Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Public House › How rightwing media is already attacking Florida teens speaking out
- This topic has 6 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 8 months ago by zn.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 21, 2018 at 11:03 pm #82969znModerator
How rightwing media is already attacking Florida teens speaking out
As students rise up to demand gun control the right aims to take them down, along with anyone who offers them supportJason Wilson
After Parkland’s mass shooting, the wind seems to have changed. Students are speaking out, demanding that politicians act. And they’re getting some traction.
Many found their voice on Twitter and directly attacked Donald Trump’s strange and distracted online response to the massacre. David Hogg, a student journalist who interviewed his classmates as the massacre was happening, has been one of the leaders of a chorus of students calling for tough action on gun control. Emma González made a widely shared, impassioned speech which attacked the president directly, calling out the funding he has received from the National Rifle Association. Today, many of them are making their way in buses to the Florida State House to demand change.
The survivors are not elementary school students, or public employees, either shielded from media intrusion or disbarred from speaking out. They are confident young adults, many of them media savvy, and more than capable of matching the president when it comes to online snark. Several made it clear that “thoughts and prayers” in the wake of slaughter isn’t welcome.
So what is a rightwing media apparatus dedicated to the maintenance of unrestricted access to powerful assault weapons to do?
By and large, the answer has been to attack the students, along with anyone who offers them a platform or any other form of support. The nature of such attack has varied with the self-perceived seriousness of the outlet, but almost the entirety of the right has joined in. Unremitting support for the current interpretation of the second amendment and the advocacy of the NRA is one of the single issues that unites them.
The sleaziest and most direct attacks on individual students have come from the right’s more conspiratorial fringe. On Jim Hoft’s pro-Trump, conspiracy-minded website, Gateway Pundit, Lucian Wintrich performed a hatchet job on David Hogg, suggesting that he was “heavily coached on lines and is merely reciting a script”. Wintrich once told the Guardian that he learned about the perfidy of the left while attending Bard College. In his new piece, he claimed that because Hogg’s father works for the FBI, he may well be part of a broader anti-Trump conspiracy.
Gateway Pundit has been retweeted by Donald Trump senior and junior in the past, and they say that last year they managed to get White House Press Corps accreditation.
Conspiracy kingpin Alex Jones, who once told Piers Morgan that “1776 will commence again if you try to take our firearms,” published a similar attack on his Infowars website. His minions trawled through Hogg’s past, unrelated media appearances, saying that they “raised questions”. The piece then quoted one of their bevy of retired military “experts” who had appeared on Infowars, who repeated the FBI conspiracy theory, claiming that the bureau “has been hiring Social Justice Warriors for years”.
It’s not that Jones doesn’t want to hear from students at all. The site, and Jones show, has highlighted commentary from a witness who claimed that there was a second shooter, and gave a lot of airtime to another who bolstered Jones’s now-reflexive “false flag” take on any given massacre. They just don’t want to hear from any who think that others should be spared the trauma they have endured through some measure of gun control.
Another approach was to find individual survivors of this massacre who did not happen to support the call from a large number of their classmates for gun control. The Daily Wire managed to find a pro-gun Marjory Stoneman student who accused the media of “politicizing” the massacre to talk about gun control. Glenn Beck’s outfit, The Blaze did their best to extract criticism of the FBI, not Trump, from one student’s CNN interview.
Others reached back into history to feature the wisdom of survivors of massacres in the more distant past. The Washington Times spoke to Columbine survivor and Colorado Republican Patrick Neville, who wants to remove restrictions on concealed carry in K-12 schools. His thoughts were reliably disseminated by Breitbart and other outlets.
The Federalist, a would-be purveyor of considered debates, considers itself a cut above such vulgar attacks – instead, under the guise of big tent commentary, they featured writers who have merely tried to undermine the students’ credibility by claiming they have no special status in the debate. On Monday, Chandler Lasch complained on the site that “Media tends to treat survivors like Hogg as if they are policy experts … Yet enduring tragedy does not make anyone a source of wisdom on legislation.”
Just because your school has been shot up by a disturbed young man with a semi-automatic weapon, the logic seems to run, you don’t deserve a more extensive hearing than a Hillsdale College student, hundreds of miles away.
Talk radio heavyweight Rush Limbaugh also likes to affect a certain gravitas. He was invited to discuss the massacre, and the students’ activism, on Fox News Sunday. Speaking to Chris Wallace, he defended the status quo, and recommended that more guns be introduced to schools to defend them from mass shooters. He lubricated the message with a few crocodile tears about the students’ pain.
Conservative movement stalwart the National Review is similarly fastidious – but they’ll reliably put their shoulders to the wheel to prevent measures that might lessen the incidence of large scale, random slaughter. Ben Shapiro spat out a would-be demolition of the students, and the left, arguing that their activism should be dismissed because in adolescence, “the emotional centers of the brain are overdeveloped in comparison with the rational centers of the brain”.
