Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › relocation? relocation! relocation:
- This topic has 17 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 2 months ago by Isiah58.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 24, 2015 at 4:32 pm #26726znModerator
Randy Karraker @RandyKarraker
@dougieswoll No. A person in the league told me the pendulum has swung toward STL. Doesn’t mean it can’t swing back.Momentum good right nowJune 25, 2015 at 3:03 am #26734znModeratorfrom off the net
==
Goat Daddy
I bought Rams season tickets today.
If St. Louis loses the Rams I will see their last season here. And if they do move there’s a good chance we won’t see another team here for many a moon, if ever again.
The more important reason is I think Rams fans in St. Louis have to show up this year to demonstrate that we support out team. It is something, maybe the only concrete thing we can do as fans.
I liked the seats I got in section 411 on about the 45 yard line for about $75.00 a seat.
June 28, 2015 at 9:13 pm #26860znModeratorTalk commences of a possible one-year L.A. delay
by Mike Florio
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/06/28/talk-commences-of-a-possible-one-year-l-a-delay/
At a time when it’s become a foregone conclusion that the NFL will return to Los Angeles in 2016, a possible caveat has emerged
The return might come in 2017.
According to an item from the Editorial board of U-T San Diego, “There is speculation that the owners at the August meeting [to discuss Los Angeles] may delay the entire process for a year to let everything percolate in [Oakland, San Diego, and St. Louis] to see what develops.”
The paper calls it the “best possible outcome” for San Diego, since it would give the local politicians more time to properly pursue a vote regarding the use of taxpayer funds. It also would give both the city and the team cover, if the voters decide to reject the use of public money — necessarily paving the way for the Chargers to return to the city where the team spent its first season in 1960, the inaugural year of the AFL.
It’s unclear where the speculation came from. It could be something that the Editorial board of U-T San Diego conjured (“yes, there is speculation, started by us”) as a Hail Mary pass to keep an NFL team in town for U-T San Diego to cover. If, of course, a public vote regarding the use of taxpayer money would go against the current national trend against subsidizing billionaires’ ballparks.
Tapping the brakes could have unintended consequences. For example, if one of the three teams linked to L.A. gets too antsy about the situation, it could in theory decide to go rogue, moving without NFL approval and bracing to argue that a group of independent businesses ultimately can’t tell one of those businesses where it should conduct its business without violating the antitrust laws.
It’s also possible (“yes, there is speculation, started by us”) that the owners could decide to green light a return by the Rams to L.A. for 2016, with the question of whether the team’s new stadium in Inglewood would be shared with the Chargers or Raiders unresolved.
No amount of delay will change the fact that L.A. has quickly morphed from luxury to necessity for the NFL, with three teams having unsettled stadium situations and each circling the City of Angels. But if the eventual goal is to put two teams in L.A. and to ensure that the third has a new stadium in its current market, it could be that one more year will allow one of the teams to work out a deal locally, allowing the other two to move.
Under that scenario, it’s unlikely that the Chargers would accept an outcome that puts them in a new San Diego stadium and the Rams and Raiders back up the road in L.A. Delaying the process that would allow the Chargers to grab one of the two seats in Los Angeles increases the likelihood that, when the music stops, three franchises will be clustered into territory in which the Chargers currently enjoy their status as the only NFL show in town.
For that reason alone (and the fact that they’ve been trying for 14 years to bring this situation to a head), the Chargers probably aren’t inclined to wait any longer.
June 29, 2015 at 2:22 am #26863znModeratorTalk commences of a possible one-year L.A. delay
by Mike Florio
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/06/28/talk-commences-of-a-possible-one-year-l-a-delay/
At a time when it’s become a foregone conclusion that the NFL will return to Los Angeles in 2016, a possible caveat has emerged
The return might come in 2017.
Albert Breer @AlbertBreer
LA scenario I’ve heard floated a lot is a little like this, with one big differenceAlbert Breer @AlbertBreer
That scenario: Rams go to LA in ’16, get head start for investing. Second Inglewood spot stays open, so Chargers/Raiders maintain leverage.
so screw STL with financing set?Albert Breer @AlbertBreer
No. If St. Louis has a solid plan in place in the fall, things get more complicated.June 29, 2015 at 1:43 pm #26870snowmanParticipantDid the recent hearing have anything to do with the pendulum’s movement?
http://finance-commerce.com/2015/06/judge-hears-case-over-new-st-louis-football-stadium/
Judge hears case over new St. Louis football stadium
By: The Associated Press June 26, 2015 4:26 pm 0ST. LOUIS — A judge will decide whether a public vote is necessary on funding the construction of a new football stadium in downtown St. Louis, after hearing arguments in the case.
