Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › How do people feel about Foles right now, before anything else happens?
- This topic has 65 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 8 months ago by zn.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 23, 2015 at 8:32 pm #21338znModerator
I suggest that we stop talking about a power running game until we see them assemble the OL to make one possible.
Do we know what that is?
The Rams OL has had a couple of healthy spurts. The 2nd half of 2012, much of 2013. When they had a running threat in there, they ran the ball on the best of them. Just looking at the 2nd half of 2012, Jackson was getting 4.3 a carry. Before the OL eroded with injuries in 2013, Stacy was getting just under 4.1 a carry, and that’s with Clemens at qb for most of those games. So yes they have run the ball effectively enough even without the pieces. Yet my bet is that on paper, those OLs did not impress people.
And besides, when I personally talk about a power running game, I never think of the Rams as having ever intended to be run run run. It always has been, and always intended to be, a balanced offense, with around 53-55% passing. And I never say “power running team.” And I never say “short passing game” either. What I say is “they use power running and ball control passing and set up big plays” (through play action but also other means too.) Seattle is a run run offense and they passed around 44% of the time. IND is a passing team, and they passed around 60% of the time.
March 23, 2015 at 11:33 pm #21364znModeratorI just dont think anyone on this board buys
into the “QBs elevate the team” thing.Yeah, on the other side, it’s that old formula. 1 + 21 = 1
March 24, 2015 at 2:49 pm #21375rflParticipantDo we know what that is?
Well, I know that what I saw last year was an OL that was rarely able to open holes to get the running game going. I know that WASN’T it. And we have less now than what we had then.
They’ll do something. But if it is not something fairly dramatic, we will not have a power running game.
And besides, when I personally talk about a power running game, I never think of the Rams as having ever intended to be run run run. It always has been, and always intended to be, a balanced offense, with around 53-55% passing.
I think it’s clear that I have never spoken of a “run run run” approach. I’ve always had a pretty nuanced version of offense.
Here’s what I am saying. And it has nothing to do with “run, run, run.”
First, an effective running game must be able to impose its will on defenses, even when they are looking for the run. It doesn’t have to be a numbers game of carries. It does have to be a weapon that defenses have to take seriously and that can significantly carry the burden of the game. A “power running game” of the sort generally attributed to Fisher teams, is capable of grinding out 1st downs in the face of schemes designed to stop it without the secondary orienting to the passing game.
Second, such a running game requires competent OL. I’ve argued scores of times that you don’t have to have stars. You do need solid professionals. RBs cannot impose a team’s will on a defense without solid OL play. I mean, this is too obvious to belabor further.
Third, we did not have such an OL last year and have only had flashes of solid OL play since Fisher got here. As a result, in 3 seasons, we have only in brief flashes been able to impose our will running the football. The rest of the time, the (limited) success and (abundant) failure of our offense has been put in the hands of the QBs and WRs. Fisher has not displayed a true power running game since he got here.
Fourth, the Rams have, so far, made only the most minimal move so far to even regain last year’s low standard of play, let alone improve it. They almost certainly have a plan, but whatever it is, it shows no sign of urgency, it continues to risk missing out on any of the few available vet FAs, and it has, until now at least, subordinated the OL to DT, LB, and, notably, QB, in off season activity.
Fifth, in light of 1-4, the commonly held assumption that Fisher is committed to a power running game or that, as the line I quoted put it, this team is not built to depend on the QB, is highly suspect. Through Fisher’s 1st 3 years, with very few exceptions, the Rams’ few successes have precisely been based on QB performance. ZN, your points about Foles themselves support the idea that he is attractive to the Rams precisely BECAUSE they think he can throw quickly and effectively to offset the lack of a power running game.
Sixth, unless they fill the glaring holes in the OL with competence, with improvements on recent levels of talent, you can forget about power running this year. At best I can imagine a running game that gets going in fits and starts beneath a QB effectively throwing medium routes with quick releases and relying on Mason to occasionally break off a reasonably big play when the stars align perfectly. But play action will get us very little and we will NOT be able to impose our will running the ball.
Again, this is all intended to oppose stock league and fan assumptions about Fisher with the actual evidence of what he has done so far. And to caution against having expectations that diverge from what the team is actually up to.
I feel it bears repeating, though others may not: this team will have a power running game and alleviate pressure on QBs WHEN IT ASSEMBLES A COMPETENT OL AND NOT BEFORE! And it hasn’t happened yet.
By virtue of the absurd ...
March 24, 2015 at 7:23 pm #21388znModeratorThird, we did not have such an OL last year and have only had flashes of solid OL play since Fisher got here.
