informal poll: Goff not starting, being #3 – disaster? not concerned?

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle informal poll: Goff not starting, being #3 – disaster? not concerned?

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 31 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #52102
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I’m not in freak out mode over it. I have seen arguments that this is an indictment of Goff, Rams coaching, or both. I don’t share that view…I think it’s an indictment of the Rams not drafting Cam Newton when they had a chance.

    #52106
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I don’t think the Rams coaches are bad.

    I think the expectations for Goff are too high. But, whether that is true or not, it is certainly true that he has a lot to learn to be NFL ready. More than he could learn in one preseason. imo

    I do think he will start some games this season.

    Agamemnon

    #52108
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Cam had about the same preseason performance as Goff. I’m not concerned , how long did Aaron Rodgers sit ? I do think coaching plays a part. He got one series with the ones, hardly enough time to develop. Putting him in with 2’s and 3’s against the opponent’s ones exposed him to more punishment and injury and was pretty stupid imo.

    #52114
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Mildly disappointed, but not concerned yet. He showed the kind of flashes you want to see in a big-talent. Looks to be just mental-processing issues at this point.

    Woulda been nice if he coulda had an RG3-type first year. Ah well.

    We will rally behind Case Keenum — and Donald and Quinn — and the Rams will play
    good football.

    w
    v

    #52115
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    I wouldn’t call it a disaster, exactly, but I do think it’s another mark against the trade. I thought it was dumb when they did it — actually, before that. When I heard they might do it. And nothing this off-season has made me feel any better about it.

    Whether or not Goff’s lack of progress is due to all those other factors . . . . coaching, staff, his own will to win . . . I have no real clue, though I don’t think Fisher is a good coach overall, and I don’t think he’s especially given to “developing QBs” well.

    Anyway, I wish they had gone a different route back in April. Kept their picks. Gone for someone like Hackenburg in the 2nd. I just don’t think they have enough talent yet to trade all of those picks away for one player.

    Hope I’m wrong. But that’s my view.

    #52123
    NERam
    Participant

    Not concerned at all. I think they’ll fly ok with Captain Keenum, and Goff will play when the coaches feel he is ready. Fisher has said all along that starting in game 1 was not a given for Goff.

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 2 months ago by NERam.
    #52128
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I have mild concern. I don’t like all the fumbles, and it seems to me that he is playing with…not fear…worry? No, not worry. Nervousness. He plays nervous.

    So I have mild concern because those things are little cracks that can lead to David Carr. Or Daniel Carr. Or Bobby Carr. Whichever Carr it is that ended up a mess in Houston. But the concern is only mild because I think these little cracks are totally normal for the majority of rookies. That stuff will go away with reps. Probably.

    I am also mildly concerned because all I saw on Hard Knocks was Weinke giving him the old, “You may be the first pick in the draft, but you’re a piece of shit until you prove otherwise” routine, and actually, the entire staff seems to approach player development with the direct threat of the sword of Damocles placed over everybody’s head, and I never saw anything in the way of encouragement. And not everybody works the same way psychologically, and I don’t know how Goff is wired. Is he going to brush aside the “You’re a dumbass rookie” reprimands, or is he going to let those negative comments and threats widen the cracks?

    The guy has the arm.

    He unleashed some wild pitches, but I think that was nerves, not mechanics, and that he will grow out of those wild pitches. I think he will be professionally accurate next season.

    I think he has the work ethic and the desire.

    Maturity. I think everything I see in him boils down to a green, green little kid. He just comes across like some of the teenagers I deal with every day. He just isn’t a Man yet. He seems younger than everybody else, and I mean younger than EVERYBODY else by a few years. It’s like he’s the first football player drafted directly out of high school, like a rookie Kobe Bryant jacking up airballs in the playoffs.

    There ya go. I stumbled on the answer. Hire Kobe Bryant to come in and get inside that guy’s head.

    #52137
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Zooey,

    That’s an interesting take. Especially on his age. I know you don’t mean his actual age, but his maturity, etc. etc. But he’s also pretty young for a rookie QB. He turns 22 next month. Most rookie QBs are 23 or 24. In effect, he’s still a Junior or Senior in college.

