wv wrote:
Rams4life wrote:
They shouldn’t have to change the name.
Well no-one that i know of, has
ever argued they ‘have to’ do anything.
Its not about ‘have to’ — its about
what ‘should’ they do.
I think they ‘should’ — you think
they shouldnt, i guess.
w
v
Well eventually they will make them change it. The NFL, the government, someone will. It’s already heading that way.
But i don’t think they should have to. And why should they? The last thing i think of when i hear the redskins name is a racial slur. Everyone knows the skins are a football team. I see no problem with it. And I’m about half Indian myself.
Sure, i get that there are plenty of people who share
your view. And there’s plenty of people who think
the name is offensive/racist. So, its contested
ideological-ground.
There was a time white folks wore black-face makeup
and did minstrel shows etc. At the time
a lot of folks just saw it as good clean fun,
with no harm intended — but then ideas changed.
You dont see those shows much if at all anymore.
Things change. Looks to me like the R-word
is going to change. Just a matter of when,
not if. I think thats a good thing. You disagree,
apparently.
w
v
-
This reply was modified 10 years ago by wv.
-
This reply was modified 10 years ago by wv.