Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › Ask Dolphins, Titans why splurging on free agents is a losing strategy
- This topic has 9 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 10 months ago by zn.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 11, 2015 at 3:01 pm #18329znModerator
Ask Dolphins, Titans why splurging on free agents is a losing strategy
By Jason LaCanfora
It used to be, more or less, that you could evaluate free-agent classes somewhat similarly to a draft class. Give them three to four years, see how it all worked out, how they fit into the larger scheme, how much, if any, the team improved.
Seems a quaint concept these days.
As long documented, the series of five- and six-year contracts that will be announced around the NFL a month from now when the league year begins are really one-to-three-year propositions cloaked as something longer. The owners have the hammer with this CBA, and they are using it. The bulk of the money spent isn’t fully guaranteed, or close to it, and it seems like each year the amount of prime talent hitting the market, particularly at the skill position, is shrinking.
So, a week before the combine — the unofficial start of NFL free agency, where agents and team executives begin a complicated dance of laying the foundation of contracts without flaunting in the face of anti-tampering rules too overtly — let me send out my annual reminder to teams across this land of ours.
Caveat Emptor.
Buyer Beware.
Free agency is not a panacea. Not even close.
It’s not even an attractive band-aid (like the cute Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle ones our 3-year-old layers all over his wrist from time to time). It’s, quite often, a faint piece of gauze that will barely conceal, if cover up at all, some of the blood and puss oozing from your roster. It remains, primarily, the fodder for the downtrodden and left behind, teams sitting on oodles of cap room, short on victories, holes all over the roster.
It looks like a quick fix. It is anything but. In this, the ultimate team sport, where continuity and camaraderie and depth and balance are so imperative, and with the salary cap serving as a parity-ensuring device, free-agent splurges on other team’s players often create more problems than it solves.
And, should we need more empirical evidence to this end, let me present two more cautionary tales from the not-too-distant past: The 2013 Miami Dolphins and the 2013 Tennessee Titans. Recall, if you will, the splash these two teams made less than two years ago, setting the market at multiple positions and seeking to reverse their malaise through heavy spending. Fast forward to the present, and both of these clubs remain far from contenders. The Titans hold the second overall pick. The Dolphins collapsed in the second half again and fell far short of the playoffs. Both clubs are now trying to extrapolate themselves from many of these very same over-the-top contracts they were ever so eager to toss out there 23 months ago.
A mere two seasons have passed, barely, but oh the damage done. With ever-struggling teams like the Browns, Raiders (who wasted a bevy of cash on aged free agents a year ago), Jets and Jaguars sitting on more cap space than they could ever fathom spending, no doubt these mistakes will be repeated in the weeks to come. Some lessons are never learned. And, heaven help those intent on repeating them.
Take the middling Dolphins, for example. Jeff Ireland was their under-fire general manager at the time and owner Stephen Ross, after striking out in attempts to land Jim Harbaugh and Jeff Fisher and Peyton Manning, was trying to make a splash of sorts, with the Miami Heat and LeBron James the toasts of the town and empty seats a way of life on Sundays in South Florida.
Problem is, that splash has continued to ripple, with the Dolphins following up their 2012 record of 7-9 with an 8-8 campaign in 2013 and another ho-hum 8-8 record this past season. And now the Dolphins are mired in a cap crunch, projected to have about $2 million in cap room before an inevitable purge, still a pedestrian team and one bogged down by the decisions of two offseasons ago.
The Dolphins opted to part with linebacker Karlos Dansby that offseason, primed to throw big money at younger players at the position. The Ravens valued linebacker Dannelle Ellerbe as perhaps a $4 million per season player after helping the team win a Super Bowl in a year in which Ray Lewis was largely injured; Miami gave him a five-year, $35 million deal. Ellerbe has made $14.5 million in the first two years of that deal, yet has made little impact. I can’t fathom he’s in Miami in 2015, set to make a staggering $8.5 million next season. They gave Philip Wheeler, another relatively obscure linebacker, a five-year, $26 million deal. The Dolphins have already paid Wheeler $13 million over two years and would owe $3 million for 2015.
They opted to give Randy Starks the franchise tag that season, a whopping $8.45 million; Starks is very likely to be a cap casualty this season after signing a short-term deal last season. Safety Chris Clemons made $2.75 million for his one year of service in 2013. To their credit, the Dolphins secured stud corner Brent Grimes to a one-year, $5.5 million deal in 2013, and have extended him since, an anomaly in the type of overspending that doomed this Dolphins team and has doomed so many others.