    That youth can be a plus, of course. It means he’s likely gotta coupla extra years of peak physicality for the Rams on the back end of things. But on the front end, it may mean he’s less ready than an older QB. Perhaps.

    For most positions on the field, I strongly prefer drafting the younger guys, the players who come out at 21 or 22. Gurley, for example, was only 21 as a rook. That’s generally big plus for me. If the Rams can keep him, you can basically add on three seasons of peak performance, compared to a large number of other draftees.

    Anyway . . . . maturity. He does seem like a pup so far. Nice guy, if Hard Knocks is any kind of indication. But a pup.

    #52140
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I wonder how much coming from a spread offense is holding him back? I’m no expert on spread offenses but from what I hear they are as different from a pro-style offense (as far as what’s expected of the QB) as apples are from bowling balls.

    My understanding is spread QB’s don’t have to read defenses. They don’t know anything about different defensive alignments and they don’t even know standard terminology like “over” vs “under” defensive alignments. So when an NFL team drafts a spread QB they are starting from scratch. They have to learn all the basics before they can begin to understand the complexities of the NFL system. I think on Hard Knocks one of the coaches mentioned Goff never even called a play in the huddle.

    Anyway, it’s no wonder Goff hasn’t quite progressed as far as we hoped.

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 2 months ago by Avatar photonittany ram.
    #52144
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    wonder how much coming from a spread offense is holding him back? I’m no expert on spread offenses but from what I hear they are as different from a pro-style offense (as far as what’s expected of the QB) as apples are from bowling balls.

    Well, yes, it;s an issue. BUT there are several kinds of college spreads, and other qbs from spread offenses have started as rookies (Bradford, Newton, Griffin, Mariota).

    The Air Raid offense, of which the Cal offense is a variation, has at this point only 1 qb who has translated to the NFL.

    It’s not Foles. Foles was in a college Air Raid, but then played 2 years in Kelly’s spread. His first real year (other than as a rookie) in a pro system, he ended up crashing (that was 2015, obviously).

    The other who is a candidate to be The Only One started out rough in his second year playing in the pros, but by his 3rd and 4th years had started 7 games, his team winning 5 of those. That’s Keenum.

    The Cal spread had some pro-like elements, but still, there’s a lot to learn. Interestingly Goff is learning it behind the only successful (thus far) Air Raid to pros transition qb.

    #52146
    PA Ram
    Participant

    I’m not worried–yet.

    This kid has a great arm. He needs to be developed. If they do it right—he’ll be fine.

    If not—ugh.

    But what is THE right way?

    I’m in favor of him sitting for now. Let’s see how things go once the season begins. There’s no harm in him sitting the season out, IMO. That will be more a media thing. Keep the focus on getting him ready and play him WHEN he’s ready.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    #52158
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i’d be lying if i said i wasn’t completely without concern.

    there’s a little bit of doubt in my mind creeping in. and now with this bradford trade that worry picks up a little.

    but i also don’t want them to rush goff if he isn’t ready.

    #52174
    sdram
    Participant

    Not too concerned yet.

    Additional ‘seasoning’ won’t hurt him – the or one of the best QBs in the nfl sat for three years behind Brett Favre. Now, place holder guy(Kellen or Aaron or mike or whatever his name is) isn’t F
    Favre but he’s a better director right now than the rookie. Fisher really does have to win now to open the new stadium in three years.

    #52206
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    Disappointed and moderately concerned about what seemed like a lack of progress from the first preseason game to the last preseason game.

    #52213
    Winnbrad
    Participant

    Not worried at all.

    12 months from now, if Goff still looks this bad, then yes I’m worried.

    #52216
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Not worried at all.

    12 months from now, if Goff still looks this bad, then yes I’m worried.

    ———-

    I gotta feeling 12 months from now, the Rams will have a
    No.1 WR for him to throw to, which should help.

