the non-call issue continues & has earned another thread

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle the non-call issue continues & has earned another thread

Viewing 30 posts - 31 through 60 (of 74 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #97219
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I just re-watched it on my desktop computer where I have better control over Stop Go than I did on the Chromebook I used last night. From the live angle (which is a better angle than the angle they showed repeatedly on replay), R-C clearly hit him early, and by quite a bit. At full speed it looks bang-bang, but if you freeze it at contact, the ball is 4 feet from the receiver. So…yeah…I’m dropping the “it may not be as bad as they say” argument.

    =================

    Yeah it was terrible, but the thing I wonder about is the REFs perspective. We dont have HIS angle on the replays. We dont know exactly how it looked to him. Maybe the players and the ball and the speed and all the gazillion factors created a…a….vortex of some sort….ya know…like a Burmuda Triangle type thing. Only inside a dome. Also lizard people could be involved. We just dont know. So i say, screw the Saints.

    w
    v

    #97318
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #97324
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Sean McVay downplays fine imposed on Nickell Robey-Coleman

    Sean McVay downplays fine imposed on Nickell Robey-Coleman
    Posted by Mike Florio on January 26, 2019, 9:59 AM EST
    Getty Images

    The NFL has remained silent on the controversial play at the end of regulation in Rams-Saints, but the fined imposed on cornerback Nickell Robey-Coleman speaks volumes. And it was a topic on which Rams coach Sean McVay probably wasn’t thrilled to be speaking on Friday.

    “[T]hese are things that come up every week where in a lot of instances,” McVay told reporters. “Sometimes it goes unreported if a player gets fined based on the way that the league office sees some of the things that take place during the course of the game. Unfortunately, sometimes that’s just kind of common nature that you go through week-in and week-out.”

    He’s right. And McVay wisely didn’t stray toward addressing the obvious implication that fining Robey-Coleman for hitting a defenseless receiver in the head or neck area means that, indeed, the league blew the call.

    “[W]e’re certainly not going to allow that to be a distraction,” McVay said regarding whether the lingering questions about the blown call will affect his team.

    Actually, the Rams should embrace it, because it can become a strong motivator to take the next step and necessarily prove that the Rams should have been there.

    “All you have to do is look at history,” Hall of Fame coach Tony Dungy said on Friday’s PFT Live. “There’s been all kinds of bad calls, non-calls. It happens all the time. It will never be remembered if you win the Super Bowl.”

    Dungy pointed out that, as Saints fans continue to be up in arms over the call that wasn’t, the Saints benefitted from a similar error nine years ago in the NFC Championship against Minnesota.

    “The Vikings got an apology on a Brett Favre interception that should have been roughing the passer,” Dungy said. “Wasn’t called. And the Saints go to the Super Bowl. They’re not giving their Super Bowl trophy back and saying, ‘You know what? That was roughing the passer. We should play that game over.’”

    It’s unlikely that a Rams Super Bowl win will get Saints fans to abandon their position that they were robbed, teams use whatever they can to get themselves motivated and focused. Instead of thinking about the lingering furor as a distraction, McVay should welcome it as the source of a valuable edge that his team may desperately need when facing a head coach and a quarterback who will be teaming up for their ninth Super Bowl.

    Agamemnon

    #97325
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    AP NFL@AP_NFL
    The now-infamous no-call has been the talk of Pro Bowl week.

    Several players have been calling for better officiating and more accountability.

    #97327
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #97328
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    All along the Saints thought they were going to win, from before the kickoff. So, they were expecting to win the game from before the kickoff and then they lose it on a what might have been. It is just hard for them to take. imo
    I can’t help it. I think it is extremely funny. I have to laugh everytime I hear some whining. Do I need professional help. Whatever. lol

    Agamemnon

    #97337
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #97340
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    I have to laugh everytime I hear some whining. Do I need professional help. Whatever. lol

    it is funny. and yes. you need professional help. haha!

    what’re ya gonna do.

    i’m reading posts over at the herd, and i’m seeing bitterness bubbling up about superbowl 36. this is gonna burn for some saints fans for a long long time.

