Bucs fire Lovie, Coughlin resigns, which naturally leads to Fisher discussion

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle Bucs fire Lovie, Coughlin resigns, which naturally leads to Fisher discussion

Viewing 27 posts - 1 through 27 (of 27 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #36741
    Avatar photowv
    Participant
    #36743
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Interesting stat on the Steelers
    w
    v

    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2016/01/06/aj-mccarron-will-be-the-sixth-straight-backup-steelers-have-faced/
    AJ McCarron will be the sixth straight backup Steelers have faced
    Posted by Michael David Smith on January 6, 2016, 5:48 PM EST
    Johnny Manziel, Arthur Moats AP

    If, as expected, the Bengals are forced to go with backup quarterback AJ McCarron on Saturday, it will be a familiar feeling for the Steelers’ defense: Playing backup quarterbacks has become the norm for Pittsburgh.

    In fact, assuming Andy Dalton can’t go, Saturday’s game would be the sixth straight game in which the Steelers faced a backup on the other team.

    On Sunday, the Steelers closed the regular season against Browns third-string quarterback Austin Davis. A week earlier the Steelers got the Ravens’ fourth quarterback, Ryan Mallett. The week before that, the Steelers got Broncos backup Brock Osweiler. The week before that, the Steelers got the Bengals and McCarron. The week before that, the Steelers got Colts backup Matt Hasselbeck.

    The Steelers also faced Browns backup Johnny Manziel in Week 10, which means that counting McCarron on Saturday, Pittsburgh will have faced a backup in seven of its last eight games. Overall, the Steelers were 5-1 against backup quarterbacks this year and 5-5 against starters. They owe part of their position in the playoffs to bad luck befalling opposing teams’ quarterbacks.

    #36753
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    The Bucs are an embarrassment. Lovie should have gotten a third year. Even worse, Jeff Fisher, who should be fired, is still the Head Coach.

    #36754
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    The Bucs are an embarrassment. Lovie should have gotten a third year. Even worse, Jeff Fisher, who should be fired, is still the Head Coach.

    My bet is that Fisher works out just fine this year.

    Unless of course he once more has to deal with both a qb problem and OL issues (including youth and injuries). Cause those were the real cause of the record. IMO scapegoating the coach for that isn’t good football business.

    #36758
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    The Bucs are an embarrassment. Lovie should have gotten a third year. Even worse, Jeff Fisher, who should be fired, is still the Head Coach.

    My bet is that Fisher works out just fine this year.

    Unless of course he once more has to deal with both a qb problem and OL issues (including youth and injuries). Cause those were the real cause of the record. IMO scapegoating the coach for that isn’t good football business.

    Furthermore, I think there is value in continuity. Teams that constantly start over win less than teams that have continuity. And it’s Kroneke’s style to keep his team stable, so I never thought he WOULD fire Fisher. Whether he should or not is a fair question, but I’m still in favor of keeping Fisher and Snead. They have put together a lot of talent, and it hasn’t produced a winner because of the QBs. And even if you want to blame Snisher for the Foles disaster, I think that’s the only thing that they’ve really screwed up in four years.

    #36759
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Kroneke cares about money not winning if and when he puts those two together Fisher is gone. You can give the guy 10 years if he gets above .500 it’ll be just dumb luck.

    #36760
    Dak
    Participant

    I thought Fisher did a good job his first year here, but that must have been due to a weak schedule, because the team hasn’t done better since.

    7-8-1
    7-9
    6-10
    7-9

    Now, if we look back at his days with the Oilers/Titans, he started out:

    7-9
    8-8
    8-8
    8-8

    His fifth year was the turnaround. That was 1999. 13-3 and a trip to the Super Bowl thanks to that miracle special teams play. Then, one yard away from forcing OT for the championship.

    So, maybe 2016-2017 is the season the Rams go back to the Super Bowl … if only they hang on to Fisher.

    #36764
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I thought Fisher did a good job his first year here, but that must have been due to a weak schedule, because the team hasn’t done better since.

    7-8-1
    7-9
    6-10
    7-9

    Now, if we look back at his days with the Oilers/Titans, he started out:

    7-9
    8-8
    8-8
    8-8

    His fifth year was the turnaround. That was 1999. 13-3 and a trip to the Super Bowl thanks to that miracle special teams play. Then, one yard away from forcing OT for the championship.

