robots vs homeless californians

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Public House robots vs homeless californians

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #78851
    wv
    Participant

    This of course is just the beginning.
    w
    v
    ====================
    corporotacracy:http://www.businessinsider.com/security-robots-are-monitoring-the-homeless-in-san-francisco-2017-12

    Robots are being used to deter homeless people from setting up camp in San Francisco

    A security robot has been put to work in San Francisco in an attempt to deter homeless people from forming tent cities.

    The robot uses lasers and sensors to monitor an area for criminal activity. Rather than intervene during a crime, it alerts human authorities.

    The robot’s owner, the San Francisco SPCA, said it has seen fewer tents and car break-ins since it deployed the robot in the city’s Mission neighborhood.

    In San Francisco, autonomous crime-fighting robots that are used to patrol parking lots, sports arenas, and tech company campuses are now being deployed to keep away homeless people.

    The San Francisco Business Times reported last week that the San Francisco SPCA, an animal advocacy and pet adoption group, put a security robot to work outside its facilities in the gentrifying Mission neighborhood. The robot’s presence is meant to deter homeless people from setting up camps along the sidewalks.

    Last week, the City of San Francisco ordered the SF SPCA to keep its robot off the streets or be fined up to $1,000 per day for operating on sidewalks without a permit, according to the Business Times.

    Krista Maloney, media relations manager for the SF SPCA, told Business Insider that staff wasn’t able to safely use the sidewalks at times because of the encampments. Maloney added that since the SPCA started guarding its facilities with the robot — known as K9 — a month ago, the homeless encampments have dwindled and there have been fewer car break-ins.

    #78873
    wv
    Participant

    corporate intelligence operations:https://www.rt.com/news/412982-private-surveillance-caterpillar-corporations/

    Big, brand-name companies hired private intelligence firms to monitor political groups considered to be threats to their businesses, leaked documents reveal. The papers shine light on the shadowy world of corporate intelligence gathering.

    British Airways, the Royal Bank of Scotland, Porsche and Caterpillar are among the companies that have been identified as having enlisted the services of corporate intelligence firms to spy on – and sometimes infiltrate – activist groups.

    Hundreds of pages of leaked documents from two corporate intelligence firms, C2i International and Inkerman Group, reveal widespread use of spies-for-hire among the large companies over several years in the 2000s.
    Read more
    Harvey Weinstein © Panoramic / Global Look Press ‘Army of spies’: Weinstein hired ex-Mossad agents to silence abuse allegations – report

    The corporate intelligence firms obtained emails, meeting minutes and other internal documents from the groups they spied on, according to The Guardian, which obtained the leaked documents in partnership with the Bureau for Investigative Journalism. Infiltration was also a common tactic used by the private spy firms. In one notable instance, a private spook “dressed up as a pirate with a cutlass and eyepatch as part of a protest.”

    The intelligence firms were also paid to provide advance warning about demonstrations or other political activity being planned against the companies.

    The document cache reveals that Caterpillar, one of the world’s largest manufacturing companies, hired C2i to spy on the family of Rachael Corrie, an American activist killed by a bulldozer while demonstrating against Palestinian home demolitions in the Gaza Strip in 2003.

    At the time, Corrie’s family was taking legal action against Caterpillar, alleging that the firm was complicit in war crimes by exporting bulldozers to Israel with full knowledge that they would be used to illegally demolish Palestinian homes. The lawsuit was dismissed in 2007 after US judges ruled they lacked the proper jurisdiction to decide the case.

    Shortly after the case was dismissed, Corrie’s mother held a conference call with supporters. C2i was able to obtain notes of the call, the documents show. Her comments were summarized in a five-page “restricted – commercial” report known as a “corporate threat intelligence alert” – authored by a C2i operative and stamped with a Caterpillar logo.
    Read more
    Surveillance cameras overlook the building site of the new headquarters of the Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND), Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service in Berlin October © Tobias Schwarz ‘Bad day for democracy’: German court rejects calls for disclosure of NSA spy targets

    When reached for comment, Cindy Corrie told The Guardian that she found the private snooping “really distasteful.” She said her family had approached Caterpillar in the hope of fostering an open dialogue about the lawsuit but was spied on instead.

    In 2005, Caterpillar enlisted the services of a different intelligence firm, Inkerman Group, to monitor protests in the UK. The Kent-based firm has a history of infiltrating campaign groups. Documents reveal how the firm was hired by a client to infiltrate a small group of activists in the UK, who were protesting against the construction of new cell towers.

    Inkerman declined to comment when asked by The Guardian about who had hired it to spy on the cell tower campaigners. Responding to a separate request for comment, Caterpillar declined to “discuss specifics of its relationship with suppliers.” However, the company said that when it hired outside help, it would “expect those firms to act in a lawful manner and in accordance with our values in action.”

    The leaked documents also show that C2i boasted of “real-time intelligence assets” embedded in a range of environmental groups, including Greenpeace. The firm’s clients included Royal Bank of Scotland, British Airways and Porsche around 2008. C2i changed its name before going belly-up in 2011.

    #78954
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    This of course is just the beginning.
    w
    v
    ====================
    corporotacracy:http://www.businessinsider.com/security-robots-are-monitoring-the-homeless-in-san-francisco-2017-12

    Robots are being used to deter homeless people from setting up camp in San Francisco

    A security robot has been put to work in San Francisco in an attempt to deter homeless people from forming tent cities.

    The robot uses lasers and sensors to monitor an area for criminal activity. Rather than intervene during a crime, it alerts human authorities.

    The robot’s owner, the San Francisco SPCA, said it has seen fewer tents and car break-ins since it deployed the robot in the city’s Mission neighborhood.

    In San Francisco, autonomous crime-fighting robots that are used to patrol parking lots, sports arenas, and tech company campuses are now being deployed to keep away homeless people.

    The San Francisco Business Times reported last week that the San Francisco SPCA, an animal advocacy and pet adoption group, put a security robot to work outside its facilities in the gentrifying Mission neighborhood. The robot’s presence is meant to deter homeless people from setting up camps along the sidewalks.

    Last week, the City of San Francisco ordered the SF SPCA to keep its robot off the streets or be fined up to $1,000 per day for operating on sidewalks without a permit, according to the Business Times.

    Krista Maloney, media relations manager for the SF SPCA, told Business Insider that staff wasn’t able to safely use the sidewalks at times because of the encampments. Maloney added that since the SPCA started guarding its facilities with the robot — known as K9 — a month ago, the homeless encampments have dwindled and there have been fewer car break-ins.

    I can think of better ways for the SPCA to spend its donations.

    On the other hand, their employees have to be safe.

    Of course, the ultimate responsibility for this falls on a mental healthcare system where inpatient care is discouraged (so people are on the street) and the medications that could help are too expensive.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.