commodification of art

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Public House commodification of art

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #64547
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    link:http://www.counterpunch.org/2017/01/27/the-commodification-of-art-in-the-prelude-to-eschaton/

    “..people overall are mostly tranquilized in their existence until they feel something. Years may go by and then a movie, a piece of music, a painting, or why gosh darn heck maybe even a little well crafted essay may hit us in a way that vibrates the proper inner chord to strike nerve. It’s when that little thistle of truth has burrowed its way in that life in a commodified society becomes maddening. The cognitive dissonance pains the mind. The artist is left with three plausible options – become enlightened (dropout), sellout, or perish.

    The art is running thin, this culture is running thin, and our ability to sustain in this way much longer is rapidly collapsing environmentally…”

    #64549
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Hey, WV,

    You should read Grand Hotel Abyss by Stuart Jeffries. I’m 120 pages into it and will probably do a little summary here shortly.

    It’s a great group bio of the Frankfurt School so far. Too may excellent takeaways to list, but commodification of society is huge, as is commodity fetishism, alienation and reification, due to capitalist internal mechanics, competitive laws of motion, drive, etc. Reification is an especially interesting dynamic. Boiled down to its essence: Capitalism turned things into people and people into things. Cogs in the machine. At work and at home. As Norman Mailer said in the 1950s (not in the book) Capitalism follows us everywhere.

    The author is excellent at making these concepts accessible, quoting the thinkers of the group bio and putting them in proper context.

    Chief among them: Walter Benjamin, Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer and Eric Fromm.

    #64553
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Hey, WV,

    You should read Grand Hotel Abyss by Stuart Jeffries. I’m 120 pages into it and will probably do a little summary here shortly.

    It’s a great group bio of the Frankfurt School so far. Too may excellent takeaways to list, but commodification of society is huge, as is commodity fetishism, alienation and reification, due to capitalist internal mechanics, competitive laws of motion, drive, etc. Reification is an especially interesting dynamic. Boiled down to its essence: Capitalism turned things into people and people into things. Cogs in the machine. At work and at home. As Norman Mailer said in the 1950s (not in the book) Capitalism follows us everywhere.

    The author is excellent at making these concepts accessible, quoting the thinkers of the group bio and putting them in proper context.

    Chief among them: Walter Benjamin, Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer and Eric Fromm.

    Just a personal tidbit about the frankenfurter school…I saw Marcuse’s last lecture in San Diego. Way way back when.

    #64555
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Hey, WV,

    You should read Grand Hotel Abyss by Stuart Jeffries. I’m 120 pages into it and will probably do a little summary here shortly.

    It’s a great group bio of the Frankfurt School so far. Too may excellent takeaways to list, but commodification of society is huge, as is commodity fetishism, alienation and reification, due to capitalist internal mechanics, competitive laws of motion, drive, etc. Reification is an especially interesting dynamic. Boiled down to its essence: Capitalism turned things into people and people into things. Cogs in the machine. At work and at home. As Norman Mailer said in the 1950s (not in the book) Capitalism follows us everywhere.

    The author is excellent at making these concepts accessible, quoting the thinkers of the group bio and putting them in proper context.

    Chief among them: Walter Benjamin, Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer and Eric Fromm.

    Just a personal tidbit about the frankenfurter school…I saw Marcuse’s last lecture in San Diego. Way way back when.

    I forgot to mention Marcuse. The author hasn’t dealt with him as much as others so far (especially Benjamin), but I imagine this will change as the book progresses. It’s set up, more or less, chronologically.

    What are your memories from his lecture?

    #64556
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    What are your memories from his lecture?

    Are you kidding? My memories? It was that long ago. Petty much–none. The talk was about Adorno though. I also seem to remember him being stuck in a huge cargo ship in space with a weird morphing alien creature, but, that may mean I mixed up the lecture with the movie Alien, which I also saw that year.

    #64557
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    What are your memories from his lecture?

    Are you kidding? My memories? It was that long ago. Petty much–none. The talk was about Adorno though. I also seem to remember him being stuck in a huge cargo ship in space with a weird morphing alien creature, but, that may mean I mixed up the lecture with the movie Alien, which I also saw that year.

    :>)

    Prior to the bio, I had read some Marcuse, a lot of Benjamin, and Adorno’s Negative Dialectics — a very tough but worthwhile slog. But this work has me wanting to go back and read much more. It also has excellent notes which provoke further reading, so I’m gonna read critical bios of at least a coupla of the key figures in the near future. Another cool thing in the Internet age — the book came out last year — links to online resources.

    Speaking of Alien. Have you bumped into leftist readings of that movie? Serious, critical theory, tongue-in-cheek, send-ups and otherwise? Seems ripe for that.

    Avatar would seem a much more obvious choice. But wasn’t Alien about a corporate-sponsored space mission? It’s been a long time since I watched it.

    btw, I might be one of ten humans in the known universe who actually liked Prometheus, despite its many flaws.

    #64559
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    But wasn’t Alien about a corporate-sponsored space mission? It’s been a long time since I watched it.

    The ship in Alien, remember, is named The Nostromo. That is of course a reference to Conrad’s novel Nostromo, which is about post-colonial struggle and the wealthy’s domination of resources. More than that, remember, in the 79 Alien film, the corporation that owns the ship (and crew) is called The Company, which is a clear and direct allusion to The Company in Heart of Darkness.

    What Ripley discovers during the story is that The Company had dictated to Ash, the science officer (who is also secretly an android) that all efforts had to be made to preserve the creature for The Bio-Weapons Division. (Though is not until the sequel, Aliens, that it is called “the bio-weapons division.”) Under those circumstances the crew was to be regarded as “expendable.”

    The plot turn in the film, then, is that The Company is the real enemy.

    That’s all right up front in the film. It’s not “subtext.” It’s all foregrounded.

    Top Secret – Science Officer’s Eyes Only…Bring back life form. Priority One. All other considerations secondary. Crew expendable.”

    Ripley: All I can think of is they must have wanted the Alien for the Weapons Division. They’ve been protecting it right along.

    Ash: Bring back life form, priority one. All other priorities rescinded.
    Parker: That’s the damned Company. What about our lives, you son-of-a-bitch?
    Ash: I repeat. All other priorities rescinded.

    #64568
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Avatar would seem a much more obvious choice.

    zn had the best analogy for that movie I have ever heard. He called it “the Iroquois vs Halliburton”.

    • This reply was modified 7 years, 9 months ago by Avatar photonittany ram.
    #64572
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    He called it “the Iroquois vs Halliburton”.

    Well I think that was over-stating it. Now, I think of it more as the HURON v. Halliburton.

    Though I don’t see why in the end it turns out the on-site corporation is supposed to be so bad. They were just trying to do business. Nothing wrong with that.

    Instead…Magua wins. Hardly seems fair.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.