Full video, not cherry-picked, of Obama and Jane the Virgin star.

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Public House Full video, not cherry-picked, of Obama and Jane the Virgin star.

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 17 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #57102
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    bnw posted a sliced and diced version of this, from Fox News, which, for anyone in the right-wing bubble, may have led to Olympian levels of “jumping to conclusions.”

    I googled it. Found the site with the actual interview, plus the actress’s prologue.

    After Interviewing President Obama, Gina Rodriguez Isn’t Staying Silent on This Election

    It’s even more clear now that Obama was talking about citizens — and ONLY citizens — voting. And the fear Gina Rodriguez expressed on behalf of Latinos was that one’s name on voter roles, AS a citizen, might give extra info to authorities to go after family and friends who might not be citizens yet. Nothing was ever even remotely suggested regarding non-citizens voting. It was the worry that being legally on voting roles might provide side-info that could lead to non-citizen friends and family being harassed or worse.

    As usual, righties and their media outlets jump on nothing, desperately trying to make it into something. And right-wing leaders try to use this to fearmonger and cover up their own voter suppression efforts.

    That’s despicable.

    #57104
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    I’ve seen this for decades now, and it’s beyond tiresome. The right throws so much absolute shit out there, distortions, outright lies, hair’s on fire hysterics, twisting nothing into something, it’s really impossible to keep up with.

    It’s a smart strategy, though. Despicable in every way. But smart. Why? Because the overwhelming amount of pure D bullshit spewed by the right takes time to debunk. All of it is easily debunked, but it takes time. And that time would be far better spent developing structures and policy and communications to get out the left’s message.

    The center-left, to generalize like crazy, often falls for this, and the right knows it. That means it’s basically up to leftists to mobilize, concentrate on better policies, vision and methods to express all of that. The Dems, who run the gamut, typically, from center-left to center-right, with the party power being center-right, seem lost in this battle against the far more aggressive and scruples-free right.

    Here, on this site, I fear I’ve fallen back into some bad old habits, and I need to take my own advice:

    Be a leftist who doesn’t waste any time with endless wingnut bullshit. Gotta stop posting about that aspect of politics, and the end of this crazed election will make that a hell of a lot easier for me.

    ;>)

    • This reply was modified 8 years ago by Avatar photoBilly_T.
    #57108
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Here, on this site, I fear I’ve fallen back into some bad old habits, and I need to take my own advice:

    Be a leftist who doesn’t waste any time with endless wingnut bullshit. Gotta stop posting about that aspect of politics, and the end of this crazed election will make that a hell of a lot easier for me.

    —————-
    I actually have intense negative Italian hot-headed emotions about all the rightwing tactics and stuff, like the Fox crap and Rush Limbaugh/O’Reilly/Hannity/etc crappolla-fest.

    My own approach, which has changed over the years, is to use such interactions and experiences as…oh…’tests’ of my ability to stay..’centered’ for lack of a better word.
    I mean I HAVE all the same emotions you do, but i ‘try’ to find a way to stay tranquil in the midst of rightwing-fuck-the-poor crap.

    Call it ‘political meditation’ 🙂 I dunno. It just doesn’t seem healthy for ‘me’ to get all crazed by things i cant change. Ya know. It is VERY difficult for me. You have no idea. I have to let a LOT of things go, or else i would be frantic trying to correct all kinds of people about all kinds of things. It just doesnt work. So mainly, i just let a lot of things go, and try to find some common humanity when i can.

    w
    v
    “Everything that lives is Holy.” William Blake
    w
    v

    #57110
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Here, on this site, I fear I’ve fallen back into some bad old habits, and I need to take my own advice:

    Be a leftist who doesn’t waste any time with endless wingnut bullshit. Gotta stop posting about that aspect of politics, and the end of this crazed election will make that a hell of a lot easier for me.

    —————-
    I actually have intense negative Italian hot-headed emotions about all the rightwing tactics and stuff, like the Fox crap and Rush Limbaugh/O’Reilly/Hannity/etc crappolla-fest.

    My own approach, which has changed over the years, is to use such interactions and experiences as…oh…’tests’ of my ability to stay..’centered’ for lack of a better word.
    I mean I HAVE all the same emotions you do, but i ‘try’ to find a way to stay tranquil in the midst of rightwing-fuck-the-poor crap.

