That socialist didn’t sound all that angry.
Not a socialist. A sparticist. There’s a difference. And she sounded like a typical spariticist to me. Not so much angry as dogmatically self-righteous (raised emphatic “j’accuse” tones) in the pissy way sparticists do that, while also in the way sparticists do things, getting most of the facts just completely wrong. It’s actually speech-making. They prepare these things and practice. Remember the poster 9erhater? They’re like that. In every group discussion where I’ve ever encountered them, going back decades.
I was merely responding to the Title of the youtube which is “Noam Chomsky Brilliant Speech vs Angry Socialists.” The title reveals a bias itself, is all I was saying. The “socialist” wasn’t angry, and Chomsky’s response was pedestrian (albeit accurate).
And you are right about the self-righteousness, and the tone.