    So, maybe 2016-2017 is the season the Rams go back to the Super Bowl … if only they hang on to Fisher.

    ========================

    Well, to go ‘that’ deep in the playoffs, he’s
    gonna need someone as good as prime-Steve McNair.

    They can scratch and claw their way
    to ten ugly wins with Keenum/Mannion

    ….maybe they give the OC job to the Browns coach,
    and then give a pick for Josh McCown. I dunno.

    w
    v

    #36766
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I think they are going to trade Foles and draft Cook. Cook had a bad playoff game and is falling a bit. Treadwell’s draft status is probably linked to his 40 time at the combine. We should interview all the OCs that out coached GW.

    Irony: Fisher breaks 8 wins and gets fired next year. 😉

    Agamemnon

    #36768
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I think they are going to trade Foles and draft Cook. Cook had a bad playoff game and is falling a bit. Treadwell’s draft status is probably linked to his 40 time at the combine. We should interview all the OCs that out coached GW.

    Well, I think we’d all love a Foles trade-away.
    But who is gonna want him? I mean would ‘you’
    give a 7th round pick for him? I wouldn’t.

    I imagine the Rams would have to agree to pick
    up half his salary or somethin.

    I dont want anymore players named Cook.
    The last good cook who played in the NFL
    was the Bengals Greg Cook. Now ‘there’
    was an old-school football player.

    w
    v

    #36771
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Well, I think we’d all love a Foles trade-away.
    But who is gonna want him? I mean would ‘you’
    give a 7th round pick for him? I wouldn’t.

    I imagine the Rams would have to agree to pick
    up half his salary or somethin.

    I dont want anymore players named Cook.
    The last good cook who played in the NFL
    was the Bengals Greg Cook. Now ‘there’
    was an old-school football player.

    w
    v

    He would be incredibly cheap for another team, cause we are on the hook for almost all of is salary. Coaches always think they can fix a player.

    Agamemnon

    #36819
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    The Bucs are an embarrassment. Lovie should have gotten a third year. Even worse, Jeff Fisher, who should be fired, is still the Head Coach.

    My bet is that Fisher works out just fine this year.

    Unless of course he once more has to deal with both a qb problem and OL issues (including youth and injuries). Cause those were the real cause of the record. IMO scapegoating the coach for that isn’t good football business.

    #36821
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well as for the race issue, i think
    its interesting. All the owners are white, I think,
    aren’t they? So when coaches like Garrett and Fisher
    get long runs, its understandable that some people
    would question just how the good-ole-boy system works.

    Nothing wrong with raising that issue, and
    conversing about it.

    As far as all this anti-fisher talk lately
    that scolds the media for somehow liking him
    more than they should — I dont even know
    how to process that.

    Whats missing from all these ‘national’ celebrity
    rants is, any serious break-down of what
    happened during each of his seasons, and why
    things either went well or didnt. They just
    count the winning seasons and the losing
    seasons and they call that analysis.

    w
    v

    #36823
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    Fisher is a keep it close guy. I want a we are going to blow you out of the stadium guy. If a coach has no accountability , why do you even need a coach ? What exactly is his job and what warrants a coaching change ? What would a 5th season Rich Brooks coached team look like or Spags ?

    #36824
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    . If a coach has no accountability

    This is all “record” v. “context.” In my view he DID turn the corner, but 2014’s OL and qb injuries, plus the 2015 qb meltdown, delayed that.

    That’s not not holding him accountable, that’s looking realistically at what happened. I am a context guy and always have been. To me the “just look at the record and shoot” method is just…nothing. I’m like Will Smith in the first Men in Black, during the test to determine who gets to be a MiB. Remember the shooting scene with the simulation? Quote below.

    And Jack, I don’t see how inappropriately racializing the issue is even a tiny bit relevant. That’s just some talking head going off the rails.

