Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › relocation articles & links … 1/25 & 1/26
- This topic has 13 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 9 months ago by Dak.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 25, 2016 at 9:58 am #38026znModerator
http://mmqb.si.com/mmqb/2016/01/24/nfl-championship-games-broncos-patriots-panthers-cardinals
Peter King
L.A.: One team or two?
Eric Grubman, the NFL executive vice president in charge of the Los Angeles decision, worked for six years on market studies of L.A. as well as the competing franchises to move there. So there’s no one inside the NFL—except possibly Roger Goodell, whose job for years before becoming commissioner was to weigh Los Angeles options—more qualified to answer this question: Why is the NFL so set on making Los Angeles a two-team market again, when the league failed so notably in 1994?
“I think that L.A. is a one-team market, I think L.A. is a two-team market, I think L.A. is a three-team market, I think L.A. is a four-team market,” Grubman told me. “But each of those models is going to rest on a couple of essential foundations. One is you have to a have a killer stadium, and two is you have to have flawless execution of the market because you have to have an identity that is unique, and your brand has to really resonate. As big as it is, it is a very competitive place, and second place in anything in Los Angeles, in anything, gets no air time. So if you have two teams in one stadium and they execute flawlessly and it’s a great stadium, they’ll be terrific. If you have two stadiums and each of them execute flawlessly, they’ll be terrific. If you have two stadiums and one executes well and one executes poorly, it doesn’t matter what that second stadium is. It is all about execution, plus a great stadium. With that, I think you can have any number of teams, up to a point of course. And Los Angeles loves a winner. They love a winner, they love sizzle, they love being first.”
For years the Clippers didn’t win, and for years they didn’t register on the L.A. sports meter. Odds are that if Los Angeles hosts two football teams, at least one will be like the Clippers of old (or the Lakers of today). The Rams, for instance, have played an astounding 12 consecutive seasons without being over .500, and the Chargers, should they come, haven’t had a double-digit-winning season since 2009.
Then there’s the matter of the quarterback position. Philip Rivers turns 35 this year; this will be his 13th NFL season. The Rams don’t have a quarterback of the long-term future unless either Case Keenum or Nick Foles shocks the world. So what we have here is one team for sure and maybe a second, and an iffy future for both in terms of on-field success.
“Grading NFL clubs’ probability to win looking forward is the same as grading history on stocks to try to predict future performance,” said Grubman. “And every expert in the world will tell you that you can’t do that. You can grade a management team that is running a company, and you can grade a coach who is running a team, but as long as those variables can change, then performance can change. I think when you raise the stakes and you raise the bar, you generally get a response. Owners are not dumb and owners aren’t shy. They don’t want to be second place wherever they live and play.”
==========
“I dissented because I felt the NFL would be best served by having less realignment. Moving one team would be less disruptive to our fan base. And, also, having just one team in Los Angeles would give the league the best chance to be successful.”
—Kansas City owner Clark Hunt, to me, for a story on why the owners chose the Rams to move to Los Angeles instead of the Chargers and Raiders moving to a stadium in Carson, Calif.Hunt believes what I do: that the NFL should not go to L.A. with two teams now. The league and Rams owner Stan Kroenke should make the 283-acre Inglewood site a dream location for a single team, and make that team a part of the fabric of Los Angeles, before trying to add a franchise that the locals don’t care much about.
January 25, 2016 at 5:54 pm #38061DakParticipant“I think that L.A. is a one-team market, I think L.A. is a two-team market, I think L.A. is a three-team market, I think L.A. is a four-team market,” Grubman told me. “But each of those models is going to rest on a couple of essential foundations. One is you have to a have a killer stadium, and two is you have to have flawless execution of the market because you have to have an identity that is unique, and your brand has to really resonate. As big as it is, it is a very competitive place, and second place in anything in Los Angeles, in anything, gets no air time. So if you have two teams in one stadium and they execute flawlessly and it’s a great stadium, they’ll be terrific. If you have two stadiums and each of them execute flawlessly, they’ll be terrific. If you have two stadiums and one executes well and one executes poorly, it doesn’t matter what that second stadium is. It is all about execution, plus a great stadium. With that, I think you can have any number of teams, up to a point of course. And Los Angeles loves a winner. They love a winner, they love sizzle, they love being first.”
