Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › Wagoner: St. Louis Rams mailbag, parts 1 & 2 (expanded)
- This topic has 1 reply, 1 voice, and was last updated 10 years, 9 months ago by
zn.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 30, 2015 at 5:55 pm #25581
znModeratorSt. Louis Rams mailbag: Are Rams ready to compete?
Nick Wagoner, ESPN Staff Writer
EARTH CITY, Mo. — The St. Louis Rams will finally open organized team activities this week with the first session available to the media coming on Thursday afternoon.
The roster is mostly built, but Los Angeles still lingers on the minds of many of you.
Adam @RAMdom_Haus
What are the odds a team gets a stadium deal done with their current market before the relocation period opens?@nwagoner: That depends on what you define as getting a stadium deal “done.” All the way done means the city would have all of its bases covered including land acquisition and public financing, plus a commitment from an owner to provide the private financing piece of the puzzle. At this point, I tend to think it’s very realistic that the city will get its part of the equation done with the public money ready and actionable sometime in the fall and the rest of the option agreements in place for the land. But I still just don’t see a scenario in which Rams owner Stan Kroenke or any owner will have agreed to pay the private part of the project at that point. It seems more likely that part of the situation would be resolved after the league and its owners make it clear what project it wants in Los Angeles and what it thinks of what’s happening in the home markets.
lemon crack @lemonjii
Relative to the teams we face this year, can it be said rams have a genuinely competitive roster? (coaching included)@nwagoner: I don’t think it’s anything new to say the Rams have a competitive roster. This team has been competitive under coach Jeff Fisher. They were last season, as evidenced by victories against Seattle and Denver. But that’s not really the problem. It’s not about being competitive — Fisher teams always are. It’s about taking the next step from competitive (read: mediocrity) to being a legitimate contender. That’s a different question entirely. Looking at this roster, I think there’s no doubt they have the pieces in place on defense to be a contender, but they still have a lot of questions on offense. They should be better at quarterback, which would be an important step forward, but they have a lot of questions on the offensive line and the receiver group still has much to prove.
MarkDavid. Warlick @mdwarlick
I recall when Stan Kroenke was a minority owner of the Rams, he was on the committee to bring football back to LA. Pls confirm.@nwagoner: That is correct. At the time, it was referred to as the “NFL’s Los Angeles Stadium Working Group Committee.” The current “Committee on Los Angeles Opportunities” is a different entity, of course, with the potential for teams in Los Angeles now far more real.
Joe Marciano @JoeMarciano
Do you think this latest lawsuit to block stadium funding is serious?@nwagoner: Well, it’s serious in the sense that it’s just another road block that has been tossed up. I don’t get the impression that the task force or those on the side of the stadium are too concerned with it, but anything that could potentially slow down progress on getting the financing in place has to be taken seriously at some level. The thing is, this is a situation that requires swift action. The sooner the task force can get the public financing in place, the better it’s chance of convincing NFL owners that St. Louis deserves to have or keep a team. The longer that process drags out, the worse it is for those efforts. I don’t personally know the politicians who are trying to block this, but if nothing else they seem to understand anything they can do to slow down the process will help their cause of trying to shut the whole thing down.
Brent Lancaster @lannyosu
Do you see Isaiah Pead being in the mix at RB/KR, assuming he’s healthy?@nwagoner: Well, to hear Jeff Fisher talk about Isaiah Pead at the owners meetings in March, you would certainly think so. Then again, to hear Fisher talk about Sam Bradford for about three years, you would have thought he was going to be the team’s quarterback this year, too. The Rams have clearly been hesitant to give up on Pead after using a second-round pick on him in 2012. He’s apparently healthy and it seems like he’ll have a chance to at least compete for a job this season. Benny Cunningham has proved effective as a third-down blocker and kick returner, which means it’s hard to see how the Rams would keep Pead at his current price tag as a potential fourth running back.
May 31, 2015 at 8:52 pm #25625
znModeratorSt. Louis Rams mailbag: Are Rams ready to compete?
Nick Wagoner, ESPN Staff Writer
EARTH CITY, Mo. — With organized team activities finally set to begin this week, the St. Louis Rams have some sorting out to do with their offense after an offseason full of change.
At the top of that list might be receiver/returner Tavon Austin, who at first blush doesn’t look to be a fit in the run-heavy offense. We explore that and more in this weekend’s mailbag, Part II.
