The First Neutron Star Collision We've Ever Seen

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Public House The First Neutron Star Collision We've Ever Seen

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #84395
    zn
    Moderator

    #84440
    Ozoneranger
    Participant

    Was alcohol involved?

    #84443
    zn
    Moderator

    Was alcohol involved?

    Gold was.

    That’s true. Collisions like this produce the heaviver elements, and in this case the collision made several earth masses worth of gold.

    . https://www.space.com/38493-gravitational-waves-neutron-star-gold.html

    By comparing observations made using the Hubble Space Telescope and Gemini Observatory with theoretical models, astronomers have now confirmed that the process occurs in kilonovas, observing the spectroscopic fingerprint of heavy elements being created in the explosion’s afterglow.

    Researchers are witnessing a distant heavy-element factory synthesizing “maybe hundreds of Earth masses’ [worth] of gold and … maybe 500 Earth masses’ worth of platinum,” theoretical astrophysicist Daniel Kasen, of the University of California, Berkeley, said in a new video.

    #84713
    wv
    Participant

    jus somethin i read:https://portside.org/2018-03-25/why-our-universe-didnt-collapse-black-hole
    If you conceive of the Universe as the full suite of matter and energy we know, and the early stages had it all compressed into a tiny region of space, then why didn’t it collapse into a black hole?

    #84714
    wv
    Participant

    “….Finally, there’s the “Goldilocks” case, or the case where the Universe is right on the bubble between recollapsing (which it would do if it had just one more proton) and expanding into oblivion (which it would do if it had one fewer proton), and instead just asymptotes to a state where the expansion rate drops to zero, but never quite turns around to recollapse.

    As it turns out, we live almost in the Goldilocks case, with just a tiny bit of dark energy thrown in the mix, making the expansion rate just slightly larger, and meaning that eventually all the matter that isn’t gravitationally bound together already will be driven apart into the abyss of deep space.

    What’s remarkable is that the amount of fine-tuning that needed to occur so that the Universe’s expansion rate and matter-and-energy density matched so well so that we didn’t either recollapse immediately or fail to form even the basic building-blocks of matter is something like one part in 1024, which is kind of like taking two human beings, counting the number of electrons in them, and finding that they’re identical to within one electron. In fact, if we went back to a time when the Universe was just one nanosecond old (since the Big Bang), we can quantify how finely-tuned the density and the expansion rate needed to be.

    The level to which the expansion rate and the overall energy density must balance is insanely precise; a tiny change back then would have led to a Universe vastly different than the one we presently observe. And yet, this finely-tuned situation very much describes the Universe we have, which didn’t collapse immediately and which didn’t expand too rapidly…”

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.