What the hell is Grubman saying, or trying not to say, in this quote? So, L.A. can support up to four teams. Or, if there’s a team or multiple teams who are not winning, L.A. won’t support any of them. I mean, I know that the Kroenke project is what made this deal happen. He has the crazy money, the land and the vision to wow a bunch of rich guys, and the NFL front office folks like the idea of landing in a shiny new facility in the greater L.A. area. It really does all make sense … except when SK, or anyone in the NFL, tries to talk about football and how this was a decision about football. SK hasn’t made any football decisions. This is all about empire building. And, if his product sucks, it doesn’t matter, because he will make money. The part that’s a little head-scratching for me is that he’s gonna make money off the real estate project around the stadium, but the other NFL owners don’t share in that, do they? No way. How could they?
January 25, 2016 at 6:04 pm #38062InvaderRamModeratori don’t know what grubman is trying to say but i read one thing that makes sense. having a team in los angeles will be key when negotiating a new tv deal. i think that’s what the owners are ultimately banking on rather than the real estate project around the stadium.
it will also act as a home base for nfl west with nfl films and the combine (after the contract expires with indianapolis) and the draft and superbowls.
January 25, 2016 at 9:41 pm #38069znModeratorLos Angeles to build world’s most expensive stadium complex
http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/19/architecture/new-nfl-stadium-los-angeles/
(CNN)Los Angeles will welcome the return of NFL football with the construction of a new 80,000-seat stadium complex and “NFL Disney World,” expected to become the world’s most expensive sports arena.
The 300-acre development in Inglewood, a few miles from downtown Los Angeles, will provide a new home for the NFL’s Rams franchise, whose return to their former home city was approved by league officials last Tuesday. The development has an estimated cost of $2.6 billion — more than $1 billion more than New Jersey’s MetLife Stadium, currently the league’s most costly venue.
The capacity of the new stadium could exceed 100,000 for special events, say developers. Inglewood Mayor James Butts has already announced ambitions to host the Super Bowl at the arena, which developers say will be the “cornerstone” of a year-round sports, music, and entertainment events district.
An unnamed “owner” is reported in the Los Angeles Times comparing their ambitions for the development to Florida’s Disney World theme park. The development’s footprint is about twice the size of the original Disneyland Resort in Anaheim, California, and will also host a 6,000-seat performance venue, more than 1.5 million square feet of retail and office space, 2,500 homes, a 300-room hotel, and 25 acres of parks.
The Rams, who played in the Los Angeles area for almost 50 years, will give the city its first NFL team since 1995 — the year the Rams left for St. Louis, and the Raiders departed for Oakland.
Rams owner and property developer Stan Kroenke, who has an estimated personal net worth of $7.4 billion, is credited with spearheading the return of NFL football to the country’s second largest city.
The new stadium is expected to be complete in time for the 2019 NFL season, with the team playing at their former home at the L.A. Memorial Coliseum, until then. The team’s owners have begun courting the San Deigo Chargers and Oakland Raiders to join them at the new venue, on the site of the former Hollywood Park horse racing track.
International architecture giant HKS have been contracted to design the venue and have announced that it will center on a 19-acre transparent canopy, which will cover the entire stadium and parts of the surrounding development.
The canopy will be made from the same transparent ETFE plastic that coats Bayern Munich’s stadium, the Allianz Arena, and the Beijing National Aquatics Center.
Munich’s stadium changes color, from red to white to blue, according to which team — Bayern, second division side TSV 1860 München, or the German national side — is playing at the stadium that day. The architects have not yet said if similar color indication would occur if two or more teams host matches at the new stadium in Inglewood.
