Perhaps it would make sense if the Rams were trending upward, but that’s not the case since it looks like they need a QB and still have other personnel issues on offense.
They also treated this season as “build for the future.” The personnel issues you are talking about including having a predominantly young and inexperienced line. I wouldn’t call that “personnel issues” though, that falls more under “development.”
That in fact is the case with the entire offense. They had an offense, but in 2014 the qb and the OL got taken out. So they started over with that new young OL, a new qb, a new first time coordinator, and an injured RB taken high in the first round. In that situation, it makes perfect sense to me that any judgements of the season by ownership would see this as starting over and building for the future.
The unpredictable part of this was Foles melting down from the GB game on.
And given that it is a start-over, I can see how management would put the record in context. Under those conditions continuity would be a strong consideration.
I don’t know what will happen, but if there IS an extension it does have a logic behind it.
…