For liberals and conservatives, ideology trumps scientific consensus…

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Public House For liberals and conservatives, ideology trumps scientific consensus…

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #45726
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator
    #45733
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I dont think much of that article.

    The writer actually equates denying the evidence of climate change, or evolution
    with being against using animals in research?

    That is apples and oranges. Or apples and ethics.

    I mean, one category is simply denying or ignoring scientific evidence/consensus.

    And the other category has nothing to do with denying scientific evidence. Its simply arguing science takes a backseat to compassion for animals. Now whether you agree or disagree with animal-activists, you cant equate them to evolution deniers.

    w
    v

    #45735
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    I think the author also dismissed the work of Chris Moody too quickly. He’s not alone. There is a growing pile of evidence showing the differences in the way people on the left and right think — though I wish they’d extend this beyond the usual liberal/conservative paradigm:

    Different brain structures

    “What’s really fascinating is that there have been a number of recent studies looking at brain structural differences between liberals and conservatives,” said Saltz. “And what’s been found in several studies is that liberals tend to have a larger anterior cingulate gyrus. That is an area that is responsible for taking in new information and that impact of the new information on decision making or choices. Conservatives tended on the whole to have a larger right amygdala. Amygdala being a deeper brain structure that processes more emotional information—specifically fear-based information,” Saltz explained.

    While understanding brain structure could be helpful when engaging in any bipartisan negotiation that reaches across the aisle, of course, as Saltz explains, “it’s not black-and-white” for every individual. But it does give a pretty good guess at which kind of appeal could resonate more successfully with the political other, depending on how they respond to fear-based decision-making and how open they are to new information.

    “Basically the study showed that if you just based it on brain structural size difference, you could predict who would be a conservative and who would be a liberal with a frequency of 71.6 percent; 71.6 percent is a pretty high ability to predict who is a conservative and who is a liberal just from brain structure,” Saltz said.

    #45769
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I don’t think it’s a great article either, guys but the main point is true…regardless of one’s politics, many people hold onto beliefs that are aligned with their particular ideology even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. To me, that sort of rigidity is a problem and deters progress towards that Star Trekian utopia we all want. 😉

    #45770
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    To me, that sort of rigidity is a problem and deters progress

    No it’s not. No it doesn’t. Everything’s fine. If there were any REAL evidence for your position, someone would have written an article by now.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.