    #97342
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I have to laugh everytime I hear some whining. Do I need professional help. Whatever. lol

    it is funny. and yes. you need professional help. haha!

    what’re ya gonna do.

    i’m reading posts over at the herd, and i’m seeing bitterness bubbling up about superbowl 36. this is gonna burn for some saints fans for a long long time.

    Like Dungy said, we don’t see the Saints wanting to replay their tainted victory over the Packers. The one where roughing the passer wasn’t called, during bounhty gate. 😉

    Agamemnon

    #97343
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    Like Dungy said, we don’t see the Saints wanting to replay their tainted victory over the Packers. The one where roughing the passer wasn’t called, during bounhty gate.

    exactly.

    #97344
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Like Dungy said, we don’t see the Saints wanting to replay their tainted victory over the Packers. The one where roughing the passer wasn’t called, during bounhty gate.

    exactly.

    The question then becomes, if the non-call had happened to the Rams in the exact same kind of situation, what would WE be saying?

    Don’t get me wrong…when Patz fans assail me with the non-call I have the same responses we all do–there were other non-calls that would have changed the outcome, Saints shouldn’t have been throwing there in the first place, etc.

    But, I also think that how we see this is determined not by reason but by fandom, and so my best guess is, if it had happened to the Rams, we would be saying the same things Saints fans are now, and also not listening to them saying the same things we are saying now.

    #97346
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Like Dungy said, we don’t see the Saints wanting to replay their tainted victory over the Packers. The one where roughing the passer wasn’t called, during bounhty gate.

    exactly.

    The question then becomes, if the non-call had happened to the Rams in the exact same kind of situation, what would WE be saying?

    Don’t get me wrong…when Patz fans assail me with the non-call I have the same responses we all do–there were other non-calls that would have changed the outcome, Saints shouldn’t have been throwing there in the first place, etc.

    But, I also think that how we see this is determined not by reason but by fandom, and so my best guess is, if it had happened to the Rams, we would be saying the same things Saints fans are now, and also not listening to them saying the same things we are saying now.

    If the Rams had failed as many times as the Saints did and done some extremely stupid things, I might say we deserved to lose. But, I will have to wait for the to happen to know for sure. Two extremely stupid things, we went for the tie on 4th and goal and they threw the ball on first down. imo
    So it is only right the stupid refs determine the outcome. 😉

    Agamemnon

    #97347
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    IMO, it doesn’t work to say, “We’d think differently if we were Saints fans.” Or, “We’d sing a different tune.” Why? Because there is no one song that all Saints fans sing on this issue. There are differing opinions among them, too, as is the case with Rams’ fans.

    IOW, it’s actually impossible that we’d all sing that different tune, because there are many different tunes vying for space and time.

    Take any issue just among Rams fans themselves. The draft. Free Agency. Individual players, their mistakes, their triumphs, their skills, their faults, etc. Front office mistakes, triumphs, etc. etc. You’re going to get different takes just from Rams fans alone, which proves there is no particular “fan’s” way to see things.

    Humans always live in a mixture of the rational and irrational, and we tend not to be purely anything at any given time. Which is why it is entirely possible for Rams fans, and Saints fans, to discuss this controversy in a rational manner. Likely not in any “pure” sense of that word, but enough to make logical deductions, inductions, inferences, etc. etc.

    Yes, the irrational will intrude from time to time, but it will never be “pure” either, or in just one form, regarding any aspect of the controversy. IMO, intelligent adults can make good faith attempts at rational dialogue, knowing we’ll never reach “purity.” But getting close is certainly within our range, and there really are some views closer to the truth than others.

    #97348
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    To be more specific. Note my previous take on Goff’s mechanics. Is that the “official” Rams’ view on the matter? Is that the official Rams fans’ view? No. It’s one of many takes among just Rams fans, and it was opposed by other Rams fans. There’s disagreement about this just among us.

    Every year, we argue about the draft, free agency moves, who should be kept, who should be dumped, etc. etc. We argue about time management, run/pass ratios, lineups, personnel configurations. There is no one Rams fans line on any of these topics. How could there be one for the no-call, either among us or Saints fans? Which means, logically, you can’t just flip this on its head, if you change teams. Flip what? There isn’t any consensus to flip?

