Well not everything is for the average reader. If it were that would severely limit the range of discussion. Some stuff is for people already conversant with a field, so they can sharpen their sense of things. Then, some of those write for mainstream consumption.
It seems to me what would help reading that would be some knowledge of post-colonial history. Just the idea of it. For example, the crucial idea that post-colonial african and middle-eastern nations are not “organic” — they arose from some foreign power drawing lines on a map. Then leaving, and saying okay you’re a country now. That right there alone is one of the single most significant factors in 20th and 21st century history and drives more of our world experience than virtually any other political factor.
If you persist with that article it’s not so bad btw.