Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Public House › Can you read this email and be unmoved?
- This topic has 12 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 2 months ago by TSRF.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 27, 2016 at 8:33 pm #54012TSRFParticipant
Matthew,
Today my sweet little Daniel would have turned 11 years old.
I’m often told that he is looking down on us, that he’s all around us even though we can’t see him – that the hole left by Daniel’s murder will heal as time goes on. I wish these thoughts brought my family comfort, especially on days like today, but there are no words of wisdom that can fill the void in our hearts. When people ask if it’s getting easier, I don’t know what to say.
Every day that passes is one day further from my life with Daniel. But today, when we should be celebrating Daniel’s birthday, I will try to find comfort in what people say – that maybe, just maybe, he might in some way still be with us. Maybe he wraps his arms around us while we sleep. Maybe he visits James and Natalie at school. Maybe he hears us say we love him.
And maybe Daniel sees how his beautiful soul and acts of compassion have inspired thousands of supporters like you to join our mission to ensure no other family has to endure the unending grief of birthdays without their children. Please, would you take a moment to join our family in honoring Daniel’s kindness and generosity by signing a special remembrance card today?
Click here to sign a special remembrance card in honor of Daniel’s birthday today.
Life without Daniel hasn’t gotten easier, Matthew. I’d give anything for even one more moment in which my kindhearted, freckle-faced boy chased the school bus, reunited worms and ants with their families, helped his teachers and drummed in our family band.
Of course, that can’t happen. So instead, I try to keep Daniel with me by telling everyone I can about his compassionate spirit, his bottomless zest for life and his belief that everyone – from his siblings and beloved cousins to a child at school with special needs – deserves kindness and respect.
We know from the hundreds of thoughtful messages, posts and tweets we’ve received that Daniel has inspired you to support our mission to create a safer, kinder world for all of our children. So in honor of Daniel’s birthday, will you sign our special remembrance card today?
Click here to sign a special remembrance card in honor of Daniel’s birthday today.
Happy birthday, sweet Daniel. We love you more than yesterday and not as much as tomorrow.
Mark Barden (Daniel’s father)
September 28, 2016 at 9:35 am #54033Billy_TParticipantIt is heart-breaking.
I don’t think there is anyway around the fact that we have been insanely “liberal” in our gun policies, protecting the virtually unlimited purchase and usage of deadly pieces of metal. No other product gets this kind of pass on public safety concerns, and no other product kills or maims more often.
It’s absolutely insane. And so much of it is based upon a recent, irrational, illogical, rabidly emotional misreading and reinterpretation of the 2nd amendment. Nothing in that amendment ever gave anyone the right to unlimited consumer choice of weaponry, and if we actually do take it as intended, it was meant solely for white males in state government militias — which no longer exist.
Time to return to sanity. IMO, we need to get rid of conceal carry, nationally, impose a ban on all weapons with removable, detachable ammo containers, limit legal guns to those with internal chambers only, six bullets max, and these must be hand-loaded. No capacity for any kind of auto-loading.
License and registration for all guns and gun owners. Like our cars.
Smart tech ASAP on all guns.
Change the way we do our ratings on media. The depiction of deadly violence should get restricted ratings. We should flip the emphasis from sex and sexuality to violence. Without censorship, we should mount public safety campaigns that push for a mass reduction in any kind of glorification of guns, gun violence or violence, period.
We have had amazing success reducing smoking levels. They’re now under 20%. We should do the same with guns and all things regarding guns.
- This reply was modified 8 years, 3 months ago by Billy_T.
September 28, 2016 at 10:53 am #54035bnwBlockedI don’t think there is anyway around the fact that we have been insanely “liberal” in our gun policies, protecting the virtually unlimited purchase and usage of deadly pieces of metal. No other product gets this kind of pass on public safety concerns, and no other product kills or maims more often.
Use of tobacco and alcohol both kill and maim far more than private ownership of firearms.
The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
September 28, 2016 at 11:21 am #54036Billy_TParticipantI don’t think there is anyway around the fact that we have been insanely “liberal” in our gun policies, protecting the virtually unlimited purchase and usage of deadly pieces of metal. No other product gets this kind of pass on public safety concerns, and no other product kills or maims more often.
Use of tobacco and alcohol both kill and maim far more than private ownership of firearms.
We have strong regulations when it comes to tobacco and alcohol. Our gun regulations, OTOH, are extremely lax.
And, yes, tobacco is worse. Tobacco kills roughly 400,000 smokers a year, and more than 40,000 non-smokers, through secondhand smoke.
Alcohol is the fourth leading, preventable cause of death, at roughly 88,000 a year. Still trying to track down info on accidents.
Gun deaths and accidents combined number over 100,000 per year. Gun fatalities — accidents, homicides, suicides — come to roughly 33,000 a year.