    ;>)

    #97350
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    IMO, it doesn’t work to say, “We’d think differently if we were Saints fans.” Or, “We’d sing a different tune.” Why? Because there is no one song that all Saints fans sing on this issue. There are differing opinions among them, too, as is the case with Rams’ fans.

    It’s most of them.

    That’s pretty clear.

    And it’s structural to the situation.

    I mean maybe someone could dissuade me by copying and pasting a long debate from a Saints board with many different views represented by many different fans per view. Though I doubt that even exists.

    Heck are there even any Rams fans discussions out there with a sizeable proportion of discussants saying “I think the Saints have a point”? I haven’t seen one anyway.

    Debating the draft is an in-house discussion, where you would expect differences. Feeling cheated by an OBVIOUS bad call in a close game where the stakes are high and a lot rides on who wins and loses? That seems to trigger the kinds of emotions all fans tend to have in common, so it’s far less likely to produce differences.

    An example. Go back over the years and find all the sizeable numbers of Rams fans who openly say that it was not significant that the Patz taped the Rams walk through before their first super bowl.

    #97355
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Strong emotions get media coverage/attention. I’m betting media won’t give air time to Saints fans who calmly, rationally discuss the no-call and conclude that it’s part of the game and couldn’t be “decisive,” because football doesn’t work like that. That doesn’t attract clicks or eyeballs or ears. But since I know a lot of people who start out with that view, that must include Saints fans as well. Why would they be an anomaly?

    Anger and passions of one sort or another sell. Calm, measured dialogue tends not to. That’s why we’re not going to see Saints fans who view the controversy as a non-controversy.

    As for your example of the Pats and the walk through. I know it’s just an example, and you could find hundreds more . . . . but on that one I didn’t think there was consensus among Rams fans that it even happened. Personally, I’m not so sure. But I am sure about their mugging Faulk and the Rams’ receivers on game day and getting away with it. Still, if the Rams had played better at a thousand other pivot points along the way, none of that would have mattered.

    In short, just speaking for myself, I start out with the strong belief that no play can possibly be “decisive” in any game. Not even a last-second field goal that leads to a 3 to 0 win. A make or a miss at that point didn’t win or lose the game. It was all the moments leading up to and including that.

    #97356
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Briefly back to the no-call. I understand anger and high emotions over an obvious missed call. But Saints and Rams fans should be able to agree to this: there were missed calls on that play that went against the Rams, too, and missed calls prior to it that went against the Rams. Even if we make the logical error in claiming one play can be decisive — it can’t possibly be — if the play were called to perfection, the Saints have to replay the down. Penalties offset.

    To me, this is indisputable, no matter which team someone roots for. Number 75 clearly grabs hold of Donald’s face mask on that play. So the best case scenario for the Saints then becomes a do-over. That’s the rational way to view this, and, again, I can’t imagine that the Saints have fewer rational fans than any other team.

    #97357
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    If the Rams had failed as many times as the Saints did and done some extremely stupid things, I might say we deserved to lose. But, I will have to wait for the to happen to know for sure.

    i agree with you completely.

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 11 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    #97359
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Even if we make the logical error in claiming one play can be decisive — it can’t possibly be — if the play were called to perfection, the Saints have to replay the down. Penalties offset.

    Saints fans know this argument and you don’t see agreement over it. In fact around here, Patz fans know this argument and they don’t agree.

    This is what we face, like it or not. Near the end of the game there is an open, completely visible, flagrant pass interference assault that is not called. A first down in that situation gives the Saints an enormous advantage, given the time left and where the ball would be placed.

    The emotional impact of seeing that and NOT getting a call is just simply not off-set by Rams fans pulling up screen caps and going look, that’s a facemask.

    And why not. There is no “truth” here. There’s just differing emotional takes. It’s judgment call v. judgment call.

    I live in Patz territory, where the near universal view is, the Rams got a gift. No one I have talked to accepts the view that there were non-calls against the Rams or that one non-call does not define a game.