The Rams are urging the Chargers, currently based 200 km south of L.A. in San Diego, to join them at the stadium, and fund a portion of the massive costs, with the Oakland Raiders considered a fallback option.
Kroenke has publicly estimated the cost at $1.86 billion, but the Los Angeles Times quotes unnamed “(NFL) officials and owners” who say the true cost could reach $2.66 billion. The New York Times and others have put the value at nearly $3 billion.
The NFL already claims the world’s most expensive stadium. That title belongs to the MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey, home to New York teams the Giants and Jets, which opened in 2010 at a cost of $1.6 billion. The Dallas Cowboys and San Francisco 49ers are also among a minute group of teams worldwide to play in stadiums costing more than $1 billion.
Outside the U.S., stadiums with budgets exceeding $1 billion dollars are rare. London’s home of soccer, Wembley Stadium, crossed the mark in 2007. Tokyo abandoned plans for a $2 billion Zaha Hadid-designed stadium last July amid rising costs, with a cheaper design now underway.
January 25, 2016 at 9:46 pm #38070znModeratorSteve Hartman @cannonhartman
High ranking Rams official says talks have stalled for a Chargers move to LA in 2016…most likely the Chargers staying in SD in 2016
January 25, 2016 at 11:41 pm #38076znModeratorSteve Hartman @cannonhartman
High ranking Rams official says talks have stalled for a Chargers move to LA in 2016…most likely the Chargers staying in SD in 2016
—-
Report: Rams, Chargers at impasse over L.A. moveMike Florio
Report: Rams, Chargers at impasse over L.A. move
Here’s a surprise. Rams owner Stan Kroenke apparently is driving a hard bargain with Chargers owner Dean Spanos.
According to Steve Hartman of XTRA Sports 1360 (via NBCSanDiego.com), the Rams and Chargers have reached an impasse in their effort to work out a deal that would bring the Chargers back to L.A. as tenants or partners in Kroenkeworld, the new, multi-billion-dollar stadium being built in Inglewood.
Hartman’s information comes from an unnamed Rams official, news which comes only days after the Rams and Chargers issued a statement that the two teams had agreed not to disclose information regarding their talks.
The Chargers have until January 15, 2017 to negotiate exclusively with the Rams. However, the Chargers need to quickly determine whether they will be staying in San Diego for another year or moving to L.A. on a temporary basis in 2016.
It’s possible that the Chargers have decided that it makes sense to spend one more year in San Diego than to rush to L.A., presumably joining the Rams and USC at the Coliseum. Or maybe Kroenke has realized that he should insist on terms so onerous that neither the Chargers now nor the Raiders later will choose to horn in on the Rams’ new turf. Whatever the value of sharing space with a team that would double the inventory of annual NFL games, the Rams presumably would make a lot more money for themselves if they own the L.A. market exclusively.
Even if they simply squat on L.A. for a year or two, they’ll have a huge head start over whoever joins them there.
PFT initially raised the red flag regarding the possibility that the man known in St. Louis as Silent Stan will be as calculatingly ruthless with a potential partner as he was with a hometown he supposedly loves and then left. League sources have expressed optimism that the deal finalized two weeks ago in Houston comes with assurances that Kroenke will be reasonable, and incentives for him to quickly welcome another team to L.A., including for example the immediate ability to sell premium products at the stadium to be opened in 2019.
Ultimately, Kroenke is going to do what’s right for him and his franchise. The best outcome for Kroenke and the Rams could be to own L.A., with the Chargers staying in San Diego and the Raiders staying in Oakland or going to anywhere else but L.A.
For the Chargers, the best outcome could be staying put. With $100 million in new money from the NFL and $550 million in relocation fees that would be avoided by not moving, that’s plenty of extra cash that could go toward building a new venue in San Diego, if Spanos would be willing to surrender on the issue of finagling public money that simply isn’t there to be finagled.
