well. “If human beings are less stressed out, it’s better for their health.”

    “I definitely think oxytocin was involved in domestication,” says Jessica Oliva, a Ph.D. student at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, whose work recently showed that the hormone enhances the ability of dogs to understand human pointing. Still, she says, mutual gazing doesn’t happen in a vacuum; most of these dogs probably associate the behavior with food and playing, both of which can also boost oxytocin levels. So although we may view our dogs as our babies, they don’t necessarily view us as their mothers. We may just be cool friends who give them an occasional massage.

    #40892
    bnw
    Blocked

    I am a font of oxytocin.

    The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.

    Sprinkles are for winners.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.