    One would think thats the no.1 need at this point,
    anyway.

    w
    v

    #52217
    NewMexicoRam
    Participant

    I expected this.
    Playing time shouldn’t be just handed to anyone.
    Prove yourself. Stretch yourself. Get better, Mr. Goff.

    #52218
    NewMexicoRam
    Participant

    Not worried at all.

    12 months from now, if Goff still looks this bad, then yes I’m worried.

    ———-

    I gotta feeling 12 months from now, the Rams will have a
    No.1 WR for him to throw to, which should help.

    One would think thats the no.1 need at this point,
    anyway.

    w
    v

    _______________________________________________

    I’m with you there. We really need that #1 WR for this O to step up.

    #52279
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Not worried at all.

    12 months from now, if Goff still looks this bad, then yes I’m worried.

    ———-

    I gotta feeling 12 months from now, the Rams will have a
    No.1 WR for him to throw to, which should help.

    One would think thats the no.1 need at this point,
    anyway.

    w
    v

    The Rams do not have a first round pick next year, so I don’t see how they are going to get a #1 WR.

    #52282
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    The Rams do not have a first round pick next year, so I don’t see how they are going to get a #1 WR.

    I was curious about that too so I looked. Unless you think the term “#1 receiver” is synonomous with “elite,” yes you can do that (find a #1 in round 2 or 3). Obviously not as easily, but it can be done, sure. There are some receivers taken in rounds 2 and 3 from 2012 on who proved they are consistently capable of the 70 catches/1000 yards metric (which is how I define a #1) (Any lower than rounds 2/3 and you’re just gambling.) That includes guys TY Hilton, Alshon Jeffrey (though he got going in year 2), and Keenan Allen. The trick obviously is hitting one. And the trick to THAT, IMO, is to just keep taking them every year until you have one. I looked at GB’s and Pitt’s receivers once because they always have good ones, and they did it by just continually drafting them fairly high year in and year out. Green Bay for example had Jennings but then took Nelson and then took Cobb…all 3 being 2nd rounders.

    That’s not an “easy answer” response but yes, it can be done.

    #52283
    PA Ram
    Participant

    If nothing else the Rams can trade a #1 in 2018 to the Vikes for Bradford and start over.

    Hey,hey, hey!!!! Stop throwing stuff!!!

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    #52351
    Isiah58
    Participant

    One thing that Snead said in an interview a few months back is that the mistake the Rams made organizationally is that they handed Foles the starting job last year and didn’t make him earn it. I felt like this would lead to Goff having to “earn” his way into the starting line-up. Several intervening factors have delayed that transition, but make no mistake that day is still coming.

    First, one has to concede that Case Keenum has played pretty well in the preseason. Not “house-on-fire” kind of play, but steady, consistent, and with a fair amount of success. Had Keenum played poorly in the preseason, I think that the situation would have been much different.

    I do not care about Dak Prescott or Carson Wentz starting week one. I do not think either of those players would have been starting for the Rams week 1, and I think Jared Goff would have been starting for both the Eagles and Cowboys week 1. Different team philosophies. The Eagles are so ready to justify their selection that they are starting Wentz over Chase Daniel even though Daniel probably gives them a much greater chance to win.

    Many, if not all, of the so-called media experts said that Goff and Wentz would need to sit and learn early on. If you don’t believe me, go back and read the scouting reports. Yet, there is now panic at the disco when Goff is not starting week 1. I am actually relieved that the Rams had the courage and conviction to sit Goff until he is ready. And Fisher said that Goff will start when he is ready. I believe allowing him to sit will be the best thing long term for his career.

    This also shows a certain attitude by Fisher that he is still coaching with a long view. The Rams again have the youngest team. The star QB that they packaged a bunch of picks for is put on ice for a while. A veterans like Ayers is jettison for a couple of raw and unheralded rookies. This is a long term approach.