January 26, 2016 at 12:47 am #38083ZooeyModeratorLos Angeles to build world’s most expensive stadium complex
http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/19/architecture/new-nfl-stadium-los-angeles/
(CNN)
What? Is this writer new to this story?
This project is a long way from being on the same tier as Disney World in scope. This is a really big, epic project, but easy does it with the comparisons. This is nowhere near the scale of Disney World. And I know he puts this in the voice of a quote owner unquote, but he runs with that comparison. But that’s not the worst of it.
Kroenke is “courting” the Chargers and Raiders? He’s “urging” the Chargers?
I doubt it.
In fact, I think the one thing everybody should be perfectly clear on in this chapter of the story is that Kroenke is going to present terms to the Chargers that are as onerous as possible while still arguably reasonable.
I’ll tell you, he doesn’t want to share LA. He doesn’t need their money, and he is better off in the long term without their presence. That is clear. He isn’t courting them. He is trying to repel them while appearing reasonable. Why anybody would think any differently about that, I do not know.
January 26, 2016 at 8:21 am #38090DakParticipanti don’t know what grubman is trying to say but i read one thing that makes sense. having a team in los angeles will be key when negotiating a new tv deal. i think that’s what the owners are ultimately banking on rather than the real estate project around the stadium.
it will also act as a home base for nfl west with nfl films and the combine (after the contract expires with indianapolis) and the draft and superbowls.
We’ll see how this affects TV ratings. I’m not 100% sure they will go up. But, if it was inevitable that an L.A. team would get the NFL a better TV contract, that’s not really an argument for SK’s vision as it was for moving any viable team into L.A.
January 26, 2016 at 8:28 am #38091DakParticipantPFT initially raised the red flag regarding the possibility that the man known in St. Louis as Silent Stan will be as calculatingly ruthless with a potential partner as he was with a hometown he supposedly loves and then left. League sources have expressed optimism that the deal finalized two weeks ago in Houston comes with assurances that Kroenke will be reasonable, and incentives for him to quickly welcome another team to L.A., including for example the immediate ability to sell premium products at the stadium to be opened in 2019.
MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Have the other owners met Stan Kroenke?
January 26, 2016 at 8:41 am #38095InvaderRamModeratori don’t know what grubman is trying to say but i read one thing that makes sense. having a team in los angeles will be key when negotiating a new tv deal. i think that’s what the owners are ultimately banking on rather than the real estate project around the stadium.
it will also act as a home base for nfl west with nfl films and the combine (after the contract expires with indianapolis) and the draft and superbowls.
We’ll see how this affects TV ratings. I’m not 100% sure they will go up. But, if it was inevitable that an L.A. team would get the NFL a better TV contract, that’s not really an argument for SK’s vision as it was for moving any viable team into L.A.
true but i think the owners also wanted the shinier toy.
January 26, 2016 at 8:48 am #38096InvaderRamModeratorthey want this to be a spectacle. any old stadium on carson wasn’t going to do it.
inglewood has a bad reputation too, but that area. not just inglewood. is undergoing massive gentrification. lots of tech corporations i believe are moving near that area. that place is going to be a spectacle which is what the nfl wanted. it will be very much be a disneyland type atmosphere. carson would not.
January 26, 2016 at 8:28 pm #38120znModeratorRams owner Stan Kroenke won more than just L.A.
Dan Wetzel
DENVER – Stan Kroenke owns three major professional sports franchises in the Denver area: the NBA Nuggets, the NHL Avalanche and the MLS Rapids, plus the Colorado Mammoth of the National Lacrosse League.
When he is here to tend to their business, which is often, he lives in a spacious penthouse jutting out of one side and on top of the Pepsi Center, the 18,000-seat downtown arena he also owns.