    Call it ‘political meditation’ :>) I dunno. It just doesn’t seem healthy for ‘me’ to get all crazed by things i cant change. Ya know. It is VERY difficult for me. You have no idea. But i get better every year.

    w
    v

    ;>)

    WV,

    It may sounds weird, but that makes me feel better. Knowing you also have struggles with this stuff.

    Most of the time when I read your posts, I’m amazed at their “grounded” aspect. Off the top of my head, it’s like you’re a comedic Yoda and you’ve internalized that old saying our wiser high-school buddies would always write in our yearbooks.

    ;>)

    Anyway, it’s going to be a tremendous relief when this lunacy is over with. Gotta get back to my writing and step up reading as well. Currently reading Alice Kaplan’s Looking for The Stranger. It’s kinda like a biography of a novel. On a bit of a Camus kick at the moment.

    #57118
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    <

    WV,

    It may sounds weird, but that makes me feel better. Knowing you also have struggles with this stuff.

    Most of the time when I read your posts, I’m amazed at their “grounded” aspect. Off the top of my head, it’s like you’re a comedic Yoda and you’ve internalized that old saying our wiser high-school buddies would always write in our yearbooks.

    ;>)

    Anyway, it’s going to be a tremendous relief when this lunacy is over with. Gotta get back to my writing and step up reading as well. Currently reading Alice Kaplan’s Looking for The Stranger. It’s kinda like a biography of a novel. On a bit of a Camus kick at the moment.

    ——————-
    OMG, Billy you have no idea how hard it is for me to even read the titles of rightwing articles or even hear the NAME Bill O’Reilly, etc, etc.

    I mean this is serious stuff right. Its not football. Its real life policy stuff that affects who lives and who dies and who gets to live longer and who gets gets dehumanized, etc. Serious stuff. So, yeah, it all grabs me in the Gut and twists me.

    So, i can either go nutz and become Mr Hateful Angry Leftist, or i can… find another path.

    I try and figure out very quickly when its pointless to go any further and when its not.

    And i try to find my happy-place and stay there for as long as i can 🙂

    I’m reading the “Black Jacobins” btw. Fine book. About the only slave revolution that was successful. The slaves rose up and took over Haiti and fought off the Brits, French and Spanish.

    w
    v

    #57121
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    <

    WV,

    It may sounds weird, but that makes me feel better. Knowing you also have struggles with this stuff.

    Most of the time when I read your posts, I’m amazed at their “grounded” aspect. Off the top of my head, it’s like you’re a comedic Yoda and you’ve internalized that old saying our wiser high-school buddies would always write in our yearbooks.

    ;>)

    Anyway, it’s going to be a tremendous relief when this lunacy is over with. Gotta get back to my writing and step up reading as well. Currently reading Alice Kaplan’s Looking for The Stranger. It’s kinda like a biography of a novel. On a bit of a Camus kick at the moment.

    ——————-
    OMG, Billy you have no idea how hard it is for me to even read the titles of rightwing articles or even hear the NAME Bill O’Reilly, etc, etc.

    I mean this is serious stuff right. Its not football. Its real life policy stuff that affects who lives and who dies and who gets to live longer and who gets gets dehumanized, etc. Serious stuff. So, yeah, it all grabs me in the Gut and twists me.

    So, i can either go nutz and become Mr Hateful Angry Leftist, or i can… find another path.

    I try and figure out very quickly when its pointless to go any further and when its not.

    And i try to find my happy-place and stay there for as long as i can :>)

    I’m reading the “Black Jacobins” btw. Fine book. About the only slave revolution that was successful. The slaves rose up and took over Haiti and fought off the Brits, French and Spanish.

    w
    v

    Again, that’s good to know.

    I’m guessing there are several books with that title. Are you talking about the classic by C. L. R James? That’s definitely on my list. Recently bought Frantz Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth (with an intro by Sartre), which is often listed along with James’ work as seminal, leftist, must-read books.

    Gotta get back to my reading. A New Year’s resolution, perhaps. It brings me a great deal of satisfaction, and this current political stuff does the opposite. It’s not healthy for me to take time away from great art, etc. etc.

    Hope all is well —

    #57123
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    As a rule over the years I have found that if a right-wing media theme or issue sounds like it makes no sense, chances are it doesn’t. When you need actual info, it is never hard to refute. You don’t have to refute every single one every single time. Just know that your experience has taught you that every single time you HAD to refute or or wanted to refute it, it’s never hard and doesn’t take long.

    Like the idea that there’s voter fraud in the USA that has to be guarded against.

