Bryce Hager Interception

This topic has 3 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by NERam.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)

Author

Posts
December 16, 2016 at 10:38 am #61186
JackPMiller
Participant
I don’t care what anyone says, that was an interception. We were screwed by the refs on that one. As bad as we looked , and not saying we would have won the game, especially how pathetic our offense is, but still, don’t help out Seattle with a cheap call like that to help them win.
- This topic was modified 8 years ago by JackPMiller.
December 16, 2016 at 10:54 am #61189

Agamemnon
Participant

I thought it was an interception too, Jack.

Agamemnon

December 16, 2016 at 11:18 am #61191

PA Ram
Participant

That was a ridiculous call AFTER the review. And Collingsworth tried really hard to justify it by first claiming it was bobbled(it wasn’t) and then something about Graham touching the ball while he stepped out of bounds. So if Graham is fighting for the ball and gets control but Hager steps on the out of bounds line and has a hand on the ball it’s no good?

I don’t know about that one.

But that was an interception to me. If some weird rule I’ve never heard of is the reason I wish they’d be specific and explain it.

"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

December 16, 2016 at 12:16 pm #61194

NERam
Participant

PA Ram wrote:

If some weird rule I’ve never heard of is the reason I wish they’d be specific and explain it.

Yeah, where’s the live feed to Mike Pereira at times like this, for an explanation ??? What the guy OUT of bounds is doing should have no bearing on what the guy IN bounds is doing. Weird call.
Author

Posts