It’s an incredible home, spacious and brilliantly decorated, with multiple outdoor spaces and views of both downtown and the Rocky Mountains in the distance. Once inside, it feels like a standalone home off in some gated community in the suburbs, not something that is an elevator ride from a raucous arena.
“Convenient commute,” Kroenke said with a laugh to Yahoo Sports on Saturday night while watching his Nuggets defeat the Detroit Pistons.
It’s every young sports fans’ dream – can’t we just live in the arena?
“Sports and real estate development is a large part of what we do,” said Kroenke, who Forbes estimates is worth $7.7 billion.
Sports and real estate. Real estate and sports.
It’s how Stan Kroenke, despite lacking the big personality or high-profile of a Jerry Jones or a Mark Cuban, has emerged as one of the world’s preeminent professional sports owners and, with construction set to begin on a state-of-the-art, 100,000-capacity, clear-roofed stadium in a 300-acre development in Inglewood, Calif., undeniably one of the most powerful figures in sports in this country.
The franchises here in Colorado are big, his other two are bigger. There is the London-based Arsenal Football Club of the English Premier League and its home arena, Emirates Stadium, the third largest in England.
Then there are the Rams of the NFL, which after approval this month from the NFL will leave St. Louis and return to their Los Angeles roots and into what is expected to be the envy of any venue in the world. It was Kroenke, who after two-plus decades solved the NFL’s L.A. riddle, something many billionaires, businessmen, entertainment moguls, governors, mayors and so on couldn’t.
“The NFL had a problem out there, I was on the committee [looking at relocation possibilities] for years,” Kroenke said. “We never got anything done. It’s hard to get things done in California.”
Hard, but, it turns out, not impossible.
*****
Kroenke, 68, grew up in rural Missouri, where as a child he served as a bookkeeper to his father, a small business owner. He later attended the University of Missouri, where he also earned an MBA. He focused on real estate and operates a vast array of companies and interests, although he still carries himself with a calm, down-home style that belies his immense wealth. His preferred drink is a very cold Coors Light. His wife, Ann Walton Kroenke, is herself a billionaire, part of the Wal-Mart family fortune.
This is the background, the experience, the financial might, the business acumen and the quiet but determined personality that was probably required to solve one of professional sports’ most vexing challenges.
Kroenke was brought in as a local Missouri-based minority owner for the Rams in 1994 to help move the franchise to St. Louis, where the city had built, entirely with public funds, a dome stadium that lacked a tenant. In 2010 he took over full ownership, but plans for a new stadium were slow and complicated and forced him to find alternative options.In L.A. he quietly purchased the land, most of it the old Hollywood Park racetrack, to put up a sporting palace.
“As a real-estate developer, its 300 acres,” Kroenke said. “Three-hundred acres in a city like Los Angeles, in the middle of everything, is very, very unusual to say the least. So that’s a real-estate developer’s dream.”
The project will include much-needed retail, housing and office space for the area, plus the cutting-edge stadium. Costs are expected to soar well over $2 billion. While the NFL has granted San Diego Chargers owner Dean Spanos a one-year window to join Kroenke as a partner on the project, even if Kroenke goes it alone, there will be no direct public funding, almost unheard of in sports business these days.
The plan, both the concept of the stadium and the competency of Kroenke’s team, overwhelmed Spanos’ attempt for a joint stadium with the Raiders down in Carson, Calif. The vote went 30-2. Now they are awaiting Spanos’ decision. If Spanos passes, Raiders owner Mark Davis has one year to consider coming also.
“There is tremendous excitement,” Kroenke said. “It’s amazing.”
Last Monday, the Rams offered a chance for fans to get on a list to buy up to eight tickets each for games the next three years at the L.A. Coliseum, while the new venue is being built. It’s already approaching 50,000, an eye-popping number even for the NFL, and if all come through it would easily exhaust supply.
