Rams wont win a ring

This topic has 5 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 5 years, 11 months ago by Herzog.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

Author

Posts
December 12, 2018 at 10:32 am #95122

wv
Participant

The Rams just dont look like a Super Bowl winner to me. They havent all year long. The eagles ‘did’ look like a super bowl winner to me, last year. They looked hot. The Pats also looked like ring-winners last year.

This year though….i am not sure ‘any’ team looks like it would be ‘likely’ to go on a run where it would beat three of these teams in a row: LA, New Orleans, KC, Pats, Bears, Cowboys, Texans.

I mean ya gotta win three in a row. Which of those teams looks like it can do that?

Texans maybe??

It wont be the Rams.

I dont think there will be a winner this year. I just dont see it happening.

w
v

December 12, 2018 at 1:18 pm #95133

JackPMiller
Participant

Are you trying to get yourself banned? You know Agamemnon, Hal, InvaderRam, & Zooey do not condone that kind of language on these boards. Just saying.

December 12, 2018 at 1:27 pm #95134

joemad
Participant

Rams looked like Super Bowl winners to everyone in Dec of 2000 and 2001…and in 1989, 1978, 1977 et al….

it doesn’t matter…..at this point the goal is to stay healthy and to get HFA in the playoffs …..to execute and hope that luck falls in your favor…..

December 12, 2018 at 10:06 pm #95158

JackPMiller
Participant

joemad wrote:

Rams looked like Super Bowl winners to everyone in Dec of 2000 and 2001…and in 1989, 1978, 1977 et al….

it doesn’t matter…..at this point the goal is to stay healthy and to get HFA in the playoffs …..to execute and hope that luck falls in your favor…..

The Saints play the Panthers twice, and the Steelers at home. Doubt the Saints are losing another game, if we keep winning.

December 13, 2018 at 5:25 pm #95181

zn
Moderator

Another view, fwiw

==

LMU93

I predicted the Rams to go 11-5 this year, a slight ‘step back’ from what I considered a 12-4 team in 2017 (scratching the SF finale). Part of that was the idea the Rams would be facing a tougher schedule and also more and better starting QBs overall. Fewer Scott Tolziens, Brian Hoyers, Tom Savages, and Drew Stantons. They won five games by 26 or more points last year. Certainly they couldn’t replicate that (and they haven’t- winning two so far this year).

But through 13 games I was wrong. This is a better team than 2017 not only in wins (11-2 vs 9-4 a year ago) and in things like points per game. But also because by any measure they have played one of the league’s 4 or 5 hardest schedules while last year it was arguably around 18th or 19th. And they’ve faced a much better slate of opposing QBs overall.

In the debate over whether this is a “Super Bowl caliber” team or not, to me it’s 100% yes. They are more battle tested than they were a year ago. So if you hear talk of them playing a very easy schedule the final three games that’s probably true. But they’ve earned their way here.

December 13, 2018 at 5:42 pm #95182

Herzog
Participant

Defense starting to gel too. So long as we don’t forget about running…. maybe get a short passing package… we should be hard to beat.
Author

Posts