- This topic has 7 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 4 months ago by
.
-
There are big lapses in logic and certain things that the writers felt they could ignore as they pleased and pay attention when it was convenient.
So they should just call it The Shallow?
Yuck yuck.
My take on the Shallows? I agree with PA…it sucked.
****Beware – here there be spoilers***
This movie depicts white shark behavior about as accurately as Jurassic World depicts dinosaurs. But the Shallows tries to be a more serious movie than JW, and that’s part of the problem. Because when you make a serious film you better not have lapses in logic. And this one has plenty.
For example, there is a dead humpbacked whale about 50 yards off the beach. Apparently this is what attracted the shark to begin with. 30 yards away from the whale is our heroine, happily surfing. Why a shark would go out of its way to attack and then stalk a 110 pound bony woman when there is 15 tons of blubber nearby is beyond me. Tbe heroine speculates that she was attached because she entered its ‘hunting grounds’ but that explanation rings hollow. By now everyone has seen footage of white sharks feasting on whales. There is no territoriality at play when there’s that much food in the water. Multiple white sharks will often be feeding at the same time and even other species of sharks will be feeding as well. The sharks often eat so much that they enter a stupor and become very lethargic. They are not aggressive at all. No way would a shark in these circumstances care about a tiny woman on a surfboard 30 yards away.
Also, the shark in this film was easily 20 feet long and would have weighed at least two and a half tons. How did the 110 lb heroine survive the attack? Not only did she survive but her only injury was a 7 inch gash on her thigh. She was able to close the wound by using her ear rings as sutures. Now, the vast majority of people attacked by white sharks survive. However, in those attacks the sharks are not thought to be actively hunting. They are curious about an unusual object (a human) in their environment and bite it out of curiosity. That’s their only method of determining what something is. Since humans doesn’t taste like their normal prey, the encounter usually ends there. But even under these circumstances the wound inflicted by the shark is greater than what our heroine experienced. A two ton monster shark with a two and a half foot wide mouth and two inch teeth bites her and the result is a 7 inch gash?! And the shark wasn’t being curious…according to the film it was aggressively attacking her for entering its hunting ground. If a 20 foot white shark is trying to kill you, you would be killed and there is not a thing you could do to prevent it. The result of such an encounter would not be a seven inch wound that can be mended with jewelry. There were many other lapses in logic but these bugged me the most.
The one thing I liked about it is it was effective at building suspense by filming from the surface of tbe water. From that perspective as waves slowly move up and down you’d get a quick glimps of the view beneath the surface. During these quick glimpses you kept expecting to see the shark but usually there was nothing there. Since the advent of CGI, the creatures in these type of films often look very realistic. I think how good they look often leads the filmmaker to have it get a lot of screen time. However, this over exposure often reduces the level of suspense and the impact the creature has on the audience. In this movie the shark looked pretty realistic but IMO the filmmakers didn’t over expose it.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
