Well, apart from all the ‘dick sucking’ dialogue, the defendant
was supposed to be given ‘discovery’ (autopsy reports, police reports, lab reports, etc)
and apparently all he was given was the Indictment (Ie, the piece of paper telling him what he is charged with)
So, the Defendant was just asking for what he is entitled to. When the lawyer said “I gave him everything i have” that is kindof a dead give away, that he didnt give him what he was
entitled to.
The judge just should have asked the lawyer “What, exactly did you give the defendant?”
And if the lawyer hadnt gotten discovery and given it to the defendant, then the judge should have just ordered that, and continued the trial, and on to the next case.
w
v