    Well, first I was gonna pop this guy hanging from the street light, and I realized, y’know, he’s just working out. I mean, how would I feel if somebody come runnin’ in the gym and bust me in my ass while I’m on the treadmill? Then I saw this snarling beast guy, and I noticed he had a tissue in his hand, and I’m realizing, y’know, he’s not snarling, he’s sneezing. Y’know, ain’t no real threat there. Then I saw little Tiffany. I’m thinking, y’know, eight-year-old white girl, middle of the ghetto, bunch of monsters, this time of night with quantum physics books? She about to start some shit, Zed. She’s about eight years old, those books are WAY too advanced for her. If you ask me, I’d say she’s up to something.

    #36826
    PA Ram
    Participant

    I have to agree with Skip and Stephen.

    Fisher is what he is.

    He’s a .500 coach.

    Were there injuries? Yes.

    Did he put the team in the position where those injuries were devastating? Yes.

    Youth? He built the team that way.

    No QB?

    Who wanted Foles? Yes–I agree that on paper it was a good trade but ultimately Fisher has to accept failure for thinking Foles was the guy to lead this team.

    Jeff Fisher has put the team in the position it’s in.

    Because of that–youth and injuries and no QB have played a role in its failure.

    But within games there are things like dumb penalties–overly conservative offense at times, there are decisions like trying to get his coaching staff right and that seems to be a work-in-progress.

    To me–Fisher has not earned that fifth year.

    Having said that–I think it’s okay to give him the fifth year with the expectation that playoffs and nothing less is acceptable–with no excuses.

    That’s where I’m at on Fisher.

    And should this team be out of it by mid-season next year–I wouldn’t even give him the end of the year.

    I hope he proves everyone wrong and builds a contender. I don’t think he has shown he can do that yet.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    #36827
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Fisher is what he is.

    He’s a .500 coach.

    I don’t agree with that. Calling Fisher a .500 coach ignores the shape of the actual record. His record worked this way, from the start: longish valleys of .500 or below, but always with a reason (like, moving from Houston with no home when they moved, or later, being hit by a combo of injuries plus cap issues). The valleys are followed by peaks of consecutive winning seasons. To me, just averaging that all together without making distinctions provides you with nothing but an empty abstraction.

    Once again, it’s record v. context.

    I will always be a context guy. IMO just looking at the record by itself tells you nothing.

    Watching the Rams the last couple of years tells me that if they had A qb (any decent starting qb) they would have won more games in 2014 and 2015. That is so self-evident I am not sure who would deny it. The OL ups and downs don’t help either.

    Fisher HAS built contenders, so I don’t see why he won’t again.

    ..

    #36829
    Avatar photojoemad
    Participant

    His fifth year was the turnaround. That was 1999. 13-3 and a trip to the Super Bowl thanks to that miracle special teams play. Then, one yard away from forcing OT for the championship.

    When the Titans scored their 1st TD in the Super Bowl vs the Rams, Fisher went for 2 and failed. I thought about that failed attempt when the Rams played in Minnesota this year …In both cases I thought it was a gamble with low reward….

    If Mike Jones doesn’t make that tackle on that drive, I wonder if Fisher goes for 2 again? He wouldn’t need to if he played it safe when Tennessee scored their 1st TD. I’ll give him credit, he fired up the Titans in the 2nd half when the Rams faltered in the redzone in the 1st half of Super Bowl 34 to put the game away…..

    #36864
    Avatar photoEternal Ramnation
    Participant

    . If a coach has no accountability

    This is all “record” v. “context.” In my view he DID turn the corner, but 2014’s OL and qb injuries, plus the 2015 qb meltdown, delayed that.

    That’s not not holding him accountable, that’s looking realistically at what happened. I am a context guy and always have been. To me the “just look at the record and shoot” method is just…nothing. I’m like Will Smith in the first Men in Black, during the test to determine who gets to be a MiB. Remember the shooting scene with the simulation? Quote below.

    And Jack, I don’t see how inappropriately racializing the issue is even a tiny bit relevant. That’s just some talking head going off the rails.

