informal poll: should the Patz even bother to show up?

This topic has 18 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 9 months ago by sanbagger.

Viewing 19 posts - 1 through 19 (of 19 total)

Author

Posts
November 30, 2016 at 8:32 am #59832

zn
Moderator

I mean the Rams are due to bust out.

.

November 30, 2016 at 10:06 am #59838

Agamemnon
Moderator

Fisher runs Gurley 40 times and the game ends like the Denver vs KC did last week, except Fisher runs the clock down before the FG miss and it ends in a tie.

Agamemnon

November 30, 2016 at 11:53 am #59844

PA Ram
Participant

Rams are 13 point dogs.

This is just the type of game they show up and cover the spread.

Heck–they may even win.

But I don’t know how it will go after last week. Will the team pack it in? Are they looking for next year? Or are they REALLY pissed off and looking for blood?

I think Goff will struggle a bit in this one. New England defense is much better than the Saints.

Pats: 24 Rams: 13

"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

November 30, 2016 at 1:02 pm #59850

wv
Participant

Rams play inspired, rowdy football, and it works for a half.

And then Belichick simply outcoaches Fisher, and Brady outplays the rookie.

Hekker booms a 90 yarder… due to the Pats over-inflating the rams balls.

Rams 20
Pats 31

And after the game, Pats fans ask “whats wrong with the Pats, they only
scored 31 on the Rams”

w
v

November 30, 2016 at 7:28 pm #59891

Zooey
Moderator

The Rams win.

That’s just what they do. They lose to 5 mediocre teams, then rise up and beat the best teams.

November 30, 2016 at 7:37 pm #59893

sanbagger
Participant

Zooey wrote:

The Rams win.

That’s just what they do. They lose to 5 mediocre teams, then rise up and beat the best teams.

That is kinda their MO…but the Pats MO is to not allow the lesser teams to rise up against them.

I think Goff has a decent game against a suspect Pats D but it won’t be enough.

Pats – 27
Rams – 19

November 30, 2016 at 9:11 pm #59901

Zooey
Moderator

sanbagger wrote:

Zooey wrote:

The Rams win.

That’s just what they do. They lose to 5 mediocre teams, then rise up and beat the best teams.

That is kinda their MO…but the Pats MO is to not allow the lesser teams to rise up against them.

I think Goff has a decent game against a suspect Pats D but it won’t be enough.

Pats – 27
Rams – 19

Okay, well, if you hate the Rams so much, why don’t you just move to Seattle?

November 30, 2016 at 11:13 pm #59917

zn
Moderator

sanbagger wrote:

I think Goff has a decent game against a suspect Pats D but it won’t be enough.

Pats – 27
Rams – 19

Zooey wrote:

Okay, well, if you hate the Rams so much, why don’t you just move to Seattle?

Or North Korea.

December 1, 2016 at 8:02 am #59924

sanbagger
Participant

Zooey wrote:

Okay, well, if you hate the Rams so much, why don’t you just move to Seattle?

Now that just hurts…well, at least you didn’t tell me to move to San Fran cause then I would have to seek you out.

December 1, 2016 at 9:49 am #59929

zn
Moderator

off the net from brownsugar

I think the Rams can win, and will win. Yep, crazy. THE D didn’t get bad in one week….that thinking is for 13 year old girls.

Also, history says when team gives up 40+ they come back and play great.

They shut down Carolina, the Giants and the Dolphins (mostly). Those offenses scare me more than Brady.
Upset players is important for focus and motivation. Tru Jo and a few others missed tackles….they slacked off….that simple

Bill Belly dominates rookie QBs, that is my only fear in this game. They will bliltz in ways that Goff can’t concieve.

Who have the Pats beaten?

December 1, 2016 at 10:14 am #59932

sanbagger
Participant

zn wrote:

Upset players is important for focus and motivation. Tru Jo and a few others missed tackles….they slacked off….that simple

I think it was a little more than missed tackles and slacking off.