On offense, Miami made Mike Wallace, a speedy but limited receiver, one of the highest-paid ever at his position, at $12 million annually. He has been a colossal bust, clashing with coach Joe Philbin throughout his tenure. The Dolphins have flirted with trading Wallace in the past and he’s already pocketed more than $27 million in two suspect years and is due $10 million more in 2015 (again, I can’t fathom he sees that, and I can’t fathom he makes more that 65-70 percent of that total on the open market, at best).
Fellow unproductive receivers Brandon Gibson (earned $6.45 million the past two years after signing in Miami as a free agent) and Brian Hartline (re-signed with Miami in 2013 and has made $12.6 million the past two years, and won’t see the $5.9 million he’s due in 2015) didn’t come close to living up to their deals.
Tight end Dustin Keller received $4.25 million for one year that was marred by injury; tackle Tyson Clabo received $3.5 million to try to fill a void. Backup quarterback Matt Moorepicked up $8 million on a two-year deal signed in 2013.
All of it, fairly disastrous. Nearly all of it still having ramifications on the direction and plight of this team. It’s still affecting them. Still limiting them.
But they weren’t alone in 2013. Not close. I can recall, in real time, wondering if, like the Dolphins, all the money the Titans were throwing around would result in any significant increase in their win total. And, as my instincts told me then, it didn’t come close to making a difference. If anything, this franchise remained in a freefall, going from 6-10 in 2012 to 7-9 in 2013 to 2-14 last season.
It actually started in 2012, when the Titans gave declining linebacker Kamerion Wembley a deal that has netted him $18.5 million during the past three years. Steve Hutchinson, a once-stellar guard now at the end, also made $6.5 million in 2012, the only year of a three-year deal he would play in Tennessee. Desperate to improve a sagging offensive line, the Titans gave guard Andy Levitre a record contract for his position, with him making $19.5 million the past two years. Now, the Titans might have no choice but to run from that contract with Levitre’s play steeply declining. Running back Shonn Greene ended up unproductive and out of favor, making $6.65 million the past two seasons and unlikely to see the third year of his deal.
It has been money well-spent on tight end Delanie Walker — for while his four-year, $17.5 million seemed hefty at the time, he responded with a career year in 2014. Still, they are not solidified at quarterback — Ryan Fitzpatrick made $3.25 million in 2013 in is lone year with the Titans, and while defensive lineman Sen’Derrick Marks left the team, Sammie Lee Hill was part of a collapsing defense and faced off-field issues as well, making $7.4 million in his two years with Tennessee.
This money, of course, has bought the Titans nothing of consequence. For however few players remain from that 2013 class in 2015, the overriding reality is that all will be long gone way before this team gets out of the bottom of the AFC, which could take quite some time and quite some doing. Trying to buy their way out, history tells us, won’t work, throwing bad money after bad.
A few calculated signings here or there might help turn a good team better. Free agency, in some moderation, used strategically, can provide a boost. But you can ask Jerry Jones and Dan Snyder and Ross and the Adams family and so many others about how effective widespread spending is in unrestricted free agency. And, regardless, soon enough, I guarantee you a franchise or two will be celebrating their March marvels and toasting their free-agent riches, only to rue it a year or two later.
February 11, 2015 at 10:43 pm #18343TackleDummyParticipantEvery year we have a bunch of posters who want the Rams to go big after this player or another. I remember some who really wanted Mike Wallace, for example. And it will be no different this year. But it seems that the current Rams strategy of build through the draft and sign your own players is, in the long run, the best way to go. Just not the fastest.
February 12, 2015 at 3:51 pm #18372DakParticipantYeah, it never fails. I can’t remember the last big, expensive signing (outside of the likes of Peyton Manning) that really made a huge difference for a team.
The Rams’ big FA signings have been fairly conservative, and yet they haven’t paid off, either. There’s always a reason a team lets a player get to free agency.
February 12, 2015 at 4:07 pm #18373znModeratorYeah, it never fails. I can’t remember the last big, expensive signing (outside of the likes of Peyton Manning) that really made a huge difference for a team.
The Rams’ big FA signings have been fairly conservative, and yet they haven’t paid off, either. There’s always a reason a team lets a player get to free agency.
Let’s see how Fisher & co. did.