    Well, first I was gonna pop this guy hanging from the street light, and I realized, y’know, he’s just working out. I mean, how would I feel if somebody come runnin’ in the gym and bust me in my ass while I’m on the treadmill? Then I saw this snarling beast guy, and I noticed he had a tissue in his hand, and I’m realizing, y’know, he’s not snarling, he’s sneezing. Y’know, ain’t no real threat there. Then I saw little Tiffany. I’m thinking, y’know, eight-year-old white girl, middle of the ghetto, bunch of monsters, this time of night with quantum physics books? She about to start some shit, Zed. She’s about eight years old, those books are WAY too advanced for her. If you ask me, I’d say she’s up to something.

    ZN I’m not saying hold him accountable for the injuries , I do think he bears some responsibility for the “meltdown” though . I’m talking about all kinds of stuff, GRob’s head is swimming his rookie year and Fisher does the musical chairs with him. Starting 2 rookies and the still raw GRob and what the hell lets change to the zone blocking scheme that nobody’s run before. The penalties the penalties the penalties .Showing up in Wash.,Balt and S.F. with that team the one that looks like it doesn’t have a coach. MN,Balt, Wash, S.F. winnable games that weren’t won. The Bears game, that was ridiculous. Then there’s that Fisher thing where he brings in Cook and Britt from the after the contender day’s at Ten.Never did like Sherman as WR coach one constant is they never seem to run to the sticks and can’t catch it anyway especially when its 3rd down. Slants were rare as hen’s teeth but on the rare occasion they threw one it was unstoppable. Dedicating to run the spread in 13 and bailing a couple weeks in even though they were scoring enough points to have gone undefeated with ’15’s D. My view is it’s been misstep after misstep. He did build a contender but that team followed the same graph as the GSOT and was a lot less fun to watch. IOW the contender is singular not plural or multiple. My questions were serious though what is his job what is he accountable for what would warrant his firing?

    #36867
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    My view is it’s been misstep after misstep.

    Yeah we just differ. My view is, if they had a qb none of that stuff would matter (and I don’t agree with your take on some of it.) When you have very little margin of error the errors get magnified.

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 10 months ago by Avatar photozn.
    #36869
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i don’t know. i’d give serious thought to hiring lovie or coughlin if either were interested.

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 10 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    #36874
    PA Ram
    Participant

    Next year when they go 6-10 it will be because of all the distractions with the move. Or the non-move.

    If they don’t solve QB that will be another excuse.

    Injuries will always be an excuse.

    So because of these problems, Fisher gets a pass–gets extended a year. Then what?

    At some point don’t you have to hold him to some level of accountability?

    5 years? 6 years? 8 years?

    At what point?

    As I said–I don’t have a problem with him coming back next year. Did he earn that? Not in my opinion–but no–it hasn’t been all bad. I do think there is talent on the team. So yes–come back for year 5.

    But what is the expectation now?

    Will 6-10 do it? 8-8?

    Because of the move will the “context” of that give him a free pass?

    For me–no.

    Yes–come back.

    No–7-9 is not good enough.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    #36875
    JackPMiller
    Participant

    I would go after Hue Jackson. I feel We need to get an Offensive coach. Someone that can utilize the talent we have. Foles is not that bad, look at his time in Philly, especially a few years ago. He needs proper coaching, and Fisher is not it.

    #36876
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Foles is not that bad

    Yes Foles is that bad.

    And the coaching is certainly not so bad that it would turn a good qb into a one THAT bad by itself. In fact, that would be historical level bad coaching, worse even than the Linehan years.

    Foles melted down. It was visible. It was openly there to see. Had nothing to do with coaching.

    #36878
    PA Ram
    Participant

    Foles is not that bad

    Yes Foles is that bad.

    And the coaching is certainly not so bad that it would turn a good qb into a one THAT bad by itself. In fact, that would be historical level bad coaching, worse even than the Linehan years.

    Foles melted down. It was visible. It was openly there to see. Had nothing to do with coaching.

    I agree with that. Foles was just awful. Has he looked better before? Yes.

    Not this year.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    #36880
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I think the old plan was, Foles was the bridge QB to Mannion and Keenum was insurance. We are now on Plan B. I think that means we draft another QB.

    Agamemnon

    #36889
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Yeah, draft another QB. I hope the Answer is Mannion, but draft a QB.

    As for Foles, he is a nice guy. Good luck, Nick, in whatever you do next.

Viewing 27 posts - 1 through 27 (of 27 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.