Last year? Injuries. In fact–2 sets of injuries. The off-season, which led to guys recovering more than practicing, and then the Chiefs game, where they lost 3 players in on game. One didn’t come back and 2 played hurt. Before that? Not flashes–that’s not what I saw. I saw extended periods where the Rams could run the ball, regardless of the qb, UNLESS the OL got beat up with injuries.
I read your post with appreciation for how you make your case, I just disagree with it.
Do they have their OL now? Today? No not yet, as of later March. But then free agency isn’t over and the draft is coming.
See my feeling is this. They HAVE done what we want them to do, and so the odds favor them doing it again.
..
March 25, 2015 at 9:34 am #21407DakParticipantFoles sounds like he could be a roller coaster. Some big plays. Some INTs that vex us. I think he’s a place holder at QB. I’m not excited, but also know he was likely the best option for 2015. This year should show us whether he’s the best option moving forward.
March 25, 2015 at 10:15 am #21408znModeratorFoles sounds like he could be a roller coaster. Some big plays. Some INTs that vex us. I think he’s a place holder at QB. I’m not excited, but also know he was likely the best option for 2015. This year should show us whether he’s the best option moving forward.
I think he can be better than that even. I don’t think of him as a placeholder.
I just thought I would intervene here, and put your opinion in its place as NOT THE TRUTH, and instead put the focus back on WHAT IS THE TRUTH.
Kidding. Obviously.
Different opinions. It will be interesting to see how it evolves.
..
March 25, 2015 at 10:19 am #21409wvParticipantFoles sounds like he could be a roller coaster. Some big plays. Some INTs that vex us. I think he’s a place holder at QB. I’m not excited, but also know he was likely the best option for 2015. This year should show us whether he’s the best option moving forward.
I agree with zn ; i think Foles can be what he’s already been — a good QB.
Not elite, but a tough, smart gamer.Obviously, they need to keep drafting young QBs, every year or so
for all the obvious reason. To state the obvious.I did not mention the OLINE once
in this post. Not once.w
vMarch 25, 2015 at 1:02 pm #21419DakParticipantI think that 2013 was an outlier, and that’s why I’m not so excited. Besides, 2013 happened in a different system. Truly, I have no idea what to expect of Foles here, but my range of possible outcomes is probably not as high as many other Rams fans’. In my range, Foles is somewhere between just below average at QB to the “tough, smart gamer” that wv mentions above. I think that’s his ceiling, and it’s quite a bit below Bradford’s ceiling.
- This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by Dak.
March 27, 2015 at 12:32 am #21599znModeratorFoles is somewhere between just below average at QB to the “tough, smart gamer” that wv mentions above. I think that’s his ceiling, and it’s quite a bit below Bradford’s ceiling.
Foles is kinda like the Rams Kaepernick. But, better.
And. Not as fast.
April 4, 2015 at 5:15 pm #22121znModeratorfrom off the net
—
merlin
I believe that Weinke as QB coach was a fantastic hire. I like that Cigs has said his QB coach will have room to do his job because when coupled with the quality of the hire I think Foles’ problem areas from last season (degradation of fundamentals that were solid in 2013) are going to be heavily addressed throughout camp as they make their offensive adjustments and there is a good chance they get him back on track.
April 6, 2015 at 12:35 pm #22249HerzogParticipantFoles is somewhere between just below average at QB to the “tough, smart gamer” that wv mentions above. I think that’s his ceiling, and it’s quite a bit below Bradford’s ceiling.
Foles is kinda like the Rams Kaepernick. But, better.
And. Not as fast.
Since we have some time. What would you say is considered average at quarterback in the NFL. Ratings and statistically speaking.
April 6, 2015 at 12:50 pm #22250znModeratorFoles is somewhere between just below average at QB to the “tough, smart gamer” that wv mentions above. I think that’s his ceiling, and it’s quite a bit below Bradford’s ceiling.
Foles is kinda like the Rams Kaepernick. But, better.
And. Not as fast.
Since we have some time. What would you say is considered average at quarterback in the NFL. Ratings and statistically speaking.
You mean what is an average qb? Cause an “average” designation for a qb is NOT good. As in,”enh, he’s just average.” (Not talking about Foles, just in general.)
Cause with qbs you have good levels and then bad levels.
Or do you mean what’s average for a GOOD qb? A starting caliber qb you want to keep?
BTW it might be a few hours before I respond. That eerie entity out there they call “the real world” is demanding my presence.
.
April 6, 2015 at 1:32 pm #22251bnwBlockedI’m optimistic about Foles being the Rams QB.
The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
April 6, 2015 at 2:41 pm #22252wvParticipantI’m optimistic about Foles being the Rams QB.