Big market FAs:
Finnegan. I didn’t like this one.
Langford. He’s fine IMO.
Long. Injuries killed this one.
Wells. Injured man walking. When he can walk.
Cook. I like Cook as part of the mix as a player, but…and I rarely say this… I don;t think he will ever be worth the money.Budger market FAs:
Hayes: Score.
Dunbar. Up and down.
Carrington. Nada.
Williams. Well…better than Joseph…
Joseph. Not as good as Williams.
Britt. Score.
Hill & Clemens. No Jamie Martins here.February 13, 2015 at 12:19 pm #18422rflParticipantAsk Dolphins, Titans why splurging on free agents is a losing strategy
By Jason LaCanfora
Way too many generalizations here. And, ultimately, a pretty lame argument.
Basically, the argument boils down to this: overspending on bust FAs is bad.
Uh-huh.
The article does mention Manning. Well, I think Manning was worth the money to the Broncos. LaCanfora has to admit that a Miami move was motivated by a desire to match the success of that move.
Is that the norm? Probably not. And I guess one could argue that a franchise should be very slow to pull the trigger on a mega-deal. But then, it depends on who is involved. A player who is good enough is worth the money. Which means that the burden is on the FO to acutely assess the talent.
But my biggest problem is the big, sweeping generalization that you can’t accomplish much with FAs.
You certainly cannot make up for poor drafting and a lousy roster with FA signings.
But you CAN fill holes with FAs. And astute roster building can get great value out of modest signings. A great example is William Hayes. We’ve been bad for a decade. But there were years when we’d have been far WORSE without a solid vet like Hayes.
I don’t like any discussion that focuses on stars. Especially when talking about general roster building, which is the theme of this article. Yes, indeed, draft well and commit to 4-5 years of roster building. By all means.
But a competitive team needs solid play just about everywhere. Even with some stars, holes will sink the ship. And no one can build solid competence solely through a couple of drafts. As we know.
I fervently believe that one can get solid, competitive-level competence from astute FA signings. ZN has listed some of our better ones. The guys don’t have to be studs. They do have to be experienced, capable, and disciplined. If they are, they will help.
If they are busts, well, that just means the FO blew the assessment and signing process.
You’ve heard me say it over and over. THIS YEAR, we MUST fill holes on the OL and at QB. We must. And the Draft won’t fill all those holes.
Which leaves FA. I get so tired of people–for example JT–looking at the FA class at QB and saying no one looks to move the needle. OK. But then Carson Palmer was not seen as a needle mover when AZ got him. But Ariens did pretty well moving the needle making good use of a solid, experienced QB even though his body is aging and vulnerable. To me, Carson Palmer disproves the over negative thrust of the article. You can do a lot with a solid, non-star vet filling a hole.
Well chosen vet FAs can raise a team’s ceiling a couple of notches. They can limit the damage on bad teams. They can solidify teams looking to stabilize as winners. And they raise play-off teams to genuine contention. Sure, you can look at a bunch of busts, as you can look at draft busts. But the challenge is always the same: construct a team vision and select rookies and FAs that can play and fit that vision. Do it well, and you’re competing. Do it badly and you are a laughingstock.
So what else is new?
By virtue of the absurd ...
February 13, 2015 at 12:32 pm #18423znModeratorBut you CAN fill holes with FAs. And astute roster building can get great value out of modest signings. A great example is William Hayes. We’ve been bad for a decade. But there were years when we’d have been far WORSE without a solid vet like Hayes.
I would say the Rams have done better with mid- and low-market FAs than they have with high market FAs.
It’s interesting to compare that to the Vermeil Rams. First, I wanta say, as much as we attributed a lot of the success in 99 to Armey, I have thought for years now that that was Vermeil…or at least Armey did better with Vermeil than he did since.
Lyght: inherited draft pick
McCleon: Vermeil draft pick
Bush: mid-market FA
Jenkins: Vermeil UDFA
Collins: mid-market FA
Fletcher: Vermeil UDFA
Jones: mid-market FA
Wistrom: Vermeil draft pick
Farr: inherited UDFA
Agnew: high-market FA
Carter: inherited draft pickPace: Vermeil draft pick
Nutten: low-market FA
Gruttadauria: inherited scrap-heap find
Timmerman: high-market FA
Miller: inherited draft pick
Williams: Vermeil draft pick
Green: high-market FA
Warner: Vermeil scrap-heap find
Bruce: inherited draft pick
Holt: Vermeil draft pick
Hakim: Vermeil draft pick
Proehl: mid-market FA
Faulk: tradeBTW, on another issue? The OL in 99 had a total of 2 missed starts. Nutten missed 2 games.