They had no answer for the TE’s
They were gashed by the running back
The screens pass was open all game
They allowed 3rd and long completions

I think Brees had a lot to do with getting NO in the correct play call to offset the call GW was putting the D in.

I believe in a team being flat and I do believe that was a big part of what happened but I also believe a great QB can get their team in the correct sets to expose the D.

December 1, 2016 at 11:37 am #59935

Agamemnon
Moderator

off the net from brownsugar

….they slacked off….

I flat out don’t believe that.

Agamemnon

December 6, 2016 at 2:51 pm #60433

sanbagger
Participant

zn wrote:

sanbagger wrote:

I think Goff has a decent game against a suspect Pats D but it won’t be enough.

Pats – 27
Rams – 19

Zooey wrote:

Okay, well, if you hate the Rams so much, why don’t you just move to Seattle?

Or North Korea.

Just got back from North Korea via Seattle, looking at dwellings when I noticed I wasn’t too far off.

Actual score

Pats – 26
Rams – 10

December 6, 2016 at 3:04 pm #60436

wv
Participant

The defense has looked terrible against two of the best offenses. Now they face a third good offense. It aint gonna be pretty.

w
v

December 6, 2016 at 3:31 pm #60437

Zooey
Moderator

It is the same defense that looked pretty bad against the 49ers, you may recall. The ONLY game the 49ers have won all year.

Who will win the rematch?

I cannot wait to see that game. All the epic 9er/Rams battles over the decades! This one promising to be among the most tightly contested fiascos in that proud history.

December 6, 2016 at 4:08 pm #60440

wv
Participant

Zooey wrote:

It is the same defense that looked pretty bad against the 49ers, you may recall. The ONLY game the 49ers have won all year.

Who will win the rematch?

I cannot wait to see that game. All the epic 9er/Rams battles over the decades! This one promising to be among the most tightly contested fiascos in that proud history.

———–
True, zooey. All the rest of the games leading up to that one
are just insignificant. Its all about the rematch.

w
v

December 6, 2016 at 4:23 pm #60442

sanbagger
Participant

wv wrote:

The defense has looked terrible against two of the best offenses. Now they face a third good offense. It aint gonna be pretty.

w
v

I actually thought the D did an admirable job. I know the Pats were a little shorthanded but that’s life.

If the Rams O could have mounted any kind of attack this score would have been a lot closer…even though I realize they called off the dogs in the 4th, I still believe this to be true.

December 6, 2016 at 4:29 pm #60443

nittany ram
Moderator

sanbagger wrote:

wv wrote:

The defense has looked terrible against two of the best offenses. Now they face a third good offense. It aint gonna be pretty.

w
v

I actually thought the D did an admirable job. I know the Pats were a little shorthanded but that’s life.

If the Rams O could have mounted any kind of attack this score would have been a lot closer…even though I realize they called off the dogs in the 4th, I still believe this to be true.

Yeah I was pretty happy with the way the defense played against the Pats sans that 43 yd TD run on 4th and 1. The defense got no help from the offense so they were on the field a lot but they played hard the entire game. They didn’t really wear down.

If the Rams had just a competent offense that would have been a close game.

December 6, 2016 at 4:47 pm #60445

sanbagger
Participant

nittany ram wrote:

Yeah I was pretty happy with the way the defense played against the Pats sans that 43 yd TD run on 4th and 1.

Yah…that was brutal, but if I had a complaint I would say it appeared the run was open to the outside the entire game. I would love to know if that was a scripted play…run up the middle to get everybody to crash then kick it back outside…it sure seemed like it was a planned play.

The Rams need to tighten up the run D and get Mo to figure out he’s not ice skating that he is supposed to at least try and tackle one on one then that D can be pretty strong.

I will say, I wanted to see more blitzing, but then I think I say that every week…so, maybe I don’t have a clue.
Author

Posts