While the league never doubted there would be interest, the vision for the epic stadium closer to the city’s moneyed Westside is undoubtedly a factor. This is L.A., where they expect big things. So too is the fact it is the Rams that are returning, where a fan base that grew up with them are now in middle age.
Kroenke related a story about a man who was wearing a Rams jersey during the week of the NFL vote as a public display of hope.
“He said, ‘I grew up rooting for the Rams and when they left for St. Louis [in 1995] it was tough for me. So this could be the best week I’ve had in 21 years,'” Kroenke said.
*****
The process, of course, wasn’t all fun. Kroenke notes that the league purposely makes relocation difficult because “it should be difficult.” It is almost always preferred that teams remain in their current markets. However, the realities of the stadium lease in St. Louis and the enormous possibilities of moving to the nation’s entertainment capital was too much. He’s a businessman and has never apologized for it.
Kroenke talks of needing rhino hide to deal with some of the anger back in St. Louis – the reaction could be described as nuclear, if not worse. The truth, however, was he never misled about the possibility of a move, speaking bluntly about the challenges of staying and the possibilities of leaving from the start.
At least some of the local media, most notably Bryan Burwell, the late, great St. Louis Post-Dispatch columnist, paid attention and wrote extensively about Kroenke demonstrating a willingness to make an unpopular business move. The portrayals through the years weren’t always flattering, but they spoke to an owner who wasn’t hiding behind glad-handing or phony news conferences (he rarely speaks to the media at all).
Perhaps no one else paid attention or believed Burwell that it could happen. Perhaps they thought L.A. was impossible, or underestimated Kroenke. Perhaps they just couldn’t see past the Arch. This despite year after year Kroenke making clear statements and buying land in Southern California that spoke to his resolve.
Kroenke is acutely aware of how some fans in Missouri feel about the team returning to L.A. He also knows there is no simple answer that solves that.
“There’s an emotional side to it,” Kroenke said. “I understand that. I also think that people in Missouri understand you can’t just throw rational thought to the wind. You have to do something that makes sense. And by the way, the league and my partners are not going to let me stay in a deal that doesn’t make any sense.”
Business is business. It’s what got the Rams out of L.A. in the first place, after all. Still, what do you say to the regular guy who just wanted to have a team?
“I say that 22 years ago they had a stadium that was built and it had no team,” Kroenke said. “And we had a lot to do with bringing a team in for 21 years. And by the way we won a Super Bowl and participated in another one. Some people never do who have been around the league a long time, so I’m proud of that.
“I understand the emotional side of it. But it has to make sense.”
*****
There is little question that L.A. makes sense. On a macro scale having a team and stadium there rather than Missouri is non-comparable. It’s not just the Rams and potentially the Chargers or Raiders who will play at the new stadium, set to open in 2019. It will assuredly host Super Bowls, Final Fours, college regular-season and bowl games, not to mention concerts, rodeos, political conventions and anything else they can think up.
Jerry Jones has said he expects it to eclipse his AT&T Stadium in Arlington, Texas, as the country’s finest venue.
“The commissioner [Roger Goodell] said he thought it would be the greatest sports complex in the world,” Kroenke said. “I’m proud of our architects. It’s a great place that everyone knows, Hollywood Park. I love it. We’ve got a great design, a spectacular stadium and it’s a fantastic place to do everything.
“It’s an opportunity that doesn’t come along every day.”
Actually, it was there for the taking for two decades. No one could get it done. Stan Kroenke, a guy who cumulatively lives months each year inside a sports venue, did. Maybe that total immersion was it. He was a billionaire who was hands-on every step in the way.
The hardest part done, the NFL political battle and relocation behind him, L.A. is now more about fun, the dream project to see fulfilled. The new stadium will have everything, except one thing – a built-in home like this one.
January 26, 2016 at 9:11 pm #38124znModeratorRams minority owner is not to be trusted
April 20, 2010
Bryan Burwell
I know big business is supposed to be a rough-and-tumble contact sport, but wow, does it have to be like this?