    It never takes very long to demonstrate that in fact not only is there no such issue, but actually, it’s a made up issue so that republicans can find ways to exclude constituencies which tend to vote democratic. That’s all it ever is.

    Demonstrating that means a short search and they very quickly and easily you choose one or two of the best sources from the first couple of search pages, and you’re done.

    Meanwhile we know full well that there are some who will never be convinced because they are so partisan that they just buy the (always invariably chanted in unison) routine you;re refuting. They won’t listen to the refutation. We know that.

    So I just trust that if the rightie themes need to be confronted, it doesn’t take much real effort to do it. It has always been that way before and will always be that way.

    Other than that, I pay no attention to them. When they show up in my consciousness it’s because I am in a discussion (like those here) that bring them up. Usually I don’t even invest anything, but when I do, I have always found it takes minutes to expose the disinformation for what it is.

    #57126
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Recently bought Frantz Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth (with an intro by Sartre), which is often listed along with James’ work as seminal, leftist, must-read books.

    Which raises the entire list of post-colonial theory and scholarship, which basically is an entire library section in its own right.

    I find that when reading into post-colonial theory and scholarship and history, it is always a good bet to read the fiction too. They reinforce one another. So being aware of post-colonial fiction is a huge contribution to becoming invested in post-colonial theory and history.

    .

    #57132
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Recently bought Frantz Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth (with an intro by Sartre), which is often listed along with James’ work as seminal, leftist, must-read books.

    Which raises the entire list of post-colonial theory and scholarship, which basically is an entire library section in its own right.

    I find that when reading into post-colonial theory and scholarship and history, it is always a good bet to read the fiction too. They reinforce one another. So being aware of post-colonial fiction is a huge contribution to becoming invested in post-colonial theory and history.

    .

    Do you have some recommendations? I’ve read some African post-Colonial writers, like Achebe, Soyinka and Tutuola, and some from Asia like Naipaul, Anita Desai and Pramoedya Ananta Toer. But, aside from poets like Aime Cesaire, I haven’t explored much in the way of Afro-Caribbean literature, which could augment reading Fanon, etc.

    #57143
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Three books for starters. All short stories

    Larson (ed), Under African Skies: Modern African Stories. Read at least Mphahlele, Head, and Magona (all three are south african)
    Achebe, Girls at War, if you haven’t read it. It’s uneven but read it all.
    Achebe & Innes (eds), African Short Stories. Read at least Ogot and Head.

    Also find:

    Mukherjee, “The Management of Grief”
    Lahiri, “Interpreter of Maladies”
    Mueenuddin, “Nawabdin Electrician” (which is a favorite of mine)

    #57154
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I’m guessing there are several books with that title. Are you talking about the classic by C. L. R James? That’s definitely on my list. Recently bought Frantz Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth (with an intro by Sartre), which is often listed along with James’ work as seminal, leftist, must-read books.

    Gotta get back to my reading. A New Year’s resolution, perhaps. It brings me a great deal of satisfaction, and this current political stuff does the opposite. It’s not healthy for me to take time away from great art, etc. etc.

    Hope all is well —

    ————
    Yup. CLR James.

    w
    v

    #57173
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    I don’t know guy’s , it really bothers me when you describe Obama or Clinton as Left or even center Left . The Right wing owns all of the media and both Democratic and Republican parties as well as the Libertarians . It’s all just corporate branding

    #57174
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    I don’t know guy’s , it really bothers me when you describe Obama or Clinton as Left or even center Left . The Right wing owns all of the media and both Democratic and Republican parties as well as the Libertarians . It’s all just corporate branding

    Unless I missed it, no one here has done that, Eternal.

    I’ve been saying Obama has governed from the center-right going back to the beginning. I also see the Democratic Party power structure as center-right, and too much of its agenda as “conservative.” HRC may even be more to the right on most issues than Obama. We’ll see.

    A possible source of confusion: I did say Democrats run the gamut from center-left to center-right, and I think they do. But I’m talking primarily about citizens, not politicians — not people running the party, etc. In my view, there aren’t that many elected Dems who one could legitimately call “liberal,” and I don’t think the Dems could be accurately called center-left overall since (perhaps) the early 1970s. They’ve been drifting rightward for forty years, and they’ve never, ever been “radical.”