It’s not known when St. Louis Circuit Court Judge Thomas Frawley will make his decision, though several attorneys said after a Thursday hearing that they expect a ruling soon, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported.
At issue is a 2002 city ordinance that requires a public vote before using tax dollars on the replacement of the Edward Jones Dome, where the Rams play.
A public board that operates the dome had claimed in its lawsuit against the city that the law is “overly broad, vague and ambiguous.” The board wants the court to rule that law doesn’t apply, conflicts with Missouri statutes or is unconstitutional.
But city officials contend that the ordinance is valid and doesn’t contradict state law.
Proponents of a new stadium hope for a quick ruling, since Gov. Jay Nixon’s stadium task force is relying on the city to pay for some of the bonds needed to build the proposed $985 million open-air, riverfront arena.July 10, 2015 at 6:44 pm #27162znModeratorfrom off the net
==
HOFIkeBruce
Balzer: Kroenke to invest even more than expected in STL?
On Howard’s lunchtime show today, he said he spoke to a source who told him not to dismiss the possibility of Stan Kroenke not only keeping the Rams here, but investing more than $250 in the new stadium in exchange for parking and other event revenues.
July 11, 2015 at 1:27 am #27168— X —ParticipantBalzer: Kroenke to invest even more than expected in STL?
On Howard’s lunchtime show today, he said he spoke to a source who told him not to dismiss the possibility of Stan Kroenke not only keeping the Rams here, but investing more than $250 in the new stadium in exchange for parking and other event revenues.
Wow, two and a half C-notes?
There’s probably more than that in his couch cushions.You have to be odd, to be number one.
-- Dr SeussJuly 24, 2015 at 7:09 pm #27539znModeratorfrom off the net
==
max
Anyone hear Jeanne Zelasko?
Yesterday on the Beast, she had Howard Balzer on talking about the NFL position on StL stadium progress. Of course, Balzer gave the pro StL viewpoint. But it was Zelasko that surprised me.
Zelasko went on to say that her sources told her things have changed regarding the Rams recently. They may not be coming to LA. She cited 2 major reasons. One is that the NFL is gonna have a very hard time turning down money from StL, especially when they don’t see much coming from SD and Oak. She said that the guys on the LA committee, like Kraft and Mara, will have a hard time snubbing StL if they come up with all the money to build a new stadium. And that committee will set the stage for what the NFL does regarding LA. Second is that she heard that Kroenke had made a promise to all the owners that he will not go rogue and move to LA regardless. She said this is a 180 degree change from she has been hearing regarding the Rams, and she said the Rams are very frustrated with these developments.
I am a bit confused about what Zelasko is all about. Is she a reputable sports reporter or is she just someone who likes to throw crap out there to fill air time? She has been all over the place on the NFL to LA story, so I just can’t get a read on her.
August 1, 2015 at 7:40 am #27842znModeratorMiklasz: Potential move is buzzkill at Rams camp
By Bernie Miklasz
The Rams have opened their training camp, and they’re hard at work, preparing for the season, trying to improve and doing their best to block out the noise.
In some ways, this will be business as usual. Coaches teaching. Players learning. Team meetings. Polishing fundamentals in the summer heat. Going through repetitions, and fine-tuning their knowledge of the offense and defense.
In other ways, this is a most unusual training camp — a strange way to begin a strange season. No one knows where the Rams will be practicing and training a year from now. They could be in Los Angeles. They could set up, like normal, in Earth City.
And if Rams owner Stan Kroenke gets his way, this will be the team’s final training camp in St. Louis. And for many fans, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to embrace the team they love. When you aren’t sure if the team will run away from you, the natural reaction is to hold back, stay at a safe distance and try to minimize the pain inside.
When an emotional connection between a fan and team is being frayed and gradually severed by feelings of uncertainty, fear and betrayal, it’s excruciatingly difficult to put on a front, feign enthusiasm and pretend that everything is normal.
Is this any way to begin the ritual of getting ready for some football? Something already has been taken away — the happy anticipation of the coming season — and that stinks.
The fans deserve better. But I have empathy for the players, the coaches, and the Rams’ front office. Coach Jeff Fisher and GM Les Snead don’t ask for pity, but I sympathize with them, too.