    Back to Goff, there was a scene in Hard Knocks where Goff is getting the play relayed into his helmet, and he needs to spit it out right then to the huddle. The play sounds like an 18 word random phrase generator, and Goff calls the play but messes up part of the middle section of the play. A confused offense breaks the huddle, but soon everyone just stops and Boras goes over to Goff and asked him what he called. A frustrated and embarrassed Goff replies, “I’m not sure.” It is not the physical part of being a QB that is holding Goff back, its the mental part. In the same episode, you see Keenum in the kitchen with his wife going over play calls, just going over repeating the plays. You get a sense for what seems like an impossible task, and Keenum was here last year and the whole spring. The Rams have repeatedly said that Goff is working hard, but it just takes some time. When he is ready, he will start.

    Lastly, I wonder how Goff would have looked starting with the 1s and with Gurley, instead of the 2s with a bunch of rookie wide receivers. The one time he had Britt to throw to, he went right down the field and scored a touchdown. Against the Broncos and the Vikings, Goff was continuously and repeatedly in third and 8 or 9, and few QBs can operate successfully in that situation.

    When he does start, it will be with a firm grasp of the offense and then its going to be sink or swim for good with Goff. Until then, the Rams want to see how well Keenum plays and if he can hold the fort until Goff is ready. Barring something crazy, I think Goff starts game 4 or 5 regardless of how the Rams are doing, and Goff will finish the year and get better and better each game.

    Isiah 58

    “Marge, don't discourage the boy! Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals! Except the weasel.” - Homer Simpson

    #52361
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    No big deal but Fisher confirmed that Goff will be inactive against San Francisco…

    http://www.turfshowtimes.com/2016/9/6/12822026/la-rams-qb-jared-goff-inactive-week-1-san-francisco-49ers

    #52366
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    if he’s still inactive week 8 i’ll be worried.

    #52376
    bnw
    Blocked

    So Snisher drafted first overall a QB who never took a snap under center. It should work out as well as having WRs that can’t run routes, get separation or catch the ball.

    The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.

    Sprinkles are for winners.

    #52380
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    So Snisher drafted first overall a QB who never took a snap under center.

    And he’s not the first in the NFL either.

    #52385
    bnw
    Blocked

    So Snisher drafted first overall a QB who never took a snap under center.

    And he’s not the first in the NFL either.

    Big boys don’t use the misery loves company defense.

    The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.

    Sprinkles are for winners.

    #52395
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    So Snisher drafted first overall a QB who never took a snap under center.

    And he’s not the first in the NFL either.

    Big boys don’t use the misery loves company defense.

    I know. I was using the “actually if you look at the league there are good starters who began in the spread offense” defense.

    Including, I might add, Keenum. Who is a good stopgap/placeholder and the best #2 the Rams have had in years and years.

    There’s also Flacco, Newton, Mariota, Smith, Brees, Tannenhill, Rivers, and Roethlisberger.

    The spread offense is all over college football so yes teams have to adapt college spread qbs to play in pro style.

    It takes time. Some teams do it through reps, and just put the guy out there and let him learn the hard way. Usually that’s teams that were picking high in the draft because they were losing, so they can handle losing again to develop the qb.

    In the Rams case, it is VERY rare in all NFL history for a team picking below the top 10 to trade up to the top and take a qb. Teams in that position are not as bad off as teams that won 2, 3, 4 games the year before. A team like the Rams can play to win now, and let the qb develop over time.

    //

    #52398
    Isiah58
    Participant

    someone remind me – in 2004 when the NY Giants traded several picks, including multiple number 1s, to trade up for Eli Manning and then sat him on the bench for 9 weeks, were people assuming that the world was on fire and the sun wouldn’t rise again back then? I don’t recall.

    Two Super Bowls later and 12 years, I wonder if those same people are still claiming he wasn’t worth trading up for and wish the Giants had those picks back?

    Isiah 58

    “Marge, don't discourage the boy! Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals! Except the weasel.” - Homer Simpson

    #52417
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    it’s probably true that the rams aren’t as bad off as most teams with the number one pick in the draft.

    the one plus about all this is it just buys time for goff to really get into the playbook and learn this offense. no outside worries of preparing for the opposing team. or at least not as much. all he’s got to do at this point is worry about learning the terminology, learning the concepts, learning the protections, and the adjustments.

    this could be really good for him.

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 2 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 31 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.