February 13, 2015 at 5:17 pm #18425wvParticipantI get so tired of people–for example JT–looking at the FA class at QB and saying no one looks to move the needle. OK. But then Carson Palmer was not seen as a needle mover when AZ got him. But Ariens did pretty well moving the needle making good use of a solid, experienced QB even though his body is aging and vulnerable. To me, Carson Palmer disproves the over negative thrust of the article. You can do a lot with a solid, non-star vet filling a hole.
Well to me, Carson Palmer was a very good QB. Not a Manning, but he was known to be
a very good QB. The way i saw it, The only issue was health. I just dont
see a Carson Palmer in this year’s batch of free agent QBs. It really does
look like a terrible pool of veteran free agent QBs this year.The Draft though, is different. There are bound to be some good ones
in the college ranks. Gotta be. Is the personnel dept good enough to identify them?w
vFebruary 13, 2015 at 5:26 pm #18428wvParticipantDolphins record the last three years:
2012 7-9
2013 8-8
2014 8-8See, just ‘trying’ to hire
Fisher causes TFE:
“the fisher effect”w
vFebruary 13, 2015 at 8:53 pm #18448znModeratorBig free-agent spending rarely yields more wins
By Nick Wagoner
EARTH CITY, Mo. — In the three years since coach Jeff Fisher and general manager Les Snead took charge of the St. Louis Rams, their approach to free agency has changed each year.
In 2012, they spent big money on cornerback Cortland Finnegan, center Scott Wells and defensive tackle Kendall Langford in an effort to bolster a roster in desperate need of a makeover. In 2013, they were active again, landing offensive tackle Jake Long and tight end Jared Cook on big-money deals.
But last year, the Rams were notably quiet in free agency, the result of two years of drafting with an eye toward re-signing their own rather than swinging for the fences on big additions. They re-signed offensive lineman Rodger Saffold to a big contract after his deal with the Oakland Raiders fell through and then took a flier on a handful of one-year “prove it” contracts with guys like receiver Kenny Britt and defensive lineman Alex Carrington.
Heading into 2015, the Rams again don’t figure to be among the bigger spenders on the free-agent market, though adding a key piece or two could help propel them toward contention so long as they land the right players. That hasn’t been their forte, as evidenced by some of the names above from the previous three years.
Per ESPN Stats & Info, six of the 12 teams that have ranked in the top three in free-agent spending since 2011 did not improve their win total, including all three of last year’s top-three spending teams.
Finding the balance of adding a key piece and a few other ancillary pieces that can help has proved to be more of a winning formula. The New England Patriots offered a prime example of that in 2014 when they signed star cornerback Darrelle Revis and key role players like receiver Brandon LaFell and cornerback Brandon Browner at bargain prices. They ranked 16th in spending last year.
The Patriots also prioritized keeping their own, re-signing receiver Julian Edelman, among others. It’s a similar tactic to the approach the Seattle Seahawks took. Clearly, the Rams aren’t as strongly positioned as winning teams that can more easily attract free agents.
This time around, the Rams should be in better position to add a key piece or two that might be costly while re-signing some of their own and taking a shot on some cheaper options who can help. As always, it’s not about how much a team spends as much as how wisely it spends that actually yields results.
February 16, 2015 at 3:58 pm #18525znModeratorI am not going to look for it…but, a while back, I posted an article that looked at playoff teams across a few years and asked how they approached free agency.
I mean I CAN find that article if anyone is interested. But right now I will just summarize it.
According to that analysis, consistent playoff teams average about 4 high-market big-money FAs per team. Obviously you want to think about WHO the FAs are–a Peyton Manning means more as a free agent, for example. But to me it was interesting that it was just 4.
So that says something, anyway.
How many high-end FAs have the Rams signed? 5. Wells, Finnegan, Langford, Long, Cook. That number is probably about to shift.
How many high-end FAs did the 99 Rams have on the roster? 3. Timmerman, Green, Agnew. (In 99, AT’s 5 year, 19 M contract made him the highest paid player in Rams history.)
Though in 97 and 98 they had some failed signings. Remember Eric Hill? Leslie O’Neal?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.