    And everyone is completely annoyed if it is suggested to them that I am being reasonable and they just have this emotional take they ought to see through.

    Rams fans think like Rams fans about this, and Saints fans think like Saints fans (though it’s not just Saints fans as I have found out in Patz territory).

    And as Rams fans what we have to live with is that right or wrong, the non-call has a real effect on how the team is seen. We’re not going to talk anyone out of that, and we’re not going to triumph with “reason” in the face of their partisan emotion….it just doesn’t work like that. (Partly because there is no “reason” on this, just clashing fan-emotion driven perspectives.)

    What we should patiently wait for is the time when the McVay Rams have done so much that the non-call just doesn’t have the same significance anymore. It won’t go away but it will ease up (but not till the Rams have done enough to make that happen).

    And don’t get me wrong. I don ‘t always talk this way. To the contrary. Around here, where I live, when Patz fans say to me “they were gifted that game,” I say “naw there were other non-calls in that game like a facemask the series before, and the Saints had their chances.” I don’t actually change anyone’s mind (nor expect to), but at least I come across to them as a dedicated Rams fan who is sticking by his team.

    #97360
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Strong emotions get media coverage/attention.

    And if it were ONLY that we could find evidence of clashing views among Saints fans.

    No one has that. No one is telling me where I could find it. No one sees that anywhere. It’s not turning up. Merely supposing it exists isn’t the same as empirically demonstrating it does. In the days of message boards and social media, it would be easy to spot signs and symptoms of those clashing views among Saints fans. Something would bubble up. And, there’s nada.

    It;s the same if I said to you, go find the pockets of resistance among Rams fans where some
    groups of fans are saying, heck I understand how the Saints feel, the non-call tilted the game in an unfair way, and it was decisive—Saints were robbed,

    I promise you that does not exist either. At most you get, and rarely, an isolated individual here and there saying something like that (and then instantly getting piled on for it).

    #97361
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    ZN,

    I was in the camp of “they got robbed” after the game. I’ve been a diehard Rams’ fan since 1966/67, and I was seriously bummed out by what happened. Felt terrible for the Saints fans.

    What changed my mind? Stepping back, taking a deep breath, and thinking about it a bit, trying to be objective, trying to consider all the angles. This started me down a different path. Seeing the earlier no-calls that hurt the Rams got me most of the way there. Seeing the no-calls on that particular play sealed the deal.

    I think your view of this precludes any kind of normal thought-processing by the Saints fans, any kind of evolution in their thinking. Unless I misread you, it sounds like you’re saying they’re going to forever remain where they were in the original moment, without change, guided by “fan emotion” even with distance — time and space.

    I just don’t see humans acting and reacting like that. We change. We rethink things, etc.

    Again, I see no reason why Saints fans would be different from anyone else. Rams fans evolve and change their minds about X, Y and Z in the proverbial “clear light of day.” It happens in Nawlins too.

    #97362
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I’m done btw on this topic, cause, part of me is just annoyed that the Rams are in a super bowl and this is the main issue getting discussed.

    That game should have been untainted singular glory and…it’s not being seen like that.

    I also have a minority view and repeat post over insistence on those is a huge message board no-no. I may have already pushed that limit.

    You know this is the kind of game where I want to be endlessly hearing and reading about how well Goff did, and it;s kinda gettin drowned out.

    Someone somewhere else did the numbers on that for example:

    goff, after the saints made it a 10-20 game in the 3rd quarter:
    13 of 17 for 183 yards, 1 td 0 pick, 130.3 qb rating, 76.5% completion rate, 10.8 yards per attempt, including completions of 39, 33, 25, 19, 16, 14 and 12 yards.

    brees, after the rams made it a 17-20 game:
    7 of 14 for 81 yards, 0 tds, 1 pick, 38.1 qb rating, 50% completion rate, 5.8 yards per attempt, including only 1 completion of more than 10 yards – in fact that 1 completion of over 10 yards accounted for more than 50% of his passing yards during this stretch… excluding that pass brees was 6 of 13 for 38 yards and a 2.9 per attempt average for the stretch

    #97363
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    We agree, ZN. I want to talk about anything but this.