I feel bad for everyone, really, including the non-football employees who have to market the product, sell the tickets and generate a positive vibe.
And I feel lousy because none of these people is named Stan Kroenke. They just work for Kroenke, but he’s not around. The people who keep the Rams organization going are still here, wanting to do a great job. But they’ll endure the fallout, dealing with the inevitable repercussions that surface when a fan base is agitated and alienated.
The Rams just want what every NFL team has right now: a fired-up fan base, amped to support them, and filled with optimism. Training camp is supposed to a time of building. Precious weeks that not only strengthen a squad of football players but reinforce the bond between a franchise and a community.
The Rams haven’t posted a winning record since 2003, or made the playoffs since 2004. Now in their fourth year in charge of the Rams football operation, Snead and Fisher are setting out in search of their first winning season.
They’ve made significant progress, reconstructing the roster and positioning the Rams for a brighter future. But the problem is away from the field, with the future of the franchise placed on hold.
This is Camp Kroenke. He’s not here, but his presence will be felt.
August 4, 2015 at 12:45 am #28042znModeratorGordon: It’s been a winding road of camps for Rams
By Jeff GordonThe Rams have been all over the map since arriving in 1995. Sometimes thrilling, often terrible and occasionally ridiculous, they have taken us for quite a ride.
Now owner Stan Kroenke wants to move the franchise back to the greener pavement of greater Los Angeles, leaving fans here clinging to fleeting hopes of NFL intervention.
At the far end of the practice field, John Romanchuk held up a “Don’t Do It Stan” sign as training camp opened.
“You have to be positive and try to have the good outlook on things,” Romanchuk said. “If they stay, it will be awesome. If they leave, it’s going to be, in my perspective, brutal. I love this team.”
This potential lame-duck scenario generates mixed emotions for all involved. This is the best Rams team in ages with its punishing defense and (potentially) powerful run game.
And yet the Rams seem halfway gone, as their looming practices in Oxnard, Calif., underscore. Long-suffering Rams fans in Southern California will give them a heroes’ welcome when they work there with the Dallas Cowboys. The circle is nearing completion.
What a long, strange journey it’s been. The Rams’ 21-year training camp travelogue tells the story.
The team debuted on the fields at Parkway Central, arriving with a police escort to their first practice at the high school. They were there because a previously scheduled soccer camp displaced them from their opening camp sessions at Maryville University.
So what if the team worked in makeshift facilities, featured a mish-mash roster and struggled with mismatched coach Rich “Big Daddy” Brooks at the helm?
The NFL was back and the city was agog.
When the Rams moved their training camp to Western Illinois University for a nine-year run, the three-hour trek through cornfields and farming towns became ritual for thousands of diehards.
They witnessed much suffering in 1997 as coach Dick Vermeil staged grueling practices in the unrelenting Macomb heat. The rattling air conditioners at the Amerihost Inn offered refuge for fans, media types and at least one cagy Rams veteran who kept guests and party supplies there in his hideaway.
Vermeil finally eased up on his punitive “Junction Boys” training regimen, but progress was halting until fresh talent (especially Marshall Faulk) and offensive innovator Mike Martz arrived in 1999.
But who was this Kurt Warner fellow? The former grocery stock boy looked especially clumsy playing quarterback.
During a scrimmage against Indianapolis at the University of Illinois, Warner sailed a duck into pass coverage. Two Colts defenders converged on the wobbly pass and collided while fighting for the interception. The ball caromed past them for a 45-yard TD pass.
“We’ve got a safety sitting right in the middle of the field,” Colts coach Jim Mora complained afterward. “Some guys make plays, some don’t.”
As it turned out, Warner could make plays. He stepped in for the injured Trent Green and, improbably, the “Greatest Show on Turf” was born.
Unfortunately Martz unraveled after succeeding Vermeil as head coach. Among his many quirks: falling in love with marginal prospects, only to turn on them once they bungled drills.
Former Mizzou quarterback Kirk Farmer endured this love/hate experience during the 2003 camp. Twice he threw Farmer out of the huddle in the first three days in Macomb.
“You stink!” Mad Mike barked during one of the ejections.
In 2005 an increasingly edgy Martz moved camp back to Rams Park, where he could keep a wrap on things. This pleased his players.
“There’s nothing I like about Macomb,” safety Adam Archuleta sniffed. “I don’t think there’s anything good about it. It’s just a pain for everybody.”
Alas, the change of scenery did not stem the team’s steady decline into the NFL’s cellar.