Dan McLaughlin, who has long blogged and tweeted under the moniker of The Baseball Crank, added that “if you have ever been, or known, a teenager, you know that even comparatively well-informed teens are almost always just advancing arguments they’ve heard from adults”.
Even, it seems, teens who have recently been shot at by a mass murderer.
February 22, 2018 at 12:00 am #82970ZooeyModeratorAttack the messenger.
Easier than addressing the message.
Bunch of fuckers. I am sick and tired of it. I’m done with it. I cannot take opposition to gun control laws seriously. All arguments against restrictions on these guns are morally bankrupt.
Kids are being killed. Again and again and again and again and again and again. Kids.
There is no legitimate defense of these weapons. They do not belong in circulation. I’ve had it.
February 22, 2018 at 12:59 am #82971znModeratorThere is no legitimate defense of these weapons. They do not belong in circulation. I’ve had it.
Yeah.
.
February 22, 2018 at 6:20 am #82973Billy_TParticipantCoupla more good articles on the subject of right-wing sliming of these kids. And they’re getting death threats, too:
The right-wing sliming of Douglas High students can’t be ignored. It’s too disgusting for that.
and
How a survivor of the Florida school shooting became the victim of an online conspiracy
Excerpt:
David Hogg, 17, went from Florida high school student to mass shooting survivor to telegenic advocate for gun-control laws in a few days. And just as quickly, online conspiracy theorists began spinning viral lies attacking the teenager’s credibility.
By Wednesday — a week after a gunman wielding a semiautomatic rifle killed 17 people at Hogg’s Parkland, Fla., school — online media sites including YouTube swelled with false allegations that Hogg was secretly a “crisis actor” playing the part of a grieving student in local and national television news reports.
Hogg was not the only one targeted by an online campaign that flared up on anonymous forums such as 4chan and Reddit before it reached conservative websites, Twitter, Facebook and Google’s video platform. Collectively the posts questioned the honesty and credibility of the grieving students as they spoke out against gun violence and in some cases publicly challenged President Trump, the National Rifle Association and lawmakers opposed to gun control.
“It’s annoying. I hate it. But it’s part of American democracy,” Hogg said in a phone interview. “Am I an actor? No. Am I a witness? Yes.”
The falsehoods about Parkland students come even after the technology giants have tried to tamp down disinformation campaigns by hiring thousands of moderators, changing the algorithms that surface information and enacting stricter policies. The Parkland flare-up underscores how efforts to quell the spread of such online conspiracies remain incomplete on platforms that derive profits by attracting eyeballs en masse.
The incident has also highlighted how nobody — even a group of teens just days removed from seeing their fellow students gunned down — is off limits in the no-holds-barred world of online commentary, with its often-toxic mix of rumor, innuendo and unrefuted accusation.
The president’s son Donald Trump Jr. was among the many people who “liked” a tweet criticizing Hogg. On YouTube, a video featuring one conspiracy theory reached the top of the service’s “Trending” clips list and was viewed more than 200,000 times before the company admitted that its filtering of news had not functioned as intended and it blocked the video. A search for Hogg’s name on YouTube on Wednesday turned up eight conspiracy videos and only two legitimate news reports in a top-10 listing before YouTube intervened.
February 22, 2018 at 6:27 am #82974Billy_TParticipantAttack the messenger.
Easier than addressing the message.
Bunch of fuckers. I am sick and tired of it. I’m done with it. I cannot take opposition to gun control laws seriously. All arguments against restrictions on these guns are morally bankrupt.
Kids are being killed. Again and again and again and again and again and again. Kids.
There is no legitimate defense of these weapons. They do not belong in circulation. I’ve had it.
They don’t. Other nations don’t allow them, and they have a fraction of our gun violence.
There is no defense for weapons that can shoot 50 rounds a minute (or more), like the AR-15. Rubio said a ban on assault weapons wouldn’t have prevented the latest slaughter, but it would have limited the carnage, saved lives, at least. My own view is that Cruz never would have tried to shoot up the school if he didn’t have the firepower to do so. So, it actually would prevent it. Take away the power rush of high capacity weaponry, and folks who snap might just reconsider. Keep them in circulation and every owner is a potential mass shooter, or a potential target for a B and E job which THEN leads to more gun violence.
Most criminals get their guns from break-ins to begin with.
They need to go.
February 22, 2018 at 8:02 am #82975wvParticipantYeah, the rightwing-machine and memes are surreal.
In West Virginia the rightwing memes are dominant. I have to listen to them all day long. Yesterday, for example, i was in a prosecutor’s office and there were three cops in the office and they were all discussing how terrible it was that liberals were picking on Trump for saying Haiti was a ‘shitstain nation’ — because, after-all, Haiti was a shitstain nation…”
I heard Trump on NPR floating the idea of arming the teachers. He said maybe schools should not be gun-free zones. I think the reps will push that hard. And the Dems will spend their energy fighting that idea, and then nothing will change.
It would take a big election defeat of Reps to change things, I’d think.
w
vFebruary 23, 2018 at 11:17 am #83017znModerator -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.