Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Public House › "ethically based anti-intellectualism"
- This topic has 6 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 4 months ago by nittany ram.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 26, 2016 at 11:21 am #47111wvParticipant
I came across some Carnegie quotes in the book I’m reading. That there social-darwinizm thing is still with us today. Ya know. I think you even see traces of it among the liberal dems when they get into their ‘blame the poor’ stuff…
w
v
—————–
“Great inequality, the concentration of business in the hands of a few, and the law of competition between these is not only beneficial but essential for the future progress of the race.”
Andrew Carnegie“Millionaires are the bees that make the most honey and contribute most to the hive even after they have gorged themselves full.”
Andrew Carnegie“The law of competition may be sometimes hard for the individual, [but] it is best for the race , because it insures the survival of the fittest in every department.”
—Andrew Carnegie, “The Gospel of Wealth, (1889)“Of all the problems which will have to be faced in the future, in my opinion, the most difficult will be those concerning the treatment of the inferior races of mankind.”
― Leonard Darwin“A drunkard in the gutter is just where he ought to be…The law of survival of the fittest was not made by man, and it cannot be abrogated by man. We can only, by interfering with it, produce the survival of the unfittest.”
— William Graham Sumner, What Social Classes Owe to Each Other (1883)w
v
——-
The assault on education began more than a century ago by industrialists and capitalists such as Andrew Carnegie. In 1891, Carnegie congratulated the graduates of the Pierce College of Business for being “fully occupied in obtaining a knowledge of shorthand and typewriting” rather than wasting time “upon dead languages.” The industrialist Richard Teller Crane was even more pointed in his 1911 dismissal of what humanists call the “life of the mind.” No one who has “a taste for literature has a right to be happy” because “the only men entitled to happiness… is those who are useful.” The arrival of industrialists on university boards of trustees began as early as the 1870s and the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business offered the first academic credential in business administration in 1881. The capitalists, from the start, complained that universities were unprofitable. These early twentieth century capitalists, like heads of investment houses and hedge-fund managers, were, as Donoghue writes “motivated by an ethically based anti-intellectualism that transcended interest in the financial bottom line. Their distrust of the ideal of intellectual inquiry for its own sake, led them to insist that if universities were to be preserved at all, they must operate on a different set of principles from those governing the liberal arts.”
― Chris Hedges, Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of SpectacleJune 26, 2016 at 12:22 pm #47126Billy_TParticipantThanks, WV.
In Kristin Ross’s excellent Communal Luxury, she talks of Marx’s discovering Russian evolutionists, and their quite different theory of the rise of humans. Rather than seeing it all as “survival of the fittest,” they tended to view it as “survival of the cooperative.” That humans lived on if they banded together to fight the elements, not each other. My own take from this was that perhaps Darwin and others in Britain had been unduly influenced by Capitalism and its laws of competitive motion — consciously or unconsciously. Perhaps they read the present back into the past, at least a bit.
It’s also the case that inside any business with employees, they can’t survive via internal competition. If they don’t have cooperation, they fall. So there are dueling aspects happening, even under capitalism, constantly. And that internal cooperation, its necessity, tells me that the external, competitive kind isn’t at all necessary, because it (cooperation) could be scaled up between businesses. Though that would, of course, mean the end of capitalism, which I fervently desire.
So, anyway . . . . I just think it’s really interesting that the Brits and the Russians had wildly different ideas about what “evolution” actually meant for human beings.
June 26, 2016 at 12:47 pm #47134znModeratorMy own take from this was that perhaps Darwin and others in Britain had been unduly influenced by Capitalism and its laws of competitive motion — consciously or unconsciously.
It is not entirely clear to me that Darwin himself was a social darwinist.
From the wiki:
Social Darwinists
It has been claimed that “the survival of the fittest” theory in biology was interpreted by late 19th century capitalists as “an ethical precept that sanctioned cut-throat economic competition” and led to the advent of the theory of “social Darwinism” which was used to justify laissez-faire economics, war and racism. However, these ideas predate and commonly contradict Darwin’s ideas, and indeed their proponents rarely invoked Darwin in support, while commonly claiming justification from religion and Horatio Alger mythology. The term “social Darwinism” referring to capitalist ideologies was introduced as a term of abuse by Richard Hofstadter’s Social Darwinism in American Thought published in 1944.
June 26, 2016 at 1:06 pm #47140Billy_TParticipantNever thought that Darwin himself believed in Social Darwinism. But his concept of evolutionary change is easily hijacked by those who do. Twisted for their own purposes, etc.
June 26, 2016 at 3:08 pm #47158nittany ramModeratorNever thought that Darwin himself believed in Social Darwinism. But his concept of evolutionary change is easily hijacked by those who do. Twisted for their own purposes, etc.