What would your NFC WEST QB ranking look like?
Russell Wilson
Kaepernik
Carson Palmer
Folesw
vApril 6, 2015 at 3:57 pm #22254nittany ramModeratorI’m optimistic about Foles being the Rams QB.
What would your NFC WEST QB ranking look like?
Russell Wilson
Kaepernik
Carson Palmer
Folesw
v1. Wilson
2. Palmer
3. Foles
4. KaepernickApril 6, 2015 at 4:14 pm #22255joemadParticipant
What would your NFC WEST QB ranking look like?
Russell Wilson
Kaepernik
Carson Palmer
Folesw
vthat’s pretty fair…..
what about the NFC East?
Romo
Sam
Eli
RGIII or the Cuz?April 6, 2015 at 4:34 pm #22257bnwBlockedI’m optimistic about Foles being the Rams QB.
What would your NFC WEST QB ranking look like?
Russell Wilson
Kaepernik
Carson Palmer
Folesw
vI am optimistic.
Passing yards
Palmer
Foles
Wilson
KaeernickWins
Wilson
Foles
Palmer
KaepernickThe upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
April 6, 2015 at 4:35 pm #22258wvParticipantthat’s pretty fair…..
what about the NFC East?
Romo
Sam
Eli
RGIII or the Cuz?Hmmmm. I dunno. I suppose I’d have
to go with Eli’s two playoff runs,
over the others:Eli
Romo
Sam
RG3/CuzBut that group could easily shift
around a lot, I would think,
if Sam and RG3 could stay healthy.April 6, 2015 at 6:40 pm #22263HerzogParticipantFoles is somewhere between just below average at QB to the “tough, smart gamer” that wv mentions above. I think that’s his ceiling, and it’s quite a bit below Bradford’s ceiling.
Foles is kinda like the Rams Kaepernick. But, better.
And. Not as fast.
Since we have some time. What would you say is considered average at quarterback in the NFL. Ratings and statistically speaking.
You mean what is an average qb? Cause an “average” designation for a qb is NOT good. As in,”enh, he’s just average.” (Not talking about Foles, just in general.)
Cause with qbs you have good levels and then bad levels.
Or do you mean what’s average for a GOOD qb? A starting caliber qb you want to keep?
BTW it might be a few hours before I respond. That eerie entity out there they call “the real world” is demanding my presence.
.
I mean average in the strictest sense of the term…statistically speaking.
April 6, 2015 at 6:42 pm #22264HerzogParticipantI’m optimistic about Foles being the Rams QB.
I’m with you. I think he is one good qb coach (and decent offensive line) away from being amazing.
April 6, 2015 at 6:52 pm #22265wvParticipantI’m optimistic about Foles being the Rams QB.
I’m with you. I think he is one good qb coach (and decent offensive line) away from being amazing.
“Hope clouds observation.”
― Frank Herbert, Dune🙂
w
vApril 6, 2015 at 7:12 pm #22266bnwBlockedI’m optimistic about Foles being the Rams QB.
I’m with you. I think he is one good qb coach (and decent offensive line) away from being amazing.
“Hope clouds observation.”
― Frank Herbert, Dunew
vSuch pessimism is not warranted in my opinion. Foles is the answer for this season for multiple reasons. A decent answer at that. Crack a smile it won’t hurt.
The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
April 6, 2015 at 7:18 pm #22267wvParticipantI’m optimistic about Foles being the Rams QB.
I’m with you. I think he is one good qb coach (and decent offensive line) away from being amazing.
“Hope clouds observation.”
― Frank Herbert, Dunew
vSuch pessimism is not warranted in my opinion. Foles is the answer for this season for multiple reasons. A decent answer at that. Crack a smile it won’t hurt.
So you think Foles can be “amazing” ?
Call me a pessimist,
but i do not expect that.
Despite the amazing year
he had for the Eagles 🙂w
vApril 6, 2015 at 7:32 pm #22268HerzogParticipantI’m optimistic about Foles being the Rams QB.
I’m with you. I think he is one good qb coach (and decent offensive line) away from being amazing.
“Hope clouds observation.”
― Frank Herbert, Dunew
vLOL!! I LOVE IT!
I will respond after my next patient.
April 6, 2015 at 7:46 pm #22269bnwBlockedI’m optimistic about Foles being the Rams QB.
I’m with you. I think he is one good qb coach (and decent offensive line) away from being amazing.
“Hope clouds observation.”
― Frank Herbert, Dunew
vSuch pessimism is not warranted in my opinion. Foles is the answer for this season for multiple reasons. A decent answer at that. Crack a smile it won’t hurt.
So you think Foles can be “amazing” ?