The most picturesque Rams camp came in 2008, at Concordia University in Mequon, Wis. — located north of Milwaukee on the banks of Lake Michigan. Finding this scenic getaway was one of coach Scott Linehan’s few bright ideas.
Players stayed in new dormitories on the pristine campus. During lulls in the action, visitors could stroll down to the sky-blue water and relish the cool breeze.
“I think I’m at the Ritz Carlton compared to Macomb,” Vermeil told the Rams’ website during a camp visit that year. “Macomb was great for us but this place is unbelievable.”
Alas, things got ugly once the Rams broke camp. They finished 2-14.
Camp shifted back to Rams Park in 2009, with the hapless Steve Spagnuolo coaching. That preseason belonged to Kyle Boller — and his conspicuous girlfriend, former Miss California Carrie Prejean — after quarterback Marc Bulger suffered a broken finger.
More than 10,000 fans attended camp sessions that summer, hoping to witness a turning point that never came. The Rams remained brutal.
Kroenke energized the fan base by hiring coach Jeff Fisher, who quickly molded a competitive team. Each of his camps at Rams Park brought fresh hope, but each season brought debilitating injuries and daunting schedules in the merciless NFC West.
Today the Rams finally look ready for liftoff, with quarterback Nick Foles stretching the practice field with accurate deep throws and running back Todd Gurley racing back from knee surgery.
Scott Ess, who held up a “Keep the Rams In STL” sign as camp opened, said he has been a season-ticket holder for about 11 years.
“This is the best we’ve looked and we’re only going to get better,” he said. “Playoffs, Super Bowl. Probably Super Bowl.”
But then what?
Winning and then leaving would be so Rams-like, creating euphoria and anguish all at once. Such is the twisted road this franchise travels.
August 4, 2015 at 11:35 am #28059bnwBlockedBest Gordo in a long time.
The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
August 12, 2015 at 11:47 pm #28611znModeratorESPN.com’s Nick Wagoner on the obstacles teams face in the relocation efforts
…
August 13, 2015 at 2:13 pm #28640znModeratorNick Wagoner
http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/20287/can-rams-defense-be-the-leagues-best
A roundup of Wednesday’s Rams stories appearing on ESPN.com. … We started the day with the thoughts of the man who once nearly owned the Rams, Jaguars owner Shahid Khan, on the future of football in St. Louis. … The Inglewood project is the most impressive of all of those being discussed but owners might have a tough decision when it comes time because St. Louis has made the most progress of the home markets. … Rams owner Stan Kroenke is nearly free and clear from the cross-ownership issue that’s followed him for the past four-plus years. … Breaking down quarterback Nick Foles’ contract.
Elsewhere:
Chris Mortensen discussed Los Angeles and the competition to get there on Mike and Mike.
Chargers reporter Eric Williams writes that San Diego is making it harder on the Chargers to get to Los Angeles.
Missouri Governor Jay Nixon stopped by Chiefs training camp and talked about the pursuit of a stadium in St. Louis.
At 101sports.com, Anthony Stalter and Chris Duncan had a conversation about whether the Rams should re-sign cornerback Janoris Jenkins soon.
At stltoday.com, Dave Peacock says St. Louis controls its NFL destiny.[/quote]
August 26, 2015 at 1:44 pm #29320znModeratorfrom off the net
===
hokahey
I just had a conversation with Kevin Demoff for the last 40 minutes or so in the cafe at my work. I honestly feel like I learned more in those 40 minutes than I have all year from the media.
One on One may be a little misleading. He came to my work for a speech on team work and outreach in the community.
After words, I pulled him aside with a few co-workers. I asked most of the questions. It was about 40 minutes of talk time.
For anyone that doesn’t know me, I am co-founder of Keep the Rams in St. Louis (although I’ve distanced myself from the group the last few months).
I am the person you may have seen in multiple news interviews with Andy Banker on Fox 2 and Casey Nolan on Channel 5.
Key points (all according to Demoff of course, but he appeared to be very genuine):
– Kroenke NEVER said St. Louis no longer works for the Rams. Demoff personally called Dave Peacock to tell him that never happened.
– The Rams are not keen on sharing the stadium with an MLS team. Not sure region can support 4 teams, and causes concerns about who gets paid what for non game day events.
– St. Louis still has a chance. Nothing is definite. The Rams will not remove L.A. from the equation until they know the final deal from St. Louis. He flat out said “doing so would remove all leverage in case something falls through here.”
