Wagoner: Blame for Rams' abysmal offense starts with Fisher

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle Wagoner: Blame for Rams' abysmal offense starts with Fisher

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #34627
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Blame for Rams’ abysmal offense starts with coach Jeff Fisher

    Nick Wagoner

    http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/23962/the-blame-for-rams-abysmal-offense-starts-with-coach-jeff-fisher

    BALTIMORE — Whether it’s Nick Foles, Case Keenum, Austin Davis, Shaun Hill, Sam Bradford, Kellen Clemens or any other quarterback the St. Louis Rams have trotted out since coach Jeff Fisher took over in 2012, the offense hasn’t gotten better.

    And it’s not just the quarterbacks. It’s an offensive line that only got the appropriate attention in the draft this year and a group of pass-catchers that hasn’t showed much improvement and infrequently combines the ability to get open with actually catching the ball.

    After Sunday’s ugly 16-13 loss to the Baltimore Ravens, the Rams again found themselves wondering when, if ever, the offense will raise its level from the dregs of the NFL to something closer to middling.

    “This can’t be happening every week,” cornerback Janoris Jenkins said. “Defense, we are playing great ball, man. All we are asking for is a little bit of help. We can’t just keep losing like this.”

    On the contrary, with Fisher at the helm, it sure looks like the Rams can keep losing games like they did on Sunday. After all, it’s Fisher who built this roster on the hope that a dominant defense would trump all, even if the offense was lagging far behind.

    It’s a recipe that elevated the Rams from NFL bottom-feeders to approaching the mediocre mark that has permeated Fisher’s two-decade career as a head coach in the league. It’s also a formula that doesn’t look anywhere close to getting the Rams to the next level.

    The latest abysmal offensive performance came against a Ravens defense that entered the game 20th in yards allowed per game. Matched up against the Rams’ offense, you would have thought the Ravens were lining up with Ray Lewis and Ed Reed in their prime.

    In his first start as a Ram, Keenum was 12-of-26 for 136 yards with a touchdown and a fumble, hardly the spark the Rams hoped he would provide when switching from Foles earlier in the week.

    The Rams finished with 213 total yards and four turnovers, both tied for their worst outputs of the season. That such an outing could happen in Weeks 2 and 5 isn’t OK but a bit more understandable than one that would combine the two in Week 11.

    Remember, this was an offense that was supposed to coalesce as the season went on as it integrated a new quarterback, offensive coordinator, running back and offensive linemen.

    Through 10 games, the Rams are 31st in yards per game, yards per passing attempt and first downs. They’re last in passing yards per game and third-down conversion percentage.

    “I think we are kind of stagnant,” tight end Jared Cook said. “But that’s nobody’s fault but ours. It’s nobody’s fault but ours. The guys that are in this room right now, it’s our fault.”

    While there’s truth in that, there’s also plenty of blame to land at the feet of those making the decisions, namely Fisher and general manager Les Snead.

    Despite outside pressure to add veteran help on the offensive line, the Rams decided to use five draft picks on the position. Perhaps not so coincidentally, the one veteran the Rams did add, Garrett Reynolds, is probably playing the best of the starting five.

    That Rams offensive line has been besieged by injuries, playing Sunday’s game without starters Rodger Saffold, Jamon Brown and Rob Havenstein and then losing fourth-round pick Andrew Donnal to a knee injury during the game.

    “I think we are just kind of at a standstill right now,” tight end Lance Kendricks said. “It’s tough when you’ve got the O-line kind of shifting players around. You need steadiness on the O-line to really get the offense going. We are kind of shifting guys around, and they’re young guys too. It’s hard to kind of point the finger at them.”

    The Rams spent their first seven picks of the 2015 draft on offense, a dedication to that side of the ball previously absent in the Fisher regime. While a youth movement on the offense was needed, it also probably came about three years too late to make Fisher’s preferred ground-and-pound philosophy work, if it was ever going to.

    The same can be said of addressing the situation at quarterback, where the Rams are still without a long-term option, and the short-term ones are far from appealing despite having a plethora of extra draft picks from the Robert Griffin III trade with Washington. Or making a play for a No. 1 receiver who can consistently get open and make plays on contested balls.

    Asked if he felt like he waited too long to give due attention to building the offense, Fisher demurred.

    “No, I thought I made a good decision this offseason,” Fisher said. “We’ve got good coaches, good players; we’re just not scoring the points and converting third downs right now. Until we do that, we’re not going to win a whole lot of games. That has to change.”

    More than three-and-a-half seasons into Fisher’s tenure, that change doesn’t seem to be close to happening. And any question of how it will change is mostly met with more wishing and hoping than actual solutions.

    Even with rookie running back Todd Gurley as the foundation, the Rams don’t have enough firepower to maximize his ability. They now sit at 4-6 and are staring another lost season square in the face.

    That falls on Fisher and his coaching staff. Most likely, Fisher’s job isn’t in danger, as he has another year left on his contract and owner Stan Kroenke is more focused on changing the team’s address than changing its coach.

    “Our frustration is very high, because there’s days that we come out there and we look like one of the best offenses in the league, and there’s times that we don’t,” receiver Kenny Britt said.

    There’s a name for the times that they don’t: Sundays. And until sweeping changes are made, the Rams will continue to get the same results.

    #34632
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    Maybe having a first year play caller in Cignetti mixed in with all this personnel upheaval isn’t all that helpful either. Pointing at the ineffectiveness of the QB position is easy when diagnosing the overall ineptness of most NFL offenses, but the Rams truly have a perfect storm of factors to include in the diagnosing of their problems this year.