September 28, 2016 at 11:27 am #54037bnwBlockedI don’t think there is anyway around the fact that we have been insanely “liberal” in our gun policies, protecting the virtually unlimited purchase and usage of deadly pieces of metal. No other product gets this kind of pass on public safety concerns, and no other product kills or maims more often.
Use of tobacco and alcohol both kill and maim far more than private ownership of firearms.
We have strong regulations when it comes to tobacco and alcohol. Our gun regulations, OTOH, are extremely lax.
And, yes, tobacco is worse. Tobacco kills roughly 400,000 smokers a year, and more than 40,000 non-smokers, through secondhand smoke.
Alcohol is the fourth leading, preventable cause of death, at roughly 88,000 a year. Still trying to track down info on accidents.
Gun deaths and accidents combined number over 100,000 per year. Gun fatalities — accidents, homicides, suicides — come to roughly 33,000 a year.
Gun regulations are already far more stringent than those for either alcohol or tobacco.
The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
September 28, 2016 at 11:31 am #54039Billy_TParticipantI don’t think there is anyway around the fact that we have been insanely “liberal” in our gun policies, protecting the virtually unlimited purchase and usage of deadly pieces of metal. No other product gets this kind of pass on public safety concerns, and no other product kills or maims more often.
Use of tobacco and alcohol both kill and maim far more than private ownership of firearms.
We have strong regulations when it comes to tobacco and alcohol. Our gun regulations, OTOH, are extremely lax.
And, yes, tobacco is worse. Tobacco kills roughly 400,000 smokers a year, and more than 40,000 non-smokers, through secondhand smoke.
Alcohol is the fourth leading, preventable cause of death, at roughly 88,000 a year. Still trying to track down info on accidents.
Gun deaths and accidents combined number over 100,000 per year. Gun fatalities — accidents, homicides, suicides — come to roughly 33,000 a year.
Gun regulations are already far more stringent than those for either alcohol or tobacco.
We disagree about that. I think we’re about as far apart on this issue and can be. I see our gun laws as insanely lax and dangerously permissive. You see them as far too strict. There’s a Grand Canyon between us on this topic.
September 28, 2016 at 1:00 pm #54041bnwBlockedI don’t think there is anyway around the fact that we have been insanely “liberal” in our gun policies, protecting the virtually unlimited purchase and usage of deadly pieces of metal. No other product gets this kind of pass on public safety concerns, and no other product kills or maims more often.
Use of tobacco and alcohol both kill and maim far more than private ownership of firearms.
We have strong regulations when it comes to tobacco and alcohol. Our gun regulations, OTOH, are extremely lax.
And, yes, tobacco is worse. Tobacco kills roughly 400,000 smokers a year, and more than 40,000 non-smokers, through secondhand smoke.
Alcohol is the fourth leading, preventable cause of death, at roughly 88,000 a year. Still trying to track down info on accidents.
Gun deaths and accidents combined number over 100,000 per year. Gun fatalities — accidents, homicides, suicides — come to roughly 33,000 a year.
Gun regulations are already far more stringent than those for either alcohol or tobacco.
We disagree about that. I think we’re about as far apart on this issue and can be. I see our gun laws as insanely lax and dangerously permissive. You see them as far too strict. There’s a Grand Canyon between us on this topic.
You always exaggerate this issue.
The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
September 28, 2016 at 10:27 pm #54072ZooeyModeratorI don’t think there is anyway around the fact that we have been insanely “liberal” in our gun policies, protecting the virtually unlimited purchase and usage of deadly pieces of metal. No other product gets this kind of pass on public safety concerns, and no other product kills or maims more often.
Use of tobacco and alcohol both kill and maim far more than private ownership of firearms.
I wonder, do you have a tendency to change the subject much?
When a critical statement is made about something you like, do you feel like saying, “Hey! Over here! Look here instead!”
September 28, 2016 at 10:37 pm #54073bnwBlockedI don’t think there is anyway around the fact that we have been insanely “liberal” in our gun policies, protecting the virtually unlimited purchase and usage of deadly pieces of metal. No other product gets this kind of pass on public safety concerns, and no other product kills or maims more often.
Use of tobacco and alcohol both kill and maim far more than private ownership of firearms.
I wonder, do you have a tendency to change the subject much?
When a critical statement is made about something you like, do you feel like saying, “Hey! Over here! Look here instead!”
I challenged the veracity of his statement. He conceded the point. However your post is directed solely about me which is against the rules here.
The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
September 28, 2016 at 11:30 pm #54075ZooeyModeratorI challenged the veracity of his statement. He conceded the point. However your post is directed solely about me which is against the rules here.
It was directed at your rhetorical strategy (of throwing out red herrings) which is fair game.