Call me a pessimist,
but i do not expect that.
Despite the amazing year
he had for the Eaglesw
vI know I feel much better about going into the season with Foles and a 2nd round draft pic and more cap space to address team needs than having Bradford start after 2 ACL surgeries in 18 months. I never wrote amazing. I wrote optimistic. In fact it was the only feeling of such optimism since the Marshal Faulk trade moment I experienced 16 years ago and the Aeneus Williams signing two years later.
- This reply was modified 9 years, 8 months ago by bnw.
The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
April 6, 2015 at 7:53 pm #22271HerzogParticipantI’m optimistic about Foles being the Rams QB.
I’m with you. I think he is one good qb coach (and decent offensive line) away from being amazing.
“Hope clouds observation.”
― Frank Herbert, Dunew
vSuch pessimism is not warranted in my opinion. Foles is the answer for this season for multiple reasons. A decent answer at that. Crack a smile it won’t hurt.
So you think Foles can be “amazing” ?
Call me a pessimist,
but i do not expect that.
Despite the amazing year
he had for the Eaglesw
vI know I feel much better about going into the season with Foles and a 2nd round draft pic and more cap space to address team needs than having Bradford start after 2 ACL surgeries in 18 months. I never wrote amazing. I wrote optimistic. In fact it was the only feeling of such optimism since the Marshal Faulk trade moment I experienced 16 years ago and the Aeneus Williams signing two years later.
I think he was talking to me….I wrote amazing…..I will explain shortly
April 6, 2015 at 8:32 pm #22273HerzogParticipantI’m optimistic about Foles being the Rams QB.
I’m with you. I think he is one good qb coach (and decent offensive line) away from being amazing.
“Hope clouds observation.”
― Frank Herbert, Dunew
vSuch pessimism is not warranted in my opinion. Foles is the answer for this season for multiple reasons. A decent answer at that. Crack a smile it won’t hurt.
So you think Foles can be “amazing” ?
Call me a pessimist,
but i do not expect that.
Despite the amazing year
he had for the Eaglesw
vI think he could be. I think he was Bulgerized in Philly last year. They had three Offensive line starters out while he was playing. I don’t completely discount that spectacular 2013 season he had.
All that being said, I do think he needs a good offensive line AND a good qb coach….and a simple offense. I think we are headed in that direction.
From an ESPN BLOG:
In 2012, the Eagles’ offensive line was a mess due to injuries. Pro Bowl left tackle Jason Peters missed the entire season after tearing his Achilles tendon. Center Jason Kelce tore his ACL in the second game of the season. Left guard Evan Mathis was the only lineman to start all 16 games.
In 2013, Foles’ best season, all five starting offensive linemen played all 16 games. In 2014, disorder was again the order of the day. Right tackle Lane Johnson was suspended for the first four games of the season. Mathis and Kelce were injured early. Right guard Todd Herremans tore his biceps midway through the season.
April 6, 2015 at 11:07 pm #22275znModeratorI mean average in the strictest sense of the term…statistically speaking.
Hmm. Well I think an avg. qb—one right in the middle of the pack—
QB rating in the low 90s
Completion percentage around 63%
Around 240 yards a game
INT% around 2.2-2.4%
YPA around 7.2Let me see who I just described. ……….. (I am actually just now looking to see……) That is, who in 2014 does this describe?
Okay.
Joe Flacco
.
April 7, 2015 at 1:58 pm #22282bnwBlockedI mean average in the strictest sense of the term…statistically speaking.
Hmm. Well I think an avg. qb—one right in the middle of the pack—
QB rating in the low 90s
Completion percentage around 63%
Around 240 yards a game
INT% around 2.2-2.4%
YPA around 7.2Let me see who I just described. ……….. (I am actually just now looking to see……) That is, who in 2014 does this describe?
Okay.
Joe Flacco
.
Not bad. I think Flacco’s numbers were less than that when they won the Super Bowl. Glass is half full my friend!
The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
April 7, 2015 at 4:22 pm #22284HerzogParticipantI mean average in the strictest sense of the term…statistically speaking.
Hmm. Well I think an avg. qb—one right in the middle of the pack—
QB rating in the low 90s
Completion percentage around 63%
Around 240 yards a game
INT% around 2.2-2.4%
YPA around 7.2Let me see who I just described. ……….. (I am actually just now looking to see……) That is, who in 2014 does this describe?
Okay.
Joe Flacco
.
I guess I’m so used to seeing below average quarterback play, that I didn’t realize how bad it had been. Average in today’s NFL is better than what it used to be, and we ain’t had it in a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG TIME.
- This reply was modified 9 years, 8 months ago by Herzog.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.