    Ironically, with the media’s insistence on endlessly replaying that no-call, that helped kill my previous sympathy, as did Payton’s reaction and the owner’s.

    I’ll leave this one alone too.

    #97367
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    Someone somewhere else did the numbers on that for example:

    goff, after the saints made it a 10-20 game in the 3rd quarter:
    13 of 17 for 183 yards, 1 td 0 pick, 130.3 qb rating, 76.5% completion rate, 10.8 yards per attempt, including completions of 39, 33, 25, 19, 16, 14 and 12 yards.

    brees, after the rams made it a 17-20 game:
    7 of 14 for 81 yards, 0 tds, 1 pick, 38.1 qb rating, 50% completion rate, 5.8 yards per attempt, including only 1 completion of more than 10 yards – in fact that 1 completion of over 10 yards accounted for more than 50% of his passing yards during this stretch… excluding that pass brees was 6 of 13 for 38 yards and a 2.9 per attempt average for the stretch

    for me that’s why this is such a big get for goff.

    and really. it wouldn’t have mattered if the rams ended up losing.

    he went into an insanely hostile road environment against a hall of fame qb. and to come back the way he did just cemented his credentials that much more. and not just come back. he outperformed drew brees. journalists and teammates can talk all they want about how he’s always been the same old jared.

    well no. no one’s ever always the same. you grow and get better. and that game was a culmination of the past two years under mcvay.

    it’s certainly not the end for goff. but this is one of those milestone games i was waiting to see.

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 11 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    • This reply was modified 5 years, 11 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    • This reply was modified 5 years, 11 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    #97371
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    We agree, ZN. I want to talk about anything but this.

    I should quickly add–I don’t mean to put a damper on the conversation.

    It’s just that I personally have already done too much of it.

    Others–post away, all views welcome.

    I will be filling this thread with media bits and stuff as it comes in.

    #97373
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i do have to say. the nfl privately loves this.

    20 years from now people will be dissecting that play like the zapruder film.

    was the ball tipped or not tipped?

    donald’s facemask getting held. is brockers getting held.

    it’ll add to the nfl lore. well. only if the rams can take it one more step.

    #97374
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    along with the report now coming out that all four officials had “long ties” to southern california.

    #97375
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/25863631/concern-nfl-4-officials-nfc-championship-game-live-southern-california?platform=amp

    Concern around NFL that 4 officials in NFC Championship Game live in Southern California

    ADAM SCHEFTER
    ESPN Senior Writer
    4:24 PM ET6 Minute Read

    In the latest twist to the still-simmering controversy from last Sunday’s NFC Championship Game, there is some concern in league circles about the NFL’s judgment in allowing four game officials who live in Southern California to work the game between the Los Angeles Rams and New Orleans Saints, league sources told ESPN.

    Those same four officials — all with long ties to Southern California — were the ones most responsible for the non-call on Rams cornerback Nickell Robey-Coleman’s early, helmet-to-helmet hit on Saints wide receiver Tommylee Lewis that was widely viewed as pass interference. The league admitted to the Saints that it “f—ed up the call,” according to sources.

    The Saints and other officials not involved in the game do not believe that these officials’ geographical ties influenced their non-call, according to sources. Officiating assignments are communicated to clubs on Monday, and there were no complaints from either the Rams or Saints in advance, according to a league source.

    But in a league constantly trying to safeguard the integrity of the game, there are some privately wondering how four officials with Southern California roots wound up officiating a conference championship game that involved a Los Angeles team.

    There is a perception of bias that the league either ignored or was blind to when it assigned this crew to this game. It ultimately could wind up influencing officiating assignments in the future, according to a league source, to make sure a scenario like this does not happen again.

    “The NFL put [itself] in a bad situation,” one officiating source told ESPN. “This is stuff that has to be taken care of prior to game. It’s just guys not thinking of what’s going on, nobody doing their checks and balances. The league is usually pretty much on top of it. This is one that slipped through the cracks.”

