Anybody think Trump still has a chance?

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Public House Anybody think Trump still has a chance?

Viewing 9 posts - 31 through 39 (of 39 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #50577
    Ozoneranger
    Participant

    I have a hard time taking Trump seriously no matter what comes out of his mouth. The thing with him is, he says whatever pops in his mind in the last second…He cannot help himself (I had the same problem early in my marriage- I recognized this flaw in the earliest days of his campaign.). I don’t for a second believe his words implied violence of any sort. More like blowback from gun advocates if she picked justices who may erode the 2nd in any way, shape or form.

    That said, if elected his lack of disciplined thought and speech is dangerous. The president speaks for the country, his\her words are interpreted as policy and position, particularly overseas. That’s what scares me.

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 3 months ago by Ozoneranger.
    #50579
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I have a hard time taking Trump seriously no matter what comes out of his mouth. The thing with him is, he says whatever pops in his mind in the last second…He cannot help himself (I had the same problem early in my marriage- I recognized this flaw in the earliest days of his campaign.). I don’t for a second believe his words implied violence of any sort. More like blowback from gun advocates if she picked justices who may erode the 2nd in any way, shape or form.

    That said, if elected his lack of disciplined thought and speech is dangerous. The president speaks for the country, his\her words are interpreted as policy and position, particularly overseas. That’s what scares me.

    I don’t know. I am inclined to think it was talking smack rather than a seriously felt call for violence. But that doesn’t excuse it. It’s dangerous to say shit like that. Sarah Palin posted a map of the US on her website with crosshairs on candidates she thought should be targeted for political elimination. Well, one of those people was Gabrielle Giffords, who subsequently got shot in the head. So I don’t think it makes it any better if Trump was mildly kidding. I don’t have to convince anyone here that this country has an ample supply of examples of nutjobs who have gone off with guns, including Giffords’ assassin. Hell, Trump’s comment could have been an OBVIOUS joke and it would still have been completely reckless, irresponsible, and possibly criminal. I mean…go to an airport and jokingly announce your shaving cream is a bomb and see what happens to your ass. You can’t joke about killing politicians and judges. There is some asshole in the audience who may get to thinking hard about the idea. And, let’s face it: there already ARE several assholes out there who have fantasized about it, and along comes a hero of theirs who gives a little wink to the idea, and that is enough to push someone into action.

    And you’re right. A president REALLY, REALLY can’t go off. As much as the red meat crowd would love it if President Trump insulted the French, and the Germans, and the Japanese, and Whoever, it’s just….

    I cannot believe that Hillary Clinton is actually preferable to somebody else. But she is.

    #50582
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I’m not sure the justices could erode the second amendment if they wanted to. To amend or remove an amendment to the constitution requires a 2/3 vote from the house and senate and a 2/3 vote from the state legislatures and governors. That sounds like a pretty tall order so I don’t think any changes to the second amendment or the way it is written are forthcoming.

    On the other hand, the Supreme Court could reinterpret what the second amendment means… 😉

    #50584
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    And you’re right. A president REALLY, REALLY can’t go off. As much as the red meat crowd would love it if President Trump insulted the French, and the Germans, and the Japanese, and Whoever, it’s just….

    I cannot believe that Hillary Clinton is actually preferable to somebody else. But she is.

    When Clinton ran against Obama, didn’t she say he could be removed from the race the same way RFK was or words to that effect? Even someone as coldly calculating and measured in their comments as Hillary Clinton is can make those mistakes.

    #50587
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    And you’re right. A president REALLY, REALLY can’t go off. As much as the red meat crowd would love it if President Trump insulted the French, and the Germans, and the Japanese, and Whoever, it’s just….

    I cannot believe that Hillary Clinton is actually preferable to somebody else. But she is.

    When Clinton ran against Obama, didn’t she say he could be removed from the race the same way RFK was or words to that effect? Even someone as coldly calculating and measured in their comments as Hillary Clinton is can make those mistakes.

    That does ring a bell.

    And watching her laugh about killing Kaddafi is chilling, actually. “We came. We saw. He died…ha, ha, ha.” WTF is going on?

    #50597
    Ozoneranger
    Participant

    And you’re right. A president REALLY, REALLY can’t go off. As much as the red meat crowd would love it if President Trump insulted the French, and the Germans, and the Japanese, and Whoever, it’s just….

    I cannot believe that Hillary Clinton is actually preferable to somebody else. But she is.

    When Clinton ran against Obama, didn’t she say he could be removed from the race the same way RFK was or words to that effect? Even someone as coldly calculating and measured in their comments as Hillary Clinton is can make those mistakes.

    That does ring a bell.

    And watching her laugh about killing Kaddafi is chilling, actually. “We came. We saw. He died…ha, ha, ha.” WTF is going on?

    You’re right, Clinton made similar comments about Obama in 08.

    http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-rfk-comment/

    And it goes back even further. When EMK announced his run against Carter back in 79, 80, Carter immediately assigned SS protection to Kennedy, sparking outrage.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1979/09/21/kennedy-gets-secret-service-protection/a735a76e-875f-45bf-8a70-21cf6af71ca3/

    #50611
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Republican EPA chiefs endorse Hillary

    Republican EPA chiefs endorse Clinton, bash Trump

    “Donald Trump has shown a profound ignorance of science and of the public health issues embodied in our environmental laws,” Ruckelshaus and Reilly write in a joint statement. They express particular disgust with Trump’s climate science denial and opposition to climate action, even though those remain common positions among leading Republicans…”

    ————

    Trump is toast.

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 3 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    #50619
    bnw
    Blocked

    In short, not only did he lie about his premise, he didn’t have the courage to go beyond dog whistles to his nutjob audience and actually state his case in full.

    No, HRC doesn’t want to end the second amendment, even though there is absolutely no reason for its existence. No, she doesn’t want to get rid of it, even though it serves no purpose, is obscenely barbaric and anachronistic in intention and effect.

    And, no, Trump isn’t fooling anyone with his cowardly hedging.

    Trump passed the point of disqualification months and months ago. Hell, just his birther antics and his appearance on Alex Jones should have been enough. But this latest really should be a bridge too far, especially following closely upon his call for espionage against his opponent.

    The call for assassinations, espionage, “the vote will be rigged” — Trump obviously wants to be installed as Il Duce. He doesn’t want to actually go through the process of being elected. As bad as HRC is, she at least is willing to do that.

    Didn’t Hildabeast bring up assassination in her 2008 campaign? Why yes she did!

    The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.

    Sprinkles are for winners.

    #50620
    bnw
    Blocked

    Republican EPA chiefs endorse Hillary

    Republican EPA chiefs endorse Clinton, bash Trump

    “Donald Trump has shown a profound ignorance of science and of the public health issues embodied in our environmental laws,” Ruckelshaus and Reilly write in a joint statement. They express particular disgust with Trump’s climate science denial and opposition to climate action, even though those remain common positions among leading Republicans…”

    ————

    Trump is toast.

    w
    v

    Yet more of the establishment bashing Trump and being squarely on the wrong side of history.

    The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.

    Sprinkles are for winners.

Viewing 9 posts - 31 through 39 (of 39 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.