There is a lot of controversy over Darwin’s views on what came to be known as Social Darwinism. Regardless of what he truly believed, we have to remember that he was a product of his time. He was not raised in isolation but in a society that had a deeply entrenched class system and believed unquestionably in the superiority of the white race.
June 26, 2016 at 4:42 pm #47163wvParticipantThere is a lot of controversy over Darwin’s views on what came to be known as Social Darwinism. Regardless of what he truly believed, we have to remember that he was a product of his time. He was not raised in isolation but in a society that had a deeply entrenched class system and believed unquestionably in the superiority of the white race.
=======================
Have you been to the stain?
w
vEvolutionists Flock To Darwin-Shaped Wall Stain
DAYTON, TN—A steady stream of devoted evolutionists continued to gather in this small Tennessee town today to witness what many believe is an image of Charles Darwin—author of The Origin Of Species and founder of the modern evolutionary movement—made manifest on a concrete wall in downtown Dayton.
“I brought my baby to touch the wall, so that the power of Darwin can purify her genetic makeup of undesirable inherited traits,” said Darlene Freiberg, one among a growing crowd assembled here to see the mysterious stain, which appeared last Monday on one side of the Rhea County Courthouse. The building was also the location of the famed “Scopes Monkey Trial” and is widely considered one of Darwinism’s holiest sites. “Forgive me, O Charles, for ever doubting your Divine Evolution. After seeing this miracle of limestone pigmentation with my own eyes, my faith in empirical reasoning will never again be tested.”
Added Freiberg, “Behold the power and glory of the scientific method!”
Since witnesses first reported the unexplained marking—which appears to resemble a 19th-century male figure with a high forehead and large beard—this normally quiet town has become a hotbed of biological zealotry. Thousands of pilgrims from as far away as Berkeley’s paleoanthropology department have flocked to the site to lay wreaths of flowers, light devotional candles, read aloud from Darwin’s works, and otherwise pay homage to the mysterious blue-green stain.
Capitalizing on the influx of empirical believers, street vendors have sprung up across Dayton, selling evolutionary relics and artwork to the thousands of pilgrims waiting to catch a glimpse of the image. Available for sale are everything from small wooden shards alleged to be fragments of the “One True Beagle”—the research vessel on which Darwin made his legendary voyage to the Galapagos Islands—to lecture notes purportedly touched by English evolutionist Alfred Russel Wallace.
“I have never felt closer to Darwin’s ideas,” said zoologist Fred Granger, who waited in line for 16 hours to view the stain. “May his name be praised and his theories on natural selection echo in all the halls of naturalistic observation forever.”
Despite the enthusiasm the so-called “Darwin Smudge” has generated among the evolutionary faithful, disagreement remains as to its origin. Some believe the image is actually closer to the visage of Stephen Jay Gould, longtime columnist for Natural History magazine and originator of the theory of punctuated equilibrium, and is therefore proof of rapid cladogenesis. A smaller minority contend it is the face of Carl Sagan, and should be viewed as a warning to those nonbelievers who have not yet seen his hit PBS series Cosmos: A Personal Voyage.
Still others have attempted to discredit the miracle entirely, claiming that there are several alternate explanations for the appearance of the unexplained discoloration.
“It’s a stain on a wall, and nothing more,” said the Rev. Clement McCoy, a professor at Oral Roberts University and prominent opponent of evolutionary theory. “Anything else is the delusional fantasy of a fanatical evolutionist mindset that sees only what it wishes to see in the hopes of validating a baseless, illogical belief system. I only hope these heretics see the error of their ways before our Most Powerful God smites them all in His vengeance.”
But those who have made the long journey to Dayton remain steadfast in their belief that natural selection—a process by which certain genes are favored over others less conducive to survival—is the one and only creator of life as we know it. This stain, they claim, is the proof they have been waiting for.
“To those who would deny that genetic drift is responsible for a branching evolutionary tree of increasing biodiversity amid changing ecosystems, we say, ‘Look upon the face of Darwin!'” said Jeanette Cosgrove, who, along with members of her microbiology class, has maintained a candlelight vigil at the site for the past 72 hours.
“Over millions of successive generations, a specific subvariant of one species of slime mold adapted to this particular concrete wall, in order to one day form this stain, and thus make manifest this vision of Darwin’s glorious countenance,” Cosgrove said, overcome with emotion.
“It’s a miracle,” she added.
http://www.theonion.com/article/evolutionists-flock-to-darwin-shaped-wall-stain-2523June 26, 2016 at 5:43 pm #47167nittany ramModeratorNo, I’ve never been to the stain. I did once make a pilgrimage to Tibet to pray at the feet of a Sherpa who possessed a birthmark shaped exactly like Coy Bacon.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.