    Right-wingers, when I say the above, typically react with some degree of shock. Cuz they have it in their minds the Dems have always been “far left” and are worse now than they were forty years ago. To me, their view is absurd and just doesn’t sync up with historical reality. Though, with the emergence of Sanders (the Indy), I’m hopeful the right-ward slide might be at its end.

    • This reply was modified 8 years ago by Avatar photoBilly_T.
    #57176
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Of course, to take the historical further back, the Dems once owned the South, pre-Civil-Rights era, and at least that part of the party was “hard right.” They actually tacked a bit to the left when they lost the South. For decades prior to that, the Dems were quite mixed, ideologically, and included severely right-wing Southerners, moderates and liberals in the North, Midwest and West, especially . . . .

    This was also true of the GOP, which once had its share of center-left pols, in pretty much the same geographical areas as the Dems.

    Talking heads, like the truly vile Jeffrey Lord, whose presence on CNN puts the lie to its supposed “liberal bias,” mix this stuff up constantly. He’s another of those nutcases who says the Nazis were “leftists” and that the KKK was a “leftist” organization — the latter because Dems supposedly started it. What he and pretty much every wingnut forgets is that the Dems used to be solidly hard right in the South, as mentioned, so it’s absurd to just assume Dems are “on the left.” His idiocy about the Nazis has been debunked here and elsewhere endlessly. The Nazis considered themselves “right-wing,” as did every fascist party in Europe at the time. Everyone during that time period — the 1920s thru the 1940s, primarily — considered fascists to be right-wing. Contemporary news reports, letters, essays, political party minutes, etc. etc. all show this. Memoirs from the French Resistance show this. Memoirs from every partisan group fighting the Nazis and the Fascists show this.

    And, of course, present-day KKK members consider themselves right-wing, as do all neo-Nazi and neo-Fascist movements and parties around the globe.

    Anyway . . . /rant.

    ;>)

    #57181
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    I don’t know guy’s , it really bothers me when you describe Obama or Clinton as Left or even center Left . The Right wing owns all of the media and both Democratic and Republican parties as well as the Libertarians . It’s all just corporate branding

    Unless I missed it, no one here has done that, Eternal.

    The collective you not you or anyone personally BT. I am basically agreeing with you here:

    Here, on this site, I fear I’ve fallen back into some bad old habits, and I need to take my own advice:

    Be a leftist who doesn’t waste any time with endless wingnut bullshit. Gotta stop posting about that aspect of politics, and the end of this crazed election will make that a hell of a lot easier for me.

    #57184
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    I don’t know guy’s , it really bothers me when you describe Obama or Clinton as Left or even center Left . The Right wing owns all of the media and both Democratic and Republican parties as well as the Libertarians . It’s all just corporate branding

    Unless I missed it, no one here has done that, Eternal.

    The collective you not you or anyone personally BT. I am basically agreeing with you here:

    Here, on this site, I fear I’ve fallen back into some bad old habits, and I need to take my own advice:

    Be a leftist who doesn’t waste any time with endless wingnut bullshit. Gotta stop posting about that aspect of politics, and the end of this crazed election will make that a hell of a lot easier for me.

    Thanks for the clarification, ER.

    Yeah, I think the right just gets the political spectrum and the media waaay wrong. One aspect of that, IMO, is its (general) conflation of a few “culture war” issues with all of politics. So if the media, or the Dems, come down on the side of things like a woman’s right to choose, or marriage equality, then that supposedly “proves” they’re “far left” on everything. Plus, tragically, even Climate Change has become a culture war thing, when it’s obviously not. It’s science, logic and common sense observations of what humans have done to this planet.

    Most of we leftists would agree that the Dems and the Media tilt right on things like economics, capitalism, war, empire, coups, regime change, covert wars, “law and order,” the mass surveillance state, mass incarceration and so on. The establishment tilts right on pretty much everything outside a few socio-cultural things.

    In short, from my pov, our two major parties and the MSM range from the center-right to the hard-right now. The actual left, as opposed to the one invented from thin air by the right, has no real representation in our current system.

    #57201
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Reading my original post BT pre Kava instead of post 3 shells it was poorly constructed, I shouldn’t have used the word “you ” at all. Anyway I agree with your post and as always it’s a well written easy to understand post. As Leftist we are constantly bombarded with nonsense like Obama is a radical Marxist NAZI, I feel like my auto response has been conditioned. The leftist position is that of kitty litter under the tires of a corporate dems bus while the right dems argue with the right repubs over whether we should nuke’m till they glow or nuke’m till the glow.

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 17 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.