Chad @squick4n
Where do Tavon and Cook fit in to ground and pound? Big offseason acquisitions just a couple of years ago look like square pegs
@nwagoner: I’ve been wondering about this myself. It goes back to the team’s inability to go all in on an offensive identity until this, the fourth year of the Jeff Fisher/Les Snead regime. Going back to that offseason, the team wanted to be a spread-it-out, throw-it-around offense and invested heavily in skill position guys like Austin and Cook to make it happen. But they didn’t invest in offensive linemen who could protect well enough to handle the offense. Now they have those pieces, but they’ve invested in offensive linemen (through the draft) to go all-in as a power-running team. That puts the onus on new coordinator Frank Cignetti to find ways to use them. Cook should be OK and will likely come in around his usual production, but Austin is a bigger test. In an ideal world, he can represent a real change of pace from what the Rams will be doing down to down. But it’s fair to wonder if a team that’s struggled to get the most from him in his first two seasons can flip the switch and do it now that the team has gone even further in the opposite direction of his skill set.Mark Warren @MarkWarren_39
Where is WR Brian Quick in his rehab? Will he be ready to go week one?@nwagoner: As I wrote about in March, the Rams don’t want to commit to a timetable for Brian Quick, given the severity of his injury and what’s required for him to get back up to speed. But all signs point to him making progress and it seems like Week 1 is going to be realistic. We’ll get a better idea when we get to see what he’s up to during OTAs starting this Thursday and, more importantly, how far along he is when training camp rolls around in late July.
Chris @BiggameCB
5th CB? Do the Rams like Marcus Roberson for the spot or do they give McGee another shot (injury prone)@nwagoner: The battle will likely come down to those two players, but the Rams are high on Marcus Roberson and he performed pretty well when given some chances late in the year last year. I’d tend to think Brandon McGee’s best chance it to make it in addition to Roberson as a sixth corner rather than as a fifth corner who beats him out. With Janoris Jenkins and Trumaine Johnson set for free agency after the season, Roberson might have a chance to stake a longer-term claim this year, if given the opportunity.
Jim Everett @dcfilmninja
Fish does orientations, not OTAs, doesn’t that contribute to the teams slow starts year over? 4 old school guy its odd
@nwagoner: I’m not sure that’s really at the root of that problem, but there’s no doubt that the slow starts are a major issue that must be corrected. They continue to dig themselves in an early hole they can never get all the way out of. And they do OTAs just like every team. He does orientations instead of minicamps. I don’t think that’s really a problem. In fact, I think it’s one of the “different” things the Rams do that makes a lot of sense. Fisher does it to protect his players and it generally seems to work. I don’t know the reason for the slow starts, but I don’t think this is it.Eric W @biggs_73
How do you see the battle for OC and OG playing out? Who gets the first crack at ota’s?@nwagoner: As it stands right now, it’s hard to make a call on center. I think the Rams would like to see Barrett Jones claim that job, but I get the sense they really will evaluate all of the options. Tim Barnes has at least a little experience and don’t underestimate Demetrius Rhaney, who has the toughness and quickness to be an intriguing option. But when evaluating centers, I always tend to lean toward intelligence above all else and from talking to people at Rams Park, Jones is one of the smartest players on the team. If he’s healthy, he’s probably the favorite, but that guarantees nothing moving forward. At guard, I tend to wonder if the team is comfortable just plugging Jamon Brown into a spot and having him start right away. If they didn’t have so much youth elsewhere, maybe there’s no concern there. That’s not to say it would be a surprise if he did, but it also wouldn’t be a surprise if Garrett Reynolds got some work there until they’re comfortable with Brown in one spot. I still maintain signing Justin Blalock would be the best move (unless there’s injury issues or something else I’m unaware of), but they don’t seem to be in a rush to do that.
derrick costoplos @costoplos
EJ starts opposite JJ with LJ in the nickel…TJ to the 4th corner?
@nwagoner: As it stands, this would be how I’d project everything to play out. E.J. Gaines and Janoris Jenkins on the outside with Lamarcus Joyner in the nickel. Theoretically, they could also go with Trumaine Johnson as the third corner and bump Gaines inside in the nickel. But having Gaines and Jenkins on the outside with Joyner in the slot not only makes sense for this season, but could be how they want to line up for the long term as well. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