    I caught he end of Jim Miller discussing the Rams offense yesterday on Sirius and he pointed to the static nature of the Rams offense. He was noting a lack of pre-snap reads by both QBs and pointed to a lack of shifts and motion as evidence. He was adamant that both Foles and Keenum were missing the most basic of personal reads. He was also speculating about Cignetti being a first year NFL play caller and the overall impact that is having.

    #34634
    PA Ram
    Participant

    I agree with Wagner.

    You know, I wonder if during this long long search for an OC, if one of the problems was Fisher trying to put these guys in a box. If he truly wanted guys willing to limit what they do and he gave them the guidelines and said something like, “Our defense will win games–our offense shouldn’t lose them. We’ll take a 6-3 victory. That’s our style and we need a commitment to that sort of offense.”

    All speculation, I know.

    But someday I’d love for former OCs to come out and say what it was like to work for Fisher.

    Cigs may feel so handcuffed by every thing that he may be predictable.

    We’ve seen this, as Wagner says, for too long for this just to be a set of circumstances that dictate it. It runs deeper than that–to a certain philosophy. That is a recipe for mediocrity and that is Fisher. He can’t shake who he is. He can’t shake what he believes. And he needs to–to change.

    But he won’t.

    What a difference when Martz got with Vermiel. Vermeil let Martz do his thing.

    I don’t think Fisher is Vermeil.

    What we see is what we get and will continue to get. It’s a waste, IMO.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    #34656
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    youngest offensive line. first year coordinator. new quarterback. not a recipe for success. how much of that was out of the rams control?

    i don’t know but at least part of the reasoning for a first year coordinator was continuity. bringing in a new coordinator with a whole new system. would that have made things better?

    could they have brought in some veteran linemen? would they have been better than havenstein? would that have offset the avalanche of injuries that buried this offense?

    what a calamity.

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 12 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    #34703
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams trying ‘different things’ to get Todd Gurley back on track

    Nick Wagoner

    http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/24046/rams-trying-different-things-to-get-todd-gurley-back-on-track

    EARTH CITY, Mo. — After the most prolific four-start beginning to a career by a running back in NFL history, the St. Louis Rams’ Todd Gurley was bound to have at least a minor drop-off in production.

    Logic dictated that Gurley would see more defenses keyed on stopping him and daring the Rams’ anemic passing attack to beat them. And sure enough, Gurley’s output over the past three games has paled in comparison to his first four starts.

    Which has put the onus on Rams coach Jeff Fisher and his staff to find a way to get Gurley and, by extension, the Rams offense, going.

    “We have to run the football better,” Fisher said. “We’re working on that right now, as we speak. We have to do some different things in the run game. Todd’s longest carry [Sunday] was 7 yards and the longest last week was 9, so we have to do a better job up front.”

    In Gurley’s first four starts, he had three touchdowns on 88 carries for 566 yards, an average of 6.43 yards per attempt. In the past three weeks, he has the same number of touchdowns on 61 carries for 200 yards, an average of just 3.28 yards per attempt.

    When Fisher referred to doing a better job up front, he also mentioned the outbreak of injuries that have made Gurley’s job more difficult. The offensive line has been plagued with injuries, losing starting guards Rodger Saffold and Jamon Brown for the season. Right tackle Rob Havenstein is dealing with a calf issue and has missed two of the past three games. And rookie tackles Andrew Donnal and Darrell Williams have missed chunks of time.

    Todd Gurley
    In Todd Gurley’s first four starts he averaged 6.43 yards per carry. In the past three weeks he has averaged 3.28 yards per carry.
    Even before all of those issues, the line wasn’t consistently creating big holes for Gurley to run through. In Gurley’s first four starts he had 15 runs of 10 yards or more and seven carries of 20-plus yards. In the past three games, Gurley has three runs of 10 yards or more and none of 20 or more.

    When it comes to yards before contact, a good measure of how much space a line is creating in the run game, Gurley was getting 3.98 yards per carry in his first four starts. Since, he’s averaging 1.8 yards before contact.

    By Gurley’s own admission, the line dancing in front of him has made things more difficult, a difference he sees when he watches the film.

    still running hard, but like I said, it’s kind of a tough adjustment,” Gurley said. “You’ve got four guys down. So, that’s always going to be a tough adjustment, new guys coming in. At the end of the day, we’ve still got to play hard and execute and make the calls and do everything else up front.”

    Like a quarterback adjusting to new receivers, Gurley says there’s a period of adjustment where a running back has to get used to the players blocking for him.

    “Yeah, definitely, one lineman might react a lot different or his reaction time might not be as quick or as fast as the one before,” Gurley said. “But like I said, everybody’s been doing a great job preparing and putting in the work throughout the week. We’ve just got to come to the game with that.”

    Against Baltimore last week, Gurley had his worst outing since becoming a starter, rushing for 66 yards on 25 carries, an average of 2.64 yards per attempt. He also coughed up a fumble, though that came on a run like many others where he was hit almost as soon as he received the ball. With defenders on him so fast, Gurley’s yards after contact has also dropped from 2.45 per rush in his first four starts to 1.48 over the past three.

    For what it’s worth, Gurley said Tuesday that his surgically repaired knee hasn’t given him any problems, and that while he generally feels the aches and pains on Sunday, he begins feeling better by Monday. Eight games into his career, Gurley’s dip in production doesn’t seem to be a function of a rookie wall so much as a lack of help.

    “Todd is a good runner,” Fisher said. “This is not Todd’s issue right now. This is an offensive issue.”

    There’s little doubt the Rams have an offensive issue — it’s one that’s existed for most of the year — but there also doesn’t seem to be any magic pill to fix that problem.

    “Coaches have been doing a great job all year, but they implemented some new runs and we’ll try them out this week and see how they go,” Gurley said.

    It remains to be seen what fixes to the run game the Rams are making (they’re not offering details at the moment), but there’s little doubt they have to do something, anything to get their best offensive player back on track.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.