Eagles trade up to #2

Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › Eagles trade up to #2

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 20, 2016 at 2:28 pm #42303
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    April 20, 2016 at 2:34 pm #42304
    Avatar photojoemad
    Participant

    who got the better QB in the deal between Foles or Bradford… now it’s Goff or W?

    better deals with Eagles / Rams
    Charlie Young or Jaws? Harold Jackson or Roman G?

    April 20, 2016 at 3:33 pm #42308
    bnw
    Blocked

    I suppose now the choice of the Rams might have trade value if it differs from what the Eagles want.

    The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.

    Sprinkles are for winners.

    April 20, 2016 at 5:05 pm #42312
    Isiah58
    Participant

    Does the Eagles’ move validate the Rams’ move to anyone? Unlikely, but the Eagles were not seemingly desperate for a QB but saw not one, but two QBs who they felt were worth moving all the way to Number 2 to get. Since they can suspect, but cannot know who the Rams are taking, they have to be confident with both Wentz and Goff.

    “Marge, don't discourage the boy! Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals! Except the weasel.” - Homer Simpson

    April 20, 2016 at 5:19 pm #42313
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant
    joemad wrote:

    who got the better QB in the deal between Foles or Bradford… now it’s Goff or W?

    better deals with Eagles / Rams
    Charlie Young or Jaws? Harold Jackson or Roman G?

    According to my math on the actual trade they made to move up in the draft, the Rams and Eagles are close, maybe a slight edge to the Eagles.

    We should have traded Bradford to Cleveland for their #1. 😉

    I favor Wentz, but Demoff didn’t ask me before he made the trade. 😉

    Agamemnon

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.