Every day as the Rams’ sale process moves along — and as the mysterious billionaire Stan Kroenke continues to drop people’s jaws and raise their blood pressure with one strategic move after another — my mind races to guess what sort of end game might lie ahead.
If Kroenke continues to prove to be this unpredictable (did someone say “diabolical?”) as a potential buyer, how nervous should that make us if he actually ends up assuming full control of St. Louis’ NFL franchise?
As far as I can tell, what we have learned about Kroenke is that every move he makes is straight out of a Machiavellian playbook. From his cunning 11th hour maneuver to gain complete financial control of the franchise, to this latest reported strategy to seek an eight-figure “compensation” from would-be buyer Shahid Khan to step out of the buying process, his actions reek of cold-blooded duplicity.
According to the Sports Business Journal, it turns out Kroenke may not want to buy the Rams. He just wants to maximize the value of his existing 40 percent share of the team by gumming up Khan’s attempt to buy the team.
On Wall Street, there’s a not-so-polite term for such tactics: “greenmail.”
But in St. Louis, the word “blackmail” would work just as well, because what else would you call it when someone basically tells you to just pay him to stop being a nuisance?
Every maneuver the minority owner makes feels more duplicitous than the next. I know he’s not doing anything his original purchase agreement doesn’t allow. But the more you see how cutthroat Kroenke’s business strategies are, the more urgent it seems to me that Khan ultimately finds the economic wherewithal and additional investors to make Kroenke go away.
I have no idea what sort of owner Khan might become. But I do know that he has St. Louis’ best interests at heart. He wants to keep the Rams in St. Louis and would not turn the tenuous lease situation into a devilish ploy at the negotiating table. No matter how contentious those negotiations end up as the city tries to find a creative way to satisfy the Rams’ lease — and drastically improve the amenities at the Edward Jones Dome — Khan’s goal is to keep the team in St. Louis.
No one can assume what Kroenke’s ultimate goal is except that it will end up benefiting Kroenke. He has shown in the short span of a few weeks that he will use any ruthless strategy to maximize his bottom line.
If you don’t think that means using our city’s economic weakness as a way of doing a double-turn back to Los Angeles, you’re sadly underestimating Kroenke’s ability in the art of the (double) deal.
Kroenke has already clearly and dramatically demonstrated that he cares about two things — himself and his money.
Everything else is negotiable.
I’ll give Kroenke credit for this: In a severely depressed economy, he is finding a way to “maximize” the value of his share of an NFL franchise. He has played this thing out with ruthless skill. He has leveraged everything at his disposal, and now he’s just sitting back and waiting to see if, or when, Khan will blink.
Everything about Kroenke’s past indicates he isn’t afraid to do the unpopular thing if it makes him more money. Is this the guy St. Louis wants owning controlling interest in its NFL franchise?
I have now seen more than enough to know that I don’t trust him as far as I can fling a penny off the thumb of a boxing glove.
So now what it all comes down to is this: Are there any other local businessmen and local politicians, who care as much as Shahid Khan does about keeping St. Louis an NFL city indefinitely?
If Khan is shopping for additional investors, this should not be that difficult a process. I would suspect that investors would line up for the privilege. It might be distasteful to buckle under to Kroenke’s demands, but consider the alternatives.
And just as soon as Khan and his new investors do get their stuff together, the people who wind up in control of the negotiations that could reshape the sorry stadium lease need to get their act together.
For a change, wouldn’t it be nice if these folks stopped doing what too often our local pols have been famous for — reacting to a crisis way too late rather than being proactive to prevent another major asset of the community from bolting far, far away?
January 27, 2016 at 4:48 pm #38170DakParticipantI’ll tell you what. I always thought Burwell was just a drama queen. But, the more I look back at the things he wrote, the more I appreciate them. He just nailed this one, from SK’s cutthroat style to the fact that local leaders needed to prepare for the worst scenario.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.