    Referee Bill Vinovich, who led the game’s officiating crew, lives in Newport Beach, California. Down judge Patrick Turner, whose primary responsibility was to follow Lewis on the blown call from start to finish, lives in Lakewood, California, in Los Angeles County.

    Side judge Gary Cavaletto, whose job was to initially watch outside receiver Dan Arnold before shifting his focus once the ball was thrown to Lewis, lives in Santa Barbara, California. Back judge Todd Prukop, who was stationed in the end zone as an extra set of eyes on the controversial play, lives in Mission Viejo, California.

    The Saints declined comment when contacted by ESPN, but others did not.

    “I haven’t heard anybody say the game was fixed; I have heard people say the crew F’ed up,” one high-level league source told ESPN. “But the optic is bad. It’s a legit issue and they should have figured that out.”

    A league spokesman said Sunday: “Officiating assignments are based on performance and not geographic location.”

    Nobody in the officiating community thinks the site of the officials’ residences influenced the non-call; but the idea that all four hail from California left some sources wondering why they weren’t assigned to the Patriots-Chiefs game in Kansas City rather than the Rams-Saints game in New Orleans.

    One person with competition committee ties said the league needs to take steps in the future to ensure that officials do not work games that involve teams in the states in which they are from and that no perception of impropriety is created.

    The league used to routinely ensure that certain referees would not officiate games in which the host was playing in the hometown of that referee. Phoenix resident and former NFL referee Ed Hochuli would routinely not be assigned Cardinals home games, and San Diego resident and former NFL referee Mike Carey would routinely not be assigned Chargers home games.

    But for an NFC Championship Game that had a heavy Southern California presence in the officiating crew, there is a sense in the officiating community that the NFL should have taken steps to avoid any perception of impropriety.

    In the opinion of many around the football world, this was the most high-profile blown call in NFL history. Turner and Cavaletto were questioned about the call in the officials’ locker room immediately after the game by NFL senior vice president of officiating Al Riveron, according to a league source.

    After Vinovich told Riveron that it wasn’t his play and it wasn’t his call, Cavaletto told Riveron it simply was a “bang-bang” call. But then the officiating crew was shown a replay of Robey-Coleman plowing into Lewis before the ball arrived, and the room went quiet, according to a league source. They knew they missed the call.

    In another interesting twist, before the conference title game, Rams fans launched a petition to prevent Vinovich from working their team’s game because Los Angeles had gone 0-8 in games that Vinovich had officiated since 2012. The Rams were based in L.A. in only the last three years of that span, after relocating from St. Louis in 2016.

    Vinovich’s regular-season crew — which features two of the other three officials from Southern California — also officiated the Rams’ regular-season losses this season to the Saints and Eagles, which contributed to New Orleans earning the No. 1 seed and getting home-field advantage in last Sunday’s game. In the first Los Angeles-New Orleans game this season, a 45-35 Saints victory, the crew missed a fake field goal spot, and it contributed to costing the Rams the game.

    Vinovich’s crew called more penalties against Los Angeles than its opponents in all nine Rams games he has officiated. But one source pointed out that, with that crew having worked the first Rams-Saints game of the season, it made sense for it to work the second.

    But the NFL also has been more than leery of any perception of impropriety in the past. In 2012, when the league’s regular officials went on strike, the NFL pulled one of the replacement officials assigned to a New Orleans-Carolina game after it was made aware that he was a Saints fan. Side judge Brian Stropolo admitted to being a Saints fan on his Facebook page, and he was pulled from the assignment that Sunday morning and replaced with an alternate, Tim Keese, who was traveling with the crew.

    This is a different issue for the NFL, but it is likely to trigger more discussion about how the officials assignments were made and how they will be executed in the future.

    For Super Bowl LIII next Sunday between the Rams and Patriots, there are no officials with any ties to Southern California or Massachusetts, according to a source.

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 11 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    #97390
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Concern around NFL that 4 officials in NFC Championship Game live in Southern California

    ADAM SCHEFTER
    ESPN Senior Writer
    4:24 PM ET6 Minute Read
    [/quote]

    #97395
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    well this certainly isn’t about logic now.

Viewing 30 posts - 31 through 60 (of 74 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.