– He and Peacock talk all the time, about “multiple options and scenarios.” Said he wishes Peacock had been involved three years ago, and that he’s the best person he’s ever worked with in St. Louis.
– This is not just a financial decision. If it was, L.A. would win out hands down all day long. There is a civic aspect to this. But there is concern about the long term financial stability of the St. Louis region.
– Attendance is a non-issue. The team and league both understand that the poor product and lease issue is causing the lowered attendance. The team has never once used attendance as a reason to the league that they might move.
– Everything will be decided by December.
.
he said Stan will not speak and does not speak because people that want to believe the Rams will stay will believe him if he says they will and those that don’t, won’t. He said it’s pointless.
If no one shows up for the games because it’s understandable, so out reach from Kroenke to the community for the sake of improving attendance isn’t necessarily important. What is important is resolving the stadium issue and then moving on from there.
he said no decision has been made. Period. He said his family asks him every day and he tells them the same thing. He said his kids cried when they heard the team might move. He said he loves St. Louis and wants to stay here to raise his family, but that L.A. was fun for him when he was younger, so there is appeal to both cities.
He said “none of this is happening in St. Louis if they had done things any differently with L.A.”
Which interestingly was almost the exact thing I said to Andy Banker once, who responded with “Bingo.”
I have training in detecting lies (believe it or not) and at no time got the sense he was lying to me.
There were people attempting to rush him off and he brushed them off seemingly so he could stay and answer every question.
August 26, 2015 at 6:30 pm #29325bnwBlockedVery interesting better than the reporting by the sports media.
The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
August 26, 2015 at 6:45 pm #29326wvParticipantVery interesting better than the reporting by the sports media.
I dunno. I really didnt learn anything significant that i
didnt already know. I mean…it could go either way.
So thats where we are at.What does this mean, btw:
“He said “none of this is happening in St. Louis if they had done things any differently with L.A.”w
vAugust 26, 2015 at 6:53 pm #29327znModeratorWhat does this mean, btw:
“He said “none of this is happening in St. Louis if they had done things any differently with L.A.”I took that as meaning that the city of St. Louis would not be diligently pursuing a stadium unless the Rams were in the mix to possibly move to LA.
It’s a remark designed to put more weight behind the “leverage” argument.
August 26, 2015 at 7:26 pm #29330Isiah58ParticipantA lot of people will make out what they will with what Hokahey said. If you are looking for positives from a Pro-STL viewpoint, you can take heart in what he said. There are many responses to his comments that essentially take Demoff’s comments as a positive development of the progress in St. Louis. Pro-LA people can look at the remarks and interpret them in a completely different way.
What I read from the remarks, which admittedly include my own bias, is as follows:
Saying that St. Louis “still has a chance” would not be very comforting to me as a pro-STL person. In every public comment that I have found from Demoff on the subject, he essentially says that things are undecided and the St. Louis still has a chance” or “the Rams have as good a possibility of playing in St. Louis as LA”. The original poster who posed the questions to Demoff also stated in the responses to the thread where this originated that he did not get a “warm feeling” about the matter after talking to KD. Again, he was actually observing Demoff as KD was talking, and I can only imagine that Kevin is going to try to cast the best light on the issue as he can when he is talking with St. Louis residents.
The hopes of the St. Louis keeping the Rams faction rests on the belief that if the City of St. Louis achieves its funding goal, then the NFL will not permit the Rams to leave. By all accounts, St. Louis will in fact achieve those stadium funding goals and while there are a few minor obstacles to go, most knowledgeable people understand that for the most part the “hay is in the barn.” If that is the case, one would expect Demoff to be much more bullish about St. Louis’ chances. Instead, he continues to characterize the situation as there is a possibility/chance that the Rams stay. I think that his response is Kevin being as honest as he can, but not misleading. St. Louis could blow Kroenke away with an offer to stay, but they are nowhere close to that now and it is not likely Kroenke’s first choice. Again, others will definitely disagree with that statement and assert the very real possibility this is merely leverage carried out to an extreme to negotiate the best deal.
The only other thing that struck me as odd is that Kevin told his kids that they might move to LA, understanding that it would likely upset them. Not sure how that plays into the leverage argument but I don’t think that you tell your kids that they may move if that wasn’t a very real possibility. Again, others will read nothing into that and see it as part of the negotiating process.
“Marge, don't discourage the boy! Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals! Except the weasel.” - Homer Simpson
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.