And you didn’t succeed in challenging the veracity of anything Billy said. All you succeeded in doing was getting Billy to admit that alcohol and tobacco kill more people than guns. Which is completely irrelevant, however correct it may be, and however much anyone agrees with you that the numbers are correct. That doesn’t mean in any way that guns are not a problem, or that you succeeded in winning the argument that guns are over-regulated. Nobody conceded that.
You want to know some other things that kill fewer people than tobacco and alcohol?
Muslims.
Illegal Immigrants.
But, hey, you wouldn’t mind seeing a little more government action there, would you, bnw?
400,000 tobacco deaths a year.
In 2015, 19 people killed by terrorists in the US. But let’s support a candidate for president who wants to respond to Muslims with a policy equivalent to banning the manufacture of firearms altogether. Who wants to respond to illegal immigrants with a policy equivalent to rounding up all firearms and destroying them.
Oh…………..suddenly tobacco and alcohol numbers are completely irrelevant, huh? Because “that’s different.”
Yeah. That’s different.
Tobacco and alcohol are irrelevant to the gun conversation.
September 29, 2016 at 12:48 am #54077bnwBlockedI challenged the veracity of his statement. He conceded the point. However your post is directed solely about me which is against the rules here.
It was directed at your rhetorical strategy (of throwing out red herrings) which is fair game.
And you didn’t succeed in challenging the veracity of anything Billy said. All you succeeded in doing was getting Billy to admit that alcohol and tobacco kill more people than guns. Which is completely irrelevant, however correct it may be, and however much anyone agrees with you that the numbers are correct. That doesn’t mean in any way that guns are not a problem, or that you succeeded in winning the argument that guns are over-regulated. Nobody conceded that.
You want to know some other things that kill fewer people than tobacco and alcohol?
Muslims.
Illegal Immigrants.
But, hey, you wouldn’t mind seeing a little more government action there, would you, bnw?
400,000 tobacco deaths a year.
In 2015, 19 people killed by terrorists in the US. But let’s support a candidate for president who wants to respond to Muslims with a policy equivalent to banning the manufacture of firearms altogether. Who wants to respond to illegal immigrants with a policy equivalent to rounding up all firearms and destroying them.
Oh…………..suddenly tobacco and alcohol numbers are completely irrelevant, huh? Because “that’s different.”
Yeah. That’s different.
Tobacco and alcohol are irrelevant to the gun conversation.
I questioned exaggeration which is routinely done around here. Odd you haven’t noticed. Hildabeast is slipping fast so I feel your pain. You’ve now doubled down on breaking the rules. Perhaps its rules for me but not thee?
The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
September 29, 2016 at 9:56 am #54101Billy_TParticipantI challenged the veracity of his statement. He conceded the point. However your post is directed solely about me which is against the rules here.
It was directed at your rhetorical strategy (of throwing out red herrings) which is fair game.
And you didn’t succeed in challenging the veracity of anything Billy said. All you succeeded in doing was getting Billy to admit that alcohol and tobacco kill more people than guns. Which is completely irrelevant, however correct it may be, and however much anyone agrees with you that the numbers are correct. That doesn’t mean in any way that guns are not a problem, or that you succeeded in winning the argument that guns are over-regulated. Nobody conceded that.
You want to know some other things that kill fewer people than tobacco and alcohol?
Muslims.
Illegal Immigrants.
But, hey, you wouldn’t mind seeing a little more government action there, would you, bnw?
400,000 tobacco deaths a year.
In 2015, 19 people killed by terrorists in the US. But let’s support a candidate for president who wants to respond to Muslims with a policy equivalent to banning the manufacture of firearms altogether. Who wants to respond to illegal immigrants with a policy equivalent to rounding up all firearms and destroying them.
Oh…………..suddenly tobacco and alcohol numbers are completely irrelevant, huh? Because “that’s different.”
Yeah. That’s different.
Tobacco and alcohol are irrelevant to the gun conversation.
Excellent analogies, Zooey.
As you know, pretty much anytime gun violence is mentioned, gun, uh, hem, “advocates” will respond with deflection and redirection. They’ll mention car deaths or something else. They just don’t want to deal with the fact that gun proliferation in America is out of control, that it creates death and destruction where it wouldn’t exist if not for those guns.
To me, this nation should think about it as a public health and safety hazard issue. The right has managed to twist it beyond recognition into a crusade for “freedom.” Guns have absolutely nothing to do with “freedom,” just death and destruction. Unless one wants to talk about making murderers, rapists, kidnappers, etc. etc. etc. “free” to do as they please.
It’s time to rethink guns in America and consider them what they really are: Death machines, in direct opposition to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
October 2, 2016 at 12:34 am #54253TSRFParticipantGod bless Jacob Hall. Open your hearts to his memory.
6 years old. Shot in the playground at his school; now gone.
How many more?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.