(article plus my editorial comment): healthiest/unhealthiest teams last 2 years

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle (article plus my editorial comment): healthiest/unhealthiest teams last 2 years

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #26980
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Study pegs Eagles as healthiest team last two years, Giants unhealthiest

    by Darin Gantt on July 3, 2015

    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/07/03/study-pegs-eagles-as-healthiest-team-last-two-years-giants-unhealthiest/

    Maybe the smoothies work. And maybe Tom Coughlin should try one.

    The folks at Bleeding Green Nation have passed along a chart that suggests the Eagles are the healthiest team in the NFL over the last two seasons, while the Giants have been the most unhealthy over that span.

    The chart is based on adjusted games lost, a formula created by FootballOutsiders.com that uses injury reports and players placed on injured reserve to quantify how available players are to their teams.

    Eagles coach Chip Kelly has put plenty of emphasis on sports science, and using nutritional supplements for players to keep them at their best. And old school coach Coughlin has been criticized for not adopting new methods, which this study would seem to back up.

    While there’s something to be said for doing everything possible to keep players well, football remains a collision sport and an amount of dumb luck can still make a big difference, particularly if that luck keeps a good quarterback on the field.

    While it stands to reason that the best teams might be the healthiest, the next six teams on the list behind the Eagles are the Jets, Ravens, Bills, Browns, Vikings and Rams. And if you look at the Giants’ neighbors at the bottom of the chart, the Colts are 30th, and have managed to perform at a high level.

    Obviously you’d rather be well than injured, but it’s unclear if all the shakes and Navy SEAL training the Eagles go through correlates to success on the field.

    Note that AGL is a metric created by Football Outsiders which uses injury report and injured reserved data to determine how a team is impacted by injury.

    #26981
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Editorial comment:

    That kind of stat fails to account for one thing.

    Injuries can matter more if they are extensive within a given unit. Depending of course on the unit, and what that unit means to a particular team.

    Like for example

    OL

    and

    qb.

    As some know, I have been making the argument over the years that extensive, multiple AND simultaneous OL injuries hurt an offense.

    Imagine this for a different unit.

    How good would the GSOT offense be if it lost, and/or had to play injured versions of, Wistrom, Farr, Agnew, and Carter. Answer: look at the 2000 Rams defense.

    It’s a context thing. The raw numbers (IMO) don’t tell ya nothin.

    #26984
    bnw
    Blocked

    That table should weight a starting QB missing an entire season more than it did.

    The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.

    Sprinkles are for winners.

    #26989
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Yeah, nothin wrong with making a chart like that,
    but it can only ‘start’ the discussion.

    Fact is every single team on there had its own
    story — I mean, take the Cards — they had a starting QB
    for a big part of the season, but then they lost him
    at crunch time, and their playoff hopes disappeared.
    Due to ONE injury.

    Ya cant really analyze the effects of injuries with
    one chart. But you see that kind of thing on the Net
    all the time. Not just in sports.

    w
    v

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.