Green Bay/ ARZ in overtime

Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › Green Bay/ ARZ in overtime

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 16, 2016 at 11:32 pm #37477
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rodgers throws his 2nd successful hail mary of the season.

    Would you rather be lucky or good? How about both?

    January 16, 2016 at 11:39 pm #37478
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Well that didn’t last long.

    Great game.

    January 16, 2016 at 11:40 pm #37479
    Avatar photojoemad
    Participant

    Fitzgerald is great. The Rams are not his only victim…

    January 17, 2016 at 12:50 am #37480
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I wanted Arians to lose. Not a fan.

    January 17, 2016 at 1:09 am #37481
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator
    nittany ram wrote:

    I wanted Arians to lose. Not a fan.

    We need every one of the other NFC west teams to go to the superbowl. That way when the Rams get rolling and take the division, it will be that much more of an accomplishment.

    Or that’s my diabolical plan, anyway.

    January 17, 2016 at 6:01 am #37483
    PA Ram
    Participant
    zn wrote:

    Rodgers throws his 2nd successful hail mary of the season.

    Would you rather be lucky or good? How about both?

    This is the way the NFL feels to me this year. No team is particularly great or dominant. It’s more about being lucky on Sunday. Any lucky play can decide things.

    I don’t see a GREAT team. Any team can lose.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    January 17, 2016 at 8:14 am #37491
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator
    zn wrote:

    Rodgers throws his 2nd successful hail mary of the season.

    Would you rather be lucky or good? How about both?

    Ya know, this Rodgers kid just might have a future in this league. I think the Rams should make a trade for him before the Packers realize what they have.

    Offer Foles and a 7th rounder to start and go from there.

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 10 months ago by Avatar photonittany ram.
    January 17, 2016 at 9:50 am #37505
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Two great QBs in yesterday’s games,
    one very good QB,
    and one good QB.

    Rogers, Brady,
    Palmer,
    Smith.

    No Keenums.

    w
    v

    January 17, 2016 at 9:59 am #37507
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator
    wv wrote:

    Two great QBs in yesterday’s games,
    one very good QB,
    and one good QB.

    Rogers, Brady,
    Palmer,
    Smith.

    No Keenums.

    w
    v

    And today we have Wilsons, Mannings, Roethlesbergers and Newtons.

    Still no Keenums.

    Maybe next week?

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 10 months ago by Avatar photonittany ram.
    January 17, 2016 at 11:52 am #37524
    PA Ram
    Participant
    wv wrote:

    Two great QBs in yesterday’s games,
    one very good QB,
    and one good QB.

    Rogers, Brady,
    Palmer,
    Smith.

    No Keenums.

    w
    v

    Well, wv–that’s cause we are the lucky ones who have Case Keenum. If those guys want him they’d better be willing to give a lot up. I mean–a LOT.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    January 17, 2016 at 12:04 pm #37527
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator
    PA Ram wrote:

    Well, wv–that’s cause we are the lucky ones who have Case Keenum. If those guys want him they’d better be willing to give a lot up. I mean–a LOT.

    Well they need a qb, and either Mannion is that guy or they need to get one.

    But I don’t give Case a hard time. In fact, as #2 Rams qbs forced to start go, I like him better than Hill, Davis, Clemens, Feeley, and Boller. Just to go back 7 years.

    January 17, 2016 at 12:13 pm #37528
    Avatar photowv
    Participant
    zn wrote:
    PA Ram wrote:

    Well, wv–that’s cause we are the lucky ones who have Case Keenum. If those guys want him they’d better be willing to give a lot up. I mean–a LOT.

    Well they need a qb, and either Mannion is that guy or they need to get one.

    But I don’t give Case a hard time. In fact, as #2 Rams qbs forced to start go, I like him better than Hill, Davis, Clemens, Feeley, and Boller. Just to go back 7 years.

    Sure, i like little Case,
    as a nice weak-armed, fiesty, bright,
    no2 qb. The little scamp.

    I keep sayin it — Offseason will be fascinating.

    Can they keep the D together?

    Can they build an offense?

    w
    v

    January 17, 2016 at 12:35 pm #37533
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I think they can keep the D together. We will find that out before the draft.

    Neither Foles nor Keenum is the franchise QB you want. Maybe Mannion isn’t either.

    This is a good draft to roll the dice on a QB and there is a lot of positional depth in the draft to help other areas. imo

    There are different ways to improve the Rams and they could all work out. That is what will make this process interesting. It will be more interesting if they do it my way. 😉

    Agamemnon

    January 17, 2016 at 12:53 pm #37536
    TSRF
    Participant

    Can Hekker run the Wishbone? If the answer is, “Yes”, we’re all set.

    January 17, 2016 at 1:16 pm #37542
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator
    zn wrote:

    Well they need a qb, and either Mannion is that guy or they need to get one.

    That’s the reality. And it’s a bit frightening. Because Mannion may not be that guy. And even if he is, he may not be ready next year.

    January 17, 2016 at 1:28 pm #37545
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator
    Zooey wrote:
    zn wrote:

    Well they need a qb, and either Mannion is that guy or they need to get one.

    That’s the reality. And it’s a bit frightening. Because Mannion may not be that guy. And even if he is, he may not be ready next year.

    Jeesh dude quit the whining. Be stoic. You;re a Rams fan. What’s another 10 years.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.