Albert Breer on Aaron Donald/Khalil Mack Contracts | The Rich Eisen Show | 8/1

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle Albert Breer on Aaron Donald/Khalil Mack Contracts | The Rich Eisen Show | 8/1

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #88833
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    ===

    #88836
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    SUMMARY.

    Breer on Donald as a leader. To expand, his lead in to Donald was to focus on how there were a lot of big personalities in that locker room. Who leads if there’s adversity? One reason Miami let Suh go was because he wasn’t that guy. That puts a lot on McVay. But you have to have strong guys in the locker room. So Breer goes, who is that guy for the Rams? And to him it’s Donald.

    On contracts. There’s 3 years of inflation at every position (that’s true) except the top defender market is represent by a 3 year old contract (Von Miller). The market correction is looked for because top defender numbers slipped from 86% in 2016 to 63% now (while EVERYONE ELSE went up since Von Miller signed). Plus of course Gurley’s deal represents a market correction so why not Donald. If you make it 80% now for the top defender (this applies to Mack and Donald) that would be 24 M.

    Eisen askes, why wouldn’t the Rams say go win a superbowl like Von Miller did? (Actually I don’t think Eisen was making a case, he was posing a good question as an interviewer). Breer goes, you could turn around to Les Snead if he says that and say you gave Todd Gurley a market correction.

    They then go off on the August 7th thing. If Donald becomes an RFA, then, the Rams have less control over it and someone’s going to give up a 1st round pick for Donald under those circumstances.

    He says in both cases, Mack and Donald, the sides are far apart and they’re having trouble finding a middle ground (me: but then different people are saying different things about this so I don’t know where Breer’s info comes from, he could be as right or wrong as anyone else on that at this point).

    Breer also said that you don”t want to mess up team morale and locker room dynamics by not coming through with guys like Donald. Breer says it can mess with your chemistry if there’s that guy out there and you;re not taking care of him. That can screw up the message a little bit.

    Says Breer, a market correction (for both Mack and AD) is a fair point. The team could say, we’re not responsible for the market (me: naw they follow the market in every other case, corrected it with Gurley, and will follow it with Goff).

    Breer predicts that of the 2, Donald is more likely to be there when games start. He also thinks that the Rams front office is creative enough with deals to get this done.

    #88849
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    Eisen askes, why wouldn’t the Rams say go win a superbowl like Von Miller did? (Actually I don’t think Eisen was making a case, he was posing a good question as an interviewer). Breer goes, you could turn around to Les Snead if he says that and say you gave Todd Gurley a market correction.

    yeah. at this point you have to give donald an extension. gurley and cooks got theirs. how do you not give the best player in the nfl his extension?

    and demoff now saying that they’re far apart?

    hmmm…. good vibes are slightly fading.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.